Motion blur that you see on TVs influences how blurry fast movement appears to be on the screen. For the most part, motion blur manifests as a trail on moving objects, and is of particular importance for sports and video games. If you enjoy watching either of those things, it’s important to get a TV with minimal blur.
When evaluating motion blur, we photograph the appearance of blur on the TV, and then test for pixel response time and overshoot time, as well as whether is flickering on the lighting.
|Product||Year||Type||Resolution||Motion Blur||Response Time||Overshoot||Backlight||Motion Blur||Our Reviews|
|LG EG9100||2015||55"||OLED||1080p||Picture||0.1 ms||0 ms||picture||10||See review|
|LG B6||2016||55" 65"||OLED||4k||Picture||0.1 ms||0.3 ms||picture||10.0||See review|
|LG EF9500||2015||55" 65"||OLED||4k||Picture||0.3 ms||1.3 ms||picture||9.9||See review|
|LG E6||2016||55" 65"||OLED||4k||Picture||0.1 ms||1.7 ms||picture||9.9||See review|
|LG EG9600||2015||55" 65"||OLED||4k||Picture||0.3 ms||2.7 ms||picture||9.8||See review|
|Samsung JU6400||2015||60"||LED||4k||Picture||6.8 ms||1.7 ms||picture||9.7||See review|
|Sony W630B||2016||60"||LED||1080p||Picture||6.0 ms||4.0 ms||picture||9.7||See review|
|Samsung J6200||2015||40"65"||LED||1080p||Picture||7.8 ms||0.1 ms||picture||9.7||See review|
|Samsung JU7500||2015||50"||LED||4k||Picture||8.9 ms||1.7 ms||picture||9.4||See review|
|Samsung JS7000||2015||55"||LED||4k||Picture||8.7 ms||2.7 ms||picture||9.3||See review|
|Vizio M Series 2016||2016||50" 55"65" 70"||LED||4k||Picture||10.4 ms||0.0 ms||picture||9.2||See review|
|Vizio P Series 2016||2016||50" 55" 65" 75"||LED||4k||Picture||10.2 ms||0.7 ms||picture||9.2||See review|
|Sony X850D||2016||55" 65" 75" 85"||LED||4k||Picture||10.3 ms||1.2 ms||picture||9.1||See review|
|Sony X930D||2016||55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||10.6 ms||0.4 ms||picture||9.1||See review|
|Samsung JS9000||2015||48" 55"||LED||4k||Picture||11.1 ms||0.2 ms||picture||9.1||See review|
|Samsung J4000||2015||32"||LED||720p||Picture||10.2 ms||3.4 ms||picture||9.0||See review|
|Samsung JS8500||2015||55"||LED||4k||Picture||11.9 ms||0.3 ms||picture||8.9||See review|
|Sony X810C||2015||65"||LED||4k||Picture||12.1 ms||0 ms||picture||8.9||See review|
|Vizio D Series 1080p 2016||2016||50"||LED||1080p||Picture||11.9 ms||1.0 ms||picture||8.9||See review|
|Sony X750D||2016||65"||LED||4k||Picture||12.2 ms||0.5 ms||picture||8.8||See review|
|Sony W600D||2016||32"||LED||720p||Picture||10.7 ms||5.1 ms||picture||8.8||See review|
|LG UF9500||2015||65"||LED||4k||Picture||10.0 ms||7.2 ms||picture||8.8||See review|
|Vizio D Series 4k 2016||2016||40" 50"||LED||4k||Picture||12.3 ms||0.9 ms||picture||8.8||See review|
|Samsung J6300||2015||65" 75"||LED||1080p||Picture||12.8 ms||0 ms||picture||8.8||See review|
|LG UH8500||2016||55" 60" 65" 75"||LED||4k||Picture||11.0 ms||5.1 ms||picture||8.7||See review|
|Sony R510C||2015||48"||LED||1080p||Picture||12.0 ms||3.2 ms||picture||8.7||See review|
|Sony X800D||2016||43" 49"||LED||4k||Picture||13.2 ms||0.0 ms||picture||8.7||See review|
|Samsung J5000||2015||32" 43" 48" 50"||LED||1080p||Picture||13.2 ms||0.6 ms||picture||8.6||See review|
|Vizio E Series 1080p 2016||2016||32" 40" 43" 48" 55"||LED||1080p||Picture||12.0 ms||4.4 ms||picture||8.6||See review|
|Samsung JU7100||2015||50" 60" 65" 75"||LED||4k||Picture||13.9 ms||0.7 ms||picture||8.5||See review|
|LG UF7600||2015||49"||LED||4k||Picture||13.5 ms||2.9 ms||picture||8.4||See review|
|Sharp UB30U||2015||43"||LED||4k||Picture||14.5 ms||0.3 ms||picture||8.4||See review|
|Sony X900C||2015||55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||14.8 ms||0.4 ms||picture||8.4||See review|
|Sony W650D||2016||40" 48" 55"||LED||1080p||Picture||14.3 ms||2.3 ms||picture||8.3||See review|
|Sony X830C||2015||43" 49"||LED||4k||Picture||15.5 ms||0.4 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|LG UH7700||2016||55" 60" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||15.7 ms||0.0 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|TCL FS3800||2016||32" 40" 50"||LED||1080p (except 32")||Picture||13.9 ms||5.7 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|Samsung KS8500||2016||49" 55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||15.9 ms||0.2 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|Samsung KS9000||2016||55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||16.1 ms||0.3 ms||picture||8.1||See review|
|Samsung JU6500||2015||40"60"||LED||4k||Picture||16.4 ms||0 ms||picture||8.1||See review|
|Sony X850C||2015||55"||LED||4k||Picture||16.5 ms||0 ms||picture||8.1||See review|
|LG UH6100||2016||43" 49"||LED||"4k"||Picture||17.0 ms||0.0 ms||picture||8.0||See review|
|Samsung KS9500||2016||55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||17.1 ms||0.1 ms||picture||8.0||See review|
|LG UF7700||2015||65"||LED||4k||Picture||17.6 ms||0 ms||picture||7.9||See review|
|Samsung JU6700||2015||65"||LED||4k||Picture||17.9 ms||0 ms||picture||7.8||See review|
|LG LF6300||2015||49"||LED||1080p||Picture||17.5 ms||1.2 ms||picture||7.8||See review|
|Samsung KS8000||2016||49" 55" 60" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||18.0 ms||0.2 ms||picture||7.8||See review|
|Samsung KU6300||2016||40" 43"60" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||18.7 ms||0.0 ms||picture||7.7||See review|
|Samsung K6250||2016||49" 55"||LED||1080p||Picture||18.8 ms||0.6 ms||picture||7.6||See review|
|LG UF6800||2015||55" 65"||LED||"4k"||Picture||19.9 ms||0 ms||picture||7.5||See review|
|TCL US5800||2016||55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||19.9 ms||0 ms||picture||7.5||See review|
|Samsung KU7000||2016||40" 43" 49" 55" 65"||LED||4k||Picture||20.3 ms||0.0 ms||picture||7.4||See review|
|Sharp LE653U||2015||48"||LED||1080p||Picture||21.9 ms||0 ms||picture||7.1||See review|
|Samsung J5200||2015||32" 40"||LED||1080p||Picture||28.6 ms||0 ms||picture||5.9||See review|
|LG LF5500||2015||49"||LED||1080p||Picture||28.9 ms||0 ms||picture||5.8||See review|
|Vizio E Series 4k 2016||2016||43" 48" 50" 55"60" 65" 70"||LED||4k||Picture||36.7 ms||0.0 ms||picture||4.4||See review|
|LG EC9300||2015||OLED||1080p||Picture||0.3 ms||1.7 ms||picture||9.9||See review|
|TCL FS3750||2016||LED||1080p||Picture||12.0 ms||0.8 ms||picture||8.9||See review|
|Vizio E Series 2015||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||14.6 ms||0 ms||picture||8.4||See review|
|LG LF5800||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||13.6 ms||5.0 ms||picture||8.3||See review|
|Samsung JS9500||2015||LED||4k||Picture||15.6 ms||0 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|Sony X930C||2015||LED||4k||Picture||15.9 ms||0 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|LG UF8500||2015||LED||4k||Picture||16.0 ms||0 ms||picture||8.2||See review|
|Sony W800C||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||17.2 ms||0 ms||picture||8.0||See review|
|Sharp UH30U||2015||LED||4k||Picture||11.3 ms||18.1 ms||picture||7.8||See review|
|Vizio P Series||2014||LED||4k||Picture||12.1 ms||16.5 ms||picture||7.8||See review|
|LG UF6400||2015||LED||"4k"||Picture||18.8 ms||0 ms||picture||7.7||See review|
|Vizio M Series 2015||2015||LED||4k||Picture||15.1 ms||16.4 ms||picture||7.3||See review|
|Sony W850C||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||22.3 ms||0 ms||picture||7.0||See review|
|LG LH5750||2016||LED||1080p||Picture||24.1 ms||0.0 ms||picture||6.7||See review|
|LG LF6100||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||24.2 ms||0.2 ms||picture||6.7||See review|
|LG LF5600||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||28.0 ms||0 ms||picture||6.0||See review|
|Samsung J5500||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||30.7 ms||0 ms||picture||5.5||See review|
|LG LF6000||2015||LED||1080p||Picture||33.3 ms||0 ms||picture||5.0||See review|
When it matters
For the majority of TVs, motion blur is really only a potential problem with sports and video games, because of the quick movement inherent to both. With movies and regular TV, you will almost never perceive motion blur other than that which is included in the video, due to the low frame rate and the slow shutter speed of the camera.
Too much motion blur is very noticeable, and can ruin the look of movement on a TV – nobody wants a long trail following a moving object. Beyond those TVs that clearly have way too much blur, the amount of blur that a person will find acceptable is subjective. Some people are much more sensitive than others.
To provide an idea of the way motion looks on the TV, we use a rail-mounted pursuit camera to take a photo of our logo while it moves across the screen. The resulting photo represents what you can expect your eye would see while watching a moving object, and while it’s not a perfect representation, it’s at least a fairly useful example.
In the test, our logo moves across the screen at a speed of 960px per second, and at a frame rate of 60 fps. We slide our camera along the rail at the same speed as the logo, and take a picture with a shutter speed of 1/15 of a second, to capture all artifacts.
To validate that our camera goes at exactly the same speed as our logo, we are using temporal tick marks placed just below the logo. This technique was invented and proposed to us by Mark Rejhon of Blur Busters, a website dedicated to the reduction of motion blur.
You can test your own screen using our test pattern. If you follow our logo with your eyes, you will be able to compare it to our test results. Alternatively, you can find a wide variety of motion tests over at TestUFO.com.
Response time is the amount of time it takes a TV’s panel to change from one color to another, and it’s a pretty big part of the blur we see on TVs. With a long response time, the pixels can’t quite keep up with moving objects, and so you can see a lengthy trail of blur following behind them. Above, you can compare a long response time (left) to a short response time (right), and you can see that the difference is a pretty big one.
To test for response time, we use a Rigol DS1102E oscilloscope and a photodiode to record how quickly a TV is able to make transitions between different shades of gray. Every shade corresponds to a different level of luminance output, and so when a TV switches from one shade to another, the screen’s luminosity must also change. The amount of time it takes a TV to make this change in luminosity is the response time, which is measured in milliseconds.
Once we have performed this evaluation for each of the transitions we test, we take the times for each completed transition and average them out, which gets us our global response time number. Note that some transitions may have a lower response time than the average we list, meaning less blur for those changes, and others might take a good deal more time, creating more blur in those cases.
In the chart above, a transition between 20% gray (dark gray) and 80% gray (light gray) begins at the first vertical green line and is complete at the second vertical green line. The luminosity level of 20% gray is represented by the horizontal red line at the left, and that of 80% gray by the horizontal red line at the right. The time it takes the luminosity to change from the first to the second represents the length of the response time.
You can see that the transition between shades/luminosities is not a smooth line, but rather has leaps and dips, including a couple of jumps where the luminosity reaches (and even surpasses) the level required by the shade, and sooner than our response time measurement would indicate. However, those jumps are just temporary fluctuations; the transition is only considered complete when the luminosity is stable at the new level.
‘Overshoot’ means a TV went too far in a transition to a brighter color, surpassing its target. It then needs to bring itself back down to the target level, which will take at least a few milliseconds. A shorter overshoot time is better, and as with response time, longer overshoot times will result in lengthy trails on moving objects.
Overshoot exists because some manufacturers try to improve response time of transitions to lighter colors by applying ‘overdrive.’ This means that the TV’s panel tries to brighten at a really fast speed. If this is implemented well, the TV will use this boost to transition quickly, but will stop itself before it can surpass its target brightness. If it does not correct itself in time and passes its target brightness by, the TV has overshoot.
Our overshoot test is conducted in the same manner as our response time test.
The chart above illustrates overshoot on the 80% to 100% transition. The initial moment the TV exceeds the desired luminosity is marked by the first vertical red line, and the moment that it manages to return to and remain at the correct luminosity is marked by the second. The time (in milliseconds) that elapses between the two represents the length of the overshoot.
Some TVs have flickering lighting, and others have lighting that is pretty much static. Both of these styles of lighting make a difference in the overall clarity of all video.
Overall, this isn’t the biggest factor in determining blur, but it does make a difference if you know what to look for. Consider this comparison of the backlight implementation on the Sony X850C (left), which does not flicker, and the Samsung J6300 (right), which has a kind of flickering known as pulse-width modulation.
For the Sony TV, you can see that whatever the level of luminosity, the backlight is pretty much static – it just stays at the same level of brightness. This corresponds to a video sampling method called ‘sample and hold’ (present on static LED backlit & OLED TVs), which presents each frame of the video for an amount of time proportional to the frame rate of the video (ex: 1/60 of a second for 60 fps), and displays the next frame right after. That means there is no break in the outflow of images, and if you refer to the image above, you can see that this makes for smooth movement, but also makes details look blurry.
With the Samsung model, you can see there is a regular pattern of brightening and dimming. This is ‘pulse-width modulation’ flickering at work. With flickering TVs (LED w/ PWM, plasma, CRT), each image is displayed for a shortened amount of time, and a dark frame is flashed before the next frame appears, which breaks up the flow of images. As you can see from the image above, details are defined a bit better with a flickering light, but you can also see there’s slight duplication to the image. This is because with PWM and flickering, while there might not be as much perceivable blur as with a static light, the movement isn’t as smooth. Some viewers also report issues like eye strain and headaches caused by PWM, though this isn’t common.
With this test, we check for flickering by analyzing the pattern of each TV’s lighting at three different levels of luminosity: maximum luminance, medium luminance, and minimal luminance. Once again, we use our oscilloscope and photodiode to record these frequencies.
Elements of motion blur
Motion blur is created by several things:
- Response and overshoot times, which represent how long it takes a TV’s pixels to change from one color to another. Longer times equate to longer blur trails on moving objects.
- Frame time, which represents the amount of time for which a frame is displayed on the screen. The longer the frame time, the more blur you will see. This happens because our eyes do not focus on just one place on the screen, but instead are constantly moving over the frames on the screen, and moving your eyes past a static frame will make that frame look blurry. There are a couple of factors that contribute to lower frame times:
- Higher frame rates have shorter frame times. For example, a 120 fps version of a video will have half the frame time of a 60 fps version, as it has to fit twice as many frames into the same timeframe.
- Flickering lighting and black frame insertion shorten the time each frame is displayed, which can help clarify movement.
- Blur within the video itself. This results from the on-camera action outpacing the camera’s shutter speed. Cinematographers usually keep this kind of blur in mind, and will account for it when planning shots for the movie or show. The result will usually be that you don’t even register that the blur is there.
How to get the best results
Most elements of motion handling are static. For example, response and overshoot times can’t be changed through settings, and so those elements of motion blur cannot be improved.
If you have the option to do so, watching media with a higher frame rate will help you avoid blur. Some TVs may also have a couple of settings that can improve other elements of the motion blur, though you should be aware that they each have their own downsides. We list those setting below.
- Motion interpolation enhances the frame rate of video by creating and inserting transitional frames between the original video’s existing frames. This reduces frame time and creates a smoother look overall, but some find the result undesirably similar to the look of a soap opera. What’s more, since there is no improvement to the response time of the pixels, the length of the trail on moving objects doesn’t change. We talk more about the pros and cons of motion interpolation here.
- Some TVs have the option to introduce backlight flickering, or insert black frames, in order to shorten frame time and clarify movement. This also has the effect of dimming the maximum luminosity, though. As with motion interpolation, this does not affect response time, so the length of the trail on moving objects does not change.
- By nature of the technologies, LCD panels (LCD and LED TVs) have relatively long response times, and OLED panels have much shorter ones.
- A video with a higher frame rate will only have less blur than an identical video with fewer frames if the TV’s refresh rate is capable of matching that frame rate (ex: a 120 hz video on a 120 hz TV, not on a 60 hz TV).
- Similarly, a TV with a 120 hz refresh rate will not have less blur than a 60 hz TV if the video’s frame rate is not also higher than 60 hz. With 60 hz video on a 120 hz TV, the video signal will still only be 60 fps, which means the frame time has not changed. The same applies for 24 hz and 30 hz on TVs with higher maximum frame rates.
- Refresh rate also does not have any effect on response time.
- It’s impossible to compare response times listed by different manufacturers and reviewers without knowing the testing methodology. We test several gray-to-gray transitions and present an average, but some manufacturers and reviewers will only list the shortest response time the screen is capable of, or they might test the time it takes to go from one shade to another, and then back. Unless you can compare the entire methodology, the results won’t match up in a fair way.
Motion blur makes fast movement look less clear, which can be an annoyance for sports fans and gamers. If you watch either of those things, it’s important to get a TV with minimal blur. To get a good idea of how much blur TVs have, we test them for their pixel response and overshoot times, and for their illumination patterns.
Your best bet for getting a TV with little blur is to find a model with low response time. You can also help reduce the amount of blur you perceive by watching higher-frame-rate video, or by enabling motion interpolation or backlight flickering features. Just remember that enabling these sorts of extra features can introduce other issues to the video.
Questions & Answers
As for how it translates to what you actually see, it is basically the length of the trail. In our pictures, the trail on the left side of our logo correspond mostly to the 0% to 80% transition in our charts. The other transitions can be seen in our pictures, but it takes a trained eye. We probably need to update our motion blur pattern to have one that shows better more transitions than just the 0 to 80.
Note that no TVs this year are really 240 hz - the numbers listed with TVs are deliberately misleading, and most 4k TVs are really 120 hz.
Other brands to look into are Sony (priced similarly to Samsung) and Vizio (cheaper, but with good picture quality).
If you are picky, no LED TV will come close to the picture quality of a plasma. That said, they are good enough for almost everyone. The Samsung H6350 is the safest bet for an LED in the mid-tier.
Does 24p via 60i/p indicate whether a TV can identify 24p content in a 60p or 60i signal and properly reverse telecine it back to 24p and then display it? What do the motion interpolation ratings mean?
We've updated the section to make it a bit more clear what the judder ratings mean.
And thanks for this great website! I've forwarded it to all of my buddies.
Since a lot of people prefer uninterpolated video, we display that image alongside the motion blur score, and present the interpolated image in the 'Judder' category instead.
-Low input lag
-Motion Interpolation - Can be turned on for gaming
-Looking at about $1,000 to spend
-TV can be any size.
I love how the soap opera effect looks, and I'm really trying to find a TV that will let me use use that effect with gaming. Thank you so much.
The Sony KDL55W800B has great picture quality, low input lag, and also has motion interpolation for when you want to use it. Overall, it's the best fit for what you are looking for. You might also want to check out the Samsung UN55H6350, which costs about the same. It also has great picture quality and can do motion interpolation, but has higher input lag than the Sony.
If you would like to test a TV yourself, you can find the pattern here.
Pick a size you would like (we suggest the largest size you can fit/afford), and then choose the best TV on that list that comes in at your target price.
If you set 'Auto Motion Plus' to 'Custom', turn off both sliders and enable 'LED Motion Mode', it will reduce the apparent blur (via backlight strobing), but at the cost of a darker screen and flickering (also, it can't be used under the low input lag of game mode).
If you think you are really picky about motion blur, a Sony TV with 'Motionflow' set to 'Custom' and 'Clearness' of 5 will get you closer to a CRT/Plasma feeling (works the same way as Samsung's 'LED Motion Mode' described above, but can be used in game mode and is even more aggressive).
Most people won't notice the difference of motion blur between the JU7100 and the JS8500. It is there, but if you are not too picky you won't really see it.
Before asking a question, make sure you use the search function of our website. The majority of the answers are already here.