The Roborock S5 Max is a mid-range robot vacuum within Roborock's extensive product lineup. It's an upgraded version of the discontinued Roborock S5, with a more advanced navigation and mapping system that allows it to clean specific rooms with custom suction and mopping settings. It also has an upgraded mopping feature that uses a larger water tank. However, it isn't compatible with self-emptying base stations and lacks the real-time hazard-avoidance capability found on newer, pricier models like the Roborock S7 MaxV.
The Roborock S5 Max is very good for bare floors. It sucks up pet hair and small and bulky debris with minimal difficulty and does a great job maneuvering itself on bare floors. It also feels very well-built, with a dense plastic body and durable rubber wheels. Battery performance is fantastic, with a maximum runtime of over four hours, which is plenty of time for cleaning very large areas. Unfortunately, its mopping functionality isn't especially effective, as it does little to scrub away dried-on messes.
The Roborock S5 Max is an okay option for low-pile carpet. While its carpet-detection system allows it to automatically ramp up its suction power on carpets, it still struggles with clearing away fine and large debris on this surface type. Thankfully, it does a fantastic job of handling pet hair. Its LIDAR-based navigation system allows for quick and precise room mapping, and it does a great job of maneuvering itself. Battery performance is another high point, as it can run for over 90 minutes even in its most powerful 'Max' mode.
The Roborock S5 Max is alright for cleaning high-pile carpet. It performs passably on this surface type, as it needs to make several extra passes to clear away most fine and large debris, though it has very little trouble dealing with pet hair. It feels impressively robust, and while it does have quite a few parts that need regular cleaning, they're very easy to access for the most part. Unfortunately, it can incur high recurring costs over time since quite a few pieces need periodic swapping out. It can also struggle to climb onto very dense shag-pile carpeting.
The Roborock S5 Max is a solid option for dealing with pet hair on floors, with a few notable downsides. It's very effective in clearing away pet hair on bare floors and low and high-pile carpet, though its brushroll and side brush are very tangle-prone and can be a bit of a hassle to clean, even with the included hook-blade cleaning tool. It has a mopping attachment with different customization settings; however, it doesn't provide much surface agitation and has a very hard time scrubbing away dried-on stains. That said, the vacuum is effective at sealing in fine allergens like pet dander and makes very little noise, which is great for animals that are sensitive to loud sounds.
The Roborock S5 Max is a robot vacuum and isn't suitable for cleaning stairs.
The Roborock S5 Max is a robot vacuum and isn't suitable for cleaning the inside of your car.
The Roborock S5 Max is a robot vacuum and isn't designed for workshop cleaning.
The Roborock S5 Max is available in two color variants: 'Black' and 'White'. We tested the 'Black' variant, and you can see its label here.
Let us know in the discussions if you come across another variant of this vacuum, and we'll update our review.
The Roborock S5 Max is a mid-range robot vacuum. Compared to the older Roborock S5, it offers a significantly upgraded mapping and navigation system that allows you to split its coverage area into different areas with tailored suction and mopping settings. It also has a larger water tank that won't need refilling as often. It sits alongside the newer Roborock Q5 in the lineup, with a less powerful suction motor and no self-emptying capability. However, it feels noticeably better built and has a mopping feature.
If you're looking for an alternative, look at our lists of recommendations for the best robot vacuums for hardwood floors, the best robot vacuums for pet hair, and the best robot vacuums for carpets.
The Roborock S5 Max is a little better than the Roborock Q5, though the two vacuums are somewhat similar overall. The S5 Max feels better built and does a much better job of sealing in fine allergens. While the S5 Max also has a mopping feature, it isn't very effective when scrubbing away dried-on dirt. The Q5 could be a better option if you don't mind its terrible air filtration performance, as it delivers similarly superb performance on bare floors and does fractionally better on carpets thanks to its more powerful suction motor. Unlike the S5 Max, it's also fully compatible with a self-emptying base station, helping to reduce hands-on maintenance requirements.
The Roborock S5 Max is a big upgrade over the Roborock S5. The S5 Max has a more advanced navigation system that allows faster mapping, and you can specify different suction and mopping modes for specific rooms. It also has a larger water tank that won't need refilling as frequently.
The Roborock S6 MaxV is better than the Roborock S5 Max, though the S5 Max is a better option for value-conscious buyers. They deliver similar overall cleaning performance; however, the S6 MaxV feels better built and has a dual-sensor navigation system, which uses LIDAR to quickly map out its coverage area and front-facing cameras to let it identify and avoid hazards like pet waste in real-time.
The Roborock S7 is better than the Roborock S5 Max. The S7 feels better built and provides a more hands-off cleaning experience, as it's compatible with a self-emptying station out of the box. Its ultrasonic mopping feature also does a much better job of scrubbing away stains than the S5 Max's entirely passive system. It clears more debris on carpets thanks to its more powerful suction motor. While it's harder to clean, the S5 Max's bristled brushroll does a much better job handling pet hair than the S7's rubber roller. The S5 Max also has a bigger internal dustbin.
The Roborock S5 Max and the Roborock S4 Max are very similar vacuums that share the same overall mapping and navigation system, suction motor, and dirt compartment capacity. The only significant difference between the two is the inclusion of a mopping feature, as the S5 Max has a mopping attachment while the S4 Max does not. Ultimately, the S5 Max's mopping attachment isn't very effective, and unless you need it, you're better off spending less on the cheaper S4 Max.
The Roborock S5 Max feels very well-built. Its glossy top cover and matte plastic bumpers give it a similar look to the Roborock S6, but without the brushed-metal finish for its LIDAR sensor. It uses a slightly different brushroll design than the older Roborock S5, with softer, more flexible bristles. It feels sturdy, as its body doesn't creak or flex when picked up. There are a few small weak points, however. The top cover to its dirt compartment will break if you overextend it while removing the dirt compartment, and the mop pad attachment can wear out over time.
Out-of-the-box setup isn't too difficult. You have to download the Roborock companion app to complete the setup process and pair the vacuum with its docking station. You'll also need to screw its side brush into place.
The Roborock S5 Max has quite a few parts that need regular cleaning, but thankfully it's designed in such a way that makes it easy to access these components.
Any part washed with water should be allowed to dry for at least 24 hours before being put back in the vacuum.
The Roborock S5 Max incurs high recurring costs.
Most parts are also sold through Roborock's Amazon store.
The Roborock S5 Max is very easy to store. The vacuum has the same overall dimensions as many other Roborock vacuums and is consequently small enough to squeeze under most tables and chairs. Its charging station is also very low-profile, and it comes with a moisture-proof pad, so you don't have to worry about the vacuum's mop cloth soaking the floor when not in use.
The Roborock S5 Max has a reasonably large dirt compartment. It has a larger capacity than pricier models like the Roborock S7 MaxV; however, it's important to note that some pricier models are compatible with self-emptying stations, where internal dustbin capacity isn't as relevant since the vacuum will empty itself whenever it fills up. You'll receive an audio alert through the vacuum's companion app to let you know when it's full.
The Roborock S5 Max's range is limited only by the room left in its dirt compartment and the charge status of its battery. However, it can't climb or descend staircases.
The Roborock S5 Max is pretty portable. Its onboard water tank and all other associated mopping hardware make it heavier than vacuum-only models like the Roborock S4 Max, but it's still lighter than the flagship Roborock S7 MaxV.
The Roborock S5 Max has excellent battery performance. It can run for more than four hours in a single charge in its most energy-efficient 'Gentle' mode, which gives it plenty of time to deal with lightweight debris on bare floors. Its runtime drops to a little over an hour and a half when used in its high-power 'Max' mode, but this is still sufficient for dealing with larger stubborn messes. The vacuum stops cleaning once its charge level drops below 20%, at which point it refuses to take any more cleaning jobs and attempts to make its way back to its charging station.
The Roborock S5 Max robot vacuum has a handful of quality-of-life features. There are five different power suction modes: the low-power 'Gentle' mode, the slightly more potent 'Quiet' mode, the default 'Balanced' mode, the 'Turbo' mode for cleaning heavier debris, and 'Max' for dealing with stubborn messes or debris embedded deeply within carpet fibers. You can also tweak the water flow for its mopping attachment through four settings: 'Close', 'Low', 'Medium', and 'High'. The 'Carpet Mode' feature allows the vacuum to automatically detect when it's cleaning the carpet and increase the suction power mode to 'Max'. This feature is turned on by default, but you can turn it off in the app.
The Roborock S5 Max has a five-arm silicone side brush to direct debris into the path of its brushroll. It also comes with a hook-blade cleaning tool for cutting away tangled hair. There's also a washable mop cloth attachment for scrubbing away stains. You can place the included rubber floor pad under the charging dock to keep water from its mop cloth from dripping onto your floor when it isn't in use.
The Roborock S5 Max performs exceptionally well on bare floors in its default 'Balanced' mode. It easily clears away small debris like rice and bulkier material like cereal.
The Roborock S5 Max's performance on low-pile carpet is middling. It has a hard time with large debris like sand and finer material like baking soda.
The Roborock S5 Max performs passably on high-pile carpet. It clears away a fair amount of larger debris like sand and finer material like baking soda, but it'll still need to make an extra pass or two to fully clear away all of it.
The Roborock S5 Max has relatively good suction force for a robot vacuum, though not quite as much as pricier models like the Roborock S7 MaxV. Like most other robot vacuums, its suction inlet is positioned too high above the contact surface to create a tight seal, so real-world suction measurements are low.
The Roborock S5 Max is exceptionally quiet. You'll hear what people nearby are saying when the vacuum is running in its most powerful suction mode, and when you use it in its low-power 'Gentle' mode, you'll have little trouble carrying on a normal conversation even when the vacuum is very close to you. It's substantially quieter than the more powerful Roborock S7 MaxV.
The Roborock S5 Max's maneuverability is great. It cleans in an organized pattern that ensures pretty comprehensive coverage, but it's worth noting that its movement is noticeably choppier than newer Roborock vacuums. Still, its side brush is effective in dragging debris from the edges of a room into the path of its primary brushroll. It's also short enough to clean under most couches. It's capable of mapping out its coverage area as it cleans, but it's important to remove its mopping attachment before letting it do so for the first time. Unfortunately, it can have a hard time cleaning tasseled rugs, which can get tangled in its brushroll, and shag-pile carpeting, which it has trouble climbing over.
The Roborock S5 Max does a good job of sealing in fine allergens. Unlike the Roborock Q5, fine particles aren't blown free of its LIDAR sensor while it cleans.
The Roborock S5 Max does a poor job scrubbing away stains. Unlike the pricier Roborock S7 MaxV, which uses a separate motor to vibrate its mop pad and physically scrub away stains, the S5 Max uses an entirely passive system that effectively consists of a damp mop cloth being dragged behind it. Even running multiple cycles does little to impove its stain-cleaning performance, and you can see the result of eight passes here.
The Roborock S5 Max has a decently wide range of physical automation features. You can technically use the vacuum with its two control buttons without needing an internet connection and its associated companion app, but you're losing out on most of its features by doing so. Pressing and holding the power button turns the vacuum off while tapping it has it start and stop a cleaning session. Tapping the 'Home' button sends it back to its dock, and you can hold it down to have the vacuum spot-clean a small area. Unlike the Roborock Q5, it isn't self-emptying compatible, so you'll have to empty its dustbin manually once it's filled up.
The Roborock S5 Max's companion app is fantastic. The vacuum offers multi-level mapping, letting it store up to four different floor plans, meaning you can use it on any floor of your home. Its LIDAR sensor can recognize what floor plan it's on based on the furniture within. You can access its coverage map though its easy-to-use companion app to set up virtual boundary lines and 'No-Go' zones that you don't want the vacuum to enter, or even set up 'No-Mop' zones for areas that you don't want mopped. You can tweak the suction mode and water flow rate for its mopping feature for specific rooms or even create a custom schedule for cleaning individual areas.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
All your BEST lists are a fraud. I’ve tested enough myself to be confident in what I say.
Best sounding? Biased ratings… Absolute k-rap
I have the Bose QC 2 and got these thinking it would be an upgrade. The ANC didn’t perform as well, and phone calls were horrible. I could hear my voice bass while I talked, like if you plug your nose and talk. I tried different setting etc and then would switch back to Bose and ANC was better (no noise) and calls were so much more crisp. Hearing myself was almost as bad as when you get an echo. It was hard to stay focused with my own voice sounding weird. Have to say its the first time I didn’t agree with testing. The only thing I could think of was that their ear options were too small, or buds too shallow to get into my ear correctly so testing didn’t translate to my experience. But that being said, never had an issue with buds before (but these are conspicuously tiny and did feel weird trying to get snug in my ear).
But I had to return them because I use them primarily for calls and their rating in my actual application would be significantly lower than Bose QC 2
Previous Test Versions from RTINGS showed that Bose QuietComfort II earbuds (now Ultra) were BY FAR the best ANC earbuds in the market, and I purchased them much before being rated in RTINGS. But RTINGS ratings and every other so-called “FAIR BUSINESS” are turning tables by improving, removing, tweaking, test versions, methodology, etc…, but they look trustworthy with so much equipment and detailed graphics. Let me tell you, they are 50% half-fake biased reviews no matter what they say, like every other YouTuber or Advertisement campaign. MONEY RULES… Money, money, where do you come from? I can tell you by reading the reviews!
It seems that the Jabra Elite 8 Gen 1 and Gen 2 have no significant hardware updates, and both models even appear to use the same hardware, with improvements in the Gen 2 only being applied to the case and firmware. According to Jabra support, the improved firmware cannot and will not be applied to the Gen 1. Additionally, the LE update has been postponed to 2025, leading to concerns that Jabra is slowing down firmware support for the Gen 1. The performance differences measured by RTINGS seem to result from mere firmware updates, yet none of these improvements are being made available for the Gen 1, which seems problematic. I would like to hear your opinion on this matter.
It’s even worse when you cannot find them anywhere for Black Friday as RTINGS are advertising them as the best ANC Earbuds for Black Friday… Cool… I don’t trust RTINGS anymore, as much as I don’t trust Trustpilot for example. Little tweaking here and there and the tables turn!!! Money, money…
Really disappointing in my opinion.
I completely disagree with your rankings and recommendations.
I used to think RTINGS was a trustful source but it is not.
I think none of these are Wired for a high-quality and latency free experience, be it gaming, composing or listening to music.
Not even Bose makes the QC20 anymore and in 2nd hand market you cannot trust finding the original ANC circuitry.
I wish someday I can buy Wired In-Ears with as good ANC as the latest Bose QC Earbuds II, which I also own.
But I need them to be wired for music production, gaming and more !!!
I asked about the new category because I think this category needs special mention.
Thank you very much for the table tool, I went back to it several times until I found them.
I didn’t notice the Nura Nuraloop headphones have ANC and can also be used wired.
Well I bought the Nuraloop, and the sound and ANC were great when I just unboxed them, but I have to edit my previous opinion as the ANC is barely noticeable, the sound quality so so, the wireless Bluetooth connection is not good and I found too many problems within the firmware and the app.
Plus there is a gigantic downside to the Nuraloop, as you can’t even use them not even wired without a prior tuning of your hearing. But the fact is that I have tried too many ear tips apart from the factory ones and repeated the same tuning procedure in the same silent room. The results vary too much even using the same tips with my ear canals deep clean and the earbuds in the same exact position.
You are also forced to send your private hearing health data between different countries which may not apply the same data protection rules as your own, and if you don’t do this, you cannot use them AT ALL.
In the app you can choose to disable the special tuning for your custom hearing tests, but closing the App or connecting to a different device or even wired forces you to use your custom hearing tuning.
I cannot understand why I had such a great experience on the day I unboxed them and it’s become so poor after just 1 week.
Also there’s no way you can manually customize your hearing profile unless you tune them with different ear tips and go back to previous ear tips for random and poor results anyway.
The provided ear tips are sized small, medium (pre-installed), large and extra-large, but all of these are just 2mm in depth and it is almost impossible to keep them in-place if you ever open and close your mouth compared to almost every other earbuds and tips. I tried different ear tips including the supposedly Comply foam compatible sized ones, but they just do not fit properly due to the conic shape of the earbuds tip.
I just cannot recommend them and I’ve turned back to using the Audio Technica ATH-100BT due to the much more decent sound quality compared to the Nuraloop.
I will keep looking for “Bose QC Earbuds II” like Active Noise Cancelling or the closest I can find in wired earbuds though.
I just thought I should edit this comment.
I agree by personal experience with RTINGS.com results in the products I have tested so far.
But some people really need a new category for In-Ear + Wired + ANC headphones:
1) In-Ear (due to serious skin-health problems after 1-2 years using closed ANC over-head exhaustively)
2) Wired (due to unbearable Bluetooth latency while playing musical instruments, 13ms is the maximum and it is already caused by almost every wired audio-interface on music creation)
3) ANC (due to inability to properly isolate home-studio against street noise, loud chat, vehicle traffic, neighbors door slams), and Comply foam tips used in most wired noise-reduction IEM’s are just not enough
I found very good reviews about the noise reduction in Bose QuietComfort 20 (QC20), but these were discontinued long ago, so I can only buy fakes from China in eBay, as vendors cannot guarantee these were not rebuilt with worse pieces affecting ANC and audio quality.
I have the Bose QC EarBuds II and these are BY FAR the best ANC in-ear headphones I’ve ever used, but I cannot use them wired for music creation, playing instruments, etc… I’d love to buy the Bose QC20 but these are discontinued and I cannot buy them anymore.
I bought Audio-Technica ATH-100BT, somehow cheap on sale, that meet all these requirements, but the earbuds cable itself is too gummy and noisy compared to good cables, even using the Comply foam tips, plus the ANC is very weak and I would like a much better alternative even if it is much higher priced (the original Bose QC20 were already around $300).
I also found a review about “1-More Dual Driver ANC Pro” (EHD9001BA) but I am unable to find vendors, and probably the ANC is not as strong as I’d need it to be. These are another one of the very very few headphones that could be used wired with ANC on even if it is mostly a Bluetooth neckband.