Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S  Robot Vacuum Review

Review updated Nov 13, 2024 at 10:56am
Test bench update Jul 02, 2025 at 03:39pm
Tested using Methodology v1.0 
Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S
5.8
Multi-Surface Household 
4.7
Pets 
7.0
Debris Pickup: Hard Floor 
6.7
Debris Pickup: Carpet 
5.0
Debris Pickup: Pet Hair 
5.1
Obstacle Handling 
 0

The Shark AI Ultra Robot is a mid-range robot vacuum. It sits above cheaper models like the Shark AI Robot and the Shark EZ Robot Self-Empty and features both LIDAR mapping and self-emptying capability to reduce hands-on maintenance requirements. Its docking station also features an on-board HEPA filter to reduce the spread of allergens as it transfers debris out of its internal dustbin. However, unlike pricier models in the lineup, it lacks any sort of 2-in-1 functionality, so you'll need to look elsewhere if you want a hybrid robot vacuum/mop.

It's worth noting that there are multiple variants of this vacuum, though they only really differ in color and the debris capacity of their docking station; see the Differences Between Variants section for more details.

Our Verdict

5.8
Multi-Surface Household 

Pros
  • Self-emptying capability.
  • Decent performance on bare floors.

  • Can run over rug tassels.
Cons
  • Demanding maintenance requirements.
  • High recurring costs.
  • Struggles with solid debris on low-pile carpets.

4.7
Pets 

The Shark AI Ultra is a poor option for dealing with pet hair on floors. It easily clears pet hair on bare floors and high-pile carpets but struggles to clear it away on low-pile carpets. It's also very quiet, which is great if your pet is sensitive to loud noises. Despite being billed as 'self-cleaning,' long hair can get wrapped around the vacuum's brushroll. On the upside, it's easy to remove and clean. The vacuum does a good job of sealing in fine particles. Its external base station has a HEPA filter to seal in allergens like pet dander, but it doesn't use disposable dirtbags to store debris, which would make it even easier and more hygienic to empty. This variant lacks a mopping feature to deal with dried-on stains.

Pros
  • Self-emptying capability.
  • Decent performance on bare floors.

  • Quiet operation.
  • Self-emptying station has a HEPA filter.
  • Can run over rug tassels.
Cons
  • Demanding maintenance requirements.
  • High recurring costs.
  • Struggles with solid debris on low-pile carpets.

  • Terrible stain-clearing performance.
  • Self-cleaning brushroll is ineffective for resisting hair wraps.
7.0
Debris Pickup: Hard Floor 

Pros
  • Self-emptying capability.
  • Decent performance on bare floors.

  • Can run over rug tassels.
Cons
  • Demanding maintenance requirements.
  • High recurring costs.
  • Struggles with solid debris on low-pile carpets.

6.7
Debris Pickup: Carpet 

Pros
  • Self-emptying capability.
  • Decent performance on bare floors.

  • Can run over rug tassels.
Cons
  • Demanding maintenance requirements.
  • High recurring costs.
  • Struggles with solid debris on low-pile carpets.

5.0
Debris Pickup: Pet Hair 

Pros
  • Self-emptying capability.
  • Decent performance on bare floors.

  • Can run over rug tassels.
Cons
  • Demanding maintenance requirements.
  • High recurring costs.
  • Struggles with solid debris on low-pile carpets.

5.1
Obstacle Handling 

Pros
  • Self-emptying capability.
  • Decent performance on bare floors.

  • Can run over rug tassels.
Cons
  • Demanding maintenance requirements.
  • High recurring costs.
  • Struggles with solid debris on low-pile carpets.

  • 5.8
    Multi-Surface Household
  • 4.7
    Pets

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.0
    Debris Pickup: Hard Floor
  • 6.7
    Debris Pickup: Carpet
  • 5.0
    Debris Pickup: Pet Hair
  • 5.1
    Obstacle Handling
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 02, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.0, which updates our performance testing to include new tests to evaluate Obstacle Adaptability, Obstacle Avoidance, Height Clearance, and Threshold Clearance. We've also introduced new performance usages. For more information, see our changelog.
    2.  Updated Nov 13, 2024: 

      We've updated the review, added text for Test Bench 0.8, and revised it for clarity and conciseness.

    3.  Updated Aug 26, 2024: We've updated the scores in the Hard Floor Pick-Up, High-Pile Carpet Pick-Up, Low-Pile Carpet Pick-Up, and Pet-Hair Pick-Up tests to align with a broader data set. For more information about the reasoning for this update, you can look at our forum post.
    4.  Updated Aug 19, 2024: We've added a link to the bObsweep Dustin in the 'Build Quality' section of the review to provide an alternative that feels better built.

    Check Price

    Black/BronzeAV2501AE
    Searching
    Finding store
    Black/SilverAV2511AE
    Searching
    Finding store
    Black/SilverRV2502AE
    Searching
    Finding store

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    There are a few variants of the Shark AI Ultra; the main differences are the colorways and their self-emptying station debris capacity. We tested the entry-level Shark AV2501S model. If you encounter a differently equipped variant of the Shark AI Ultra Robot Self Empty XL, let us know in the comments, and we'll update our review.

    Model CodeIncluded AccessoriesColorNotes
    AV2501S2x side brushes, 1x filterBlackComes with standard-size Self-Empty Base with 30-day debris capacity.
    AV2501AE2x side brushes, 1x filterBlack/BronzeComes with XL-size Self-Empty Base with 60-day debris capacity.
    AV2511AE2x side brushes, 1x filterBlack/SilverComes with XL-size Self-Empty Base with 60-day debris capacity.
    RV2502AE2x side brushes, 1x filterBlack/SilverComes with XL-size Self-Empty Base with 60-day debris capacity. Replaced by AV-series robot vacuums.

    See our unit's label.

    Popular Robot Vacuum Comparisons

    The Shark AI Ultra is a mid-range robot vacuum. It offers LIDAR mapping, self-emptying capabilities, and an excellent battery life, but its app support is somewhat lacking, as you can't see the robot's location in real-time nor produce multi-floor maps. Maintenance tasks are relatively easy to perform, but unfortunately, the dock has a relatively small dirt compartment, so you'll have to empty it more frequently than a self-empty station with a higher-capacity dustbag if you run your vacuum often. Overall, this vacuum offers a decent feature set, but cheaper models with similar performance are available.

    If you're looking for an alternative, look at our list of recommendations for the best robot vacuums for hardwood floors, the best robot vacuums for carpet, and the best robot vacuums for pet hair.

    Shark Matrix Robot RV2310AE

    The Shark Matrix Robot RV2310AE ultimately improves on the Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S in a few key ways. The Matrix feels better built, takes considerably less time to recharge while offering similar battery life, and delivers better debris pickup on low-pile carpeting. Its integration with the SharkClean companion app is also noticeably smoother. That said, the AI Ultra could be a better option if you have pets, as it does a better job of dealing with hair and is more effective in sealing in fine particles.

    Shark AI Robot RV2001

    The Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S is better than the Shark AI Robot RV2001. The AI Ultra is self-emptying compatible, does a better job of clearing debris from cracks, performs better on bare floors, has an easier time dealing with pet hair, and has a LIDAR mapping system, which allows for quicker room mapping, even in the dark. Conversely, the AI Robot has fewer parts needing regular cleaning, incurs lower recurring costs, and offers better overall coverage despite its simpler navigation system, as it won't identify everyday objects as hazards to avoid.

    Shark Matrix Plus UR2360S

    The Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S and the Shark Matrix Plus UR2360S are fairly evenly matched robot vacuums with self-empty base stations. The AI Ultra is the slightly older model, with a lower-capacity external dustbin and a battery that takes longer to recharge, though it can run for a lot longer. The Matrix Plus' CleanEdge feature is supposed to provide better performance along walls and in corners, but this feature doesn't seem to make much of a difference.

    Wyze Robot Vacuum

    The Wyze Robot Vacuum is better than the Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S. The Wyze feels sturdier, is easier to maintain, clears away more pet hair, does a better job on bare floors, and has a markedly superior companion app. However, the Shark is compatible with a self-emptying base station to reduce hands-on maintenance requirements.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    7.0
    Build Quality
    Vacuum & Mop Combo
    No

    The build quality is decent. The body is primarily a matte-finish hard plastic, giving it a reasonably upmarket, if nondescript, appearance. However, there are sturdier feeling models from Shark, like the Shark Matrix Robot. It uses the same 'self-cleaning' brushroll design as the cheaper Shark AI Robot, with pronounced vanes meant to reduce hair buildup over time, though pet hair can still get tangled around the roller. The vacuum itself doesn't flex or creak to a significant degree when picked up, though the hard plastic covering the top of its LIDAR sensor scratches very easily. If you're looking for a self-emptying robot vacuum that feels a little more premium, the bObsweep Dustin is worth a look.

    The out-of-the-box assembly is quite simple; you only need to snap the two side brushes into place and plug in its docking station.

    4.0
    User Maintenance

    While this vacuum has many parts that need periodic cleaning, they're easy to access.

    • Dustbin: You can remove this part by pressing its release button. The vacuum's self-emptying capability ensures that you won't have to empty it yourself very often, which is good, as the dustbin itself is quite small and opens from the top, allowing debris to spill out pretty easily.
    • Pre-motor filter: The pre-motor filter is located inside the dirt compartment and can be pulled out by its release tabs. You can tap this part over your garbage to dislodge dirt and dust after each use, though it shouldn't be washed underwater, which is a pretty big inconvenience should the filter ever get really dirty. The manufacturer recommends clearing away any stuck-on debris periodically to ensure peak performance, though no specific time frame is given.
    • Brushroll: You need to remove the brushroll guard underneath the vacuum to access this part, which isn't too hard. While it's billed as 'self-cleaning,' long hair can still get tangled around the brushroll, forcing you to pull it away with your bare hands or cut it free with a pair of scissors. Hair can also get caught around the brushroll bearings, which aren't as easy to clean.
    • Side brushes: The side brushes can be pulled out of their sockets. You should check them weekly and clean them as needed by removing hair or debris. You can also wipe them with a damp cloth.
    • Drive wheels: The drive wheels and their housing need periodic cleaning, as hair can get wrapped around them pretty easily. In light quantities, this won't have too severe an impact on performance, but you should still get into the habit of cleaning the wheels periodically.
    • Front wheel: You can pull the front wheel from its housing, but this can be hard, and you might want to use a screwdriver for a bit of added leverage. You should clean it periodically and take it out of its housing to clear it of debris.
    • Sensors and charging pads: The sensors and charging pads are on both the robot and its charging station. You should clean them regularly by dusting off the sensors and pads with a dry cloth.
    • Self-Emptying Dustbin: You can remove the dustbin from the vacuum's charging dock by pressing the button on top of the dock. A small observation window gives you an idea of how full it is.
    • Self-Emptying Dustbin Filters: The self-emptying station has two filters. The foam pre-motor filter can be found under the top cover of the docking station, while the post-motor HEPA filter is located on the right side of the dock. The pre-motor filter should be rinsed with water once a month, while the HEPA filter needs rinsing once a year. Make sure to avoid using soap when cleaning either filter.

    Any part you can rinse under water should be left to dry for at least 24 hours before reinstalling them into the vacuum. You can access the User Manual directly from Shark's website.

    4.0
    Recurring Cost
    Bag Part NumberNo bag
    Filter Part NumberXPRFRV2500 + XBPFRV2500
    HEPA Filter Part NumberXPSFRV2500

    The Shark AI Ultra Robot Self Empty XL incurs high recurring costs.

    • Pre-motor filter: There isn't a specified replacement time for this filter, as it's washable. That said, you can buy a replacement from Shark's website.
    • Brushroll: You should replace the brushroll every six to 12 months, depending on your usage. This product is no longer available directly from Shark's website.
    • Side brushes: You should replace the side brushes if they're bent or damaged. See Shark's website for replacements for the three-armed side brushes.
    • Self-Emptying Dustbin Filters: No replacement time is given for either the pre-motor or post-motor HEPA base station filters. You can buy a replacement pre-motor filter directly from Shark's website, but will have to look elsewhere for a compatible HEPA filter. It's worth mentioning that the manual for the Shark EZ Robot Self-Empty, which has a similarly designed dustbin post-motor HEPA filter, advises replacing this filter after three years of use.

    Dimensions
    Robot Vacuum Height10.3 cm (4.1")
    Robot Vacuum Width34.0 cm (13.4")
    Robot Vacuum Depth34.2 cm (13.5")
    Docking Station Height30.0 cm (11.8")
    Docking Station Width33.9 cm (13.3")
    Docking Station Depth21.5 cm (8.5")
    3.2
    Internal Dirt Compartment
    Dirt Compartment Capacity
    0.16 L
    Full Indicator
    No

    The Shark AI Ultra Robot's internal dustbin is incredibly small. Even when using it to clean up small messes, the vacuum will need to empty its dustbin at the end of almost every cleaning job.

    4.7
    Station Maintenance Capabilities
    Auto Empty
    Yes
    Bagless Station
    Yes
    Dirt Compartment Capacity
    0.60 L
    Automatic Tank Refill
    No
    Mop Washing
    No
    Mop Drying
    No

    This vacuum comes with a self-emptying station. Unlike most other models on the market, the Shark AI Ultra Robot doesn't use disposable dirtbags, with debris instead being sucked into a bagless compartment. This cuts down on ownership costs but also makes for a messier, less hygienic debris disposal process. Also, the dock has a much smaller capacity than other robot vacuums with bagful or bagless docks. As per the manufacturer, you'll need to empty out this dustbin every 60 days. If you purchase the AV2501S model variant instead, note that it uses a different docking station with an advertised capacity of 30 days instead.

    In The Box

    Shark AI Ultra Robot Vacuum

    • Vacuum body
    • Internal dust bin
    • Pre-motor filter
    • 2x side brushes
    • Brushroll
    • Brushroll door
    • Owner's guide

    Base Station

    • Self-Empty Station/Charging station
    • Base station dust bin
    • Base station dust bin pre-motor filter
    • Base station dust bin post-motor HEPA filter and cover

    9.3
    Battery
    Minimum Battery Life
    92 min
    Maximum Battery Life
    172 min
    Recharge Time
    280 min
    Removable Batteries
    Yes
    Quality-Of-Life Features
    Power Adjustment
    Yes
    Easy On/Off
    Yes
    Surface Type Adjustment
    None

    The Shark AI Ultra has a few quality-of-life features. There are three power settings: an energy-saving Eco mode, the default Normal mode, and a high-power Max mode. However, it's worth noting that the vacuum defaults to the Normal mode whenever it turns on, even if you selected a different mode the last time you ran the vacuum. As you can only adjust the power settings using the app once the robot is running, this can be rather annoying. There's also an on/off switch for its self-emptying base station.

    Brushroll And Tools
    Brushroll Setup
    Single
    Brushroll Type
    Rubber And Bristles
    Side Brush Setup
    Dual
    Side Brush Type
    Fixed
    Performance
    7.0
    Hard Floor Pickup

    The hard floor performance is decent. Larger debris, like cereal, is generally no problem for the vacuum, but its side brushes tend to scatter some debris around the floor; the vacuum needs multiple passes to pick up everything. Unfortunately, this vacuum does a poor job of handling any debris trapped in corners or along walls.

    7.0
    High-Pile Carpet Pickup

    This vacuum performs decently on high-pile carpets. It's good at dealing with medium-sized and large debris like rice or cereal, though it struggles with debris against walls or in corners. Finer debris, like sand, is its biggest weakness; it can't clear it consistently and will require multiple passes to get the job done.

    6.5
    Low-Pile Carpet Pickup

    Its low-pile carpet performance is okay. Though larger debris like cereal isn't a problem, the side brushes tend to toss around medium debris. The vacuum needs to make a few extra passes to pick it up. Again, walls, corners, and finer debris are pain points, as the vacuum can't clean them very effectively.

    5.0
    Pet Hair Pickup

    The Shark AI Ultra is bad at picking up pet hair. The brushes tend to press the hair into low-pile carpet fibers rather than lifting it away. You'll need to run the vacuum multiple times to collect pet hair.

    8.7
    Airflow
    Maximum Head Airflow
    17.7 CFM (0.5 m³/min)

    This vacuum's airflow performance is actually quite good for a robot vacuum, delivering comparable performance to more expensive models like the iRobot Roomba S9. It's powerful enough to lift heavier debris without issue.

    8.0
    Noise
    Bare Floor
    59.8 dBA
    Low-Pile Carpet
    59.0 dBA

    This vacuum is remarkably quiet. You'll hear nearby conversations even with the vacuum running in its Max mode, whose peak volume reaches 63.7 dBA. The multi-function dock is significantly louder than the vacuum, reaching 69.2 dBA.

    7.5
    Household Adaptability

    This vacuum has decent overall maneuverability. While it cleans in an organized pattern, its room coverage isn't actually any better than cheaper, non-LIDAR Shark models like the Shark AI Robot. It may interpret some common household items, like thicker carpets or power cords, as objects to avoid, so it's best to ensure that its cleaning area is free of any obstacles before letting it run. Unlike high-end robot vacuums like the Roborock S7 MaxV, it doesn't have a camera or an actual AI system that would allow it to see and identify the sort of obstacles that fall beneath the view of its LIDAR sensor. Its LIDAR sensor is also somewhat tall, and the vacuum can't clean under low-lying couches and TV stands. Still, it can climb over tasseled rugs without getting stuck too frequently, which is rare among other robot vacuums.

    2.6
    Obstacle Avoidance
    Obstacle Avoidance Technology
    Light-Based
    Object Recognition
    No
    Bare Floor: Avoidance Rate
    0%
    Bare Floor: Intervention Rate
    40%
    Carpet: Avoidance Rate
    0%
    Carpet: Intervention Rate
    25%
    Always Avoided Pet Waste
    No
    5.0
    Height Clearance
    Lowest Height Cleared
    10.5 cm (4.1'')
    7.0
    Threshold Clearance
    Max Threshold Height
    1.9 cm (0.7")
    Air Quality
    Anti-Allergy Filter (HEPA)
    Yes

    The Shark AI Ultra has good air filtration performance, even though it lacks an on-board HEPA filter. Its base station has an allergen-trapping post-motor HEPA filter that the manufacturer advertises can capture 99.97% of particles down to 0.3 microns in size. We don't evaluate particle filtration for self-empty docks, so we can't verify the dock's performance.

    5.0
    Cracks
    Wood Cracks Post Test

    The Shark AI Ultra does a poor job sucking up fine debris like baking powder from cracks and crevices using its Normal power mode. Thankfully, it doesn't spread lightweight debris around either, like its sibling the Shark IQ Robot.

    1.0
    Stains
    Stain Pickup Post Test

    The Shark AI Ultra has terrible stain-clearing performance; this variant lacks mopping functionality to scrub away dried-on stains.

    0.0
    Water
    Wet Compatible
    No
    Water Pickup Post Test

    This vacuum isn't designed to clean liquid spills.

    Automation
    8.9
    Physical Automation
    Recharge And Resume
    Yes
    Pathing Algorithm
    Smart
    Physical Boundary Markers
    No
    Scheduled Start Buttons
    No
    Cycle Control Buttons
    On-Board Only
    Navigation Control Buttons
    Return To Base Only

    The Shark AI Ultra Robot Self Empty XL has excellent physical automation capabilities. Its headlining feature is its self-emptying capability, which reduces hands-on maintenance requirements. The Clean button starts a cleaning session, while the Dock button simply sends it back to its base station.

    6.0
    Companion App Automation
    App Name
    SharkClean
    Software Boundary Markers (No-Go Zones)
    Yes
    App Scheduled Start
    Yes
    App Cycle Control
    Yes
    Navigation Control Within App
    No

    The SharkClean app is unremarkable. It's slow and rather buggy, with the app occasionally reporting incorrect status information. You need a constant 2.4GHz network to connect to the vacuum.

    In terms of features, the app allows you to check the battery life, set different cleaning modes, or schedule cleaning times, though not necessarily for specific rooms. You can also check the cleaning session history and create no-go zones to prevent the vacuum from entering certain areas or prevent it from maneuvering around delicate objects.

    Comments

    1. Product

    Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Will we ever get lcd’s tv’s as quick as monitors? I just can’t give any of these a chance until I know they’ll look clear for games.

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      No, it is just the nature of lcd. There are ways to improve it using voltage overdrive(to an extent but not completely), however in my experience Sony does not use these much if at all in game mode when vrr and local dimming are on. This has nothing to do with vrr or local dimming. It’s just Sonys design choice to not use much or any overdrive when in game mode. I can only assume it is to prevent jarring changes in response time (which itself is noticeable) caused by differing scan rates during vrr… or something. I know Hisense TVs change their response time at certain hz with vrr on and it causes annoying effects. I’m guessing Sony just opted to not bother with it at all. Things get mighty blurry though.

      I will definitely be sticking to Oled than, I know samsung are slightly better with overdrive, but there lcd’s overall are just a bit lackluster. I would’ve been ok with the slow transitions if the X90l I tried didn’t have such a dirty panel, but that mixed with the blur also made me nauseous.

    3. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      They can improve it by adjusting the overdrive and exact timings, but it can’t be “solved”, in the sense that there will always be a limit in what the panel is capable of.

      Are the slow transitions caused by the local dimming system and vrr?

    4. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      In reply to the previous poster. I assume it is a lack of a proper pixel overdrive setup when the tv has vrr enabled. Dark areas in games end up blurred so much certain parts are just devoid of detail when vrr is on in games at any refresh rate. Pixel overdrive is a form of voltage regulation used to counteract this inherent property of lcd tech. Sony evidently does not use it very much or at all with vrr on that I can tell and it shows. It also ends up with rolling scan lines of dark and bright when hdr is on and vrr is enabled with local dimming all at once. The rear micro led backlight array goes completely out of sync with its PWM frequency and there’s a constant rolling shutter effect that starts. This is when vrr is actively engaged such as in a game from an nvidia pc. HDR is only usable with vrr actively engaged if local dimming is off. (Does not effect non hdr modes) This means I can’t even play with vrr and local dimming in hdr mode. Why does every tv have fundamental deal breaking flaws in modern times? The most basic functionality is broken. I paid $1500 to use vrr with local dimming in hdr and it’s legitimately broken. I might be able to forgive the slow pixel response blur in dark areas if basic vrr hdr with local dimming was even usable, but it’s not. Yes the mode activates but the backlights start rolling so it’s effectively unusable. I refunded this tv for this reason. Ended up with a Samsung s90d that can’t even provide correct frame pacing in any mode with color calibration available such as filmmaker. What even is the tv modern tv market??? These aren’t just “this tv could be better” it’s literally “basic functions simply do not even work” I am frankly appalled at the state of mid and high end tv market in 2024-2025 Neither of these issues were caught or mentioned by rtings btw. I have a hard time believing that none of the staff hasn’t at least heard talk of these issues among tv nerds. Anyone with eyes would see the scan lines in the mode I mentioned on this Bravia 7, and Samsung had had frame pacing problems since at least 2020 on both their S line oleds and QN lcd line. I know some of you have heard of these. It’s never mentioned by anyone at rtings though. Please include this type of research in your reviews. Multiple deal breaking flaws with completely broken features on multiple TVs were not mentioned once here. This is the only site with the capacity to discover these problems and inform people. No one else has the tools you do. Don’t omit stuff like this PLEASE.

      It’s really a mess… I started out with the s95b and that was such a pain to use. X90l didn’t impress at all and felt very clunky. Qn85c was mini led, but looked worse, with slightly better motion, but didn’t feel premium, and now I’m using a LG G3, which is extremely good for movie and TV, but a little lackluster in games for banding and locked picture controls. If you’re mainly a movie buff, I’d go LG all day, my blurays look reference on this thing, motion works correctly and hdr tracks perfectly.

    5. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I owned the x90l and noticed at had very blurry motion for gaming, statistically similar to this. Is sony doing this to reduce perceived judder and improve 30fps visuals?

      Edited 1 month ago: Added context
    6. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Another step back for samsung lcd’s it seems.

    You have 9/10 free reviews left
    To access
    unlimited full product reviews,
    product prices
    and
    other exclusive site features
    Become an Insider