COSORI TurboBlaze vs Dual Blaze

Which Air Fryer Is Better?

Products

COSORI TurboBlaze
COSORI Dual Blaze

Tested using Methodology v1.1

Updated Oct 14, 2026 05:13 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v1.0.2

Updated Oct 02, 2026 04:09 PM

SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
COSORI TurboBlaze Picture

Track

COSORI Dual Blaze Picture

Track

  1. Recommended in 6 articles:
  2. Air Fryers
  3. Small
  4. French Fries
  5. 3

Our Verdict

COSORI TurboBlaze

COSORI Dual Blaze

The COSORI TurboBlaze is a better air fryer than the COSORI Dual Blaze for most people. The TurboBlaze makes better-quality fried food than the Dual Blaze, leaving more of each batch crispy. It also offers greater versatility. It has a wider range of fan speeds and temperature settings, particularly at the low end, making it a better choice for alternate cooking methods like dehydrating and proofing dough. It's also more compact, and despite its smaller capacity, it has nearly the same cooking surface area, making it easier to spread food out for better results. The Dual Blaze preheats and cooks a bit faster and offers special features via the app, such as voice control. However, given TurboBlaze's lower price and better overall performance, the extra features won't be worth it for most people.

2 

Variants

  • CAF-DC602 (Black)
  • CAF-DC601 (Dark Gray)
  • CAF-P583S (Blue)
  • CAF-P583S (Dark Grey)

Check Price

Black
CAF-DC602
Amazon
Blue
CAF-P583S
Amazon
Dark Gray
CAF-DC601
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Dark Grey
CAF-P583S
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
Light Gray
CAF-DC601
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Green
CAF-P583S
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
 
Oyster White
CAF-P583S
Amazon
Read more

Main Differences for
French Fries

Threshold 

0.10

French Fries 
 

7.8
No major differences between these air fryers for french fries. See full list of tests below.

Full Comparison

Design

Size 
 

7.7
7.0

Device Dimensions 
 

Compare High-Res
COSORI TurboBlaze Device Dimensions
Compare High-Res
COSORI Dual Blaze Device Dimensions

Width 
 

11.6" (29.5 cm)
11.7" (29.6 cm)

Depth 
 

14.4" (36.5 cm)
15.3" (38.9 cm)

Height 
 

11.7" (29.8 cm)
13.7" (34.9 cm)

Overall Volume 
 

2,452.3 in³ (40,185 cm³)

Cooking Surface 
 

7.3

Surface Area Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
COSORI TurboBlaze Surface Area Picture
Compare High-Res
COSORI Dual Blaze Surface Area Picture

Single Tray Surface Area 
 

75.5 in² (487.1 cm²)
76.9 in² (496.3 cm²)

Total Tray Surface Area 
 

75.5 in² (487.1 cm²)
76.9 in² (496.3 cm²)

Tray Coating Type 
 

PTFE
PTFE

Cooking Chamber 
 

7.3
7.8

Isometric Basket View 
 

Compare High-Res
COSORI TurboBlaze Isometric Basket View
Compare High-Res
COSORI Dual Blaze Isometric Basket View

Advertised Capacity 
 

6.0 qt (5.7 L)
6.8 qt (6.4 L)

Surface Area Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
COSORI TurboBlaze Surface Area Picture
Compare High-Res
COSORI Dual Blaze Surface Area Picture

Single Basket Surface Area 
 

75.5 in² (487.1 cm²)
76.9 in² (496.3 cm²)

Measured Capacity 
 

6.3 qt (6.0 L)
6.8 qt (6.5 L)

Chamber Height 
 

3.4" (8.7 cm)
3.6" (9.2 cm)

Total Basket Surface Area  

75.5 in² (487.1 cm²)
76.9 in² (496.3 cm²)

Chamber Coating Type 
 

Ceramic

Dual Chambers 
 

No
No

Glass Chamber 
 

No
No

Nonstick Coating Type 
 

PTFE
PTFE

Cooking Versatility 
 

9.7
5.4

Control Panel Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
COSORI TurboBlaze Control Panel Photo
Compare High-Res
COSORI Dual Blaze Control Panel Photo

Dual Cooking Chambers  

No
No

Cooking Method Presets 
 

9
7

Minimum Temperature 
 

90 °F (32 °C)
175 °F (79 °C)

Maximum Temperature 
 

450 °F (232 °C)
400 °F (204 °C)

Minimum Fan Speed 
 

1,000 RPM
3,000 RPM

Maximum Fan Speed 
 

3,600 RPM
3,090 RPM

Maximum Power Draw 
 

1,510 W
1,580 W

Temperature Probe 
 

No
No
Performance

Fried Foods 
 

8.3
7.4

Sorted Fries 
 

Compare High-Res
COSORI TurboBlaze Sorted Fries
Compare High-Res
COSORI Dual Blaze Sorted Fries

Fry Sorting Video  

Crispy Fries 
 

81.2%
65.6%

Overcooked Fries 
 

9.4%
9.4%

Undercooked Fries 
 

9.4%
25.0%

Meat And Poultry 
 

7.8

Sorted Wings  

COSORI TurboBlaze Sorted Wings

Chicken Wings Evaluation Video  

Wings Crisped On Both Sides 
 

46.2%

Wings Crisped On One Side Only 
 

46.2%

Wings Not Crisped On Either Side 
 

7.6%

Rendered Fat Lost 
 

13 g

Cooking Speed 
 

7.9
8.5

Moisture Loss Over Time  

 Preview Graph
COSORI TurboBlaze Moisture Loss Over Time
 Preview Graph
COSORI Dual Blaze Moisture Loss Over Time

Time To 45% Moisture Loss (Fries) 
 

13:46
16:38

Time To 50% Moisture Loss (Wings) 
 

31:35

Preheat Speed 
 

6.4
7.6

Preheat Speed  

 Preview Graph
COSORI TurboBlaze Preheat Speed
 Preview Graph
COSORI Dual Blaze Preheat Speed

Preheat Reminder 
 

Yes
No

Time To Reach 400°F 
 

03:02
02:44

Temperature Stability 
 

6.7
6.7

Temperature Stability  

 Preview Graph
COSORI TurboBlaze Temperature Stability
 Preview Graph
COSORI Dual Blaze Temperature Stability

Recovery Time Once Food Added 
 

03:50
03:31

Temperature Variation At 400°F 
 

42 °F
52 °F

Check Price

Black
CAF-DC602
Amazon
Blue
CAF-P583S
Amazon
Dark Gray
CAF-DC601
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Dark Grey
CAF-P583S
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
Light Gray
CAF-DC601
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Green
CAF-P583S
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
 
Oyster White
CAF-P583S
Amazon

COSORI TurboBlaze

COSORI Dual Blaze

Comments

  1. Comparison

COSORI TurboBlaze vs COSORI Dual Blaze: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 2
    1
    0

    The dual blaze is has a bottom heater so you don’t have to open up the air fryer halfway through and shake or turn your meat. Cooking chicken is better using the roast feature since it turns the top burner on medium and the bottom burner on high and gives you a much juicier meat. The Turbo blaze is definitely quicker at air frying food and it comes out crispier. Also, it is so much smaller with almost identical amount of tray space, plus it fits perfectly under cabinets unlike the dual blaze which is so tall. Another consideration is that the turbo blaze is so much cheaper than the dual blaze. The turbo blaze comes with an excellent cookbook and recommended cooking and temperature chart which the dual blaze does not.

    These are great points, thanks for sharing! Do you own either of these models? If not, which one would you go for?

  2. 2
    1
    0

    The dual blaze is has a bottom heater so you don’t have to open up the air fryer halfway through and shake or turn your meat. Cooking chicken is better using the roast feature since it turns the top burner on medium and the bottom burner on high and gives you a much juicier meat. The Turbo blaze is definitely quicker at air frying food and it comes out crispier. Also, it is so much smaller with almost identical amount of tray space, plus it fits perfectly under cabinets unlike the dual blaze which is so tall. Another consideration is that the turbo blaze is so much cheaper than the dual blaze. The turbo blaze comes with an excellent cookbook and recommended cooking and temperature chart which the dual blaze does not.

    Edited 5 months ago: Edit