Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Shark Rocket Pet Pro  Vacuum Review

Reviewed Aug 11, 2020 at 08:01am
Tested using methodology v1.3 
Shark Rocket Pet Pro
7.5
Bare Floor 
7.4
Low-Pile Carpet 
6.8
High-Pile Carpet 
6.7
Pets 
8.0
Stairs 
7.1
Cars 
4.9
Workshop 
 0

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is an impressive cordless stick vacuum with a lightweight handheld configuration. Designed with pets in mind, it easily picks up pet hair on all surfaces, and its self-cleaning brushroll helps it to remove hair as you clean. While it also cleans small and large debris from bare floors outstandingly well, it struggles more with smaller debris on carpet but it still does a great job on these surfaces overall. This vacuum also has excellent maneuverability, making it easy to clean under tables or to clean car seats. As it's fairly easy to maintain, and as long as each of its parts is cleaned according to their respective maintenance needs, recurring costs are low. That being said, it has a small dirt compartment that needs frequent emptying and some users may find the included tools and brushes limiting.

Note: Our Shark Rocket Pet Pro IZ162H test unit came with the MultiFLEX flexible hose, though several users have noted that their model only came with a straight wand. This component is only advertised as being standard equipment on the IZ163H variant of this vacuum. We've yet to test this vacuum's performance with a rigid wand, so your user experience may vary.

Our Verdict

7.5
Bare Floor 

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is great for bare floors. It's a decently-built vacuum that can pick up pet hair as well as small and large debris without a problem. It's also fairly easy to maintain, and as long as the parts are taken care of, there are few recurring costs. This vacuum also has excellent maneuverability.

Pros
  • Can easily pick up pet hair from all surface types.
  • Able to easily clean up small and large debris.
  • Excellent maneuverability.
Cons
  • Small dirt compartment.
7.4
Low-Pile Carpet 

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is great for low-pile carpet. It's able to pick up pet hair and large debris, and although it struggles a bit with small debris, it still can clean a good amount of it up. It has a decent build quality, and you can reconfigure it into a handheld vacuum if you need even more maneuverability. There are only a few parts that need ongoing maintenance but luckily, there are few recurring costs as long as you maintain each part.

Pros
  • Can easily pick up pet hair from all surface types.
  • Picks up most large debris.
  • Excellent maneuverability.
Cons
  • Struggles with small debris on carpet.
  • Small dirt compartment.
6.8
High-Pile Carpet 

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is good for high-pile carpet. It has excellent maneuverability and it's able to pick up all pet hair and most large debris. It has a bit more trouble cleaning up small debris though. That being said, this vacuum has a decent build quality, and it's fairly easy to maintain each of its parts. There are virtually few recurring costs as well.

Pros
  • Can easily pick up pet hair from all surface types.
  • Picks up most large debris.
  • Excellent maneuverability.
Cons
  • Struggles with small debris on carpet.
  • Small dirt compartment.
6.7
Pets 

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is decent for pets. This decently built vacuum captures pet hair on all surfaces and it has excellent maneuverability. It's also fairly easy to maintain, especially as the brushroll is designed to detangle hair wraps on its own. As long as it's taken care of, there are few recurring costs either.

Pros
  • Can easily pick up pet hair from all surface types.
Cons
  • No pet grooming brush.
8.0
Stairs 

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is a great option for stairs. As it's a cordless vacuum, you have an unlimited range as long as you have battery life left, and there's even a handheld configuration for hard-to-reach places. It has an overall great performance on all surface types too.

Pros
  • Excellent maneuverability.
Cons
  • Struggles with small debris on carpet.
7.1
Cars 

The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is decent for cleaning cars. It has good portability, comes with a crevice tool for getting into hard-to-reach places, and you can even use it as a handheld vacuum, which can make it even easier to clean your car. It does an excellent job cleaning low-pile carpet and it has unlimited range, provided you still have battery life left. It feels like a sturdy vacuum and it's fairly easy to maintain.

Pros
  • Excellent maneuverability.
Cons
  • No on-board tool storage.
4.9
Workshop 
  • 7.5
    Bare Floor
  • 7.4
    Low-Pile Carpet
  • 6.8
    High-Pile Carpet
  • 6.7
    Pets
  • 8.0
    Stairs
  • 7.1
    Cars
  • 4.9
    Workshop
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Aug 26, 2024: We've updated the scores in the Hard Floor Pick-Up, High-Pile Carpet Pick-Up, Low-Pile Carpet Pick-Up, and Pet-Hair Pick-Up tests to align with a broader data set. For more information about the reasoning for this update, you can look at our forum post.
    2.  Updated Jul 02, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.3. We've overhauled our floor performance tests and added new 'Hard Floor Pick-Up,' 'High-Pile Carpet Pick-Up,' 'Low-Pile Carpet Pick-Up,' and 'Pet-Hair Pick-Up' tests. You can see the full changelog here.
    3.  Updated Dec 14, 2023: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.2. This update builds on our previous 'Suction' test with a new 'Airflow' test that more accurately measures a vacuum's ability to generate air movement. If you'd like to see an in-depth look at the reasoning and methodology behind this change, you can see our full changelog here..
    4.  Updated Mar 09, 2023: Added link to the Tineco S10 in the 'Quality Of Life Features' section to provide an alternative with an automatic power adjustment feature.

    Check Price

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

     There are a few variants of the Shark Rocket Pet Pro, which differ seemingly only in terms of included equipment and wand color. The vacuums are similarly designed otherwise, and we expect all variants to deliver similar overall performance when using the same accessories.

    Model Name Parts Included Wand Color
    IZ163H MultiFLEX wand, motorized head, crevice tool, upholstery tool/hard bristle brush combination tool Rasberry
    IZ162H Motorized head, crevice tool, upholstery tool/hard bristle brush combination tool  Magenta
      IZ162HC Motorized head, crevice tool, upholstery tool  Red
      IZ165HC Motorized head, crevice tool, upholstery tool/hard bristle brush combination tool Iris Blue

     Let us know if you come across another variant of this vacuum so that we can update our review.

    Note:  We tested the IZ162H variant of this vacuum, and you can see its label here. However, our IZ162H variant came with the MultiFLEX wand, which seems to be unique to our test model, as this component is only advertised as being standard equipment for the IZ163H model. Let us know in the discussions below if you encounter a similar difference in standard equipment.

    Popular Vacuum Comparisons

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is a stick vacuum with a handheld configuration. Thanks to its unique self-cleaning brushroll that helps detangle hair wraps from its bristles while you clean, it's able to effectively clean pet hair from all surface types. Similar to the Shark ION F80 Cord-Free MultiFLEX, the IZ163H variant also uses a flexible hose that can bend so that you can better clean underneath tables or more easily store it away. While it has an impressive performance overall, its battery performance also stands out as it has a shorter recharge time than the Dyson V8 or Dyson V11.

    Dyson V8

    The Dyson V8 and the Shark Rocket Pet Pro are similarly performing vacuums. The Dyson is more portable and comes with more tools and brushes, including a unique 180-degree extension tool designed to help you clean hard-to-reach areas. The Shark is better at cleaning bare floors, feels slightly better built, has a shorter charge time, and is significantly more maneuverable.

    Shark Rocket Corded

    Both the Shark Rocket Pet Pro and Shark Rocket Corded vacuums have advantages; one may suit you better than the other, depending on your needs. The Pet Pro is a cordless stick vacuum that allows you to clean far away from any electrical outlets. It's also better built, easier to store, and more maneuverable, and it delivers slightly better performance on all surface types. Meanwhile, the Rocket is a corded vacuum with a virtually indefinite runtime and practically no recurring costs. There are also fewer parts that need regular cleaning.

    Shark Cordless Pet IX141

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro is better than the Shark Pet/Rocket Pro Cordless, though both vacuums are similar. The Rocket Pet Pro has all of the same features as the latter but with a self-cleaning brushroll, an allergen-trapping HEPA filter, and an easily removable and replaceable battery.

    Dyson V15 Detect

    The Dyson V15 Detect is slightly better than the Shark Rocket Pet Pro. Both deliver similarly exceptional performance on bare floors, though the Dyson is slightly superior on low-pile carpets and clears noticeably more debris on high-pile carpets. It also has a broader selection of tools and accessories and a longer battery life. However, the Shark takes much less time to charge, feels more solidly built, is less demanding in terms of maintenance, and can maneuver more easily.

    Show more 

    Video

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    7.0
    Build Quality
    Vacuum Type
    Stick/Handheld

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro Cordless has a decent build quality. It's mostly made from hard plastic except for the wand, which is made of lightweight metal. It could feel a little more sturdy, and its dirt compartment feels like it could crack if dropped. You may want to take a look at the Miele Triflex HX1 if you're looking for a better-built lightweight cordless vacuum. That being said, the handle has a rubber grip, and the wand is flexible enough to bend for cleaning under tables or for storing. There's also a lint line near the back end of the brushroll, and the brushroll itself uses angled plastic fibers which helps it to detangle wrapped hair on its own. The vacuum is easy to assemble, and the tools and brushes have clips, making it simple to switch between them.

    7.0
    User Maintenance

    This vacuum is fairly easy to maintain. There are a few parts that need maintenance but most parts are easy to access.

    • Dirt compartment: The dirt compartment is small and need to be emptied quite frequently. It can be removed by pressing its release latch. You can wash it with water, but it can be a little challenging to hand-clean the higher area of the compartment.
    • Felt screen: This part is located inside the dirt compartment and it can be cleaned by taking out trapped debris by hand, but it can't be removed.
    • Brushroll: While the brushroll can't be removed you can access it by using a coin to unlock three clips and removing the base cover. You don't need to use scissors to remove wrapped hair, but you can use carpet mode and the hair dislodges itself. However, if you need to, you can also carefully remove debris by hand. Otherwise, this part doesn't really need much maintenance as it should detangle hair by itself.
    • Pre-motor filter: There are two pre-motor filters, one foam and one felt. They're easily accessible when you remove the dirt compartment, and both need to be washed with only water once a month, depending on your usage.
    • Post-motor filter: You can only access the post-motor filter after removing the dirt compartment. This part needs to be washed once a month with only water as well, depending on your usage.

    You must air dry any part that's washed with water for 24 hours before using it again.

    8.5
    Recurring Cost
    Bag Part NumberNo bag
    Filter Part Number617FJ140
    HEPA Filter Part NumberXHF161H

    Update 02/11/2021: The recurring cost score has been updated to bring it in line with the scores of other vacuums with similar maintenance requirements. The text has also been updated.

    This vacuum has very low recurring costs.

    • Pre-motor filters: The foam and felt pre-motor filters shouldn't need to be replaced if they're well-maintained, but they can be purchased as a single kit from Shark's website if necessary.
    • HEPA filter: The post-motor filter shouldn't need to be replaced if it's well taken care of. You can buy a replacement from the manufacturer's website if necessary.

    While the user manual recommends replacing these parts regularly, no specific service interval is given, and we can only estimate their lifespan relative to parts in similar Shark vacuums like the Shark Vertex Lightweight Cordless.

    6.6
    Storing
    Height
    26.77" (68.0 cm)
    Width
    10.24" (26.0 cm)
    Depth
    9.84" (25.0 cm)
    Cord Storing
    Not Needed
    On-Board Tool Storage
    No
    Vacuum Rack/Station
    No

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro Cordless has okay storing capabilities. The wand is flexible, so you can fold it in half for easier storage. On the downside, there's no on-board tool storage, so you need to find a separate place to put the tools. Unlike the JASHEN V16, it also lacks a vacuum rack to hold the vacuum upright and store its accessories.

    7.3
    Dirt Compartment
    Bagless
    Yes
    Volume
    0.13 gal (0.50 L)
    Full Indicator
    Yes
    Bag Included
    No Bag Needed

    The dirt compartment is alright, but it's on the small side, so you need to empty it quite often. If that's a significant concern, the Shark ION P50 Cord-Free Powered Lift-Away has a larger dirt compartment that requires less frequent emptying. There's also an indicator to let you know when the dirt compartment is full, but it's small and can be hard to see.

    In The Box

    • Shark Rocket Pet Pro Cordless Stick Vacuum
    • Vacuum head
    • Vacuum body
    • Vacuum wand
    • Dirt compartment
    • Pre-motor filters (felt and foam)
    • Post-motor filter
    • Recharge cable
    • Rechargeable battery
    • Crevice tool
    • Upholstery tool
    • Hard bristle brush clip-on
    • User guide

    10
    Range
    Cordless
    Yes
    Cord Length
    N/A
    Hose Length
    N/A
    Minimum Wand Length
    1.35 ft (0.41 m)
    Maximum Wand Length
    3.22 ft (0.98 m)
    Total Range
    N/A

    This is a cordless vacuum, so it has an unlimited range, provided it still has battery life left.

    7.7
    Portability
    Total Weight
    7.94 lbs (3.60 kg)
    Weight In Hand
    4.03 lbs (1.83 kg)
    Carrying handle
    Yes

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro Cordless has good portability. It's heavier than alternatives like the Tineco PURE ONE X, but it still shouldn't be too fatiguing to use if you hold it by its carrying handle.

    7.0
    Battery
    Minimum Battery Life
    12 min
    Maximum Battery Life
    42 min
    Recharge Time
    168 min
    Recharge Dock
    No
    Battery Life Indicator
    Yes
    Removable Batteries
    Yes

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro's battery performance is decent. While it has a shorter overall battery life than the Shark ION F80 Cord-Free MultiFLEX, it takes under three hours for it to fully charge up again, which is quicker than many other cordless vacuums we've tested so far. Its battery also lasts longest when used as a handheld vacuum, as it uses its default power setting. However, if you're cleaning up a more difficult mess, its "MAX (BOOST)" mode lasts just over ten minutes, so you need to work quickly. Luckily, the vacuum has a battery life LED indicator with three lights that lower to one light when you're running out of battery life. If you want a stick vacuum with a better maximum battery life, consider the Roborock H6 Adapt.

    Quality Of Life Features
    Rotating Head
    Yes
    Power Adjustment
    Yes
    Self-Propelled
    No
    Headlights
    Yes
    Easy On/Off
    Yes
    Head Surface Type Adjustment
    None

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro has a couple of extra features. There are two floor settings: one for floors and small area rugs, which makes the brushroll spin slower, and a carpet setting which makes the brushroll spins faster. You can also increase its power by pulling on the trigger located near its handle. This activates 'MAX' mode, and you only need to release the trigger to return to normal power. However, unlike the Tineco S10, it can't automatically adjust its suction power mode.

    Tools And Brushes
    Brushroll
    Yes
    Brushroll On/Off
    No
    Removable Brushroll
    No
    Turbo Brush
    No
    Crevice Tool
    Yes
    Upholstery Tool
    Yes
    Soft Bristle Brush
    No
    Hard Bristle Brush
    Yes
    Extension Wand
    Yes
    Ceiling Fan Tool
    No
    Pet Grooming Tool
    No

    The Shark Rocket Pet Pro Cordless comes with a couple of tools and brushes. The hard bristle brush attaches to the upholstery tool. If you want something with more included tools, check out the Dyson V7.

    Alternative Configuration
    Blower Mode
    No

    This vacuum can be used in a handheld configuration.

    Performance
    8.0
    Hard Floor Pickup
    6.5
    High-Pile Carpet Pickup
    7.0
    Low-Pile Carpet Pickup
    7.5
    Pet Hair Pickup
    2.8
    Suction
    Maximum Hose Suction
    55.5 inH₂O (13.83 kPa)
    Maximum Head Suction
    1.2 inH₂O (0.29 kPa)
    Normal Head Suction
    0.6 inH₂O (0.14 kPa)
    Setting Used For NormalBare Floor
    Hose Diameter
    1.6" (4.0 cm)
    6.5
    Airflow
    Maximum Hose Airflow
    46.3 CFM (1.3 m³/min)
    8.5
    Noise
    Bare Floor
    70.5 dBA
    Low-Pile Carpet
    74.8 dBA
    8.5
    Maneuverability

    This vacuum has excellent maneuverability. It's easy to adjust power and floor type settings on-the-go. Unlike the similarly-designed Shark Anti-Allergen Pet Power, it has a flexible wand that is easy to lock and unlock, especially if you need to get under couches or tables. It's really easy to clean furniture, thanks to all of its tools and brushes. It does get stuck on rug tassels though, requiring you to turn the vacuum off to remove the rug from the brushroll.

    7.0
    Pet Hair Furniture Performance
    Sofa Pickup Post Test
    Air Quality
    Anti-Allergy Filter (HEPA)
    Yes
    6.0
    Cracks
    Wood Cracks Post Test
    3.0
    Stains
    Stain Pickup Post Test
    0.0
    Water
    Wet Compatible
    No
    Water Pickup Post Test

    Comments

    1. Product

    Shark Rocket Pet Pro: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. 4
      3
      2
      3
      0

      The regular content in your images doesn’t look too bad, but you’re right, during the startup phase it looks pretty bad. We have seen some reports that the local dimming feature doesn’t work during app and system startup. Does adjusting the local dimming setting help at all?

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      The flashy cloudy picture while loading netflix or while rebooting is normal. your blooming while watching content looks also normal to me and its more noticeable in HDR than in SDR, because in HDR you crank up all the brightness and contrast.

      Blooming is unpreventable when a TV has this number of dimming zones.

      The blooming on my X900F does not bother me, in my opinion it is not distracting at all while watching content, because my eyes get dazzled anyway by the source of light which is causing the blooming, in total i would have to focus my eyes to the blooming spot to see it, but i just dont do this while watching. I hope you guys understand what i try to say xD

    3. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Your second batch of pics, regular viewing content looks good/normal (viewing thru pics on my phone anyway). I get it, the first batch of pics looks bad and uneven, but it only a start up screen, no big deal. I would try to find a scene in a movie, show or maybe even a game with mostly black content on the screen with a bright object, (maybe a dark sky and a bright moon) and compare it to those start up screen pics. If you have similar results, yeah the 900f’s performance should be way better. Also I’m pretty sure all Sony’s w/local dimming have 4 settings for its Local Dimming algorithm. (My Z9D has this) High, Med., Low, Off. Check the settings.

    4. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      The regular content in your images doesn’t look too bad, but you’re right, during the startup phase it looks pretty bad. We have seen some reports that the local dimming feature doesn’t work during app and system startup. Does adjusting the local dimming setting help at all?

      Thanks for your response Adam.

      Yes, I have tried all local dimming settings and doesn’t resolve the issue. This is a FALD Tv And it shouldn’t be doing this.

      Here is a link to images on more noticeable blooming referencing light background on black.

      What do you think?

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

    5. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      The flashy cloudy picture while loading netflix or while rebooting is normal. your blooming while watching content looks also normal to me and its more noticeable in HDR than in SDR, because in HDR you crank up all the brightness and contrast.

      Blooming is unpreventable when a TV has this number of dimming zones.

      The blooming on my X900F does not bother me, in my opinion it is not distracting at all while watching content, because my eyes get dazzled anyway by the source of light which is causing the blooming, in total i would have to focus my eyes to the blooming spot to see it, but i just dont do this while watching. I hope you guys understand what i try to say xD

      Thank you.

      I have been doing some research on this for mixed results. There are many reports of no backlight bleeding issues on start up and Netflix screen or content viewing. But there are many who are experiencing the same issue. I wonder if this is a legitimate issue that is hampering the pic quality of this tv and some people are not noticing it or accepting it as normal. They could be getting a better pic quality to the full potential of this tv but people don’t know it.

      Here is a link to better examples of backlight bleeding.

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

    6. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Your second batch of pics, regular viewing content looks good/normal (viewing thru pics on my phone anyway). I get it, the first batch of pics looks bad and uneven, but it only a start up screen, no big deal. I would try to find a scene in a movie, show or maybe even a game with mostly black content on the screen with a bright object, (maybe a dark sky and a bright moon) and compare it to those start up screen pics. If you have similar results, yeah the 900f’s performance should be way better. Also I’m pretty sure all Sony’s w/local dimming have 4 settings for its Local Dimming algorithm. (My Z9D has this) High, Med., Low, Off. Check the settings.

      Thank you.

      Tried all local dimming setting but it’s not addressing the issue.

      Here are better examples of backlight bleeding.

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

    7. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      Hi Adam and team I’m only commenting here as I couldn’t find how to start a new topic ! I am looking to buy a 65" tv from Currys in UK I already bought a SK8500 and returned it immediately as blooming and slow backlight response made me absoltely sick. I use TV for 2 key activities 1-As a regular windows PC monitor / web browsing (which terribly burn an OLED due to constant static pictures) 2-Watching movies daily in a completely dark room with subtitles

      Due to activity 1, I don’t think an OLED is safe for me. But I also can’t look at blooming around subtitles and slowly responding dimming features or blacks looking like grays. Considering these constraints, I just couldn’t find an affordable TV. I’m closest to X900F and NU8000 but they still have blooming issues. Is there anything better you can recommend for my use cases? I can get a cheap LG b8 OLED but I’m too scared of burn-in during PC monitor use…

      Thanks

    8. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi Adam and team I’m only commenting here as I couldn’t find how to start a new topic ! I am looking to buy a 65" tv from Currys in UK I already bought a SK8500 and returned it immediately as blooming and slow backlight response made me absoltely sick. I use TV for 2 key activities 1-As a regular windows PC monitor / web browsing (which terribly burn an OLED due to constant static pictures) 2-Watching movies daily in a completely dark room with subtitles

      Due to activity 1, I don’t think an OLED is safe for me. But I also can’t look at blooming around subtitles and slowly responding dimming features or blacks looking like grays. Considering these constraints, I just couldn’t find an affordable TV. I’m closest to X900F and NU8000 but they still have blooming issues. Is there anything better you can recommend for my use cases? I can get a cheap LG b8 OLED but I’m too scared of burn-in during PC monitor use…

      Thanks

      X900F and NU8000 are probably your best picks. Despite the reported blooming issues, with regular content this really shouldn’t be very noticeable.

    9. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Between the two, I would definitely go with the Sony 900f. At regular price, the 900f is probably the best bang for your buck TV out there. (Excluding the Vizio PQ-65 for multiple reasons)

    10. 1
      0
      -1
      0
      0

      The flashy cloudy picture while loading netflix or while rebooting is normal. your blooming while watching content looks also normal to me and its more noticeable in HDR than in SDR, because in HDR you crank up all the brightness and contrast.

      Blooming is unpreventable when a TV has this number of dimming zones.

      The blooming on my X900F does not bother me, in my opinion it is not distracting at all while watching content, because my eyes get dazzled anyway by the source of light which is causing the blooming, in total i would have to focus my eyes to the blooming spot to see it, but i just dont do this while watching. I hope you guys understand what i try to say xD

      Thank you.

      I have been doing some research on this for mixed results. There are many reports of no backlight bleeding issues on start up and Netflix screen or content viewing. But there are many who are experiencing the same issue. I wonder if this is a legitimate issue that is hampering the pic quality of this tv and some people are not noticing it or accepting it as normal. They could be getting a better pic quality to the full potential of this tv but people don’t know it.

      Here is a link to better examples of backlight bleeding.

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

      I also no longer encounter backlight bleeding on netflix startup, but i definitely saw this in the beginning. Maybe it depends on the picture-settings. My main Picture-settings when starting netflix are: cinema pro, Brightness 20, contrast max, local dimming high, contrast-enhancer off, x-tended d range off.

      I do not have a big problem with blooming. When i watch HDR movies, i sometimes see it, but its so negligible for my eyes. In SDR with lower brightness, it is even better.

      Once i read a user-report who said he badly suffered from blooming and bleeding, he changed the panel or TV, i dont know anymore, and the new panel was way better.

      So MAYBE…its within the panel-lottery. But i really dont know.

      Edited 6 years ago: xxx
    11. 1
      0
      -1
      0
      0

      HI! I also have this “problem”. Basically when i boot up my TV (when i hard reset it) and when i fire up netflix or apps… My picture gets all bloomy and flashlighty but that is normal as FALD system is not engaged and the beginning of the apps or the startup have not been optimized for the light as basically every time I reboot it the brightness gets automatically set to MAX and in dark rooms with brightness on MAX you are going to see a “sh*tstorm” of bloom and uneven lighting but as soon as system loads up and i play a movie that is SDR (I set to brightness 1 as that is “100 nit” and is most acurate brightness setting for SDR) none of these issues appear EVEN with XDR on high (which increases SDR image a lot in my opinion) or HDR/DV movie/show. Now when I say “none of these issues appear” I don’t mean I don’t see no bloom or light bleed. I DO see them but like if we say the startup or netflix logo is rated at 100%, in movies/ shows be it SDR with XDR or HDR/DV with XDR I would rate it 2.5 and without XDR in both standards SDR and HDR/DV i would rate it 1. It is present but present just like with your TV. People who say they don’t see bloom are either lying or are blind or actually do not know what light bloom/bleeding is and they don’t know whether they’re seeing it they believe that is part of the movie image. It would be alarming if we saw the same or near same light bloom/bleeding/flashlighting when we play movies/shows in HDR/SDR. So you can be at peace and if you are annoyed at light bloom in the black bars from spectral lights you can (just like i am planning to do) install LED lights (stick them to the back of TV) at the back of the TV so that they light up the wall. The light bloom will disappear and image will look much better with much higher “perceived” contrast. I tested this and it is really working. The annoyed small light bleeds or blooms literally disappear and my brain actually believes the picture is much better in contrast (Dumbass brain huh!) and i can be at peace and relax while watching movie without blooming.

    12. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      This is not an issue, this is how Sony tvs work. Local dimming doesn’t engage on boot screen and loading screens. Every Sony FALD set works this way. There is no issue taking place. I have owned 5 Sony FALD sets and they all perform this way. Just enjoy your movies and tv shows and forget about the boot screen and loading screens.

    13. 1
      0
      -1
      0
      0

      Blooming on start up, app start, menu, and any onscreen display are because the menu background is not a pure black, it’s dark grey with transparant effect rather than black. And when it was displayed, all the dimming feature are set to off.

    14. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi, in 2018 I had a Sony 900f in a 55’ and had blooming issues. What I did was go back in the menu to motion and set motionflow to custom and clearness to 1. Also, you could try setting black level to either 48 or 45 and set your brightness to 40 and set sharpness to 90.

    15. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      well i got the 49 900f and i gotta say i regret this purchase very much. It’s ok for sdr however, in hdr10 or dolby vision, the tv is almost unwatchable when it has to deal with dark scenes. It only has 25 local dimming zones which if i knew i would of not bought it in the first place. I have the 55 in 950g and it just so much better. I wonder what other cutbacks they made on this model outside of cutting its dimming zones in half from the 55 inch. i got the 49.5 as that what is a good fit for my bedroom but really not cool what sony did to this tv. To answer you the tv blooms alot as it lacks dimming zones . Going to have it tested on the 9th for peak brightness cause i doubt the numbers given on this site are accurate for this size model. To sum it up i bought hdr tv that only performs in sdr very disappointing. Btw… also has washed out colors in hdr. Also wasted another 300$ to have it pro calibrated hoping it would improve the situation it did not.

      Edited 5 years ago: just adding
    16. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      Wow, $300 to have it calibrated, that is like a third of the TV price. I think these calibrations are a joke. I did it once, although half the price and switch it back to the way I had it. Trial and error. What people don’t understand about calibration is, you may see your TV display in a way that looks perfect to you and not to another. Sure there are color calibration tools, but your eyes may not see it as a computer sees it, as perfect color calibration. Even calibration disks, forget it. No matter how you feel about the NHL, put on a hockey game. The white ice gives you a perfect measurement for contrast against the blue lines and red face off circles. Once you have that your liking, just season the color to your liking. Boom, basic TV calibration, and honestly, your eyes can’t really do much more against these silly TV options. I have a Sony Z9D. Color options like blue/green/red offset/gain, I have never worn glasses, I’m pretty sure my vision is as close to 20/20 as possible, these changes do absolutely nothing to my display against my eyes.

      Ok, now as far as the 900f, it’s no Z9D, but unless you go OLED, blooming is going to happen. The smallest OLED that I know of is a 55”, but even if you bought a 55” 900f, that price is going to be a lot less than a similar size OLED. As far as the 950g, sure it’s a better TV, especially with ultimate chip, but when the 950g first came out, it was so much more expensive then the 900f, all sizes across the board. Most people will see the 900f as an amazing TV, but if your looking for those imperfections like me, (again I went Z9D even over OLED, because OLEDs are so dim, and ABL on those things are such a bitch) the 900f is an amazing TV at its price point.

      Edited 5 years ago: Spellcheck is a bitch
    17. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      I’m at 200, I need to get a life. 😜😁

      Edited 5 years ago: Idk???
    18. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Wow, $300 to have it calibrated, that is like a third of the TV price. I think these calibrations are a joke. I did it once, although half the price and switch it back to the way I had it. Trial and error. What people don’t understand about calibration is, you may see your TV display in a way that looks perfect to you and not to another. Sure there are color calibration tools, but your eyes may not see it as a computer sees it, as perfect color calibration. Even calibration disks, forget it. No matter how you feel about the NHL, put on a hockey game. The white ice gives you a perfect measurement for contrast against the blue lines and red face off circles. Once you have that your liking, just season the color to your liking. Boom, basic TV calibration, and honestly, your eyes can’t really do much more against these silly TV options. I have a Sony Z9D. Color options like blue/green/red offset/gain, I have never worn glasses, I’m pretty sure my vision is as close to 20/20 as possible, these changes do absolutely nothing to my display against my eyes. Ok, now as far as the 900f, it’s no Z9D, but unless you go OLED, blooming is going to happen. The smallest OLED that I know of is a 55”, but even if you bought a 55” 900f, that price is going to be a lot less than a similar size OLED. As far as the 950g, sure it’s a better TV, especially with ultimate chip, but when the 950g first came out, it was so much more expensive then the 900f, all sizes across the board. Most people will see the 900f as an amazing TV, but if your looking for those imperfections like me, (again I went Z9D even over OLED, because OLEDs are so dim, and ABL on those things are such a bitch) the 900f is an amazing TV at its price point.

      yeah i bought 900f for that reason in a rush as i needed a 4k tv at the time i just regret it and i agree the pro calibration helped a few things with the white levels but all in all it did not do much to improve the performance in hdr and dolby vision, the 950g got more dimming zones, better chip and its brighter than the 900f. Therefore it’s really not worth it getting a 900f for a 100$ price difference at this point over the 950g. Especially if you watch alot in dolby and hdr10.

      Edited 5 years ago: refining
    19. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi, for the 900F just use HDMI port 3 and that will solve al the blooming issues associated with this set.

    20. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      well i got the 49 900f and i gotta say i regret this purchase very much. It’s ok for sdr however, in hdr10 or dolby vision, the tv is almost unwatchable when it has to deal with dark scenes. It only has 25 local dimming zones which if i knew i would of not bought it in the first place. I have the 55 in 950g and it just so much better. I wonder what other cutbacks they made on this model outside of cutting its dimming zones in half from the 55 inch. i got the 49.5 as that what is a good fit for my bedroom but really not cool what sony did to this tv. To answer you the tv blooms alot as it lacks dimming zones . Going to have it tested on the 9th for peak brightness cause i doubt the numbers given on this site are accurate for this size model. To sum it up i bought hdr tv that only performs in sdr very disappointing. Btw… also has washed out colors in hdr. Also wasted another 300$ to have it pro calibrated hoping it would improve the situation it did not.

      Hi, I got a Sony X-900F 49 inch on Tuesday for the living room that performs like a champ. In order to get great picture quality on this television one has to activate its x-motion charity feature on it. I believe the (XMC) is the soul of the 900F. I have a Sony OLED downstairs, and this 49 inch looks that OLED in the eye.

    You have 9/10 free reviews left
    To access
    unlimited full product reviews,
    product prices
    and
    other exclusive site features
    Become an Insider