Marshall Kilburn III vs Middleton II

Which Speaker Is Better?

Products

Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall Middleton II

Tested using Methodology v0.8

Updated Dec 09, 2025 07:20 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.8

Updated Oct 23, 2025 03:20 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
  1. Recommended in 2 articles:
  2. Bluetooth For Sound
  3. Brands

Our Verdict

Marshall Kilburn III

Marshall Middleton II

Whether you should choose the Marshall Kilburn III or Marshall Middleton II depends on your primary usage. The Kilburn III has a longer battery life with a warmer and fuller bass range. It also offers a higher output level and less compression. It offers room correction in addition to EQ tools. Although well built, it's not as portable as the Middleton II, which is smaller with a higher IP67 rating. The Middleton II also has a mic for taking phone calls. It has decently flat tuning, but it's not as boomy. You can EQ it to taste, but keep in mind that its lower max output means that bass frequencies tend to compress a bit more compared to the Kilburn III as you raise the volume. Still, its small size doesn't compromise the soundstage, and it fits more easily into a backpack for on-the-go.

2 

Variants

  • Kilburn III (Black/Brass)
  • Kilburn III (Cream)
  • Middleton II (Black/Brass)
  • Middleton II (Cream)

Check Price

Black/Brass
Kilburn III
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Black/Brass
Middleton II
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Cream
Kilburn III
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Cream
Middleton II
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Main Differences for
Music

Threshold 

0.10

Music 
 

7.5
7.5

Dynamics 
 

7.4
6.2

Frequency Response Accuracy 
 

7.2
7.4

Full Comparison

Design

Style  

Style Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III Style Photo
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II Style Photo

RGB Lights  

No
No
Show Text 

Portability 
 

8.7
8.9

Dimensions Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III Dimensions Photo
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II Dimensions Photo

Volume 
 

418 in³ (6,850 cm³)
141 in³ (2,315 cm³)

Weight 
 

6.2 lbs (2.8 kg)
4.0 lbs (1.8 kg)

Power Source 
 

Battery & USB
Battery & USB

One-Hand Carry 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Build Quality 
 

7.9
8.1

Build Quality Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III Build Quality Photo
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II Build Quality Photo

Material Quality 
 

Great
Good

Water Resistance 
 

Water-resistant (IPx4)
Submersible (IPx7)

Dust Resistance 
 

Dust-Protected (IP5x)
Dust-Proof (IP6x)

Impact Resistance 
 

No
No

Floats In Water 
 

No
Yes
Show Text 

Controls 
 

7.0
8.0

Controls Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III Controls Photo
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II Controls Photo

Controls Photo 2 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III Controls Photo 2
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II Controls Photo 2

Ease Of Use 
 

Great
Great

Feedback 
 

Great
Great

Music Play/Pause 
 

Yes (Physical)
Yes (Physical)

Call Answer/End 
 

No
Yes

Volume Up/Down 
 

Yes (Physical)
Yes (Physical)

Track Next/Previous 
 

Yes (Physical)
Yes (Physical)

Microphone On/Off 
 

No
No

Additional Controls 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

In The Box 
 

In The Box Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III In The Box Photo
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II In The Box Photo
Show Text 
Sound

Frequency Response Accuracy 
 

7.2
7.4

Frequency Response Graph  

See details
See details

Slope 
 

-0.58
0.23

Std. Err. 
 

3.05 dB
2.82 dB

Low-Frequency Extension 
 

51.1 Hz
49.0 Hz

High-Frequency Extension 
 

18.8 kHz
18.8 kHz
Show Text 

Raw Frequency Response 
 

Raw Frequency Response Graph  

See details
See details

Binaural Recording @ 1m 
 

Binaural Recording @ 2m 
 

Soundstage 
 

8.6
9.0

Directivity Graph  

See details
See details

Directivity Index 
 

2.68 dB
1.95 dB

Stereo 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Dynamics 
 

7.4
6.2

Dynamic Range Compression  

See details
See details

SPL @ Max Volume 
 

92.8 dB SPL
86.9 dB SPL

DRC @ Max Volume 
 

2.22 dB
3.19 dB
Show Text 
Active Features

Battery 
 

9.1
8.6

Battery Life 
 

23.8 hrs
10.8 hrs

Charge Time 
 

2.8 hrs
2.7 hrs

Power Saving 
 

Yes
Yes

Charging Port 
 

USB-C
USB-C

Battery Powered 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Voice Assistant 
 

0.0
0.0

Alexa 
 

No
No

Google Assistant 
 

No
No

Speakerphone 
 

No
Yes

Siri 
 

No
No

Voice Assistant 
 

No
No

Voice Activation 
 

No
No

Microphone Mute 
 

No Microphone
No

Far-Field Performance 
 

No Microphone
No Assistant

Ambient Noise Performance 
 

No Microphone
No Assistant
Show Text 

App 
 

4.7
4.7

App Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Marshall Kilburn III App Picture
Compare High-Res
Marshall Middleton II App Picture

App Name 
 

Marshall Bluetooth
Marshall Bluetooth

iOS 
 

Yes
Yes

Android 
 

Yes
Yes

EQ 
 

Graphic + Presets
Graphic + Presets

Stereo Pair Mode 
 

No
No

Party Mode 
 

No
No

Multi-Room 
 

No
No
Show Text 
Connectivity

Wired 
 

Aux Input 
 

Yes
Yes

USB Audio 
 

No
No

Other Ports 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Bluetooth 
 

8.4
8.3

Bluetooth 
 

Yes
Yes

Bluetooth Version 
 

5.3
5.3

Bluetooth iOS Latency 
 

111 ms
123 ms

Bluetooth Android Latency 
 

124 ms
132 ms

Bluetooth Range 
 

334.6 ft (102.0 m)
334.6 ft (102.0 m)

Multi-Device Pairing 
 

2 Devices
2 Devices
Show Text 

Wi-Fi 
 

0.0
0.0

Wi-Fi Version 
 

No Wi-Fi
No Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi Frequency Band 
 

No Wi-Fi
N/A

Wi-Fi 
 

No
No

Apple AirPlay 
 

No
No

AirPlay Latency 
 

N/A
N/A

Google Chromecast 
 

No
No

Chromecast Latency 
 

N/A
N/A

Check Price

Black/Brass
Kilburn III
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Black/Brass
Middleton II
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Cream
Kilburn III
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Cream
Middleton II
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Marshall Kilburn III

Marshall Middleton II

Comments

  1. Comparison

Marshall Kilburn III vs Marshall Middleton II: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Dear Rtings team, I assume most of you are engineers. Could you please explain yourself the logic of how come 3 times bigger (and 1 kg heavier) Kilburn 3 has 0.2 higher portability rate than Middleton 2 just because it has AC connection? Probably I’ve written about those strange calculations a year ago, and nothing changes. OK then, we Rtings followers will consider that speakers with AC connection are more portable than the others :) And these portability ratings also changes “Outdoor” ratings-calculations as well. To have AC connection increase outdoor ratings.

    Hi Bashar, Indeed We haven’t worked on the Speaker test bench for a long time but some improvements should be coming in 2026, I have been focusing on headphone and I am the one engineer in audio team. Actually they score similar, but the Killburn 3 is 0.2 lower not higher. AC Don’t have much weight. The Power Source score for portability is:

    AC Only -0 (this one is a given) Battery & USB -9 Battery and AC -10

    I t was assumed that by a very small margin, ability to plug it in anywhere without a charging block is a small benefit in portability but you would normally lose it in other metrics So yes in this case the AC gives it a small edge, but the Volume and weight is in favor of the Middleton.

    The total Portability score is ventilated that way:

    Volume 25% Weight 25% Power source 40% 1 Hand Carry 10%

    It may be debatable, and appreciate your feedback. We may be generally a bit too generous and give it a steeper curve for Volume and weight. We typically try to make more than cherry picked changes and work on the test bench as a whole, so we’ll definitely take good notes of your interrogations.

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Dear Rtings team, I assume most of you are engineers. Could you please explain yourself the logic of how come 3 times bigger (and 1 kg heavier) Kilburn 3 has 0.2 higher portability rate than Middleton 2 just because it has AC connection? Probably I’ve written about those strange calculations a year ago, and nothing changes. OK then, we Rtings followers will consider that speakers with AC connection are more portable than the others :) And these portability ratings also changes “Outdoor” ratings-calculations as well. To have AC connection increase outdoor ratings.