Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Dec 09, 2025 07:20 PM
Tested using Methodology v0.8
Updated Oct 23, 2025 03:20 PM
Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall Middleton II
Whether you should choose the Marshall Kilburn III or the Marshall Middleton II depends on your primary usage. The Kilburn III has a longer battery life and offers room correction in addition to EQ tools. Although well built, it's not as portable as the Middleton II, which is smaller with a higher IP67 rating. The Middleton II also has a mic for taking phone calls. You can EQ it to taste, but keep in mind that it has a slightly lower max output. Still, it fits more easily into a backpack for on-the-go.
Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall Middleton II
Comments
Marshall Kilburn III vs Marshall Middleton II: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.
Hi Bashar, Indeed We haven’t worked on the Speaker test bench for a long time but some improvements should be coming in 2026, I have been focusing on headphone and I am the one engineer in audio team. Actually they score similar, but the Killburn 3 is 0.2 lower not higher. AC Don’t have much weight. The Power Source score for portability is:
AC Only -0 (this one is a given) Battery & USB -9 Battery and AC -10
I t was assumed that by a very small margin, ability to plug it in anywhere without a charging block is a small benefit in portability but you would normally lose it in other metrics So yes in this case the AC gives it a small edge, but the Volume and weight is in favor of the Middleton.
The total Portability score is ventilated that way:
Volume 25% Weight 25% Power source 40% 1 Hand Carry 10%
It may be debatable, and appreciate your feedback. We may be generally a bit too generous and give it a steeper curve for Volume and weight. We typically try to make more than cherry picked changes and work on the test bench as a whole, so we’ll definitely take good notes of your interrogations.
Dear Rtings team, I assume most of you are engineers. Could you please explain yourself the logic of how come 3 times bigger (and 1 kg heavier) Kilburn 3 has 0.2 higher portability rate than Middleton 2 just because it has AC connection? Probably I’ve written about those strange calculations a year ago, and nothing changes. OK then, we Rtings followers will consider that speakers with AC connection are more portable than the others :) And these portability ratings also changes “Outdoor” ratings-calculations as well. To have AC connection increase outdoor ratings.