Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 23, 2026 02:19 PM
SEE PRICE
Asics.com
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Jun 30, 2026 08:30 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Weight
229.9 g (8.11 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.7 mm
Plate
None
Weight
237.2 g (8.37 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.1 mm
Plate
Plastic Shank
Our Verdict
ASICS MEGABLAST
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra
The Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra and the ASICS MEGABLAST are two of the best cushioned trainers on the market, and worthy rivals in terms of performance and versatility. Both have midsole foam compositions that give them impressive energy return, but the MEGABLAST has a stiffer rocker, making it a bit more responsive. Both have incredible cushioning, but the taller stack of the Li-Ning allows it to continue absorbing more impact over the course of a long run. The deciding factor between these two shoes might be factors other than performance: the Li-Ning is much more competitively priced, but the ASICS has more accommodating sizing.
Variants
- MEGABLAST (Edo Purple/Black - (Men - US 9))
- MEGABLAST (Edo Purple/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Red Hare 9 Ultra (Black - (Women - US 7))
- Red Hare 9 Ultra (Champagne White - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
8.1
8.0
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
7.2
6.9
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
229.9 g (8.11 oz)
237.2 g (8.37 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
44.6 mm
46.2 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
35.9 mm
37.1 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.7 mm
9.1 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
N/A
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
96 mm (3.8")
93 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
80 mm (3.2")
81 mm (3.2")
Outsole Forefoot Width
119 mm (4.7")
117 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.15
2.01
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.31
3.15
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
282 mm (11.1")
273 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
66 mm (2.6")
56 mm (2.2")
Internal Forefoot Width
94 mm (3.7")
92 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
7.9
9.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-3.6 mm (-0.140")
3.4 mm (0.133")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.9 mm (-0.115")
-0.9 mm (-0.037")
Forefoot Fit: Height
8.1
6.0
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.4 mm (-0.093")
-4.8 mm (-0.189")
Arch Fit: Width
8.0
0.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-3.3 mm (-0.130")
-16.7 mm (-0.656")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.4
6.6
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
30 mm (1.2")
22 mm (0.9")
Heel Apex Position
21.7%
30.5%
Heel Rocker Angle
24.8°
13.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.2
7.3
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
50 mm (2.0")
50 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
68.3%
59.3%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
27.8°
22.6°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
Super BOOM Capsule
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
Super BOOM
Secondary Foam Type
PEBA
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
Plastic Shank
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.4
8.4
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
82.9%
83.0%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.3
8.5
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
82.8%
83.9%
Heel Cushioning
9.3
9.4
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
4.35 J
4.25 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
12.12 J
12.56 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
21.19 J
21.97 J
Forefoot Cushioning
9.4
9.5
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
6.16 J
6.51 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
11.21 J
11.59 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
16.62 J
17.07 J
Heel Firmness
5.0
5.2
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
34.4 N/mm
36.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
42.6 N/mm
43.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
59.2 N/mm
59.2 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
5.0
4.1
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
47.0 N/mm
42.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
59.1 N/mm
54.6 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
81 N/mm
75 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.9
9.3
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
10.19 J
11.07 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
9.98 J
10.79 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
9.84 J
10.63 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
9.74 J
10.49 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.5
5.8
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
99 N
58 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.9
8.5
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
70.9%
76.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.8
7.0
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
16.1 N/mm
14.2 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
316 N
244 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
ASICS MEGABLAST
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra
Comments
ASICS MEGABLAST vs Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.