New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v14  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Jan 05, 2026 at 02:09pm
Test bench update Mar 25, 2026 at 10:05am
Tested using Methodology v0.10 
New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v14

Track

6.4
Marathon Racing 
5.8
5K/10K Racing 
4.9
Energy Return 
7.7
Cushioning 
7.7
Lateral Stability 
8.2
True To Size 

Track

 3
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by New Balance 1080v15

We've tested these running shoes to expand our database and allow users to compare results to help with their buying decisions. We don't expect to write a full review, but if you have any questions about this product, please let us know.

Our Verdict

6.4
Marathon Racing 
5.8
5K/10K Racing 
4.9
Energy Return 
7.7
Cushioning 
7.7
Lateral Stability 
8.2
True To Size 
  • 6.4
    Marathon Racing
  • 5.8
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 4.9
    Energy Return
  • 7.7
    Cushioning
  • 7.7
    Lateral Stability
  • 8.2
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Mar 25, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.10, adding a new set of fit tests to the Design section and an overall fit performance usage. Check out the details in our changelog.
    2.  Updated Jan 05, 2026: Review published.
    3.  Updated May 22, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated May 06, 2025: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    HOKA Bondi 9

    Track

    The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v14 and HOKA Bondi 9 are two comfort-focused daily trainers, each built rather differently. The Fresh Foam in the New Balance is very soft, but it can feel like running on sand, as it gives back much less of the energy you put into it. The HOKA has even more cushioning than the New Balance, but its foam bounces back much better. The standard version of the New Balance fits a bit more snugly than the HOKA, but both shoes are available in Wide versions.

    ASICS NOVABLAST 5

    Track

    The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v14 and ASICS NOVABLAST 5 are both cushioned daily trainers, but they deliver that comfort in very different ways. The ASICS feels like the more modern option, pairing generous cushioning with noticeable bounce to create a fun, protective ride that stays lively for daily miles and steady efforts. The New Balance comes in heavier with a lower drop and focuses more squarely on cushioning and reliability, offering a stable, predictable platform that prioritizes comfort over energy return.

    New Balance 1080v15

    Track

    The New Balance X 1080v15 is a major update to the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v14. After several years of relatively minor updates, the 15th iteration of the 1080 series replaced the entire midsole, getting rid of the actual Fresh Foam and replacing it with a bouncier, supercritical component that New Balance calls Infinion. This makes the v15 a much livelier daily trainer, with more cushioning in the heel. While it's a worthwhile upgrade over the v14, it's not without tradeoffs: the softer foam of the v15 bottoms out a bit faster during long runs, and the forefoot doesn't provide as much protection against heavy impacts.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    5.1
    Weight
    Weight
    283.6 g (10.00 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    37.9 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    32.8 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    5.1 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    93 mm (3.7")
    Outsole Arch Width
    75 mm (3.0")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    117 mm (4.6")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.45
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.57
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    277 mm (10.9")
    Internal Heel Width
    69 mm (2.7")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    9.3
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    -0.1 mm (-0.004")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -3.0 mm (-0.117")
    5.9
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -4.9 mm (-0.193")
    3.0
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -8.6 mm (-0.339")
    10
    Length Fit
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Semi-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    3.6
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    70.2%
    5.5
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    72.6%
    7.6
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.47 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.24 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    15.89 J
    7.8
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.97 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    8.38 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    12.11 J
    5.5
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    52.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    111.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    234.3 N/mm
    8.1
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    103.9 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    218.5 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    438.3 N/mm
    7.0
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.66 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.44 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    7.33 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    7.23 J