Nike Structure Plus  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Mar 24, 2026 at 03:03pm
Tested using Methodology v0.10 
Nike Structure Plus

Track

6.5
Marathon Racing 
5.8
5K/10K Racing 
5.6
Energy Return 
7.5
Cushioning 
7.5
Lateral Stability 
9.1
True To Size 

Track

 0

The Nike Structure Plus is Nike's attempt at building a support trainer that feels cushioned and protective without crossing into the harsher, restrictive territory that has long defined the support trainer category. While the Structure Plus does use a top layer of ZoomX, don't let that fool you into expecting a particularly bouncy ride, as the ReactX bottom layer dampens the experience and shifts the focus toward protection and stability. Guidance comes from a broad base, especially the tall sidewalls wrapping the foot through the heel and midfoot on both the medial and lateral sides, which help the foot sit down into the platform for a more supportive feel that still avoids feeling overly corrective. In Nike's current lineup, it sits as the more cushioned stability-oriented option for easy miles and long runs, while the regular Nike Structure 26 remains the simpler, firmer support trainer.

Our Verdict

6.5
Marathon Racing 

The Nike Structure Plus isn't designed as a marathon racing shoe. Its cushioned platform and steady support can help keep things comfortable over long distances, but the ride feels too heavy and too muted to work well for racing, especially compared with shoes built to help you hold faster paces more efficiently. That said, for runners with pronation issues who need some guidance, it's a reasonable option for marathon training and one of the better choices in the support-trainer category.

Pros
  • Very protective heel cushioning.

  • Broad, stable platform.

Cons
  • Quite heavy.

  • Not a bouncy shoe.

5.8
5K/10K Racing 

The Nike Structure Plus isn't well-suited to 5K and 10K racing, where its bulky feel and lack of rebound become more obvious. Its forefoot is fairly firm, but that firmness is there to reinforce stability, not to create a snappy toe-off, and it isn't paired with the kind of aggressive geometry that helps a shoe feel efficient and race-ready. This is a support trainer first and foremost, not a shoe designed for chasing fast times.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Quite heavy.

  • Not a bouncy shoe.

5.6
Energy Return 

The Nike Structure Plus has a fairly dull, dampened ride that prioritizes control over excitement. There's a bit more life up front than at the heel, but overall, it doesn't do much to spring you forward. That restrained character fits the shoe's supportive intent, though it also means the prominent ZoomX branding on the midsole is bigger than any bounce it delivers.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Not a bouncy shoe.

7.5
Cushioning 

The Nike Structure Plus offers good cushioning that feels protective. The heel is especially well cushioned, helping to significantly dampen the ride, especially for heel strikers. The forefoot offers decent protection but won't feel as plush as the heel. Overall, it doesn't reach the absorption levels of the best max-cushion trainers, but it does a good job of blending comfort with control.

Pros
  • Very protective heel cushioning.

Cons
  • Forefoot cushioning is only decent.

7.5
Lateral Stability 

The Nike Structure Plus feels reassuringly stable for a fairly tall trainer, with a wide base, firm forefoot foam, and pronounced sidewalls that help keep the foot centered through the heel and midfoot. This gives the shoe a steady, supportive character that works especially well for easy runs, longer outings, and runners who appreciate guidance without an overly intrusive sensation.

Pros
  • Broad, stable platform.

  • Firm forefoot helps keep the ride steady.

Cons
None
9.1
True To Size 

The Nike Structure Plus fits true to size overall, and most runners should be fine going with their usual size. The toebox is fairly wide, so it doesn't feel too cramped side to side, but it lacks some vertical room, which can make the fit feel a bit shallow over the toes. Outside of that lower forefoot height, the rest of the shoe fits as expected and should feel comfortable but secure for most people.

Pros
  • Fits true to size in length.

  • Roomy toe box width.

Cons
  • Toe box doesn't have a lot of vertical room.

  • 6.5
    Marathon Racing
  • 5.8
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 5.6
    Energy Return
  • 7.5
    Cushioning
  • 7.5
    Lateral Stability
  • 9.1
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Mar 24, 2026: Review published.
    2.  Updated Mar 17, 2026: Early access published.
    3.  Updated Mar 11, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Feb 16, 2026: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the Nike Structure Plus in men's U.S. size 9, as noted on the label for our pair. The pair we purchased is the Iron Purple/Off-Noir/Sail/Voltage Green. This shoe is available in a variety of other colorways, depending on the region, including White/Pure Platinum/Volt/Black, White/Sail/Sea Glass/White, and Tattoo/Hot Lava/Black/Silver. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Nike Structure Plus is a cushioned support trainer that tries to make stability feel less harsh and old-school than other shoes in that category, using a plush ZoomX top layer, a firmer ReactX carrier, and tall sidewalls to deliver guidance in a modern way. More broadly, it sits between two types of stable shoes in the market. On one side are classic support trainers like the ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32, Saucony Guide 18, and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25, which rely heavily on corrective features and often give up some softness, freedom, and fun in the process. On the other side are neutral trainers that can feel naturally stable by design but don't offer any real guidance features, like the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 or Nike's own Pegasus Plus. In that sense, the Structure Plus ends up fairly close in concept to the Saucony Hurricane 25, because both rely on sidewalls and geometry rather than firm corrective posts, though the Hurricane is the more cushioned and bouncier shoe of the two. 

    Within Nike's daily training lineup, the brand splits things into three silos: Structure as the support trainers, Pegasus for bounce, and Vomero as the cushioning-focused family. Each of those silos now has a standard version, namely the Nike Structure 26, Nike Pegasus 41, and Nike Vomero 18, while the Plus tier adds more ZoomX to the mix with the Nike Structure Plus, Nike Pegasus Plus, and Nike Vomero Plus. There's also the Nike Pegasus Premium and Nike Vomero Premium, built around a large Air Zoom unit. While the Nike Structure Premium is the only trainer that still hasn't been officially confirmed, the very idea of a stability shoe built around a large malleable Air Zoom unit feels a bit counterintuitive, so if that sounds odd to you, you're not alone. 

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best Nike running shoes and the best running shoes overall.

    Nike Structure 26

    Track

    The Nike Structure Plus and Nike Structure 26 share the same support-shoe DNA, but the Plus feels like a Structure on steroids in almost every way except outright support features. The Structure Plus sits higher and delivers more cushioning, using a top layer of ZoomX over its support platform to create a softer, more premium, more protective ride. The Structure 26, by contrast, uses a full ReactX midsole and stays lower to the ground, which gives it a classic support-trainer feel with a steadier, traditional sense of guidance. Even though both are in a similar weight range, the Structure 26 feels more grounded and support-focused, while the Structure Plus is the better fit if you want a more cushioned and balanced take on the category.

    Saucony Hurricane 25

    Track

    The Nike Structure Plus and Saucony Hurricane 25 are both mild support trainers that manage to add guidance features without making the usual big sacrifices in cushioning and comfort. The Nike has a higher 10 mm drop and a ride that feels more in line with a classic support shoe, just with more cushioning than the category usually offers. The Saucony pushes further into the modern side of things, delivering much more cushioning and noticeably more bounce from the midsole while staying in a similar weight range. It also uses a lower-drop setup, which gives it a less traditional feel overall.

    Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

    Track

    The Nike Structure Plus and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 are both support trainers built to help correct overpronation, and both use raised sidewalls to guide the foot, but the Adrenaline GTS 25 is the more support-oriented shoe. That's because it pairs its GuideRails system with a firmer, more prescriptive midsole that can feel harsh, but is more effective at guiding the foot cleanly through the stride. The Structure Plus takes a more comfort-oriented approach, using a dual-layer midsole with a ZoomX top layer to create a more cushioned, plusher ride that feels less corrective and more accommodating underfoot. Both are high-drop shoes, though the Brooks goes even further in that direction with a 12 mm drop. 

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    4.8
    Weight
    Weight
    290.9 g (10.26 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    41.8 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    31.7 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    10.1 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    10.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    95 mm (3.7")
    Outsole Arch Width
    82 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    117 mm (4.6")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.27
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.69
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    281 mm (11.1")
    Internal Heel Width
    68 mm (2.7")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    9.5
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    0.1 mm (0.004")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -2.5 mm (-0.098")
    4.5
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -6.5 mm (-0.255")
    7.5
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -4.0 mm (-0.159")
    10
    Length Fit
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    4.3
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    71.0%
    6.2
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    73.9%
    8.0
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.26 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    10.11 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    17.60 J
    7.0
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.15 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    7.40 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    11.29 J
    5.0
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    52.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    97.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    208.0 N/mm
    8.1
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    116.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    212.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    402.3 N/mm
    6.5
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.02 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    6.90 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    6.83 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    6.78 J