Saucony Hurricane 25   Review

Reviewed Nov 14, 2025 at 10:31 am
Latest change: Test bench update Oct 02, 2026 at 08:59 am
Tested using  Methodology v0.15 
Saucony Hurricane 25
7.2
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
5.9
5K/10K Racing 
7.7
Long Run 
8.0
Daily Training 

Track

0

The Saucony Hurricane 25 is an impressive shoe that works as both a stability shoe and a max-cushioned trainer. Saucony has several stability trainers, and the Hurricane series is the more cushioned alternative to the Ride and Omni series. The Hurricane 25 is great for runners who want just a bit of guidance to correct over-pronation, without the rigid feel of a traditional stability trainer. The excellent cushioning and gentle rocker make it a great long run shoe, but its construction is heavy, so it could feel sluggish if you're trying to push the pace.

✅ Buy If:❌ Skip If:
  • You need a stable running shoe, but don't want to sacrifice comfort.
  • You want to do long runs but are concerned about maintaining good form.
  • You're looking for a shoe for fast workouts or races.
  • You need maximum support to correct over-pronation.

Our Verdict

7.2
Half/Full Marathon Racing

The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a decent shoe for covering the marathon distance. The cushioning is very supportive over long distances, and the midsole returns enough energy to keep you bouncing along for the full distance. This is not a shoe built for speed, though, and it will feel bulky if you are trying to push the pace, especially on tired legs.

Pros
  • Great cushioning over long distances.

Cons
  • Heavy build makes picking up the pace feel laborious.

5.9
5K/10K Racing

The Saucony Hurricane 25 is not a racing shoe, and a competitive 5k or 10k will expose its limitations. Although the foam layer provides some bounce, the shoe's weight makes picking up the pace feel more laborious.

Pros
Cons
  • Heavy build makes picking up the pace feel laborious.

  • Soft forefoot doesn't offer the firm platform needed for quick, snappy turnover.

7.7
Long Run

The Saucony Hurricane 25 holds up well over long runs. Its stability stays dependable as your legs tire, and the cushioning is still excellent even after 40 km of simulated pounding in our long run test. The shoe's weight is the only drawback, adding a bit of extra effort to each stride as your legs get tired.

Pros
  • Great cushioning over long distances.

  • Stability stays dependable even as your legs tire.

Cons
  • Heavier build adds a bit of extra effort to each stride.

8.0
Daily Training

The Saucony Hurricane 25 is an excellent daily trainer. Good stability and excellent cushioning combine to make it a dependable, protective option for everyday miles. The smooth rocker also helps heel strikers transition comfortably from landing through midstance. Its main downside for everyday use is its weight, which is on the heavier side and can make easy runs feel more like a workout than in lighter daily trainers.

Pros
  • Excellent cushioning for everyday miles.

  • Smooth heel rocker makes for comfortable transitions.

Cons
  • Heavier build adds a bit of extra effort to each stride.

  • 7.2
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 5.9
    5K/10K Racing
  • 7.7
    Long Run
  • 8.0
    Daily Training
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Oct 02, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.15, which replaces Responsiveness with three specific performance usages: Bounciness, Snappiness, and Roll. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    2.  Updated Sep 17, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.14, which adds new lace-specific results. We've included a close-up photo of the laces, as well as details including lace type, width, thickness, and stretch. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    3.  Updated Jun 30, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.13, which identifies the different foams used in the shoe's midsole. We've included a microscopic image of the foam cells to give you an idea of what the microstructure looks like. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    4.  Updated Jun 17, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.12, which fixes how we measure firmness, a component of the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages. There may be inconsistencies between the text and the scores for these usages, but the scores should still be considered valid. We've also brought back the Energy Return score and added two new usages: Daily Training and Long Run. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've bought and tested more than 300 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs. 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    7.7

    Energy Return

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 gives back a strong share of the energy you put into it, particularly up front, where the forefoot does an impressive job returning the force you load into it at toe-off, giving it a lively feel. The heel is a bit more muted by comparison, but it still gives back a decent amount of rebound on landing.

    2 tests
    8.0
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return

    The forefoot of the Saucony Hurricane 25 gives impressive rebound, feeling more like a trampoline than a stability shoe. Although it's not quite as bouncy as the ASICS MEGABLAST, it's much closer to a shoe like this than to the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 or ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32.

    7.0
    Heel Compression Energy Return

    The energy return in the heel of the Saucony Hurricane 25 is decent across the categories in which it might be placed, outperforming other stability shoes and max-cushioned trainers and offering much livelier, more fluid transitions.

    7.7

    Stability

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 has good lateral stability. The reasonably wide base and secure upper combine with the shoe's mild stability features to deliver a smooth, confident ride.

    Pros
    • Midsole strikes good balance between softness and stability.

    • Wide platform.

    Cons
    4 tests
    5.4
    Forefoot Firmness

    The forefoot of the Saucony Hurricane 25 is decently firm and becomes proportionally firmer as the pace picks up, but is still nowhere near as rigid as dedicated stability shoes like the Nike Structure 26 or ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32.

    7.4
    Heel Firmness

    The heel of the Saucony Hurricane 25 is not very firm, even when lots of force is applied. This makes the shoe feel forgiving for heel strikers, but less inherently stable.

    8.4

    Cushioning

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 has excellent cushioning. Although it doesn't feel squishy-soft, the midsole does an impressive job of absorbing impact and continues to protect your legs even as the miles pile up.

    Pros
    • Great cushioning over long distances.

    • Midsole strikes good balance between softness and stability.

    Cons
    3 tests
    8.0
    Heel Cushioning

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 is very forgiving for heel strikers, offering better protection than comfort-oriented daily trainers like the Nike Vomero 18, HOKA Bondi 9, or ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27.

    8.9
    Forefoot Cushioning

    The forefoot of the Saucony Hurricane 25 is incredibly soft from the first step, even for a max-cushioned daily trainer. It does become stiffer as the pace increases, but it remains very protective.

    7.0

    Bounciness

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 is bouncier up front than it is at the back. The forefoot compresses noticeably deeper under load and gives back more of the energy you put into it, producing a springy, lively sensation at toe-off. The heel is comparatively restrained, so heel landings feel more subdued than push-offs.

    Pros
    • Very lively forefoot.

    Cons
    2 tests
    6.2
    Heel Compression Depth
    7.1
    Forefoot Compression Depth
    6.9

    Snappiness

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 is reasonably snappy. The forefoot gives back a good chunk of the energy stored in its forefoot as it bends and resists that bending with decent stiffness, so there's a reasonable amount of pop at toe-off. It's held back by a fairly soft forefoot, though, which doesn't offer a very firm platform for push-off.

    3 tests
    7.3
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    6.8
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    7.3

    Roll

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 rolls through the stride decently. Its rocker holds its shape fairly well under load, and the forefoot stays stiff enough to keep the roll through toe-off fairly consistent. The geometry of the forefoot rocker isn't that pronounced, so it doesn't add a dramatic extra push, but the heel is beveled enough to help heel strikers roll through to midstance.

    3 tests
    7.4
    Rocker Stiffness
    Stack Heights
    9.8

    True To Size

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 fits almost perfectly, spot on. The length is true to size, and the width is appropriate from the heel through the forefoot, though there's a Wide version of the shoe for runners with wider feet. The shoe doesn't have much volume in the forefoot, but it's not excessively cramped. Most runners should stick to their usual size.

    4 tests
    10
    Length Fit
    9.8
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Additional Tests
    4 tests
    4.7
    Design Weight

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 has shed weight compared to the Saucony Hurricane 24 and certainly feels much nimbler than its predecessor.

    Design Internal Shape

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a genre-bending shoe that combines mild stability features and max cushioning. It's decidedly gentle in its approach to correcting over-pronation, so if you need more dedicated guidance, check out the Nike Structure 26. If you like Saucony's approach to stability, but don't need as much cushioning, check out the Saucony Guide 19. If you want a max-cushioned shoe that's much lighter and peppier, check out the Dynafish Xiaonian.

    For more options from Saucony, check out our recommendations for the best Saucony running shoes. If you're open to other brands, see our overall picks for the best running shoes.

    Saucony Triumph 23

    If you don't need support for overpronation, the Saucony Triumph 23 is a better shoe than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's lighter, has slightly better energy return, and can handle more weekly miles. It's also more stable. That said, the Hurricane 25 uses built-in support features to stop inward ankle roll, so if you need a dedicated stability shoe, it's the better pick.

    Saucony Guide 19

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a better shoe than the Saucony Guide 19 for most runners. It's much more cushioned and bouncier, making it the pick for runners who want a comfortable stability shoe for daily training and long runs. The Guide 19 is firmer and noticeably more stable, with a wider base under the arch, so it's the better choice for runners whose feet tend to roll inward and who need as much support as possible.

    HOKA Bondi 9

    The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a better shoe than the HOKA Bondi 9. It's bouncier and more stable while still being very well cushioned, making it the pick for runners who want one shoe for daily use, long runs, and the occasional faster workout. The Bondi 9 is slightly softer, so it's the better choice for runners who only want maximum comfort.

    Saucony Hurricane 26

    The Saucony Hurricane 26 is a slightly better support shoe than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's significantly lighter and a touch more cushioned and energetic. The Hurricane 25 is still a great, deeply cushioned, and very stable shoe, and most runners won't notice much of a difference underfoot.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the Saucony Hurricane 25 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label for our pair, in the Shadow/ViZi colorway. The shoe is also available in numerous other colorways, depending on your region. Like many other Saucony shoes, the Hurricane 25 is available in Regular and Wide versions for both men and women. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.