Salomon Aero Glide 4  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Jun 11, 2026 at 11:34am
Tested using Methodology v0.10 
Salomon Aero Glide 4

Track

7.5
Marathon Racing 
6.2
5K/10K Racing 
7.9
Energy Return 
8.8
Cushioning 
7.0
Lateral Stability 
9.5
True To Size 

Track

 0

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 is Salomon's max-cushioned shoe for runners who want plenty of protection without the sluggish feel that can come with this category. Its updated TBU-based OptiFOAM² midsole gives it a well-balanced ride that makes it a jack of all trades for daily mileage, long runs, and tempo efforts. It has enough bounce to pick up the pace when needed, but it's heavier than the Salomon Aero Glide 3, so it feels less nimble and less effortless at faster speeds. Its grip is also reassuring for a road shoe, and while the cushioning feels protective and comfortable for long runs, it does lose a bit of that plush feel late into longer efforts.

Our Verdict

7.5
Marathon Racing 

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 isn't designed for marathon racing, but it can work for runners who want a protective shoe rather than a dedicated racing shoe. Its excellent cushioning and good energy return help it feel comfortable and reasonably lively through extended efforts, and the high stack gives it plenty of underfoot protection. However, its heavier build and lack of a plate make it feel less efficient and less propulsive than true marathon racers, so it fits better as a long-run shoe than a performance-focused marathon option.

Pros
  • Lively midsole returns energy well.

  • Excellent impact absorption.

Cons
  • Too heavy to feel efficient for faster efforts.

6.2
5K/10K Racing 

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 isn't designed for 5K or 10K racing. Its midsole has enough bounce to handle tempo efforts and workouts, but the shoe is too heavy and not aggressive enough to feel at home at very fast paces. It works better as a cushioned daily trainer that can pick up the pace than as a lightweight, fast-turnover shoe for shorter races.

Pros
  • Lively midsole returns energy well.

Cons
  • Too heavy to feel efficient for faster efforts.

7.9
Energy Return 

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 has good energy return, thanks to its updated TPU-based midsole, giving it a bouncy feel that adds some life to daily miles and helps when picking up the pace for tempo efforts. The forefoot feels especially bouncy, so the ride has more pop than many max-cushioned trainers and doesn't feel dull underfoot. However, the shoe still feels fairly cumbersome, so it isn't the most efficient option for faster workouts at top-end speeds.

Pros
  • Lively midsole returns energy well.

  • Forefoot feels especially bouncy.

Cons
None
8.8
Cushioning 

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 delivers excellent cushioning, with a very protective feel under both the heel and forefoot. This makes it a good option for most strike patterns, though heel strikers will find it especially buoyant. It has enough stack to absorb impact well during daily mileage and long runs, making it a strong option for runners who want a comfortable, high-cushion platform. That said, while the cushioning is clearly one of its biggest strengths, it won't feel quite as plush late into longer efforts.

Pros
  • Excellent impact absorption.

Cons
None
7.0
Lateral Stability 

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 has decent lateral stability for a soft, high-stack trainer. Its broad outsole and secure upper help offset some of the instability that can come from its tall and cushioned platform. However, it still doesn't feel as planted as lower, firmer, or more structured daily trainers, so it's best suited to runners who don't need extra stability or guidance.

Pros
  • Wide platform keeps your foot planted.

  • Length is spot-on.

Cons
  • Soft foam can make the ride a bit wobbly.

9.5
True To Size 

The Salomon Aero Glide 4 fits true to size overall, so most runners can confidently choose their usual size. Its length and arch fit are accurate, and the forefoot width is accommodating enough for most runners. However, the forefoot height is only okay, so runners with higher-volume feet may feel some pressure over the top of the toebox.

Pros
  • Fit is accurate overall.

Cons
  • Could use a bit more space above the toes.

  • 7.5
    Marathon Racing
  • 6.2
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.9
    Energy Return
  • 8.8
    Cushioning
  • 7.0
    Lateral Stability
  • 9.5
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jun 11, 2026: Review published.
    2.  Updated Jun 08, 2026: Early access published.
    3.  Updated Mar 24, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Feb 25, 2026: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the Salomon Aero Glide 4 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label for our pair, in the Bluing/White/Black colorway. It's available in different colorways, depending on your region. There's also a GRVL edition with a different lacing system and an outsole that's meant to add extra grip for traction when you wander off the beaten path. We haven't tested this GRVL model as we don't yet have a traction test. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Salomon Aero Glide 4 is a max-cushioned daily trainer that sits between soft, protective daily shoes and livelier trainers built to handle some faster work. In the broader market, it overlaps with shoes like the Nike Vomero Plus and the PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 as a high-stack trainer made for comfort and longer runs, but it feels lighter, less purely plush, and more rebound-focused than those options. It also shares some ground with lighter, more energetic trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Azura or the original Mizuno Neo Zen, though the Salomon's heavier build means it doesn't have the same quick, easy turnover when the pace gets faster. Its cushioning is very protective, but it loses some plushness late into longer efforts. The ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 is a better option if your long runs regularly stretch very long.

    Within the French brand's growing road lineup, it sits below the Salomon S/LAB Phantasm 3, which is the brand's dedicated super shoe, and above the Salomon Aero Blaze 3 in terms of stack and protection, as the Aero Blaze 3 is a lighter, lower-stacked trainer built for faster workouts.

    If you're looking for more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes and the best long-distance running shoes.

    Salomon Aero Glide 3

    Track

    The Salomon Aero Glide 4 and Salomon Aero Glide 3 represent two generations of the shoe that turned the Aero Glide line into a serious max-cushion option. The Aero Glide 3 is lighter and feels a bit more planted underfoot, giving it a slightly more restrained character. Even if the Aero Glide 4 gained weight, it moves things further forward, with a bouncier and more cushioned ride that feels softer and more protective overall. It also fits more true to size, whereas the previous version tended to run a bit long.

     

    Salomon Aero Blaze 3

    Track

    The Salomon Aero Glide 4 and Salomon Aero Blaze 3 sit in different parts of a training rotation despite sharing some family traits. The Aero Glide 4 is a max-cushion trainer built around comfort and protection, with a higher stack, a bouncier ride, and better long-run cushioning. The Aero Blaze 3 is the lighter and more workout-oriented option, sitting closer to the ground and offering more road feel, which makes it feel more nimble during faster efforts. While both can handle daily mileage, the Aero Glide 4 is better suited to easy runs and long outings, whereas the Aero Blaze 3 shines when the pace picks up.

    PUMA MagMax NITRO 2

    Track

    The Salomon Aero Glide 4 and PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 are both max-cushion trainers built for easy miles and long runs, but they achieve that role differently. The Aero Glide 4 feels bouncier and more energetic, with a ride that encourages a bit more rhythm and flow despite its high stack. The MagMax NITRO 2 leans further into pure cushioning, delivering a more substantial and deeply protective feel, especially over longer distances. The Salomon is also lighter and feels less cumbersome when picking up the pace, while the PUMA prioritizes comfort and impact absorption above all else.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    6.2
    Weight
    Weight
    255.5 g (9.01 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    42.5 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    32.8 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    9.7 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    90 mm (3.5")
    Outsole Arch Width
    74 mm (2.9")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    112 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.11
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.41
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    280 mm (11.0")
    Internal Heel Width
    66 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    8.9
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    3.7 mm (0.146")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -2.2 mm (-0.087")
    5.7
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -5.1 mm (-0.202")
    10
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    0.6 mm (0.022")
    10
    Length Fit
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    7.6
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    78.8%
    8.0
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    80.6%
    9.0
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.84 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    11.86 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    19.72 J
    8.5
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    5.03 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    9.37 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    14.12 J
    4.2
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    41.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    87.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    218.9 N/mm
    6.9
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    85.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    173.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    334.2 N/mm
    7.6
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    8.44 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    8.20 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    8.02 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    7.90 J