Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed May 25, 2026 at 01:51pm
Writing modified Jul 07, 2026 at 04:02pm
Tested using Methodology v0.12 
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo

Track

7.8
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
7.1
5K/10K Racing 
7.7
Long Run 
8.0
Daily Training 
7.6
Energy Return 
7.5
Responsiveness 
9.0
Cushioning 
6.7
Stability 

Track

 3

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo is a high-stack performance trainer built for runners who want a rockered shoe for their faster training. Its FastTech+ ATPU foam sits above a firmer EVA-based carrier, which the brand markets as False Plate technology, though in practice, it's simply a classic dual-layer midsole setup. This gives the midsole a structured, controlled feel, while the top layer adds some rebound for tempo runs, steady long runs, and pace changes. Because it has no plate, the shoe relies solely on its foam and geometry for propulsion, but its aggressive rocker makes it surprisingly rolling at top-end speeds. Despite its high stack, the shoe stays quite light thanks to the thin, sock-like upper, and its broad platform helps keep the tall midsole relatively stable underfoot. For Decathlon's running label, it fills a missing middle in the lineup: a serious performance trainer that sits between Kiprun's more basic shoes and its plated, race-focused super shoes.

Our Verdict

7.8
Half/Full Marathon Racing 

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo is good enough for racing a marathon, though it won't feel as efficient as a dedicated long-distance super shoe. Its high stack height and excellent cushioning provide the protection needed for longer efforts, though the midsole itself feels more firm than plush. Also, the good energy return helps it feel reasonably lively when you settle into a steady rhythm. However, it lacks a plate, and its weight isn't super impressive by modern racing standards, so it won't feel as efficient and race-focused as true super shoes over marathon distances.

Pros
  • Fantastic underfoot protection.

  • Tall stack height.

  • Good bounce from the midosle.

Cons
  • No plate.

  • Not especially light for racing.

7.1
5K/10K Racing 

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo is a passable choice for 5K/10K racing. Its good energy return and reasonably light build help it pick up the pace better than a standard daily trainer, but the forefoot feels only moderately firm, and the lack of a plate limits its snap at faster speeds. It can handle shorter races if you want a single shoe for training and occasional racing, but it won't feel as snappy and efficient as a dedicated 5K/10K racer.

Pros
  • Good bounce from the midosle.

Cons
  • No plate.

  • Not especially light for racing.

  • Not the snappiest forefoot.

8.0
Daily Training 
7.6
Energy Return 
7.5
Responsiveness 

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo has good energy return. Its forefoot feels more energetic than the heel, which helps it come alive under load during tempo efforts or faster strides. The heel still feels only decent by comparison, but the midsole gives the shoe enough rebound to feel quite performance-oriented overall.

Pros
  • Good bounce from the midosle.

Cons
9.0
Cushioning 

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo has superb cushioning. Its tall midsole provides plenty of protection under both the heel and forefoot, making it a great option for runners who want a well-cushioned shoe for long runs, steady mileage, or harder efforts where impact protection still matters. That said, it doesn't have an extremely soft, sink-in feel, and its performance-oriented geometry can make it feel a bit harsher on easy miles than its cushioning score suggests. Still, it delivers a very protective underfoot experience, making it suitable for long runs.

Pros
  • Fantastic underfoot protection.

  • Tall stack height.

Cons
6.7
Stability 

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo is quite stable overall. Its wide outsole under the forefoot and sock-like gusseted tongue help keep the foot feel locked-down and planted. However, the softer, narrow heel makes the rearfoot a bit less supportive, so heel strikers or runners who need a very planted platform may notice some instability when cornering, running tired, or landing farther back. Still, this level of stability will be enough for most runners.

Pros
  • Stable forefoot platform.

Cons
  • No plate.

  • Soft heel feels less planted when landing.

8.0
True To Size 

The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo fits true to size overall, but it runs quite long. There's enough room at the arch to avoid feeling restrictive; however, the extra length makes the lockdown less precise, especially for faster efforts, and the lower forefoot height may feel a bit cramped despite the generous width.

Pros
Cons
  • Runs long.

  • Low forefoot height.

  • 7.8
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 7.1
    5K/10K Racing
  • 7.7
    Long Run
  • 8.0
    Daily Training

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.6
    Energy Return
  • 7.5
    Responsiveness
  • 9.0
    Cushioning
  • 6.7
    Stability
  • 8.0
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 07, 2026: 

      We've updated the Popular Comparisons section to add more context to Kiprun's running line-up and help distinguish between their racing shoe options.

    2.  Updated Jun 22, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.12, which fixes how we measure firmness, a component of the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages. There may be inconsistencies between the text and the scores for these usages, but the scores should still be considered valid. We've also brought back the Energy Return score and added two new usages: Daily Training and Long Run. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    3.  Updated Jun 22, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.11, adding two new rocker measurements to the Design section, and three new responsiveness tests to the Performance section. The Energy Return usage score has been replaced with Responsiveness. Check out the details in our changelog.
    4.  Updated May 25, 2026: Review published.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo in men's US size 9, and here's the label for our pair. The pair we purchased is the Foggy blue / fluo neon pink, but you can also buy the shoe in other colors, depending on the region. This shoe isn't available in wide widths. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo is a high-stack, unplated uptempo trainer built for runners who want a cushioned but responsive shoe for workouts, faster daily training, and long runs with pace changes. In the broader market, it sits near unplated performance trainers like the R.A.D UFO and the On Cloudmonster 3 Hyper, since they all use a dual-layered midsole to balance bounce and control without relying on a plate. The Kipstorm Tempo's top ATPU layer adds the livelier, more responsive feel, while the firmer CMEVA carrier helps stabilize the tall platform. The ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 is an even better dual-density option if you want stronger long-distance protection with similar pace versatility, though it isn't quite as nimble as the Kiprun.

    Within Kiprun's lineup, this model is part of a broader reset around clearer road-running categories and more serious midsole compounds. The Kipstorm Tempo falls within their faster-running range, below more race-focused models like the Kiprun Kipstorm Challenger, the most versatile racing shoe, and the Kiprun Kipstorm Elite, the more accessible racing option. On the other end, the Kiprun Kipride and Kiprun Kipride Max cover daily training and cushioned mileage.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, as well as the best long-distance running shoes and the best shoes for running a marathon.

    Dynafish Xiaonian

    Track

    The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo and Dynafish Xiaonian are both versatile trainers that can handle daily mileage but feel most at home during uptempo running. The Dynafish is lighter and uses a full-length TPEE midsole that feels much bouncier and more energetic overall, while still providing plenty of protection for longer runs. The Kiprun is higher stacked, with its FastTech+ A-TPU foam sitting above a firmer EVA-based carrier layer, creating a more controlled ride that feels slightly less propulsive. It also has quite an aggressive geometry that feels less forgiving.

    ASICS MEGABLAST

    Track

    The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo and ASICS MEGABLAST are two versatile shoes with similar weight, but they have a few important differences. The ASICS uses a full slab of A-TPU foam rather than just a top layer, which helps make it more cushioned and slightly more responsive overall. Its ride relies heavily on the midsole's bounce, giving it a more energetic, dynamic feel underfoot. The Kiprun takes a slightly more restrained approach, with a ride that feels a bit more conventional and controlled, as the shoe relies more on its aggressive geometry to help you generate propulsion. Meanwhile, the Kiprun's mesh upper gives it a more breathable and stripped-back feel.

    ASICS SUPERBLAST 3

    Track

    The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo and ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 are both marketed as versatile shoes for a wide range of distances and paces, and both use an A-TPU top layer over an EVA-based carrier. In practice, the ASICS pushes that formula further: it has a higher stack, more cushioning, and better long-run protection because its impact absorption stays more consistent as the distance builds. The Kiprun is only a few grams heavier, and its forefoot is a bit more snappy, but the ASICS feels bouncier and more protective overall, making it the stronger option for longer runs with pace variations.

    Kiprun Kipstorm Elite

    Track

    The Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo and Kiprun Kipstorm Elite share the same family DNA, but they occupy different parts of a training rotation. The Kipstorm Tempo, as its name suggests, is built for tempo sessions, intervals, and faster daily training. Its A-TPU foam sits on top of an EVA carrier, creating a more cushioned ride overall, especially at the heel. The Kipstorm Elite is the race-day model, pairing A-TPU with PEBA and adding a carbon fiber plate to maximize responsiveness. It's lighter, though not by a huge margin, and its midsole feels noticeably bouncier and more energetic, making it the faster and more performance-oriented option.

    Show more 
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    7.3
    Weight
    Weight
    227.0 g (8.01 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    43.6 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    30.0 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    13.6 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    85 mm (3.3")
    Outsole Arch Width
    77 mm (3.0")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    120 mm (4.7")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    1.95
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    4.00
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    277 mm (10.9")
    Internal Heel Width
    59 mm (2.3")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    90 mm (3.5")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    9.7
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    1.4 mm (0.056")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -0.7 mm (-0.028")
    5.7
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -5.1 mm (-0.200")
    8.5
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -2.7 mm (-0.105")
    7.0
    Length Fit
    7.8
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    27 mm (1.1")
    Heel Apex Position
    16.0%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    26.8°
    7.7
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    53 mm (2.1")
    Toe Apex Position
    63.4%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    26.8°
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    7.2
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    77.1%
    7.8
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    79.9%
    9.1
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.84 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    11.92 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    20.56 J
    8.9
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    5.48 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    9.91 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    15.08 J
    6.0
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    40.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    46.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    63.6 N/mm
    5.8
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    49.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    63.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    87 N/mm
    8.1
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    9.01 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    8.80 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    8.67 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    8.57 J
    7.0
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    84 N
    7.5
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    67.8%
    7.8
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    14.5 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    348 N