Running Shoe
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Join now
Best
Running Shoes For Men Women Nike Brooks Marathon Long Distance For Beginners New Balance ASICS Stability HOKA adidas Cheap Cushioned Heavy Runners On Most Comfortable Saucony PUMA
Tools
Compare 3D Compare Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Review Pipeline Vote Custom Ratings
Popular
Dynafish Xiaonian Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra ASICS MEGABLAST Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite adidas Adizero Evo SL HOKA Bondi 9 ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 ASICS NOVABLAST 6 adidas Adizero Pacer Nike Vomero Plus PUMA Velocity NITRO 5 ASICS NOVABLAST 5 Saucony Endorphin Azura Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Saucony Hurricane 26 Nike Vomero Premium Kiprun Kipstorm Challenger ASICS GEL-KAYANO 33 PUMA Deviate Pure NITRO Saucony Triumph 24
304 Running Shoes bought and tested
Supported by you via membership, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Running Shoe
  3. Compare

Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo vs Dynafish Xiaonian

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      WeightStack HeightsExternal ShapeInternal ShapeForefoot Fit: WidthForefoot Fit: HeightArch Fit: WidthLength FitHeel Rocker GeometryForefoot Rocker GeometryFoamLacesOther Features
    Performance
      Heel Compression Energy ReturnForefoot Compression Energy ReturnHeel CushioningForefoot CushioningHeel FirmnessForefoot FirmnessForefoot Long Run CushioningRocker StiffnessForefoot Bending Energy ReturnForefoot Bending StiffnessHeel Compression DepthForefoot Compression Depth
    Comments

Products

Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo
Dynafish Xiaonian

Tested using Methodology v0.14

Updated Aug 27, 2026 02:56 PM

SEE PRICE
Decathlon

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:46 PM

SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Picture

Track

Dynafish Xiaonian Picture

Track

Heel Stack Height
43.6 mm
Weight
227.0 g (8.01 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
13.6 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
40.6 mm
Weight
192.5 g (6.79 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.4 mm
Plate
None
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Long Distance

Our Verdict

Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo

Dynafish Xiaonian

The Dynafish Xiaonian is a better shoe than the Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo for faster running. It's lighter and much bouncier, while still providing plenty of protection for longer efforts. The Kiprun offers a more controlled ride with deeper cushioning, so it's the better pick if regular training matters more than outright speed.

GIFT THIS COMPARISON

0 

Variants

  • Kipstorm Tempo (Foggy Blue/Fluo Neon Pink - (Men - US 9))
  • Kipstorm Tempo (Foggy Blue/Fluo Neon Pink - (Women - US 7))
  • Xiaonian (Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Xiaonian (Burning Sun - (Women - US 7))

Review

See Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Review
See Dynafish Xiaonian Review
3 
11 

Check Price

SEE PRICE
Decathlon
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
SEARCH
Amazon
SEARCH
Walmart.com
Read more

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

7.8
8.4

Weight  

7.3
8.4

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

7.8
5.9

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

7.3
8.4

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

227.0 g (8.01 oz)
192.5 g (6.79 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

43.6 mm
40.6 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

30.0 mm
31.2 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

13.6 mm
9.4 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
7.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Dynafish Xiaonian 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

85 mm (3.3")
97 mm (3.8")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

77 mm (3.0")
80 mm (3.1")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

120 mm (4.7")
118 mm (4.7")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.95
2.39

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

4.00
3.78

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Dynafish Xiaonian 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

277 mm (10.9")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

59 mm (2.3")
58 mm (2.3")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

90 mm (3.5")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.7
8.9

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

1.4 mm (0.056")
4.1 mm (0.160")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-0.7 mm (-0.028")
-1.4 mm (-0.056")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

5.7
8.2

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-5.1 mm (-0.200")
-2.3 mm (-0.092")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

8.5
9.8

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-2.7 mm (-0.105")
-0.6 mm (-0.023")

Length Fit 
 

7.0
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

7.8
6.6

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

27 mm (1.1")
21 mm (0.8")

Heel Apex Position 
 

16.0%
29.8%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

26.8°
13.7°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

7.7
8.3

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

53 mm (2.1")
62 mm (2.4")

Toe Apex Position 
 

63.4%
58.5%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

26.8°
27.3°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

FASTECH +
N/A

Primary Foam Type 
 

A-TPU
TPEE

Secondary Foam Name 
 

N/A
N/A

Secondary Foam Type 
 

EVA
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Flat
Flat

Width 
 

5.0 mm (0.2")
4.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.4 mm (0.1")
1.5 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

4.0%
12.5%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Fully-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
None
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

7.2
8.0

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Heel Energy Return 
 

77.1%
80.8%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

7.8
8.6

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

79.9%
84.3%

Heel Cushioning 
 

9.1
8.8

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.84 J
4.08 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

11.92 J
11.05 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

20.56 J
18.34 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.9
9.1

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.48 J
5.83 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.91 J
10.36 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

15.08 J
15.20 J

Heel Firmness 
 

6.0
5.9

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Firmness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness At 550N 
 

40.3 N/mm
36.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

46.0 N/mm
46.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

63.6 N/mm
65.6 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

5.8
5.8

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness At 800N 
 

49.7 N/mm
49.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

63.7 N/mm
63.2 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

87 N/mm
87 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.1
8.5

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

9.01 J
9.52 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.80 J
9.29 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.67 J
9.15 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.57 J
9.04 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

7.0
7.5

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

84 N
101 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

7.5
7.9

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

67.8%
70.5%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

7.8
5.9

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

14.5 N/mm
6.9 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

348 N
243 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

7.1

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

15.0 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

23.9 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

28.9 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

7.0

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

16.1 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

20.6 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

23.6 mm

Check Price

SEE PRICE
Decathlon
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
SEARCH
Amazon
SEARCH
Walmart.com
Back to Top

Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo

Dynafish Xiaonian

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 3 months ago

Kiprun Kipstorm Tempo vs Dynafish Xiaonian: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

See All Shoe Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Membership (which gives you access to extra features), when you buy RTINGS.com Merch, and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.