On Cloudmonster 3  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed May 07, 2026 at 01:47pm
Tested using Methodology v0.10 
On Cloudmonster 3

Track

5.8
Marathon Racing 
5.5
5K/10K Racing 
1.4
Energy Return 
8.0
Cushioning 
7.6
Lateral Stability 
9.7
True To Size 

Track

 0

The On Cloudmonster 3 is a cushioned trainer that delivers the firm ride and pockmarked midsole for which the Swiss brand is known, with a few updates since the On Cloudmonster 2. The upper in the third monster has been tweaked and is now more structured and less baggy than the second version, and the tongue has more padding, reducing some of the lace bite that plagued earlier Cloudmonsters. The platform of the Cloudmonster 3 has been widened a bit, and despite being built around a void, the midsole does a better job of absorbing impact than the 2nd version, so it's a step in the right direction. The ride of the Cloudmonster 3 still doesn't feel very lively, though, as there's almost no bounce-back from the Helion Foam and plastic 'Speedboard,' although these elements do work together to create a stable ride. 

Our Verdict

5.8
Marathon Racing 

The On Cloudmonster 3 is inadequate for the marathon distance. The lack of rebound from the midsole and the shoe's relatively heavy construction make it feel sluggish in the later stages of a marathon. The CloudTec pods reduce the shoe's ability to protect your feet from repeated pounding over long distances.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Midsole feels lifeless.

  • Cushioning starts to bottom out early.

  • Heavy construction.

5.5
5K/10K Racing 

The On Cloudmonster 3 is a sub-par shoe for racing a 5K or 10K. It can cover the distance, but the lack of energy return and heavy construction mean it will be hard to run very fast. If you're doing a casual Parkrun, the Cloudmonster 3 is a fine choice, but if you're chasing a PR, it will leave you disappointed.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Midsole feels lifeless.

  • Heavy construction.

1.4
Energy Return 

The On Cloudmonster 3 has abysmal energy return. Helion foam is already not the bounciest, and filling it with holes does nothing to help it rebound when you land. The shoe has a bit of a rocker to help your foot roll forward, but the ride feels rather flat overall.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Midsole feels lifeless.

  • CloudTec pods collapse but don't rebound quickly.

8.0
Cushioning 

The On Cloudmonster 3 scores impressively well on our cushioning test, as the CloudTec pods allow the midsole to deeply compress upon impact. Once the holes are compressed, however, the firm Helion foam struggles to absorb any shock. The midsole is particularly ill-suited to long runs, as it bottoms out and becomes harsh within the first 10K.

Pros
  • Combination of Helion Foam and pods absorbs impact well.

Cons
  • Cushioning starts to bottom out early.

7.6
Lateral Stability 

The On Cloudmonster 3 has good lateral stability, thanks to the relatively firm midsole and the wider base. If you land with much force on your heel and are not in perfect alignment, the uneven compression of the CloudTec pods could cause you to wobble, however.

Pros
  • Wide platform.

  • Relatively firm forefoot.

Cons
None
9.7
True To Size 

The On Cloudmonster 3 has fantastic sizing, and most runners can stick to their normal size. The reworked upper has ample width through the arch and forefoot, without being too baggy, and the length is true to size. The toe box doesn't have much height, so it could be uncomfortable if you have tall toes.

Pros
  • Good length

  • Upper is accommodating without feeling baggy.

Cons
None
  • 5.8
    Marathon Racing
  • 5.5
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 1.4
    Energy Return
  • 8.0
    Cushioning
  • 7.6
    Lateral Stability
  • 9.7
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated May 07, 2026: Review published.
    2.  Updated May 05, 2026: Early access published.
    3.  Updated Mar 31, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Mar 10, 2026: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the On Cloudmonster 3 in men's US size 9, as indicated on our model's label. The colorway shown here is Twilight/White, and the shoe is available in a variety of other colorways depending on your region. The Cloudmonster 3 is available in Standard and Wide widths in both the men's and women's versions. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The On Cloudmonster 3 is billed as a max-cushioned daily trainer, and its main distinguishing feature is its Swiss cheese midsole. This allows it to absorb more impact despite having very firm foam, but there are plenty of other daily trainers that manage to provide similar cushioning and a firmer ride, without compromising energy return by hollowing out their midsoles. The New Balance 1080v15, the HOKA Clifton 10, and the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 all do the job without the premium price tag. Indeed, it's difficult to justify the Cloudmonster 3's initial pricing, which puts it in the same tier as max-cushioned trainers like the Nike Vomero Plus, a shoe that has better impact absorption and significantly more energy return.

    Within On's lineup, the On Cloudmonster 3 is the daily trainer positioned at the intersection of stability and cushioning. More stable but less cushioned trainers include the On Cloudrunner 3, which is the brand's dedicated support trainer for runners with pronation issues, and the On Cloudsurfer Max, which, despite its name, is lower-stacked. A more cushioned option is the On Cloudmonster 3 Hyper, which is a taller, softer, less hollowed-out version of the Cloudmonster 3.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best On running shoes, as well as the best long-distance running shoes, and the best shoes for running a marathon.

    On Cloudmonster 2

    Track

    The On Cloudmonster 3 has several notable updates that set it apart from the On Cloudmonster 2. The upper of the third version has been reworked, and now has a bit more structure, so the fit is more snug and less baggy than the 2nd version. Underfoot, the two shoes have a similar configuration, with a plastic 'Speedboard' and pockmarked Helion foam, but the 3rd version is less firm and absorbs impact better.

    HOKA Clifton 10

    Track

    The HOKA Clifton 10 and On Cloudmonster 3 are two daily trainers that provide an impressive amount of cushioning while still maintaining a fairly firm ride. The Clifton 10's has better heel cushioning, while the Cloudmonster 3 is better cushioned in the forefoot. This, combined with the steeper heel-to-toe drop in the Clifton, makes it slightly better suited to heel strikers.

    On Cloudmonster 3 Hyper

    Track

    The On Cloudmonster 3 Hyper is the lighter, more energetic sibling of the On Cloudmonster 3, which is a stable, neutral daily trainer. The Hyper is higher stacked, has a more premium, PEBA-based Helion HF foam, and most of the holes in its midsole are decorative, and don't go all the way through. That gives the Hyper far better cushioning and drastically more energy return, all while weighing over 30g less. The Cloudmonster 3 Hyper is firmer and more stable, so it will appeal more to runners who want a more grounded ride.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    4.5
    Weight
    Weight
    296.6 g (10.46 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    40.1 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    32.8 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    7.3 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    89 mm (3.5")
    Outsole Arch Width
    81 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    115 mm (4.5")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.22
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.50
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    279 mm (11.0")
    Internal Heel Width
    66 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    93 mm (3.7")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    9.7
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    1.9 mm (0.076")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    1.0 mm (0.037")
    5.4
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -5.4 mm (-0.213")
    10
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    0.2 mm (0.009")
    10
    Length Fit
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    Plastic
    Performance
    0.9
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    64.2%
    1.6
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    66.7%
    7.5
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.07 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.76 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    16.37 J
    8.4
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    5.26 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    9.23 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    13.32 J
    5.1
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    47.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    109.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    226.7 N/mm
    7.5
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    91.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    189.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    388.4 N/mm
    6.6
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.42 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.05 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    6.82 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    6.64 J