The HOKA Clifton 10 is a well-cushioned, stable running shoe that's a very good choice for everyday runs at relaxed paces. Within HOKA's lineup, it offers a lighter alternative to the more cushioned Bondi 9. Its cushioning softens landings, while the wide base helps you feel stable, making it welcoming for newer runners or those taking it easy between harder sessions. However, its relatively heavy build and lack of bounce make it feel sluggish when you pick up the pace, limiting its appeal if you want one pair for easy runs, faster workouts, and races. Its cushioning becomes less protective over long runs, so it's not the best choice for long distances.
| ✅ Buy If: | ❌ Skip If: |
|
|
Our Verdict
The HOKA Clifton 10 isn't particularly suited for marathon racing, with a performance that leans more toward comfort than efficiency. The plush EVA foam provides impressive impact protection, but at the cost of energy return. With its heavier build and relaxed geometry, it's not a great pick for runners looking to maintain faster marathon paces or those seeking a propulsive feel over long distances. However, it can still be an acceptable option for those prioritizing comfort and stability during longer, easier efforts, or who are newer to the marathon distance and not focused on racing fast.
Super protective midsole.
The midsole feels flat and dull.
Very heavy shoe.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is a sub-par option for short races, as it doesn't offer the nimble, energetic feel that faster efforts typically demand. The midsole's muted energy return and heavy overall weight make it feel a bit too sluggish for speed-focused racing. However, for casual runners doing shorter distances at more relaxed paces, where comfort and protection matter more than efficiency, it can still cover the distance.
Relatively stiff forefoot.
The midsole feels flat and dull.
Very heavy shoe.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is decent for long runs, particularly at relaxed paces. Its broad, stable platform and very good initial cushioning provide a comfortable foundation, but the midsole loses some of that protection as the miles add up. This makes it less forgiving later in longer efforts, despite its thick midsole. Its heavier build and poor energy return also limit its appeal for long runs that include faster sections.
Good cushioning for all foot strikes.
Very wide base.
Rocker shape helps guide transitions.
The midsole feels flat and dull.
Very heavy shoe.
Cushioning fades over longer runs.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is very good for daily training, particularly for easy miles and recovery runs. Its protective cushioning softens landings, while the wide platform helps keep the ride stable. The curved heel also helps ease the transition into each stride. However, the heavier build and poor energy return make it less useful if you want your everyday shoe to handle faster workouts as well.
Good cushioning for all foot strikes.
Very wide base.
Rocker shape helps guide transitions.
The midsole feels flat and dull.
Very heavy shoe.
Changelog
- Updated Oct 02, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.15, which replaces Responsiveness with three specific performance usages: Bounciness, Snappiness, and Roll. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
- Updated Sep 17, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.14, which adds new lace-specific results. We've included a close-up photo of the laces, as well as details including lace type, width, thickness, and stretch. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
-
Updated Jul 02, 2026:
We've updated the Popular Comparisons section to include a link to the newly reviewed Saucony Triumph 24.
- Updated Jun 30, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.13, which identifies the different foams used in the shoe's midsole. We've included a microscopic image of the foam cells to give you an idea of what the microstructure looks like. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
- Updated Jun 17, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.12, which fixes how we measure firmness, a component of the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages. There may be inconsistencies between the text and the scores for these usages, but the scores should still be considered valid. We've also brought back the Energy Return score and added two new usages: Daily Training and Long Run. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
-
Updated May 29, 2026:
We've updated the Popular Comparisons section to include a link to the newly reviewed HOKA Skyward X 2.
-
Updated Apr 15, 2026:
We've replaced the Energy Return usage box with Responsiveness, which incorporates four additional tests, and updated the text accordingly.
- Updated Apr 15, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.11, adding two new rocker measurements to the Design section, and three new responsiveness tests to the Performance section. The Energy Return usage score has been replaced with Responsiveness. Check out the details in our changelog.
-
Updated Feb 27, 2026:
We updated the review to include text for the new Fit usage box, which was recently added to our test bench.
- Updated Feb 20, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.10, adding a new set of fit tests to the Design section and an overall fit performance usage. Check out the details in our changelog.
-
Updated Jan 12, 2026:
We added a comparison to the Kiprun KS900 2 in the Weight section of the review.
-
Updated Oct 23, 2025:
We updated the review to include text for the Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test, which was recently added to our test bench.
- Updated Oct 23, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.9, which adds a Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test to our performance section. Read more in our changelog.
-
Updated Oct 01, 2025:
We updated the Heel Energy Return, Forefoot Cushioning, Forefoot Energy Return, and Heel Firmness boxes to align with the latest test bench and keep the review accurate.
- Updated Oct 01, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.
-
Updated Jul 30, 2025:
We revised the phrasing in the Marathon Racing and Lateral Stability boxes to better align with the latest test bench scores and to ensure the stability comparison with the HOKA Clifton 9 is as accurate as possible in the side-by-side between them and the External Shape box.
- Updated Jul 30, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.1, which mainly updates the score components for the Marathon Racing and Lateral Stability usage boxes to improve accuracy.
- Updated Jun 06, 2025: Review published.
- Updated Jun 02, 2025: Early access published.
- Updated May 14, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.
- Updated Apr 08, 2025: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
- Updated Apr 08, 2025: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.
We've bought and tested more than 300 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs.
Test Results
Energy Return
The HOKA Clifton 10 has poor energy return. The foam gives relatively little energy back under both the heel and forefoot, leaving the ride flat and muted despite its protective cushioning. This limits its appeal for runners who want a lively daily trainer, particularly when picking up the pace.
The midsole feels flat and dull.
The forefoot performs similarly to the heel in terms of rebound and still falls short of offering any real pop. The ride feels flat under load, especially compared to bouncier daily trainers like the ASICS NOVABLAST 5. If you're looking for a fun, energetic trainer, this isn't it.
This model has poor heel energy return, with the compression-molded EVA midsole prioritizing absorption over rebound. It doesn't snap back in a way that propels you forward; this is a shoe that soaks up impact rather than giving much back, which limits its performance at higher speeds.
Stability
The HOKA Clifton 10 delivers good lateral stability, thanks to its super-wide outsole platform and semi-gusseted tongue. This makes it easier to maintain balance and feel secure during daily runs. Still, the high stack of soft foam negatively affects balance, but it's a very stable shoe overall. This can also be a plus for new runners or those who prefer a more secure ride.
Very wide base.
Semi-gusseted tongue.
Foam is quite soft, especially in the heel.
In contrast to the heel, the forefoot is firmer. This adds some structure to the toe-off phase and helps balance out the overall ride. It also gives the shoe a slightly more stable feel up front, which helps offset the squishier heel and high stack. That said, it still feels noticeably softer than firmer models like the Nike Vomero 17 and the HOKA Clifton 9, particularly when more force is applied.
The heel is soft, contributing to the forgiving ride but also reducing stability. This helps soften landings, but may not be ideal for runners who prefer a firmer base.
The HOKA Clifton 10 has a wider platform than the HOKA Clifton 9, adding confidence during landings and transitions. This helps offset the higher stack height and slightly limits the overall loss of stability in this iteration.
Cushioning
The HOKA Clifton 10 delivers impressive cushioning. Impact protection is a clear highlight of the updated tenth iteration, with a plush feel underfoot that excels at absorbing shocks during easy miles. The high stack height and compression-molded EVA midsole provide ample protection, especially for heel strikers. Both the heel and forefoot cushioning are great, making it one of the more comfortable daily trainers in its class for short to mid-range efforts.
Super protective midsole.
Good cushioning for all foot strikes.
Heel cushioning is one of the shoe's standout strengths. The added stack height and EVA foam deliver a protective landing, ideal for recovery days and suitable for runners with a heel-strike pattern. This level of impact absorption firmly places the shoe within the max-cushioned category.
While it's a bit less plush than the heel, the forefoot still delivers very good underfoot protection. The forefoot provides a forgiving feel that holds up well over shorter, slower efforts, making it a solid choice for easy cruising. That said, runners who apply a lot of force when running will find it a bit less plush than less powerful runners.
The HOKA Clifton 10 feels plush and well-cushioned at first, especially when trying it on, but its basic EVA midsole quickly shows its limits over distance. The shoe's energy absorption drops sharply early in a long run, meaning that while it still provides acceptable protection up to about 20 km, it becomes noticeably less cushioned beyond that point. Despite its high stack height, the midsole compresses heavily and loses much of its initial cushioning, resulting in a harsher feel reminiscent of earlier Clifton versions on longer efforts.
Bounciness
The HOKA Clifton 10 has sub-par bounciness. The midsole returns a poor amount of energy upon impact, as expected for a shoe focused on comfort. The EVA foam feels flat and lacks the lively bounce of modern compounds. For runners looking for a daily trainer with a more propulsive feel, this shoe might feel a bit dull and uninspired.
The midsole feels flat and dull.
Snappiness
The HOKA Clifton 10 offers adequate snappiness, helped by a firmer forefoot that provides a solid surface to push against. It feels moderately stiff as you toe off, but that stiffness isn't paired with a lively forefoot, so the spring-back feels muted. As a result, it lacks the quick, propulsive kick that would make it more appealing for faster running.
Firm forefoot provides a solid push-off.
Limited energy return from forefoot bending.
The HOKA Clifton 10 feels moderately stiff as you toe off, with noticeable resistance to bending at the forefoot. This is helpful if you prefer a less flexible feel at push-off, though the poor bending energy return keeps that stiffness from producing much spring-back.
Roll
The HOKA Clifton 10 provides an adequate rolling sensation from landing to toe-off. Its curved heel helps ease you into each stride, while the forefoot rocker guides the transition toward push-off. However, the rocker flattens relatively easily under load, reducing its ability to maintain that rolling motion if you tend to apply a lot of force when you land.
Rocker shape helps guide transitions.
Rocker flattens easily under load.
This shoe's rocker flattens relatively easily under load, limiting how well it maintains its curved shape. If you tend to apply a lot of force when you land, this reduces the assistance it provides as your foot rolls forward.
This version introduces a significantly higher stack in both the heel and forefoot, pushing the HOKA Clifton 10 towards max-cushion territory. This makes it similar in height to other shoes in the same category, such as the Kiprun KS900 2. This new geometry also increases the drop, which slightly alters the feel when transitioning from heel to toe.
True To Size
The HOKA Clifton 10 fits close to true to size. Unlike many other HOKA shoes, this one has a very accommodating arch. The sizing runs slightly long, so if your foot is between sizes, consider the smaller size.
Arch isn't too narrow.
Length runs slightly long.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is on the heavier side for a daily trainer. It also weighs notably more than the HOKA Clifton 9, which felt nimbler on foot but offered less protection. That said, this added weight is the tradeoff for a more cushioned, max-stack platform. For runners who prioritize impact absorption over speed or efficiency, weight is unlikely to be a dealbreaker.
Fit is more generous in the HOKA Clifton 10, with extra width at the forefoot and heel, providing a more accommodating feel than the HOKA Clifton 9. However, the shoe also runs noticeably longer than the Clifton 9, which might require sizing adjustments.
Popular Running Shoe Comparisons
The HOKA Clifton 10 serves as a classic max-cushioned daily trainer in a market increasingly dominated by bouncier compounds. While many modern trainers chase energy return for added versatility or simply to deliver a more engaging ride, the Clifton 10 doubles down on a plush yet grounded ride, prioritizing impact absorption over responsiveness. Its compression-molded EVA midsole provides a smooth, cushioned feel that excels during easy runs, walks, and lifestyle wear, but offers little in the way of bounce. Meanwhile, other brands have begun to move past the idea that it has to be one or the other: models like the Mizuno Neo Zen, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5, and even the Saucony Triumph 24 show that it's possible to pair a deeply cushioned experience with a fun, lively bounce, often through more premium or modern midsole foams. Still, with a new, higher stack and improved cushioning, the Clifton 10 feels way more protective than the HOKA Clifton 9 and takes the model in a new direction.
Within HOKA's lineup, this shoe sits as the brand's classic, no-frills daily trainer, offering reliable cushioning and an accommodating fit for a broad audience. Its closely discussed partner, the HOKA Bondi 9, used for similar rides, gives the runner a more protective ride and bounce, creating an exciting take on easy, long miles that the Clifton shies away from. Both are more cushioned but less lively than the HOKA Mach 7, their lightweight daily trainer. The brand also offers the HOKA Gaviota 6, a premium support trainer that actively keeps your foot centered, and the HOKA Skyward X 2, an ultra-high-stack plated cruiser designed for high-mileage with maximum protection. The Clifton 10 may not be the most exciting option in HOKA's lineup, but it remains a safe, dependable choice for relaxed runs, long walks, or all-day wear.
For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, as well as the best running shoes for men and the best running shoes for women.
The HOKA Bondi 9 is a better choice than the HOKA Clifton 10 for long runs. It's softer and more protective, with a slightly more energetic feel. The Clifton 10 is lighter, firmer, and more versatile, making it the better pick for a wide mix of daily mileage.
The HOKA Clifton 11 is a slightly better shoe than the HOKA Clifton 10, though the two perform almost identically. It's lighter, more comfortable at step-in, and better on longer runs. The Clifton 10 is a bit more stable. Both are best for easy daily miles.
The HOKA Skyflow and HOKA Clifton 10 are both comfort-first daily trainers, but the Clifton 10 feels more straightforward, while the Skyflow is a more cushioned, fully committed take on the same idea. Neither model is built to feel particularly lively or propulsive, and both sit firmly in the easy mileage lane. The Skyflow trends a bit more toward premium recovery, with a higher stack of foam to isolate your legs from the ground. Meanwhile, the Clifton 10 leans a touch more toward stability and feels a bit less cumbersome for day-to-day running due to a lower overall weight.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is a better choice than the HOKA Arahi 8 for runners with a neutral stride. It has an accommodating fit and lots of cushioning, and it's good for running or walking. The Arahi 8 has a firmer foam frame that helps keep your foot stable, making it the safer choice if you know you have pronation issues.
The HOKA Mach 7 is a more versatile daily trainer than the HOKA Clifton 10. It's lighter and more nimble, making it easier to pick up the pace, and its cushioning stays more consistent after a few kilometers. The Clifton 10 is plusher at first and has a more accommodating fit, making it comfortable for easy runs.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and the HOKA Mach 6 represent two distinct takes on daily training within HOKA's lineup. The Clifton 10 is the brand's classic, comfort-oriented daily trainer, built around a higher stack of compression-molded EVA foam that prioritizes protection, impact absorption, and a plush underfoot feel. It's heavier, softer, and ideal for runners who want maximum cushioning for easy runs. The Mach 6, on the other hand, is HOKA's lighter, more stripped-down daily trainer, offering a simpler, more minimal feel underfoot that's also a bit more stable. Its midsole is more energetic, giving it a noticeably more efficient ride overall. If you're after cushioning and softness, the Clifton 10 is the way to go; if you prefer a lighter, more energetic ride, the Mach 6 is the better pick.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and the Brooks Ghost 17 are two everyday trainers that garner broad appeal, each taking a different route. The HOKA is built on the brand's trademark plush cushioning and high-stack platform. This does come at the expense of stability, and the Brooks is a safer bet for any runners who feel unsteady in their stride. The heel in the HOKA runs much narrower, so the fit of the Brooks will likely be more comfortable for runners with wider feet.
The Brooks Glycerin Max and the HOKA Clifton 10 offer two different options for runners and walkers seeking a comfortable, reliable shoe. The heel of the HOKA sits higher off the ground than the Brooks, but because the former has a steeper heel-to-toe drop, the forefoot stack height is the same in both shoes. The HOKA is the softer, more cushioned shoe and offers better energy return. Its semi-gusseted tongue provides slightly better lockdown, but the fit can be more constricting than the Brooks'. If you plan to run more than walk, the HOKA is a more compelling option, but the Brooks is still a good choice if you want a solid, comfortable everyday shoe.
The HOKA Clifton PRO is a better choice than the HOKA Clifton 10 for most runners. Its extra forefoot cushioning and more energetic foam keep it comfortable and lively over long runs and everyday miles. Heel strikers doing mostly easy runs may still prefer the Clifton 10, which feels a little more stable and has a more rockered heel for steadier, smoother landings.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is a better shoe than the Brooks Ghost 18. Thanks to its thicker cushioning and rockered shape, the HOKA delivers a soft, smooth ride for daily training and long runs. The Brooks takes a more old-school approach, with a firmer platform and lower stack height, which will appeal to runners who like to feel connected to the road and don't need as much protection underfoot.
The Nike Vomero Plus is a more well-rounded daily trainer than the HOKA Clifton 10. It's softer and more protective, with enough bounce to keep easy miles from feeling dull. The HOKA is more stable and predictable, so it's the better pick if you want a more planted ride.
The Nike Vomero 18 is a better choice than the HOKA Clifton 10 for longer runs, as its cushioning holds up better as the distance increases. The HOKA is a bit lighter and more protective up front, making it especially pleasant for easy miles. Both are stable and easy to trust.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is a better choice than the Brooks Glycerin 23 for most runners. It's lighter, softer, and more cushioned at step-in, making it great for shorter, relaxed runs. The Brooks is heavier, with a more traditional feel and slightly better forefoot protection on longer runs, so it suits runners who prefer a classic Brooks trainer.
The HOKA Bondi 8 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both comfort-first daily trainers, but the Clifton 10 feels more modern. The Bondi 8 is heavier, slightly firmer in the heel, and much less responsive, though its broad platform and mild rocker still make it a stable, easy-rolling option for walking and slow recovery miles. The Clifton 10 adds more stack, better protection, and a lighter build, while retaining the smooth, cushioned feel HOKA is known for. It isn't especially energetic either, but compared with the Bondi 8, it gives you more cushioning, more rebound, and a better overall ride for daily miles.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is a better choice than the HOKA Gaviota 6 if you want a reliable neutral trainer. It's well cushioned and naturally stable, working well for short, easy runs. The Gaviota 6 uses guidance features to help manage overpronation, making it the better pick if you want more support and structure.
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is a more versatile daily trainer than the HOKA Clifton 10. It's lighter and bouncier while still offering good stability, so it handles everything from easy runs to faster sessions. The HOKA is heavier and less lively, but its plush, stable ride absorbs impact well, making it a good no-fuss pick for easy miles.
The HOKA Clifton 10 is a better choice than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 for neutral runners. It has excellent cushioning and a soft, smooth ride for short to mid-length runs. The Brooks is a dedicated stability shoe with a more controlled, slightly less cushioned ride, making it the better pick if you need support.
The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both protective daily trainers, but they sit at different points on the max-cushion spectrum. The ASICS is the more true max-cushion option, with a bigger stack, a plusher and more premium feel, and a ride that prioritizes softness and impact dampening above all else, especially for easy days and long recovery-focused mileage. The HOKA, with this iteration, pushes closer to that territory than past versions, offering a protective high-stack that works well for everyday training, but it still stops short of the ASICS in pure depth and plushness. On the flip side, the HOKA feels lighter and more stable, which makes it compelling if you want a daily trainer that doesn't feel quite as bulky.
The ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 is better than the HOKA Clifton 10. It has better energy return and offers more protection over longer distances. It can cover a range of paces within regular training. The HOKA is more stable underfoot, making it better for runners who prefer a controlled ride.
The adidas Adizero Evo SL is a more versatile shoe than the HOKA Clifton 10. It's lighter and more efficient at faster paces, and it holds up better on long runs with pace changes. The HOKA is softer and more relaxed, making it the easier choice for short recovery runs, while the adidas can feel harsh when you're jogging easy.
The ASICS GEL-CUMULUS 27 and the HOKA Clifton 10 are two classic daily trainers that both prioritize underfoot protection and comfort, and they weigh about the same. However, the HOKA has a higher stack and softer midsole, offering a plusher, more cushioned ride that excels at easy and recovery runs where impact absorption is key. In contrast, the ASICS sits a bit closer to the ground, with a slightly firmer feel that provides more ground contact and a more traditional running sensation. While both are well-suited for daily mileage, the HOKA leans more toward maximum comfort and protection, whereas the ASICS appeals to runners who prefer a lower-profile, more stable ride without sacrificing too much cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 22 and HOKA Clifton 10 both deliver a cushioned, comfortable ride, but they feel quite different underfoot. The HOKA Clifton 10 is lighter and rolls forward more easily thanks to its firmer foam and pronounced rocker, giving it a smoother, more versatile ride across a range of paces. The Brooks Glycerin 22 feels denser and more traditional, focusing on deep cushioning and a stable, planted feel. Runners who want an easy, efficient turnover will prefer the Clifton 10, while those who prioritize softness and consistent comfort will appreciate the Glycerin 22.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and On Cloudmonster 3 are two daily trainers that provide an impressive amount of cushioning while still maintaining a fairly firm ride. The HOKA has better heel cushioning, while the On is better cushioned in the forefoot. This, combined with the steeper heel-to-toe drop in the HOKA, makes it slightly better suited to heel strikers.
The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 28 is a better choice than the HOKA Clifton 10 for longer easy runs. It keeps its cushioning better over time and stays protective as the miles add up. The HOKA feels comfortable and smooth at first, making it fine for shorter runs, but its protection fades faster.
The New Balance Fresh Foam X 880v15 and the HOKA Clifton 10 are two popular shoes that are available in a range of widths, and while both can be used for either running or walking, each has unique characteristics. The HOKA is narrower through the arch and is focused on cushioning, with the heel in particular absorbing much more impact than the New Balance shoe. The New Balance is firmer and a bit more stable, and although it's not as soft as the HOKA shoe, its cushioning doesn't bottom out as quickly during long runs.
The Nike Pegasus 41 and HOKA Clifton 10 are two of the most recognizable daily trainer series, but they represent different philosophies. The Nike carries the legacy-trainer identity, offering a firmer, more stable ride that feels grounded and consistent for everyday miles, with a traditional feel that many runners trust. The HOKA builds on its reputation as a higher-stacked, cushioned cruiser, delivering a more protective underfoot experience that prioritizes impact absorption and comfort.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and Saucony Triumph 23 are similar on paper in terms of weight and overall geometry, but they deliver different daily-training experiences. The HOKA is a comfort-first, cushioned trainer that prioritizes protection and a smooth ride, making it a dependable choice for relaxed miles when you want a plush feel. The Saucony feels more modern and well-rounded, combining cushioning with a more energetic, bouncier sensation that keeps the shoe engaging. It also feels more stable overall, which can make it easier to trust for longer steady runs when form starts to fade.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and adidas Supernova Rise 3 are two daily trainers, but they have different strengths. The adidas feels more stable and a bit lighter, with a more grounded ride. The HOKA uses a higher stack and feels more cushioned at first, but as the distance builds, that cushioning effect fades somewhat, bringing the ride closer to the more ground-connected feel of the adidas. The HOKA also feels less restrictive at the arch.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 are both popular high-cushion shoes, but are built around different levels of versatility. The HOKA is a cushioned daily trainer that feels most at home on short, easy runs where you want a plush, comfort-first ride and a relaxed pace. The ASICS, on the other hand, feels more consistent and more capable as distance increases, with cushioning that holds up better deep into long runs and a noticeably more energetic midsole that keeps the shoe engaging when you start changing gears. It's also lighter despite the higher stack, making it easier to use across a wider range of training, from easy mileage to steady efforts to long sessions with pace variations.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 are both daily trainers, but they serve different types of runners with very different design philosophies. The HOKA is a high-stack, comfort-first shoe that emphasizes protection and impact absorption. It delivers a plush, soft ride that's ideal for easy runs, recovery days, and walks. The New Balance, on the other hand, is a lighter, lower-to-the-ground trainer. It's built for runners who want a bit more natural feel, with a bit of rebound and easy turnover for strides and daily mileage at a variety of paces. While both shoes are well cushioned, the HOKA feels more protective due to the higher stack of foam that helps dampen the road effects.
The Saucony Ride 19 and HOKA Clifton 10 are two classic daily trainers, but they follow different paths. The HOKA follows the path it helped popularize, using a higher stack to create a big, absorbent buffer between your legs and the ground, with the clear focus being protection and comfort. However, this protection is most noticeable on shorter runs, since the midsole tends to bottom out after a few kilometers. The Saucony takes a more moderate stack approach, but its midsole gives it a livelier feel, and it also comes in lighter, making it feel more versatile and less one-dimensional in daily training. The Saucony is also more stable overall, while the HOKA leans more fully into that soft, protective cruiser role.
The Nike Pegasus Premium and the HOKA Clifton 10 both prioritize comfort and protection, but they go about it with distinct personalities. The HOKA has a lighter build, a firmer foam, and pronounced MetaRocker geometry, making it more adaptable across paces, from easy recovery runs to moderate uptempo efforts. The Nike shoe focuses more on comfort, providing a softer and more insulated ride during long or easy miles. Runners seeking a well-rounded daily trainer will find the HOKA more versatile, while those prioritizing plush cushioning and protection will prefer the Nike.
The Saucony Endorphin Azura is a better shoe than the HOKA Clifton 10. It's lighter, more cushioned, and livelier, making it better suited to long runs and faster training as well as regular mileage. The HOKA is more stable and better suited to runners who mainly want a simple shoe for relaxed running.
The Saucony Triumph 24 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both daily trainers, but they deliver very different rides. The Saucony is the softer, bouncier, and much more energetic shoe, providing better cushioning while remaining surprisingly lighter than the HOKA. The HOKA has a more traditional feel, with a firmer, more stable platform that suits runners looking for a calmer, more predictable ride. Runners who want maximum comfort without sacrificing fun should go for the Saucony, while the HOKA is the better choice if stability is your priority.
The HOKA Clifton 9 and the HOKA Clifton 10 share the same DNA, but the 10 refines the formula in ways that make it a better daily trainer for runners who prioritize softness and protection. The Clifton 10 has a higher stack height and is more cushioned. However, the added stack means it's less stable than the Clifton 9 despite its wider platform. It also runs longer and offers a softer underfoot feel, perfect for easy daily runs. In contrast, the Clifton 9 is lighter and a bit more compact, giving it a more nimble feel that may suit runners who prefer a firmer ride. While both shoes are fine at relaxed paces, the Clifton 10 feels like a clear upgrade for those seeking a plush, forgiving trainer with more protection for everyday mileage.
The ASICS MEGABLAST is a better shoe than the HOKA Clifton 10 for most runners. It's lighter, bouncier, and more cushioned, so it stays fun across a wide range of paces and holds up better on longer runs. The HOKA offers a more traditional, stable ride that's predictable and works best for short, easy runs.
The HOKA Skyward X 2 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both cushioned shoes that can handle daily training, but they're built for very different jobs. The Clifton 10 is the simpler daily trainer: lighter, more stable, and more traditional for regular mileage. The Skyward X 2 is the premium option, featuring a PEBA top layer, an EVA base, and a convex carbon plate to deliver far better responsiveness and long-run protection. It's heavier and less stable than the Clifton 10, but much more cushioned under the forefoot. The Clifton 10 makes more sense for runners who want a dependable daily shoe, while the Skyward X 2 is the pick if you want a more energetic long-run cruiser.
The New Balance SuperComp Rebel is a better choice than the HOKA Clifton 10 for faster workouts, long runs, and racing. It's much lighter and more energetic. The HOKA is heavier and less lively, but it's more stable and predictable, making it easier to manage for easy daily miles.
The Kiprun Kipride Max and HOKA Clifton 10 are two daily trainers with similar weight and stack, but they feel better suited to different distances. The Kiprun is more cushioned at step-in and retains that cushioning more effectively as the miles build, making it the stronger option for longer runs. The HOKA offers a good level of stability with more ground feel and a more straightforward ride, which works especially well for shorter, easy miles.
The ASICS GT-2000 15 and HOKA Clifton 10 are two daily trainers for easy mileage, but the ASICS is lighter, more energetic, and includes dedicated guidance to correct overpronation. The HOKA is softer and more cushioned, so it's the one to get for walking or relaxed runs if you don't need extra support and prefer a plush feel.
The ASICS METASLEEK and HOKA Clifton 10 are designed for very different types of running. The HOKA is the better daily trainer, as its higher-stack, more cushioned platform and greater stability make it more suitable for easy runs and longer efforts. The ASICS is the better option for intervals and short races, thanks to its remarkably lightweight build and energetic ride.
The PUMA ForeverRun NITRO 3 and HOKA Clifton 10 are daily trainers made for different types of runners. The PUMA is a stability shoe for overpronators, while the HOKA is a neutral shoe that prioritizes soft cushioning. Get the PUMA for a firmer, more stable ride with slightly better energy return. Get the HOKA if you prioritize deeper cushioning and a more pronounced rocker.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and ANTA PG7 3 are both highly cushioned daily trainers, mostly separated by price. The HOKA shoe is more stable thanks to a wider arch platform and a semi-gusseted tongue, so if that's important to you, the higher price tag might be worth it. Otherwise, the ANTA shoe offers similar performance at a more competitive price.
The adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 is far better than the HOKA Clifton 10 for racing and fast running. It's lighter and more energetic, and its carbon rods help you hold faster paces with less effort. The HOKA is a stable, comfortable daily trainer, making it the better pick for easy miles and recovery runs.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and Salomon Aero Glide 3 are both versatile running shoes with a variety of uses, but they serve different overall aims. The Salomon shoe, with its bouncy midsole and impressive cushioning, can handle daily miles and a variety of uptempo workouts, from intervals to fartleks to strides. The HOKA shoe is also a solid, reliable workhorse that can handle daily miles, but its versatility stretches in the opposite direction: it's a comfortable shoe for easy runs, walking around, or a job where you have to be on your feet all day.
The PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4 and HOKA Clifton 10 sit in completely different parts of a rotation. The HOKA is a daily trainer built for easy running, with a consistent, reliable, and stable ride that works well for relaxed mileage, though it isn't especially light or efficient. The PUMA is engineered for race-day efficiency, with a very light build, highly energetic cushioning, and enough protection to help preserve your legs while providing the propulsion needed to reach the finish line faster.
The Kiprun KS900 2 and the HOKA Clifton 10 are both high-stack daily trainers with EVA-based midsoles that prioritize impact absorption over bounce, but they approach that goal a bit differently. The HOKA delivers a softer, more cushioned ride overall, with a lighter build and a smoother step-in feel that makes it more immediately comfortable for easy, short daily runs. The Kiprun, on the other hand, feels firmer and simpler underfoot, with a more basic EVA midsole that feels predictable and tends to hold its cushioning character a bit better as distances stretch out.
The Brooks Launch 12 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both daily trainers, but they go about that role in different ways. The HOKA is the more cushioned and higher-stacked option, focusing on comfort, smoothness, and a protective ride while still feeling quite stable for its category. The Brooks is lighter and a bit more stable, with a lower stack and more ground feel as soon as you step in, which makes it feel less protective but a bit more connected to the road. It also has a touch more bounce in the forefoot, giving it a slightly livelier feel when you start to turn over.
The HOKA Clifton 10 and Mizuno Hyperwarp Pure target completely different uses. The HOKA is a daily trainer built around reliable protection and durability, giving you a predictable, comfort-first ride for everyday mileage, with the trade-off being a heavier feel and a midsole that isn't especially lively. The Mizuno is a racing tool, sitting lower to the ground and feeling extremely lightweight with a very bouncy, snappy ride that works best when you're running hard, especially in shorter races. It also stays surprisingly stable for such a minimal racer, but it isn't meant to shuffle through easy miles.
Differences Between Sizes And Variants
We tested the HOKA Clifton 10 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label of our unit. The colorway shown here is Black/White. This model is also available in numerous other colorways, including Blue Spark/White, White/White, Black/Black, Vanilla/Birch, and HOKA Blue/Skyward Blue. HOKA offers both wide and extra-wide versions for men and women, with multiple color options available even in the wide fits, which is rare. The design section applies specifically to the version we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.
