Brooks Glycerin 22  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Nov 27, 2025 at 03:03pm
Writing modified Mar 12, 2026 at 02:22pm
Tested using Methodology v0.9 
Brooks Glycerin 22

Track

0.0
Marathon Racing 
0.0
5K/10K Racing 
0.0
Energy Return 
0.0
Cushioning 
0.0
Lateral Stability 

Track

 0
  1. Recommended in:
  2. Brooks

The Brooks Glycerin 22 is a premium daily trainer that has an updated midsole, but continues the series' longstanding reputation for smooth and reliable comfort. In keeping with that focus, the Glycerin 22 also has an updated heel collar that is less rigid outside and more padded inside, improving lockdown while still feeling plush. And while this iteration of the Glycerin reduces its heel-to-toe drop from the series' traditional 12mm to 10mm, this is still very much a shoe designed with heel strikers in mind. The new "DNA Tuned" cushioning is a dual-density, nitrogen-infused material that has larger cells in the rear of the shoe to absorb more impact, and smaller cells in the forefoot, which are designed to be more responsive. As much a walking shoe as a running shoe, the 22nd version of the Glycerin delivers premium comfort for everyday use.

Our Verdict

0.0
Marathon Racing 

The Brooks Glycerin 22 is a middling shoe for the marathon distance. While the cushioning is adequate, it's not the most resilient over long distances. With the lackluster energy return from the midsole, your tired legs won't get much of a boost.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Heavy build feels sluggish compared to lighter trainers.

  • Limited energy return reduces efficiency.

0.0
5K/10K Racing 

The Brooks Glycerin 22 is a sub-par racing shoe for shorter distances. It's not tuned for speed, and the combination of poor energy return and heavier weight will make it feel sluggish if you're trying to run your best race.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Heavy build feels sluggish compared to lighter trainers.

  • Limited energy return reduces efficiency.

0.0
Energy Return 

The Brooks Glycerin 22 has poor energy return. The dual-density arrangement of cells in the DNA Tuned midsole do make the forefoot much more responsive than the heel, but neither feels particularly lively or bouncy, and the shoe can feel like it's slapping the road rather than rolling along it.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Limited energy return reduces efficiency.

  • Minimal responsiveness.

0.0
Cushioning 

The Brooks Glycerin 22 has reasonable cushioning throughout, although it is much better protected under the heel than the forefoot, and heel strikers will definitely benefit most from the shoe's new midsole. Where the heel stays plush and absorbent, even under heavy impact, the forefoot wears thin and bottoms out over longer distances.

Pros
  • Well-cushioned heel can handle heavy impact.

Cons
  • Mediocre protection in forefoot.

0.0
Lateral Stability 

The Brooks Glycerin 22 has very good lateral stability. The upside of having a very firm and relatively low-stacked forefoot is a very grounded, controlled push-off on each step. The reasonable stack height, on top of a wide outsole platform, give the shoe a secure, solid construction that withstands any wobbles.

Pros
  • Firm forefoot enhances control through transitions.

  • Wide base creates a secure landing platform.

Cons
None
  • 0.0
    Marathon Racing
  • 0.0
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 0.0
    Energy Return
  • 0.0
    Cushioning
  • 0.0
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Mar 12, 2026: 

      We've updated the Popular Comparisons section to include a link to our recently published article on the best Brooks running shoes.

    2.  Updated Mar 02, 2026: 

      We included the Brooks Glycerin Flex in Brooks' lineup within the Popular Running Shoe Comparisons section of the review.

    3.  Updated Dec 05, 2025: 

      We've updated the Popular Comparisons section to reference the recently reviewed Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25.

    4.  Updated Dec 03, 2025: 

      We updated the Popular Running Shoe Comparisons section to include the recently reviewed Brooks Glycerin Max 2 in Brooks' lineup.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We purchased and tested this shoe in a men's US size 9, as shown here on the label of our pair. The pair we bought is in the Black/Cobalt/Neo Yellow colorway. The model is available in more than 19 colorways, purchasable through various retailers depending on your region. This shoe is available in a variety of widths, ranging from 2A (Women's Narrow), B (Women's Medium) to D (Women's Wide; Men's Medium), 2E (Men's Wide; Women's Extra Wide), and 4E (Men's Extra Wide). The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Brooks Glycerin 22 is a daily trainer with a long lineage, one that has slowly but continuously evolved in response to successive changes in the broader running shoe market. It now sits with the Nike Vomero 18, Saucony Triumph 23, and ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 in the premium trainer category, shoes that are sturdy and stable enough to be daily workhorses, but more comfort-oriented than classic daily trainers. However, all of these series predate the current market categorization, and while they have all evolved in response to similar trends over the years, each has followed its own unique trajectory. The Glycerin, for its part, has long stood out as the trainer with the biggest heel-to-toe drop: 12mm in previous versions, but now only 10mm in the Glycerin 22, bringing it more in line with its peers. While the Glycerin series has grown in stack height over the years, the increase has been much more gradual than its peers', such that the Glycerin 22 now sits much lower than the Vomero 18 or NIMBUS 27. The Glycerin 22 walks a fine line: it focuses on comfort without embracing maximum cushioning, and is soft and smooth enough for walking around, yet robust enough for daily training.

    The Glycerin 22 remains one of the core pillars in the Brooks family of daily trainers that has become increasingly crowded in recent years. It sits alongside the Brooks Ghost 17 as one of the brand's legacy series, with the Glycerin remaining the softer, more cushioned, daily trainer; the Ghost is the firmer, and more stable, but less lively of the two elder siblings. Each shoe now also has a max-cushioned version, and the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 takes the Glycerin's focus on comfort to the extreme stack height and cushioning. There's also the Brooks Glycerin Flex, a high-stack daily trainer with a flexible platform that naturally bends. For runners who need more support to correct overpronation, there is the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25, which still has dedicated stability features, as well as a steeper heel-to-toe drop to accommodate heel strikers.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, as well as our guide to the best running shoes from Brooks. If you're after shoes well-suited for long runs, check out our recommendations for the best long-distance running shoes.

    Brooks Ghost 17

    Track

    The Brooks Ghost 17 and Brooks Glycerin 22 are two of the Seattle-based brand's most popular daily trainers. They serve very similar purposes, but the Glycerin 22 is more cushioned and bouncier, while the Ghost 17 is firmer and has more dedicated stability features, like a reinforced heel counter and raised sidewalls . Neither shoe is built for speed, but the Glycerin 22's midsole has more bounce, while the Ghost 17 gives a more grounded feel.

    HOKA Clifton 10

    Track

    The Brooks Glycerin 22 and HOKA Clifton 10 both deliver a cushioned, comfortable ride, but they feel quite different underfoot. The HOKA Clifton 10 is lighter and rolls forward more easily thanks to its firmer foam and pronounced rocker, giving it a smoother, more versatile ride across a range of paces. The Brooks Glycerin 22 feels denser and more traditional, focusing on deep cushioning and a stable, planted feel. Runners who want an easy, efficient turnover will prefer the Clifton 10, while those who prioritize softness and consistent comfort will appreciate the Glycerin 22.

    Brooks Glycerin Max

    Track

    While the Brooks Glycerin 22 and Brooks Glycerin Max share a similar name and a focus on comfort,  they diverge in the experience on foot. The Glycerin 22 still has a steeper heel-to-toe drop, and attempts to balance comfort and stability, resulting in a more versatile daily trainer that is a reliable companion for most heel strikers. The Glycerin Max prioritizes comfort and cushioning above all else, resulting in a deeply protective, albeit bulky and occasionally unstable shoe that is best suited for easy, recovery runs.

    Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

    Track

    The Brooks Glycerin 22 and the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 are two of the brand's best-selling shoes, each targeting slightly different runners. The Adrenaline GTS 25 is a dedicated stability shoe with multiple support features, including a medial post and guide rails, to combat over-pronation. Its firmer midsole further reduces any unsteadiness. The Glycerin 22, meanwhile, is a neutral daily trainer with better cushioning and an overall livelier midsole. The Adrenaline GTS 25 remains a solid choice for beginner runners who feel unsteady in their stride, while the Glycerin 22 is a more comfortable shoe, especially for heel strikers. 

    Show more 
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    0.0
    Weight
    Weight
    Locked292.9 g (10.33 oz)

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    LockedLock mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    LockedLock mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    Locked10.2 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    LockedLock mm

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    LockedLock mm (Lock")
    Outsole Arch Width
    LockedLock mm (Lock")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    LockedLock mm (Lock")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    LockedLock
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    LockedLock
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    LockedLock mm (Lock")
    Internal Heel Width
    LockedLock mm (Lock")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    LockedLock mm (Lock")
    Wide Sizing Available
    LockedLocked
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    LockedLocked
    Plate
    LockedNone
    Performance
    0.0
    Heel Energy Return
    SAMPLE
    JOIN NOW

    for videos & test results

    Brooks Glycerin 22 Heel Compression Video Sample
    Heel Energy Return
    LockedLock%

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    0.0
    Forefoot Energy Return
    SAMPLE
    JOIN NOW

    for videos & test results

    Brooks Glycerin 22 Forefoot Compression Video Sample
    Forefoot Energy Return
    LockedLock%

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    0.0
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    LockedLock J

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    0.0
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    LockedLock J

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    0.0
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    LockedLock N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    LockedLock N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    LockedLock N/mm

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    0.0
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    LockedLock N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    LockedLock N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    LockedLock N/mm

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.

    0.0
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    LockedLock J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    LockedLock J

    Become a member to view the full test results and text of the reviews, as well as extra website features and tools with no ads.