Saucony Triumph 23  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Oct 14, 2025 at 02:51pm
Writing modified Oct 16, 2025 at 12:53pm
Tested using Methodology v0.9 
Saucony Triumph 23
7.3
Marathon Racing 
6.6
5K/10K Racing 
7.8
Energy Return 
7.9
Cushioning 
8.0
Lateral Stability 
 0

The Saucony Triumph 23 is a premium daily trainer that marks another chapter in the long history of a Triumph series that has undergone so many changes in recent iterations. Saucony addressed some of the most notable flaws of the Saucony Triumph 22, shaving off over 20g of weight, and making the PWRRUN PB midsole a bit softer and bouncier. The thickly padded upper of the Triumph 23 is designed for comfort, but it is not very breathable and can get uncomfortably hot in summer temperatures. The firm forefoot can also feel harsh at faster paces. Overall, the Triumph 23 is a solid shoe designed to get through the grind of everyday runs with no frills and no thrills.

Our Verdict

7.3
Marathon Racing 

The Saucony Triumph 23 is a decent shoe for runners who are just focused on finishing a marathon. The shoe has enough cushioning and stability to get you through 26.2 miles, but it's too sluggish and heavy for runners chasing a fast time.

Pros
  • PWRRUN PB foam has good springiness.

Cons
  • Too heavy for racing.

6.6
5K/10K Racing 

The Saucony Triumph 23 is a passable option for a 5 or 10k race. It's not built for speed, but with its firm forefoot and good energy return, it can turn over quickly when called upon. Despite its mighty name, though, this shoe is too heavy to triumph in a competitive race.

Pros
  • PWRRUN PB foam has good springiness.

Cons
  • Too heavy for racing.

7.8
Energy Return 

The Saucony Triumph 23 gets good energy return from its PWRRUN PB midsole. However, the shoe's weight and geometry somewhat mitigate the bouncy foam, making it feel more cumbersome than its score would suggest.

Pros
  • PWRRUN PB foam has good springiness.

Cons
None
7.9
Cushioning 

The Saucony Triumph 23 has very good cushioning, and the PWRRUN PB foam's ability to absorb impact will especially appeal to larger or heavier runners. The heel can feel a bit mushy, but the overall ride is solid and consistent.

Pros
  • Very soft foam in midsole.

Cons
None
8.0
Lateral Stability 

The Saucony Triumph 23 offers great stability, thanks to its balanced construction and fully gusseted tongue. The shoe's platform is more flared on the medial side than the Triumph 22, contributing to the wider base and greater medial stability.

Pros
  • Wide midsole creates stable base.

  • Fully gusseted tongue helps with with lock down.

Cons
  • Soft heel foam can be unstable.

  • 7.3
    Marathon Racing
  • 6.6
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.8
    Energy Return
  • 7.9
    Cushioning
  • 8.0
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Oct 23, 2025: 

      We updated the review to include text for the Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test, which was recently added to our test bench.

    2.  Updated Oct 23, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.9, which adds a Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test to our performance section. Read more in our changelog.
    3.  Updated Oct 14, 2025: Review published.
    4.  Updated Oct 01, 2025: Early access published.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the Saucony Triumph 23 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label for our pair, in the Grey/Shadow colorway. The shoe is also available in numerous other colorways, depending on your region. The shoe is available in Regular and Wide versions for both men and women. There is also a GTX version, which has a waterproof, GORE-TEX lined upper. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Saucony Triumph 23 is a premium daily trainer that captures some, but not all, of the qualities that have made the Triumph series a popular shoe for so many years. As a comfort-oriented everyday running shoe, it stacks up well against the Brooks Glycerin 22, Nike Vomero 18, or ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27. The Triumph 23 is now significantly lighter than these peer rival shoes, after Saucony trimmed weight from the Triumph 22. Nevertheless, the Triumph 23 is still not a speedy shoe, and remains better suited for easy, everyday runs than harder workouts.

    Saucony's lineup contains a robust selection of daily trainers, with the Triumph 23 being at the more cushioned end of the spectrum. The Saucony Ride 18 is more of a classic daily trainer with a more consistent ride that can handle a wider range of paces. The Saucony Guide 18 is a stability-focused daily trainer that has multiple guidance features to correct overpronation. The Saucony Hurricane 25 is also a stability shoe, but with enough cushioning and energy to also be a good long run shoe.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, as well as the best running shoes for men and the best running shoes for women.

    Saucony Ride 18

    The Saucony Ride 18 and Saucony Triumph 23 are two of the American brands' most popular daily trainers, each providing a different experience underfoot. The Triumph 23 is the softer, more cushioned option and has a steeper heel-to-toe drop, which will appeal to heel strikers. The Ride 18 gives a firmer feel underfoot, but is less bulky than the Triumph 23, and is an overall more versatile shoe. Both shoes have good energy return from their midsoles, but the overall geometry makes both of them somewhat less lively than their scores would suggest. 

    Brooks Glycerin 22

    The Saucony Triumph 23 and Brooks Glycerin 22 are both popular cushioned models from their respective brands, and are part of product lines that are undergoing significant evolution. In this respect, the Triumph 23 is a step ahead of the Glycerin 22, as Saucony has managed to make this iteration of the Triumph significantly lighter while still providing better cushioning. The Triumph 23 also returns energy much better than the Glycerin 22. One area where the Glycerin 22 has an advantage would be for heavier heel strikers, as the cushioning in the rearfoot of the Glycerin does a better job of absorbing impact at higher force levels.

    ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

    The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 and Saucony Triumph 23 are both highly cushioned daily trainers that prioritize cushioning over performance. However, the Triumph 23 is noticeably lighter and has more bounce than the NIMBUS 27. This weight difference is largely due to the NIMBUS 27's much higher stack height, and the taller stack of foam in the ASICS shoe does provide better impact absorption. 

    Saucony Triumph 22

    The Saucony Triumph 23 is the successor to the Saucony Triumph 22 and contains a number of noteworthy tweaks and improvements. The 23 is noticeably lighter, and although both have PWRRUN PB foam, the 23 is softer and better cushioned. The Triumph 23's midsole has more medial flare, leading to a wider base and a slightly more stable ride than the 22.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    5.8
    Weight
    Weight
    264.8 g (9.34 oz)

    The Saucony Triumph 23 is over 20g lighter than the Saucony Triumph 22. Much of this weight savings comes from having less rubber coverage on the outsole.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    39.4 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    29.8 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    9.6 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    10.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    99 mm (3.9")
    Outsole Arch Width
    80 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    122 mm (4.8")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.51
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    4.09
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    279 mm (11.0")
    Internal Heel Width
    61 mm (2.4")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    95 mm (3.7")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    7.4
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    77.7%

    The heel has decent energy return, although less than the forefoot. Consequently, the roll through from heel to toe is somewhat muted for heel strikers.

    7.9
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    80.1%

    The forefoot of the Saucony Triumph 23 has good energy return and is a definite improvement over the Saucony Triumph 22, but it's actually marginally less energetic than the Saucony Ride 18. The Triumph 23's overall construction mitigates the midsole's bounce, and can get in the way of picking up the pace.

    8.1
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.69 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    10.04 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    16.99 J

    The heel of the Saucony Triumph 23 has very good impact absorption and holds up impressively well under heavy forces, making it a good option for larger heel strikers.

    7.6
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.92 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    8.17 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    11.65 J

    Overall, the cushioning in the forefoot of the Saucony Triumph 23 is good, although it struggles to keep up with higher impact forces. At easy paces, it provides excellent protection, but absorbs comparatively less and less impact as you apply more force.

    5.2
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    48.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    104.5 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    246.6 N/mm

    The Saucony Triumph 23 lacks rigidity in the heel, which has both positive and negative aspects: landings will feel softer, but heel strikers may be less stable.

    8.3
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    104.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    234.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    481.4 N/mm

    As with most shoes, the forefoot of the Saucony Triumph 23 gets firmer as more force is applied, but this tendency is much more dramatic with the Triumph 23. At lower forces, the forefoot firmness of this shoe sits near the median of shoes we've tested, but when moderate force is applied, it's one of the stiffest. This can lead to a feeling of the shoe becoming a brick during a run.

    6.8
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.50 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.27 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    7.13 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    7.03 J

    The Saucony Triumph 23 starts out with a moderately cushioned feel, but its PWRRUN PB midsole loses absorption capabilities as the run progresses. An initial, relatively sharp drop in cushioning occurs within the first 10km, then the decrease is more gradual. While there's still adequate protection for long runs, the forefoot becomes less forgiving over distance, making it a better fit for shorter efforts than for runners seeking plush comfort deep into a 20 km or longer session.