The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is a solid trainer that works well for faster workouts and can even serve as a racing shoe, though it's not optimized for race day. Adidas has lighter, more nimble options, like the Evo SL, but the Boston 13 will appeal to runners who want a firmer, more stable shoe for speed sessions. The shoe is better suited to forefoot strikers, as the heel is insufficiently cushioned, and the shoe's design doesn't do much to help you roll from your heel to your mid-foot.
| ✅ Buy If: | ❌ Skip If: |
|
|
Our Verdict
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 delivers reasonable performance for marathon racing. You won't see elite runners lacing it up at the Boston Marathon, but it still offers a reliable, stable ride that's ideal for runners who prioritize durability over cutting-edge efficiency. While it doesn't have the energy return of modern super shoes, the midsole is quite energetic, and the cushioning is not bad. That said, the firmer ride will likely start to feel harsh by the time you get to the end of the race.
ENERGYRODS add some structural integrity.
Bouncy ride due to Lighstrike Pro, especially in the forefoot.
Stable ride due to firmer carrier foam.
Still a bit heavy.
Insufficient underfoot protection, especially in the heel.
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is decent for shorter races, thanks to its firm, snappy forefoot and a stiff midsole that is reinforced by carbon rods, and gives good leverage as you push off. That said, true super shoes in this category are far lighter, giving them an edge in terms of overall efficiency.
ENERGYRODS add some structural integrity.
Bouncy ride due to Lighstrike Pro, especially in the forefoot.
Still a bit heavy.
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is an okay shoe for long runs. The ride stays stable even as you fatigue, and the shoe's efficiency at returning energy makes it efficient over long distances. But the cushioning disappoints over long distances, leaving your legs feeling more beat up afterward.
Stays stable and controlled even as your legs fatigue.
Strong forefoot energy return helps keep the ride efficient over long distances.
Insufficient underfoot protection, especially in the heel.
Long-run cushioning fades, leaving your legs more beat up by the end.
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is a sub-par choice for daily training. Its great stability makes for a dependable, planted ride, but the stiff midsole is a poor match for relaxed, easy-effort running. The shoe's cushioning isn't bad, but it's not really satisfactory for logging lots of miles.
Great stability gives a dependable, planted ride for everyday miles.
Stiff ENERGYRODS make relaxed, easy-effort running feel less natural.
Shallow heel rocker makes landing-to-midstance feel a little abrupt.
Changelog
- Updated Oct 02, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.15, which replaces Responsiveness with three specific performance usages: Bounciness, Snappiness, and Roll. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
- Updated Sep 17, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.14, which adds new lace-specific results. We've included a close-up photo of the laces, as well as details including lace type, width, thickness, and stretch. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
- Updated Sep 15, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.13, which identifies the different foams used in the shoe's midsole. We've included a microscopic image of the foam cells to give you an idea of what the microstructure looks like. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
- Updated Jun 17, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.12, which fixes how we measure firmness, a component of the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages. There may be inconsistencies between the text and the scores for these usages, but the scores should still be considered valid. We've also brought back the Energy Return score and added two new usages: Daily Training and Long Run. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
-
Updated Jun 05, 2026:
We corrected the plate type, which was previously identified as carbon rod but is actually fiberglass rod, and updated the information throughout the review. This change doesn't impact our scores.
-
Updated Apr 30, 2026:
We've updated this review to add text for the new Responsiveness usage box and made minor phrasing adjustments throughout the review for consistency.
- Updated Apr 28, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.11, adding two new rocker measurements to the Design section, and three new responsiveness tests to the Performance section. The Energy Return usage score has been replaced with Responsiveness. Check out the details in our changelog.
-
Updated Feb 27, 2026:
We updated the review to include text for the new Fit usage box, which was recently added to our test bench.
- Updated Feb 20, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.10, adding a new set of fit tests to the Design section and an overall fit performance usage. Check out the details in our changelog.
-
Updated Feb 16, 2026:
We refreshed the Popular Running Shoe Comparisons to include recent and relevant models as comparison points.
- Updated Oct 28, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.9, which adds a Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test to our performance section. Read more in our changelog.
-
Updated Oct 21, 2025:
We've adjusted this review's writing to align with the new test bench, including updates to all usage scores and test boxes for Cushioning, Firmness, and Energy Return. We've updated the side-by-side comparisons with other shoes accordingly.
- Updated Oct 20, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.
-
Updated Sep 04, 2025:
We added the adidas Adizero Adios 9 to the Adizero lineup overview of the popular running shoe comparisons box.
-
Updated Jul 30, 2025:
We revised the phrasing in the Lateral Stability, Cushioning, Heel Cushioning, Forefoot Cushioning, and side-by-side comparison with the adidas Adizero Boston 12 to better align with the latest test bench scores.
- Updated Jul 30, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.1, which mainly updates the score components for the Marathon Racing and Lateral Stability usage boxes to improve accuracy.
- Updated Jun 06, 2025: Review published.
- Updated Jun 02, 2025: Early access published.
- Updated May 09, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.
- Updated May 09, 2025: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
- Updated May 06, 2025: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.
We've bought and tested more than 300 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs.
Test Results
Energy Return
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 gives back a good amount of energy with every stride, especially up front, where the lively foam adds impressive pop to your push-off. The heel is less lively, returning noticeably less of the energy from each landing, though it's far from dead underfoot.
The forefoot energy return is a standout feature of the model. Thanks to the increased foam up front, the shoe feels more energetic and propulsive than ever before. While it might not be the most explosive ride out there (the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, for example, has a bit more pop), it's still a significant upgrade that makes this shoe genuinely fun to pick up the pace in.
The heel energy return is reasonable in the Adidas Boston 13. It still doesn't deliver the substantial bounce of other shoes like the Adizero Evo SL, but there's an adequately responsive feel in the heel that helps runners transition rapidly towards their forefoot upon each impact.
Stability
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 has great lateral stability, helped by its structured midsole design. Whether you're pushing the pace or just logging steady miles, the combination of a firmer platform and wide base ensures a traditional, confidence-inspiring ride. It's not quite as stable as the previous version, mostly because it's narrower at the arch, but this is offset by a slightly wider base elsewhere. This stability is a key strength of the model, especially for runners who want a plated trainer that feels secure yet remains capable of pushing the pace.
ENERGYRODS add some structural integrity.
Stable ride due to firmer carrier foam.
The forefoot is exceptionally firm, giving this shoe a very direct, snappy toe-off and a stable feel. This firmness is consistent across different forces, making it a standout for runners who prefer a stiff, responsive ride up front, though it might feel too harsh for those seeking a softer, more forgiving feel during longer runs.
The shoe is very firm in the heel, making for a stable platform. However, at lower impact forces, it's a bit softer than the adidas Adizero Boston 12, but this isn't game-changing in any way. Runners looking for an ultra-soft ride for their super trainer should look elsewhere, perhaps towards the HOKA Mach X 2.
The arch is narrower than in the previous iteration, mainly due to a redesigned cutout that's larger and more triangular, extending through the side of the outsole. This new shape, closer to that of the Adizero Adios Pro 4, may reduce stability for some runners. On the flip side, the forefoot is slightly wider, providing a more grounded feel during toe-off.
Cushioning
The adidas Adizero Boston 13's cushioning is mediocre. There's more Lightstrike Pro foam in the forefoot than previous iterations, offering a bump in impact absorption and a slightly more forgiving ride that's appreciated for longer efforts. However, the heel feels noticeably underprotected compared to most super trainers, lacking that plush, marshmallow-like protection some runners might prefer.
Insufficient underfoot protection, especially in the heel.
Heel cushioning in the shoe is marginally improved compared to the adidas Adizero Boston 12, absorbing impacts a bit more effectively, especially at lower forces like during easy runs. That said, it's still lacking a lot and won't offer the plush, pillowy feel you might expect from some max-cushion super trainers like the HOKA Mach X 2.
Forefoot cushioning is alright. The large slab of foam in this area helps, but it delivers only adequate protection. While this premium compound is noticeable and makes the shoe feel quite a bit more forgiving up front, it's still relatively under-cushioned compared to more protective options like the HOKA Mach X 2, so it might feel a little harsh during longer efforts for forefoot strikers.
Bounciness
Neither the heel nor the forefoot of the adidas Adizero Boston 13 compresses very deeply under load, so there isn't a lot of room to generate a springy sensation underfoot. The forefoot's strong energy return adds a bit of life back into push-offs, but the heel is more muted, leaving landings feeling comparatively flat.
Bouncy ride due to Lighstrike Pro, especially in the forefoot.
ENERGYRODS create snappy response.
Snappiness
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 feels impressively snappy at toe-off. The exceptionally firm forefoot resists bending well and gives back most of the energy stored in it as it releases, so push-offs feel efficient and propulsive. The forefoot rocker's shallow angle doesn't add much to that snap, but the responsiveness at push-off is one of the shoe's strongest suits.
Roll
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 rolls through the stride decently. Its rocker holds up reasonably well under load rather than flattening out, and the notably stiff forefoot keeps the push through toe-off fairly consistent. The shallow heel rocker means the transition into midstance feels a bit more abrupt for heel strikers.
True To Size
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is close to true to size. The arch runs slightly narrow, and the forefoot has slightly less volume, so this isn't an ideal shoe for runners with wide feet. The length is true to size, so most other runners can stick to their usual size.
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is noticeably lighter than its predecessor, giving it better efficiency. However, it's still heavier than other super trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and Hoka Mach X 2, so it might not feel as effortless for extended race paces. Still, the weight reduction is a welcome improvement that helps this shoe feel more nimble.
The shoe runs slightly longer than the previous iteration, so you might need to double-check your sizing to get the best fit. It's also a touch roomier in the heel and forefoot, making it a bit more accommodating overall compared to the snugger adidas Adizero Boston 12. This update can be a positive for those who want a bit more breathing room up front without sacrificing too much lockdown.
Popular Running Shoe Comparisons
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 sits squarely in the super-trainer category, offering a ride ideal for runners who prefer a traditional, grounded feel over maximum cushioning. Runners looking for an uptempo trainer with the same stack height and heel-drop, but a lighter weight, should check out the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 if you want the lightest carbon-plated option, or the adidas Adizero Evo SL if you want an unplated shoe with better cushioning. Neither of these shoes is as stable as the Boston 13, though. For heel strikers looking for a more accommodating option in this category, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 offers much better heel cushioning and does a better job of springing you forward from heel landings onto your toes.
For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, or if you want to stick with adidas, see our recommendations for the best adidas running shoes.
The adidas Adizero Evo SL is a better everyday shoe than the adidas Adizero Boston 13, with a softer, bouncier ride that's fun for steady miles. The Boston 13 is firmer, stiffer, and very stable, making it the better pick for structured speed sessions and marathon-pace efforts if you like a classic, responsive feel.
The adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 is a better shoe for racing than the adidas Adizero Boston 13. The Adios Pro 4 is a true super shoe made for the marathon, with a highly cushioned, bouncy midsole that feels protective over long distances while remaining very light on foot. The Boston 13 is more of a super trainer, designed to handle interval sessions and high-mileage workouts with greater durability than a pure race-day shoe.
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 is better than the adidas Adizero Boston 12 for racing and fast workouts. It's lighter and much bouncier, making it the pick for runners who want a shoe that feels lively at race pace, from 5Ks to marathons. The Boston 12 is a bit more stable and slightly better for easy miles and long runs.
The Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and the adidas Adizero Boston 13 are both plated speed trainers designed for uptempo efforts, but they differ notably in execution. The Saucony uses a softer PWRRUN PB foam paired with a nylon plate, resulting in a slightly more protective ride that allows you to do faster work. The Saucony is lightweight, flexible, and more accessible for runners who want plated performance without the rigidity of carbon. The adidas shoe, on the other hand, features adidas' carbon ENERGYRODS embedded in a firmer dual-density midsole, delivering a snappier, more aggressive feel. It's a shoe that rewards precise mechanics at faster paces, especially for runners who prefer a grounded, firm platform and don't mind a little stiffness underfoot.
The ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 and adidas Adizero Boston 13 are both moderately stacked super trainers with similar overall geometry, but their underfoot feel is quite different. The adidas relies on ENERGYRODS and a much firmer platform that demands more force to really come alive, so it tends to reward powerful runners who can consistently load the shoe. The ASICS uses a full-length carbon plate in a noticeably lighter and lower-stacked package, which makes it feel more efficient and easier to turn over, especially when fatigue starts to creep in. This also means it will feel more at home for short racing.
The Nike Zoom Fly 6 is a better shoe than the adidas Adizero Boston 13. It's more cushioned and slightly lighter, making it the pick for runners who want one shoe for training and race day. The adidas has more bounce, a firmer feel, and a roomier toe box, so it's the better choice for runners with wider feet or those who prefer a closer-to-the-ground feel.
The adidas Adizero Boston 13 and ASICS MAGIC SPEED 4 are both super trainers built for uptempo training, but they go about it in very different ways. The ASICS is lighter and uses a full-length carbon plate, with a more cushioned underfoot experience. The adidas relies on ENERGYRODS instead, pairing them with a Lightstrike Pro-based midsole in the forefoot that feels bouncier, but the shoe is also noticeably firmer overall. That firmness is a big part of the adidas' identity: it can feel snappier and more aggressive, but you have to load it with higher force and commit to the pace to really unlock the payoff. The adidas is also flatter, with a less pronounced rocker, so it doesn't feel as smooth when rolling forward. The ASICS is less demanding and retains more of its cushioning performance, making it the more reliable option when distance starts to pile up.
The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and adidas Adizero Boston 13 are both versatile, plated trainers that can handle everything from steady daily miles to faster workouts, but they lean into slightly different strengths. The Saucony is lighter and more energetic, featuring a softer, more cushioned heel and a more bouncy feel. Its plastic plate is a bit less stiff than the adidas ENERGYRODS. The adidas, on the other hand, is built for those who prefer a firmer feel in the heel and a more connected ride overall. It's also slightly heavier than the Saucony, so overall, the Saucony is the better performer in most use cases, while the adidas offers a classic, workhorse feel that's great for runners who want a firmer, more grounded ride during tempo efforts.
The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is a better choice than the adidas Adizero Boston 13 for most runners. It's more cushioned and a bit more stable, making it a comfortable pick for everyday training and long runs, where the adidas's firmer ride can feel harsh. The adidas is lighter and bouncier, so it's the better option for runners who mainly want a shoe for speed workouts and shorter races.
Differences Between Sizes And Variants
We tested the adidas Adizero Boston 13 in men's US size 9, as noted on the label for our pair. The color shown here is Cloud White/Pure Teal/Grey. This model is also available in other colorways, including Cloud White/Core Black/Lucid Red, Core Black/Cloud White/Grey Five, and Cloud White/Matte Silver/Dash Grey. Wide versions are not available for this model. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.
