Saucony Endorphin Speed 4   Review

The ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 are both versatile trainers but cater to slightly different priorities. The ASICS is an unplated, uptempo premium trainer that emphasizes maximum cushioning and provides a stable, plush ride, making it especially appealing for longer runs. The Saucony, however, is a super trainer that prioritizes a more energetic and responsive experience, featuring a bouncy midsole and a nylon plate, making it better suited for shorter races and faster workouts. While both shoes handle versatility well, the ASICS excels in comfort and protection. In contrast, the Saucony is the preferred option if you want a snappier shoe that can comfortably pick up the pace for faster efforts like intervals or tempo runs.

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 may look similar on paper, but they differ meaningfully. The Speed 5 is slightly softer than its predecessor, but not dramatically so, especially in the forefoot, which remains relatively stiff when toeing off. That's partly due to the new geometry: the Speed 5 has a slightly lower stack and higher drop, so it feels a bit more traditional than in the Speed 4. One notable update is the removal of the pronounced heel flare, which now allows for smoother heel landings and transitions. The Speed 5 also fits differently. It has more room through the forefoot and a wider platform, making it more comfortable for wider-footed runners or those prioritizing step-in comfort. However, the looser fit may feel less locked-in for those seeking a snug performance feel during fast sessions.

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 are both plated super trainers, but they offer different rides. The PUMA is a higher-stack shoe, with a steeper heel-to-toe drop and more absorbent heel cushioning, making it a better fit for heel strikers. The Saucony, on the other hand, is notably lighter and more responsive, making it more efficient for speedwork despite using a nylon plate rather than a carbon fiber plate like the PUMA.

The Nike Zoom Fly 6 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 are both positioned as super trainers, designed to bridge the gap between daily trainers and race-day shoes. The Nike features a higher stack and full-length carbon plate, paired with a thin ZoomX top layer over firmer SR-02 foam, delivering a rockered, stable ride with decent cushioning. In contrast, the Saucony uses a plastic plate and PWRRUN PB foam, resulting in a ride that feels more energetic and responsive, but also less protective, especially under the heel. While both shoes can handle steady runs, up-tempo workouts, and occasional racing, the Saucony is lighter, bouncier, and better suited for runners who want a livelier, more grounded underfoot feel.

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and adidas Adizero Boston 13 are both versatile, plated trainers that can handle everything from steady daily miles to faster workouts, but they lean into slightly different strengths. The Saucony is lighter and more energetic, featuring a softer, more cushioned heel and a more bouncy feel. Its plastic plate is a bit less stiff than the adidas' ENERGYRODS. The Boston 13, on the other hand, is built for those who prefer a firmer feel in the heel and a more connected ride overall. It's also slightly heavier than the Saucony, so overall, the Saucony is the better performer in most use cases, while the Boston 13 offers a classic, workhorse feel that's great for runners who want a firmer, more grounded ride during tempo efforts.

While they're both plated trainers, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is better overall than the Brooks Hyperion Max 2. The Saucony is notably lighter and more responsive thanks to its PEBA-based midsole, making it a bit more versatile and more efficient at faster paces.

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the HOKA Mach X 2 are both versatile super trainers, but each excels in different scenarios. The Saucony is lighter and more stable and offers a snappier, more responsive feel. In contrast, the HOKA is more heavily cushioned and plush. While both shoes are versatile enough for training and some racing, the Saucony shines brightest in shorter events, whereas the HOKA is the preferred option for those prioritizing cushioning and comfort over extended distances.

The Saucony Triumph 22 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 come from the same brand but serve different purposes within a runner's rotation. The Endorphin Speed 4 is a super trainer featuring a plastic plate, which enhances stability and provides significantly more energy return. This makes it well-suited for faster-paced training and racing. The Triumph 22, in contrast, offers more cushioning, providing greater comfort for daily mileage and recovery runs. That said, the Endorphin Speed 4 is a more premium model aimed at more performance-oriented runners.

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the adidas Adizero Boston 12 are both versatile, stable daily trainers, but differ notably in feel and cushioning. The Saucony provides more cushioning, a softer midsole, and better responsiveness, making it smoother for faster workouts or races. It's also lighter than the adidas, making it a more versatile partner for daily runs.

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the Mizuno Neo Vista are both plated trainers but excel in different areas. The Saucony is a lighter, more responsive super trainer, better suited for picking up the pace and racing shorter distances, making it a great option for workouts, intervals, or even competitive events. The Mizuno, on the other hand, is a plated premium trainer that provides a more cushioned, comfortable experience with greater protection, which is ideal for runners seeking plushness on recovery runs.