Brooks Hyperion Max 2  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Oct 22, 2025 at 01:29pm
Tested using Methodology v0.8.2 
Brooks Hyperion Max 2
7.1
Marathon Racing 
7.2
5K/10K Racing 
7.1
Energy Return 
7.2
Cushioning 
7.6
Lateral Stability 
 0
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by Brooks Hyperion Max 3

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is a plated tempo trainer. It features a nylon 'SpeedVault' plate in the midsole and has a pronounced forefoot rocker that makes it a good fit for speed training, though it isn't the most lightweight shoe. Its moderately high-stack cushioning and breathable mesh upper make for a stable, comfortable ride.

Our Verdict

7.1
Marathon Racing 

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is intended to be a trainer rather than a race-day option, but it's best suited to training for moderate to longer distances. It offers a decently cushioned ride, though it isn't the most protective for high-performance racing. It's also overly heavy and lacks the responsiveness needed for efficient racing, though its rockered geometry helps with smoother transitions. The nylon plate also adds structure and stability to your distance efforts, where form can begin to break down.

Pros
  • Nylon plate adds stability.

  • Forefoot rocker.

  • Decent cushioning overall.

Cons
  • Energy return is a bit lacking for high efficiency.

  • Not the most impact absorption for longer efforts.

  • Heavy.

7.2
5K/10K Racing 

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 isn't intended for racing at shorter distances. It's too heavy to really be efficient for races, and its energy return is only decent. However, its nylon plate adds some stiffness that makes for snappier transitions at faster paces.

Pros
  • Forefoot rocker.

  • Nylon plate adds stiffness.

Cons
  • Energy return is a bit lacking for high efficiency.

  • Heavy.

7.1
Energy Return 

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has decent energy return. It's fairly responsive for a trainer, but it's not propulsive enough for high-performance efficiency.

Pros
  • Decent energy return, especially at the forefoot.

Cons
  • Energy return is a bit lacking for high efficiency.

7.2
Cushioning 

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is decently cushioned. Though its forefoot doesn't quite absorb as much impact as its heel, it's fairly protected underfoot, if a bit less than ideal for very long runs.

Pros
  • Decent cushioning overall.

Cons
  • Not the most impact absorption for longer efforts.

7.6
Lateral Stability 

The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has very good lateral stability. Its relatively firm foam and nylon plate add stability to the midsole, and the shoe doesn't have an overly high stack height, giving it a more grounded feel. However, the outsole is slightly narrow in the heel.

Pros
  • Nylon plate adds stability.

  • Feels fairly firm underfoot.

  • Moderate stack height.

Cons
  • Narrow outsole heel.

  • 7.1
    Marathon Racing
  • 7.2
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.1
    Energy Return
  • 7.2
    Cushioning
  • 7.6
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Oct 22, 2025: 

      We updated the Pros & Cons, Cushioning, Marathon Racing, Heel Energy Return, Heel Cushioning, Forefoot Cushioning, and Heel Firmness boxes to align with the latest test bench.

    2.  Updated Oct 20, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.
    3.  Updated Jul 30, 2025: 

      We revised the phrasing in the Cushioning, Marathon Racing, Compared To Other Running Shoes, and Forefoot Cushioning boxes to reflect the changes in the latest test bench.

    4.  Updated Jul 30, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.1, which mainly updates the score components for the Marathon Racing and Lateral Stability usage boxes to improve accuracy.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the Brooks Hyperion Max 2 in men's US size 9 in the Crystal Seas/Diva Pink/Black colorway. Here's the label for our pair. Depending on your region, you can also buy the shoe in other colorways, including Illusion/Coral/Black, Cobalt/Green Gecko/Limpett, White/Peach/Coral, and Black/Gold/Pink.

    This shoe is only available in standard width in men's and women's sizing.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 is a plated daily trainer suited to up-tempo and longer runs. Despite the 'Max' in its name, it's not a maximalist shoe, with a moderate stack height and some underfoot cushioning. Like other models in the Hyperion lineup, such as the lightweight, lower-stack Brooks Hyperion 2 and the more performance-oriented Brooks Hyperion Elite 4, it features a breathable mesh upper and is intended for faster paces. However, it's still heavier than other shoes in its class, and its nitrogen-infused DNA Flash v2 foam doesn't offer the most responsive ride compared to more performance-oriented foams on the market. While the Hyperion Max 2 tries to balance comfort and speed, lighter and more efficient plated trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 outpace it in most areas, while higher-stack options like the ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 offer superior cushioning for long runs.

    See the best running shoes we've tested to find the best shoe for your needs.

    Brooks Hyperion 2

    Both the Brooks Hyperion 2 and Brooks Hyperion Max 2 are intended for faster-paced workouts, but they approach that goal in different ways. The Hyperion 2 is a more traditional shoe with a lighter weight and lower stack height that makes it well-suited to faster and shorter runs. Meanwhile, the Hyperion Max 2 has a less traditional geometry and falls a bit more into the super trainer category, with a pronounced rocker and nylon plate. It's notably more cushioned than the Hyperion 2, making it the better option for longer efforts.

    Brooks Glycerin Max

    Despite sharing a 'max' moniker, the Brooks Glycerin Max and the Brooks Hyperion Max 2 are quite different models. The Glycerin Max is a maximalist high-stack daily trainer, while the Hyperion Max 2 is a plated super trainer. The Hyperion Max 2 is notably lighter, with a lower stack height that delivers a more stable and responsive ride that's better for training at faster paces. By contrast, the Glycerin Max offers more cushioning but lacks the bounciness needed for uptempo runs, making it a better fit for easier miles and recovery runs.

    ASICS SUPERBLAST 2

    The ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 is a better option for long runs than the Brooks Hyperion Max 2. It has significantly better cushioning and offers more underfoot protection. It's also a bit lighter. However, some may prefer the Brooks' lower stack and firmer foam, which offers a bit more stability.

    Saucony Endorphin Speed 4

    While they're both plated trainers, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is better overall than the Brooks Hyperion Max 2. The Saucony is notably lighter and delivers better energy return thanks to its PEBA-based midsole, making it a bit more versatile and more efficient at faster paces.

    Show more 
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    5.9
    Weight
    Weight
    263.7 g (9.30 oz)

    This shoe is quite heavy, with the addition of a nylon plate adding some weight compared to its predecessor. It's not ideal for those who prefer lighter trainers.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    36.7 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    29.8 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.9 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    82 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Arch Width
    72 mm (2.8")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    112 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.23
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.76
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    273 mm (10.7")
    Internal Heel Width
    61 mm (2.4")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Semi-gusseted
    Plate
    Plastic
    Performance
    6.7
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    75.2%

    The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has okay energy return in the heel. However, its DNA Flash v2 foam doesn't deliver the bounciest experience, especially compared to more efficient plated trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4.

    7.3
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    77.1%

    The forefoot provides similar energy return. While you won't get the most propulsive toe-offs out of it, it still returns enough energy for a fairly lively feel, especially for a trainer.

    7.2
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.32 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.04 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    15.09 J

    The heel is decently cushioned, offering especially effective impact absorption at medium forces (the impact range that most runners fall into). Overall, it offers a balanced level of cushioning, comfortable enough for longer runs without feeling overly plush.

    7.1
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.17 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    7.60 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    11.44 J

    The forefoot cushioning is also decent. It doesn't provide as much comfort for those who land higher up on the foot, but it's cushioned enough to prevent bottoming out for shorter sessions. Still, it can start to feel harsh when pushing for longer distances or if you apply a lot of force when striking the ground.

    5.8
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    50.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    124.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    270.8 N/mm

    The heel is fairly soft overall. That said, it still offers a bit more firmness and stability at all impact forces than other highly cushioned models like the Brooks Glycerin Max.

    8.0
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    109.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    211.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    417.1 N/mm

    The forefoot is very firm, making it feel more stable and controlled. That said, if you prefer a softer feel under the forefoot, you might find it a bit harsh.