HOKA Clifton 9   Review

Review updated Oct 20, 2025 at 04:06 pm
Latest change: Test bench update Jun 17, 2026 at 02:00 pm
Tested using  Methodology v0.12 
HOKA Clifton 9
6.5
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
6.3
5K/10K Racing 
7.1
Long Run 
7.8
Daily Training 

Track

0
Notice This running shoes was replaced by HOKA Clifton 10

The HOKA Clifton 9 is the latest update to the brand's popular daily trainer lineup. This version brings an updated ProFly+ midsole that offers the cushioning comfort Clifton fans love while still providing good stability. This iteration of this shoe is ideal for those seeking a reliable, cushioned trainer that handles easy mileage and recovery runs well.

Our Verdict

6.5
Half/Full Marathon Racing

The HOKA Clifton 9 struggles as a marathon racing shoe, primarily due to its very poor energy return. Its moderate cushioning and average weight contribute little to enhancing marathon performance. However, its decent lateral stability provides reliable footing for runners prioritizing a stable, supportive ride over pure speed and bounce in long-distance events.

Pros
  • Very stable ride.

Cons
  • Midsole is awful at returning energy.

  • A tad heavy for racing.

6.3
5K/10K Racing

The HOKA Clifton 9 is a poor choice for shorter-distance racing, like 5K and 10K runs. Its firm forefoot provides a strong, stable platform suitable for efficient transfers, but this advantage is undermined by the shoe's low energy return and heavy weight. This limits its appeal for competitive runners looking for explosive performance.

Pros
Cons
  • Midsole is awful at returning energy.

  • A tad heavy for racing.

7.1
Long Run
7.8
Daily Training
  • 6.5
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 6.3
    5K/10K Racing
  • 7.1
    Long Run
  • 7.8
    Daily Training
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jun 17, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.12, which fixes how we measure firmness, a component of the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages. There may be inconsistencies between the text and the scores for these usages, but the scores should still be considered valid. We've also brought back the Energy Return score and added two new usages: Daily Training and Long Run. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    2.  Updated May 12, 2026: 

      We've updated this review to add text for the new Responsiveness and True to Size usage boxes, and updated the Popular Running Shoe Comparisons box and some side-by-sides to keep phrasing consistent across the review.

    3.  Updated May 05, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.11, adding two new rocker measurements to the Design section, and three new responsiveness tests to the Performance section. The Energy Return usage score has been replaced with Responsiveness. Check out the details in our changelog.
    4.  Updated Apr 29, 2026:  We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.10, adding a new set of fit tests to the Design section and an overall fit performance usage. Check out the details in our changelog.
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've bought and tested more than 250 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs. 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    2.3

    Energy Return

    2.4
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return

    Forefoot energy return is also very limited, providing little bounce or propulsion. While this is common for very basic daily trainers, it also negatively impacts efficiency, particularly at higher speeds.

    2.2
    Heel Compression Energy Return

    Heel energy return is very bad, offering minimal rebound and responsiveness. This results in an energy-draining experience for heel strikers, especially noticeable during longer runs or faster-paced sessions.

    8.0

    Stability

    The HOKA Clifton 9 has decent lateral stability, which provides satisfacfory support and steadiness during runs. This shoe limits instability with its notably wide outsole and a firmer midsole. This makes it a solid option for runners needing extra support, particularly when fatigue starts to compromise running form.

    Pros
    • Wide base makes for a stable ride.

    • Midsole is quite firm.

    Cons
    External Shape
    8.5
    Heel Firmness

    The heel foam of this model is on the firmer side. Initially, the heel feels distinctly firm, providing strong stability, but it can feel softer than other models like the HOKA Mach 6 under heavier loads, which makes it more comfortable but less stable at higher intensities.

    8.6
    Forefoot Firmness

    The forefoot is firm across all pressure levels, providing great support and a stable platform during toe-offs. This consistently firm feel benefits runners who prefer a solid, controlled sensation underfoot but might feel a bit too harsh for runners looking for a soft, pillowy feel.

    Other Features
    7.8

    Cushioning

    The HOKA Clifton 9 offers good cushioning overall. The heel stays soft and protective even as increasing force is applied, and the forefoot provides good impact protection as well, although it becomes less absorbent at higher force levels.

    Pros
    • Heel cushioning is good.

    Cons
    • Forefoot cushioning is disappointing.

    7.6
    Heel Cushioning

    The HOKA Clifton 9's heel cushioning is good, partially dampening the harshness of the road. It can be suited for heavier runners and heavy heel strikers. However, it may not fully satisfy runners seeking plush comfort because it tends to bottom out after a while.

    7.9
    Forefoot Cushioning

    The HOKA Clifton 9's forefoot cushioning is very good at lower force levels, although steadily less absorbent as more force is applied. The cushioning is good for shorter runs, but tends to bottom out over longer distances.

    4.8

    Responsiveness

    The HOKA Clifton 9 isn't designed to be responsive underfoot, making it unsuitable for runners seeking an energetic ride. Both the heel and forefoot energy return are particularly terrible, resulting in a dull experience underfoot that doesn't feel efficient, especially at higher speeds or during demanding sessions.

    Pros
    Cons
    • Midsole is awful at returning energy.

    3.6
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    7.8
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    5.8
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    6.1
    Rocker Stiffness
    9.7

    True To Size

    The HOKA Clifton 9 has superb sizing, and most runners can stick to their normal size. The length is true to size, with plenty of forefoot height and a very accommodating fit through the front of the shoe. The arch and forefoot run a touch narrower than perfect, but not enough to create a major fit issue for most runners. Wider-footed runners may still want to try them on first.

    10
    Length Fit
    9.6
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    9.3
    Arch Fit: Width
    10
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Additional Tests
    6.1
    Design Weight

    The HOKA Clifton 9 has a moderate weight. It's neither exceptionally light nor overly heavy, making it suitable for everyday runs but not ideal for races or speed-focused sessions where shaving off ounces matters significantly.

    Design Stack Heights
    Design Internal Shape
    8.0
    Design Heel Rocker Geometry
    6.9
    Performance Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The HOKA Clifton 9 is a dependable, straightforward daily trainer known for providing very good stability and some ground feel, making it a popular choice for runners seeking simplicity and consistent performance. However, it falls short in terms of versatility and responsiveness compared to lighter, more lively options like the highly cushioned and dynamic ASICS NOVABLAST 5 or the adidas Adizero Evo SL.

    In HOKA's lineup, the Clifton 9 is positioned as their entry-level model, below more specialized shoes such as the lightweight trainer HOKA Mach 7 or the versatile super trainer HOKA Mach X 2, and dedicated racing models like the carbon-plated HOKA Cielo X 2.0. Ultimately, the Clifton 9 is a reliable everyday trainer, ideal for runners who prioritize predictable comfort over responsiveness or advanced features.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes to find the perfect pair.

    HOKA Bondi 8

    The HOKA Clifton 9 and HOKA Bondi 8 are both cushioned daily trainers, but they don’t feel like direct swaps. The Clifton 9 is the lighter, more straightforward option, with similar overall cushioning in a much nimbler package, making it better suited to easy mileage and dependable daily training. The Bondi 8 is the bigger, heavier cruiser, with slightly more stack underfoot and a broader, more stable platform, but it feels much less energetic. The Clifton 9 works best if you want a cushioned daily trainer that still feels relatively light and simple. The Bondi 8 is better reserved for runners who want a stable, easy-rolling shoe for recovery runs and slow mileage.

    Brooks Ghost 16

    The HOKA Clifton 9 and Brooks Ghost 16 are both classic daily trainers, but they take different approaches. The HOKA is the higher-stack, more cushioned option, with better heel and forefoot protection, making it better suited to relaxed daily miles and longer easy runs. The Brooks is the more traditional workhorse: lower stacked, firmer, more stable, and a bit more responsive underfoot, though it doesn’t offer the same level of protection. For runners who want more cushioning and a softer ride, the HOKA is the clearer fit. The Brooks is the better match if you prefer a firmer, more stable daily trainer for easy runs and walking.

    HOKA Bondi 9

    The HOKA Clifton 9 and HOKA Bondi 9 are both cushioned daily trainers, but they deliver comfort in different ways. The Clifton 9 is the more straightforward option, with a stable, predictable ride that works well for easy mileage when you want a no-drama cruiser. The Bondi 9 feels more premium and modern underfoot, delivering a livelier ride thanks to its softer, lighter foam, which increases energy return while also feeling more cushioned. Even with a slightly higher stack, it still feels a bit lighter, which helps it feel less bulky for a max-cushion style shoe. Overall, this makes the Bondi a more versatile option for various run lengths and types.

    HOKA Mach 6

    The HOKA Clifton 9 and the HOKA Mach 6 are both daily trainers, but each caters to slightly different preferences. The Clifton 9 is a more basic, reliable option, offering simplicity and stability for everyday mileage. The Mach 6, however, is more versatile thanks to its lighter weight, superior bounce, and more responsive cushioning. The Clifton is a good choice if you're looking for a straightforward workhorse. Still, for runners wanting more agility, responsiveness, and versatility in daily training, the Mach 6 will be the better pick.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the HOKA Clifton 9 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label. The color shown here is Solar Flare/Lettuce, and the shoe is available in more than 20 additional colorways depending on the region. It also comes in a waterproof GORE-TEX version, a Movement Edition in collaboration with Free People, and a Kid's version with adapted sizes. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

    HOKA also sells the similarly named Clifton L and Clifton LS, which, despite sharing a name and using a last adapted from the Clifton 3, are lifestyle shoes designed for casual all-day wear rather than running.