ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Oct 22, 2025 at 01:13pm
Tested using Methodology v0.8.2 
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26
5.5
Marathon Racing 
4.8
5K/10K Racing 
2.0
Energy Return 
7.7
Cushioning 
7.6
Lateral Stability 
 0
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a cushioned daily trainer that's been a staple in ASICS' running shoe lineup since the '90s. As the name suggests, it's designed for cloud-like comfort, with a high stack height, moderate heel-to-toe drop for smooth transitions, and PureGEL technology in the midsole for softer landings at the heel. It also features a fully gusseted tongue, an engineered upper, and a grippy AHARPLUS™ rubber outsole. While it isn't the lightest shoe, as one of ASICS' highest-stack daily trainers, it's a safe bet for runners who want a plush, everyday cruiser for easy miles and recovery runs. Just don't expect its EVA-based midsole foam to provide the responsiveness needed for faster paces.

Our Verdict

5.5
Marathon Racing 

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 isn't suitable for marathon racing. It's designed primarily for comfort rather than speed, with firm foam and heavier weight that make it less suited for picking up the pace. While its decent cushioning and high-stack design are good for longer distances, it doesn't have enough bounce and responsiveness for high-performance racing.

Pros
  • Decent cushioning.

Cons
  • Bad energy return.

  • Heavy.

4.8
5K/10K Racing 

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a poor option for 5K/10K racing. It's primarily designed for easy runs and daily comfort rather than high-speed performance. It provides a good amount of firmness in the forefoot, which allows for more controlled toe-offs. However, the shoe is heavy, and its overall energy return is poor, lacking the springiness needed to compete at shorter distances.

Pros
  • Foam is quite firm overall.

Cons
  • Bad energy return.

  • Heavy.

2.0
Energy Return 

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 has terrible overall energy return. Its foam absorbs a lot of energy, especially in the heel, making for a less responsive ride.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Bad energy return.

7.7
Cushioning 

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 provides a good amount of cushioning. It's especially well-cushioned in the heel at higher forces, making it a good option for heavier runners and heel strikers.

Pros
  • Decent cushioning.

Cons
None
7.6
Lateral Stability 

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 has good lateral stability. The shoe has a very wide outsole that provides a stable platform, and its fully gusseted tongue and secure upper allow for good lockdown. The foam is also quite firm, especially in the forefoot, offering more stability and control. That said, its high stack height can take some getting used to.

Pros
  • Wide outsole platform.

  • Fully gusseted tongue creates solid lockdown.

  • Foam is quite firm overall.

Cons
  • High stack height.

  • 5.5
    Marathon Racing
  • 4.8
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 2.0
    Energy Return
  • 7.7
    Cushioning
  • 7.6
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Oct 22, 2025: 

      We've adjusted this review's writing to align with the new test bench, including updates to all usage scores and test boxes for Cushioning, Firmness, and Energy Return. We've updated the side-by-side comparisons with other shoes accordingly.

    2.  Updated Oct 20, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.
    3.  Updated Jul 30, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.1, which mainly updates the score components for the Marathon Racing and Lateral Stability usage boxes to improve accuracy.
    4.  Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 in Men's US size 9 in the Celadon/Light Celadon colorway, as viewable on the label

    Depending on your region, the shoe comes in several other color options, including Black/Graphite Grey, White/Birch, and Sheet Rock/Thunder Blue. At the same time, the women's version includes additional colorways like Blue Expanse/Aurora Green and Mint Tint/Pale Mint.

    There are wide versions available for both men's and women's models.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 is a cushioned and comfortable shoe that's especially well-suited to longer, recovery, and easy runs. ASICS has redesigned the upper and the rubber outsole grip compared to the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 25, as well as updated the midsole with a firmer iteration of its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO foam. It isn't particularly lightweight but provides a stable, comfortable ride for those who prefer a higher stack height.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes.

    ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31

    The ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31 and ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 are both popular and long-standing models in ASICS' lineup, but they suit different needs. The GEL-KAYANO 31 is aimed at runners who need more stability, with dedicated support elements and a slightly wider outsole. The GEL-NIMBUS 26, on the other hand, is a more neutral daily trainer designed for maximum comfort, with a slightly higher stack height and more balanced cushioning in the heel and forefoot.

    HOKA Clifton 9

    The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 and the HOKA Clifton 9 are both popular, well-cushioned daily trainers, but each has its own advantages. The HOKA is lighter and offers better energy return, making it a bit more versatile. The ASICS, meanwhile, has a wider base and offers better lateral stability, making it a somewhat smoother ride for easy miles.

    Saucony Triumph 22

    The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 and Saucony Triumph 22 are both premium daily trainers built for comfortable, easy runs. Both are on the heavier side, but the Triumph 22 is lighter and uses a higher-end midsole that delivers more energy return. The GEL-NIMBUS 26, on the other hand, has a higher stack height and more balanced cushioning. If you want max softness, go with the Nimbus; if you value a bit more versatility, the Triumph is the better pick.

    ASICS NOVABLAST 4

    The ASICS NOVABLAST 4 and the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 are both solid daily trainers in ASICS' lineup, but they excel in different areas. The NOVABLAST 4 is more versatile and better at picking up the pace, with better energy return and a notably lighter weight. However, the GEL-NIMBUS 26 is firmer overall, offering more stability and making it a good fit for easy runs at slower paces.

    Show more 
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    4.3
    Weight
    Weight
    301.9 g (10.65 oz)

    This isn't a particularly lightweight shoe, making it less suited to up-tempo runs and races.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    42.1 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    33.2 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.9 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.0 mm

    The shoe's PureGEL midsole insert was displaced when cutting it, but we've included a picture of the PureGEL beneath the shoe so you can see what it looks like.

    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    93 mm (3.6")
    Outsole Arch Width
    84 mm (3.3")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    115 mm (4.5")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.21
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.46
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    278 mm (10.9")
    Internal Heel Width
    64 mm (2.5")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    96 mm (3.8")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    1.4
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    66.3%

    The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 has terrible energy return in the heel. While the addition of PureGEL material adds some comfort, it evidently doesn't help with energy return, resulting in minimal rebound.

    2.3
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    68.4%

    There's a bit more energy return in the forefoot, but it's still bad overall. The foam in the midsole simply doesn't allow for very propulsive toe-offs. It's notably firmer than a more well-rounded shoe like the ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 and doesn't return enough energy for a more responsive ride. 

    7.6
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.24 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.26 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    16.55 J

    The cushioning at the heel is good. It does an especially good job of absorbing energy at higher forces, making it a good fit for heavier runners or heel strikers who want a bit more protection underfoot.

    7.8
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.68 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    8.39 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    12.49 J

    The forefoot cushioning does a good job of absorbing impact. However, if you prefer to have more ground feel, a less cushioned daily trainer like the HOKA Clifton 9 might be a better fit.

    5.3
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    53.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    105.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    212.8 N/mm

    The foam in the heel is reasonably firm, but it feels softer at higher forces. It provides enough stability for easier runs and forefoot strikers, though heavier runners and heel strikers will find it less rigid.

    7.7
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    98.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    199.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    383.0 N/mm

    The forefoot is much firmer than the heel, ensuring a stable ride and more controlled toe-offs, especially for forefoot strikers.