ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Oct 27, 2025 at 09:03am
Tested using Methodology v0.8.2 
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX
6.1
Marathon Racing 
5.7
5K/10K Racing 
2.9
Energy Return 
8.2
Cushioning 
7.1
Lateral Stability 
 0
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is a cushioned daily trainer designed for maximum comfort during longer-distance efforts. With a very high stack and a moderately pronounced rocker for smoother transitions, it offers a good balance of cushioning and efficiency for its class. For added stability, it's also fitted with a 3/4 EVA plate in the mid and forefoot that's sandwiched between layers of FF BLAST MAX and FF BLAST PLUS ECO foams.

Our Verdict

6.1
Marathon Racing 

While the ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX isn't made for marathon racing, it's not a bad option either. It isn't ideal for faster efforts, as the limited energy return and heavier weight can get cumbersome over the full marathon distance. However, its cushioned midsole and structural elements, like an EVA plate and pronounced rocker, make it a bit more dynamic than other shoes in its category.

Pros
  • Dual-layer midsole foam provides good cushioning.

  • Feels relatively stable.

Cons
  • Limited energy return.

  • Fairly heavy.

5.7
5K/10K Racing 

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is sub-par for 5K/10K racing. It's mainly designed for longer distances and slower paces, with a max-cushioned design and relatively heavy weight that makes it inefficient for racing. While its rockered geometry and firm forefoot make for smooth transitions, it lacks the energy return needed for up-tempo efforts.

Pros
  • 3/4-length EVA plate adds rigidity in the forefoot.

Cons
  • Limited energy return.

  • Fairly heavy.

2.9
Energy Return 

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX delivers very bad energy return. The energy loss in both the heel and forefoot makes it less suited to fast-paced runs.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Limited energy return.

8.2
Cushioning 

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is well-cushioned and offers a very good amount of protection underfoot, which is especially important for reducing fatigue at longer distances.

Pros
  • Dual-layer midsole foam provides good cushioning.

Cons
None
7.1
Lateral Stability 

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX has decent lateral stability. Its fully gusseted tongue and relatively wide outsole create a stable platform with good lockdown. The combination of different foams, with an EVA plate in between for a bit more rigidity, also makes for a relatively firm and controlled forefoot. That said, the heel is notably softer and, therefore, less stable, and the shoe's towering stack height gives a sensation of being lifted off the ground.

Pros
  • Wide outsole.

  • 3/4-length EVA plate adds rigidity in the forefoot.

  • Fully gusseted tongue for better lockdown.

Cons
  • Very high stack height.

  • Foam at the heel is quite soft.

  • 6.1
    Marathon Racing
  • 5.7
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 2.9
    Energy Return
  • 8.2
    Cushioning
  • 7.1
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Oct 27, 2025: 

      We updated the Pros & Cons, Cushioning, 5K/10K Racing, Heel Energy Return, Heel Cushioning, Forefoot Cushioning, Heel Firmness, Forefoot Firmness, and Forefoot Energy Return boxes to align with the latest test bench and revised the side-by-side comparisons to keep the review accurate.

    2.  Updated Oct 20, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.
    3.  Updated Aug 28, 2025: 

      We've updated the Popular Running Shoe Comparisons section to include a reference to the recently reviewed PUMA MagMax NITRO.

    4.  Updated Aug 11, 2025: 

      We updated the Compared To Other Running Shoes box to mention the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We purchased and tested the ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX in men's US size 9 in the Birch/Black colorway. Here's the label for our pair. Depending on the region, the shoe also comes in a range of other colorways, including Black/Oatmeal, Soothing Sea/Wave Teal, and Digital Aqua/New Leaf, with additional colorways like Black/Pale Pink and Bold Magenta/Soothing Sea in women's sizing.

    The shoe is available in standard and wide widths.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is a max-cushioned daily trainer built for casual paces. As a higher-stack revitalization of the previously discontinued ASICS GLIDERIDE series, the GLIDERIDE MAX occupies a liminal space in the ASICS lineup, with some high-tech features like a hybrid foam midsole, pronounced rocker, and 3/4 plastic plate that make it stand out as a daily trainer. However, it lacks the agility and versatility of models like the ASICS NOVABLAST 4 and ASICS SUPERBLAST 2, while its qualities slightly overlap with the mainstay ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27, which offers a more cushioned ride anyway. If you are looking for a similarly cushioned shoe that offers a similarly protective and stable ride without a plated midsole, consider the PUMA MagMax NITRO.

    See our recommendations for the best running shoes we've tested for other options.

    ASICS NOVABLAST 5

    The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is better overall than the ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX, but each shoe has its strong suit. The NOVABLAST 5 is better for picking up the pace, with significantly better energy return and a more lightweight design. The GLIDERIDE MAX, by contrast, has better cushioning, especially in the heel, and is better suited for longer, easier miles.

    ASICS SUPERBLAST 2

    The ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 is better overall than the ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX, though it's also a more premium trainer. Its PEBA-based hybrid foam significantly improves its energy return while maintaining good cushioning for longer runs.

    ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26

    The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is like a slightly more elevated (literally and figuratively) ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26. While both are designed with high-stack, max comfort in mind, the GLIDERIDE MAX is a bit lighter and has some added features, like a rocker and a partial EVA plate, that give it a slightly smoother ride. It's also got a more premium foam, which is softer in the heel.

    Brooks Glycerin Max

    The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX and the Brooks Glycerin Max are both highly cushioned daily trainers that perform very similarly overall. Neither has much bounce or pop, and both have ample cushioning overall, but the Glycerin Max is much more absorbent in the forefoot. The GLIDERIDE MAX is the more stable of the two shoes, due to its firmer forefoot and slightly lower stack height.

    Show more 
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    5.1
    Weight
    Weight
    283.6 g (10.00 oz)

    The shoe is on the heavier side, especially compared to more agile trainers like the ASICS NOVABLAST 4, but it's far from the heaviest shoe in its class.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    44.8 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    35.1 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    9.7 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    87 mm (3.4")
    Outsole Arch Width
    78 mm (3.1")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    114 mm (4.5")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    1.94
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.24
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    279 mm (11.0")
    Internal Heel Width
    62 mm (2.4")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    94 mm (3.7")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes

    ASICS shoes tend to run a little longer than most other brands, and this one is no exception, so it's worth keeping in mind when choosing a size.

    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    3/4-Length Plastic Plate

    For added stability, the ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX includes an EVA plastic plate that sits in between the white FF BLAST MAX foam and the green FF BLAST+ ECO foam on the bottom. However, it only covers about three quarters of the shoe's length, mostly in the midfoot and forefoot.

    Performance
    2.6
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    69.0%

    The heel doesn't return a lot of energy, so the shoe doesn't feel as bouncy or responsive as more performance-oriented models.

    3.0
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    69.5%

    The forefoot returns more energy than the heel, giving you a bit more propulsion when toeing off, but it still lacks sufficient rebound for a responsive ride at faster paces.

    8.5
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.63 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    10.34 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    18.75 J

    Overall, the heel cushioning is great, especially at higher forces. It's well-suited for heel strikers who want a bit more protection underfoot for easy miles and longer distances.

    7.8
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.65 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    8.37 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    12.61 J

    The forefoot is also well-cushioned, though marginally less so than the heel. There's less compression in the forefoot, but it still has decent impact absorption overall.

    4.4
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    47.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    92.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    181.6 N/mm

    The foam in the heel is on the softer side. Heel strikers especially will find it less rigid, which makes it more forgiving when form deteriorates near the end of a long run.

    7.5
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    97.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    195.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    357.6 N/mm

    The shoe's forefoot is significantly more firm than the heel, providing a bit more stability when transitioning from heel to toe. The EVA plate adds some rigidity in the forefoot but not as much as carbon-plated racers like the Saucony Endorphin Pro 4.