Salomon Aero Blaze 3  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Oct 27, 2025 at 04:54pm
Test bench update Jun 22, 2026 at 01:50pm
Tested using Methodology v0.12 
Salomon Aero Blaze 3

Track

6.5
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
7.1
5K/10K Racing 
6.7
Long Run 
7.6
Daily Training 
7.4
Energy Return 
6.3
Responsiveness 
7.5
Cushioning 
7.1
Stability 

Track

 0

We've tested these running shoes to expand our database and allow users to compare results to help with their buying decisions. We don't expect to write a full review, but if you have any questions about this product, please let us know.

Our Verdict

6.5
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
7.1
5K/10K Racing 
6.7
Long Run 
7.6
Daily Training 
7.4
Energy Return 
6.3
Responsiveness 
7.5
Cushioning 
7.1
Stability 
7.9
True To Size 
  • 6.5
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 7.1
    5K/10K Racing
  • 6.7
    Long Run
  • 7.6
    Daily Training

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.4
    Energy Return
  • 6.3
    Responsiveness
  • 7.5
    Cushioning
  • 7.1
    Stability
  • 7.9
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jun 22, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.12, which fixes how we measure firmness, a component of the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages. There may be inconsistencies between the text and the scores for these usages, but the scores should still be considered valid. We've also brought back the Energy Return score and added two new usages: Daily Training and Long Run. To read more about the changes, see the changelog.
    2.  Updated Jun 22, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.11, adding two new rocker measurements to the Design section, and three new responsiveness tests to the Performance section. The Energy Return usage score has been replaced with Responsiveness. Check out the details in our changelog.
    3.  Updated Mar 25, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.10, adding a new set of fit tests to the Design section and an overall fit performance usage. Check out the details in our changelog.
    4.  Updated Feb 02, 2026: 

      We've updated the introduction text, but all test scores remain the same.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    Salomon Aero Glide 3

    Track

    The Salomon Aero Blaze 3 and Salomon Aero Glide 3 form the core of the French outdoor company's foray into road running shoes. The Aero Blaze 3 is a lightweight, lower-stacked trainer designed for faster workouts and better suited to shorter distances, thanks to its thinner midsole. The Aero Glide 3 is a higher-stacked trainer that still packs a punch in terms of energy return, but is much more heavily cushioned. This makes it a better choice for long runs than the Aero Blaze 3. If you want a one-shoe rotation, the Aero Glide 3 is a worthwhile contender, while the Aero Blaze 3 makes the most sense for runners with several shoes in rotation who want a lightweight, unplated shoe for speed workouts.

    Salomon Aero Glide 4

    Track

    The Salomon Aero Glide 4 and Salomon Aero Blaze 3 sit in different parts of a training rotation despite sharing some family traits. The Aero Glide 4 is a max-cushion trainer built around comfort and protection, with a higher stack, a bouncier ride, and better long-run cushioning. The Aero Blaze 3 is the lighter and more workout-oriented option, sitting closer to the ground and offering more road feel, which makes it feel more nimble during faster efforts. While both can handle daily mileage, the Aero Glide 4 is better suited to easy runs and long outings, whereas the Aero Blaze 3 shines when the pace picks up.

    Salomon S/LAB Phantasm 3

    Track

    The Salomon Aero Blaze 3 and Salomon S/LAB Phantasm 3 are both lightweight shoes from the French brand, but they target very different uses. The Aero Blaze 3 is a lightweight trainer geared toward workouts, with a lower stack and more ground feel that make it feel connected to the road. The S/LAB Phantasm 3 is a high-stack super shoe built for racing, offering more cushioning while also being lighter and more efficient overall. Interestingly, despite its race-day focus, the S/LAB's midsole doesn't feel especially bouncy by modern super shoe standards, and the Aero Blaze 3 actually delivers more noticeable rebound underfoot. The S/LAB instead relies on its carbon plate, aggressive geometry, and extremely low weight to help compensate for that flaw.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    7.2
    Weight
    Weight
    230.1 g (8.12 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    35.4 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    26.5 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.9 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    84 mm (3.3")
    Outsole Arch Width
    67 mm (2.6")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    104 mm (4.1")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.37
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.92
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    279 mm (11.0")
    Internal Heel Width
    63 mm (2.5")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    9.0
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    0.1 mm (0.004")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -3.9 mm (-0.152")
    10
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    0.2 mm (0.007")
    9.9
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    1.9 mm (0.074")
    6.0
    Length Fit
    7.4
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    24 mm (0.9")
    Heel Apex Position
    25.9%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    17.3°
    7.4
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    51 mm (2.0")
    Toe Apex Position
    63.0%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    24.9°
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    7.2
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    76.7%
    7.5
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    78.4%
    7.8
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.58 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.80 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    15.95 J
    7.1
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.43 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    7.66 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    11.04 J
    7.8
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    43.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    53.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    75.9 N/mm
    9.0
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    65.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    84.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    117 N/mm
    6.5
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.02 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    6.88 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    6.80 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    6.74 J
    3.3
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    23 N
    6.0
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    60.5%
    6.5
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    7.3 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    299 N