Saucony Guide 19  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Jun 11, 2026 at 10:54am
Tested using Methodology v0.11 
Saucony Guide 19

Track

5.7
Marathon Racing 
5.6
5K/10K Racing 
5.9
Responsiveness 
7.2
Cushioning 
8.4
Lateral Stability 
9.6
True To Size 

Track

 0

The Saucony Guide 19 is a dependable daily stability trainer that sits between conventional support shoes and more modern stability options. While older models relied more heavily on stricter support elements, the Guide 19 picks up where its predecessor, the Saucony Guide 18, left off, relying on geometry to guide the ride. Rather than medial posts, it uses Saucony's CenterPath technology, combining a wide platform, raised sidewalls, and aggressive rocker to keep the ride smooth and stable. The new PWRRUN foam composition is slightly more cushioned and a bit more responsive, and the shoe is slightly taller and more supportive. The updated rocker also helps transitions roll through more smoothly. Though it's a heavy shoe, it remains a solid pick for runners who want modest support without an overly controlling ride.

Our Verdict

5.7
Marathon Racing 

The Saucony Guide 19 is a sub-par shoe for marathon racing. It's uneconomical over long distances due to its heavy weight and disappointing responsiveness.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Weight is cumbersome over long distances.

  • Inadequate energy return makes it sluggish.

5.6
5K/10K Racing 

The Saucony Guide 19 wasn't designed for speed, so it's no surprise it can't really pick up the pace. Its heftiness, combined with its middling energy return, makes it a shoe to avoid for racing.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Significant heft limits ability to pick up the pace.

  • Disappointing responsiveness makes it feel dead.

5.9
Responsiveness 

The Saucony Guide 19 has disappointing responsiveness. Though the forefoot is decently stiff, the outdated PWRRUN foam has poor energy return and provides a flat, spiritless ride.

Pros
None
Cons
  • PWRRUN foam has less than satisfactory energy return.

7.2
Cushioning 

The Saucony Guide 19 has decent cushioning across both the heel and forefoot, providing adequate protection, and is especially great for lighter runners at slower paces who land on their forefoot.

Pros
  • Particularly great for slower, lighter runners who forefoot strike.

Cons
  • Protection dissipates quickly as the miles build.

8.4
Lateral Stability 

The Saucony Guide 19 provides great stability. The tall sidewalls feel secure, and its wide platform creates a superbly sturdy base. Though the heel isn't the firmest, its width-to-stack ratio is excellent, and the shoe does a great job of stopping the foot rolling inward.

Pros
  • Wide outsole provides a solid platform.

  • Outstanding around corners and on uneven ground.

Cons
  • Softer heel could be an issue for some runners.

9.6
True To Size 

The Saucony Guide 19 fits true to size overall. The length is spot-on, and the arch and forefoot width are superb. Most runners can choose their usual size, though the forefoot might run too low for runners with taller toes.

Pros
  • Length fits amazingly.

  • Arch and forefoot width are superb.

Cons
  • Forefoot height runs low.

  • 5.7
    Marathon Racing
  • 5.6
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 5.9
    Responsiveness
  • 7.2
    Cushioning
  • 8.4
    Lateral Stability
  • 9.6
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jun 11, 2026: Review published.
    2.  Updated Jun 08, 2026: Early access published.
    3.  Updated May 04, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Apr 24, 2026: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the Saucony Guide 19 in men's US size 9, and here's the label for our pair. The pair we purchased is Black/Silver, but you can also get the shoe in other colors, depending on the region. This shoe is available in a variety of widths, ranging from Regular, Wide, and Extra Wide. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested. We expect other size and gender variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Saucony Guide 19 continues the line's long history of providing durability and comfort for runners who are searching for support and using tall sidewalls and a wide midsole to create its impressive stability. The latest version also gets a softer PWRRUN foam formulation, giving it a more cushioned ride than previous Guides, though it still lags behind more premium and responsive foams. Compared to similar shoes like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32, the Guide 19 offers a more stable platform and a slightly more responsive ride, though the KAYANO provides a bit more cushioning underfoot. Still, the Guide 19 remains a dependable option for runners who prioritize support and guidance over speed.

    Within Saucony's lineup, the Saucony Guide 19 is the support-first sister of the Saucony Ride 19. It sits between the plush, lively Saucony Hurricane 25, which uses dual-density foam, medial sidewalls, and sole flare for softer guidance, and the lighter, uptempo-focused Saucony Tempus 2, which wraps its superfoam core in a support frame to achieve midfoot stability. It isn't an old-school correction shoe, nor is it Saucony's most modern stability option, either; instead, it occupies the middle ground with impressive support, reliability, and decent cushioning. The Saucony Omni 22 is the brand's most rigorously corrective model, using traditional medial sideposts to help with excessive overpronation. Runners looking for Saucony's performance-oriented shoes should seek out the Endorphin line instead.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best stability running shoes. If you're new to running, you may also want to see our picks for the best running shoes for beginners.

    Saucony Ride 19

    Track

    The Saucony Guide 19 and Saucony Ride 19 may be sister shoes, but they're built for different runners. The Ride 19 is lighter, more cushioned, and more responsive, making it the better pick for runners with a neutral stride who want a more versatile daily trainer. The Guide 19 is heavier and less lively, but its CenterPath design adds more stability for runners who like the Ride's feel but need extra guidance.

    Saucony Hurricane 25

    Track

    The Saucony Guide 19 and Saucony Hurricane 25 both use geometry-led stability, but the Hurricane pushes further into max-cushion territory. It has substantially more cushioning, better responsiveness, and a livelier ride, making it the better pick for long runs and runners who want comfort first. The Guide 19 is firmer and more grounded, with a wider, more stable platform for runners who prioritize support over bounce.

    Saucony Guide 18

    Track

    The Saucony Guide 19 builds on the same formula as the Saucony Guide 18, but with more cushioning, a broader arch platform, and a more responsive ride. Both deliver excellent stability, but the newer model is more protective underfoot. The Guide 18 remains a dependable support shoe at a lower price, while the Guide 19 is the better pick for runners who want a bit more protection.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    4.6
    Weight
    Weight
    294.5 g (10.39 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    36.2 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    29.5 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.7 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    103 mm (4.1")
    Outsole Arch Width
    88 mm (3.5")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    121 mm (4.8")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.84
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    4.10
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    282 mm (11.1")
    Internal Heel Width
    65 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    92 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    9.4
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    3.0 mm (0.118")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    1.7 mm (0.067")
    7.1
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -3.5 mm (-0.139")
    9.8
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    2.2 mm (0.088")
    10
    Length Fit
    8.0
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    30 mm (1.2")
    Heel Apex Position
    28.9%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    19.2°
    6.4
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    44 mm (1.7")
    Toe Apex Position
    63.1%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    21.8°
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    1.9
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    67.5%
    5.6
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    72.8%
    7.0
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.20 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    8.58 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    14.98 J
    7.3
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.66 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    7.75 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    11.24 J
    6.0
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    58.5 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    116.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    244.3 N/mm
    8.4
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    115.9 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    239.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    444.8 N/mm
    6.8
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.52 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.24 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    7.08 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    6.97 J
    4.2
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    32 N
    6.7
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    63.3%
    7.4
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    18.2 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    245 N