On Cloudboom Volt  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Jun 23, 2026 at 02:30pm
Retest Jul 08, 2026 at 12:22pm
Tested using Methodology v0.12 
On Cloudboom Volt

Track

7.8
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
7.2
5K/10K Racing 
7.2
Long Run 
6.3
Daily Training 

Track

 0

The On Cloudboom Volt is a super shoe On claims is intended for anything up to half-marathon effort. It's built around a dual layer of PEBA-based Helion HF racing foam and a full-length carbon Speedboard plate. Despite it lacking the full, Swiss-cheese midsole associated with the brand, it still delivers the trademark On ride, pairing impressive cushioning with a firm forefoot that performs best when picking up the pace. The heel rocker helps smooth out transitions, but the more laid-back forefoot geometry stops the ride from feeling especially propulsive at toe-off. As a result, while it has the setup of a super shoe, it lacks the mechanics of a true marathon machine, making it most suitable for runners who want a laid-back race-day option that remains unmistakably On.

Our Verdict

7.8
Half/Full Marathon Racing 

The On Cloudboom Volt is a good marathon racer on paper, pairing a highly cushioned PEBA-based midsole with a full-length carbon Speedboard plate. However, it's heavier than many shoes in its class, its cushioning doesn't hold up especially well over longer distances, and the forefoot bottoms out, which means it stops short of being a true long-distance specialist.

Pros
  • Highly protective PEBA-based midsole.

  • Full-length carbon Speedboard plate.

  • Impressive forefoot energy return.

Cons
  • Heavy in its class.

  • Soft forefoot limits snap.

7.2
5K/10K Racing 

The On Cloudboom Volt is a decent 5K/10K racer. Its full-length carbon Speedboard plate and good forefoot bending stiffness help create a reasonably efficient ride at faster paces, and the forefoot returns a good amount of energy when compressed. However, its forefoot is only mediocre in firmness, the rocker is quite compliant, and the shoe is heavier than many short-distance racers, so it lacks the aggressive toe-off of stronger 5K/10K options.

Pros
  • Full-length carbon Speedboard plate.

  • Impressive forefoot energy return.

Cons
  • Heavy in its class.

  • Soft forefoot limits snap.

7.2
Long Run 

The On Cloudboom Volt is a decent option for long runs. Its great cushioning provides plenty of impact protection, but the forefoot protection fades as the distance builds. Combined with its mediocre stability and compliant rocker, this means it doesn't maintain its efficiency particularly well.

Pros
  • Great cushioning provides plenty of impact protection.

  • Midsole offers decent protection over longer runs.

Cons
  • Compliant rocker hinders overall efficiency of turnover.

  • Mediocre stability means runners need good form as fatigue builds.

6.3
Daily Training 

The On Cloudboom Volt isn't intended as a daily trainer. Despite its great cushioning, its carbon plate and aggressive geometry make it better suited to workouts and race-day efforts than easy daily mileage. Its mediocre stability also makes it less of a planted daily shoe.

Pros
  • Great cushioning provides plenty of impact protection.

  • Relatively lightweight.

Cons
  • Aggressive geometry is overkill for relaxed daily mileage.

  • Stability isn't decent enough for a daily trainer.

  • 7.8
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 7.2
    5K/10K Racing
  • 7.2
    Long Run
  • 6.3
    Daily Training
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 08, 2026: 

      We updated the review to match our new firmness scores. This includes changes to the Daily Training, Long Run, 5K/10K Racing, and Stability verdict boxes, along with tweaks to the pros and cons to keep them in line with the new scores. We also added text to the relevant test result boxes to reflect the updated firmness data.

    2.  Updated Jun 23, 2026: 

      We've updated the article to amend the Stability and 5K/10K Racing usages after converting the shoe to Test Bench 0.12. We also added text to the new boxes and tweaked the review to align with the Test Bench update.

    3.  Updated Jun 19, 2026: Review published.
    4.  Updated Jun 17, 2026: Early access published.
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    8.1

    Energy Return

    The On Cloudboom Volt delivers impressive energy return. Its PEBA-based midsole provides plenty of rebound under both the heel and forefoot, helping the shoe feel lively and efficient at faster paces.

    Pros
    • PEBA midsole is energetic underfoot.

    • Ample rebound helps make turnover efficient enough.

    Cons
    8.2
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    81.7%

    The forefoot returns a great amount of energy when compressed. This gives the shoe more rebound through toe-off than the heel, helping it move efficiently as the pace picks up.

    7.8
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    79.9%

    The heel returns a good amount of energy when compressed. This helps the rear of the shoe rebound efficiently after landing.

    7.3

    Responsiveness

    The On Cloudboom Volt delivers decent responsiveness. The PEBA-based midsole and plate provide good energy return, but the soft and mild rocker keeps the ride from feeling propulsive.

    Pros
    • Very good forefoot rebound.

    Cons
    • Mild rocker lacks propulsion.

    7.7
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    69.4%

    The forefoot gives back a good amount of energy when bent. This helps reduce energy loss through toe-off, though it's not as efficient as the PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4.

    7.6
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    15.6 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    291 N

    The forefoot has decent bending stiffness. It resists flexing enough to give the shoe some structure at toe-off, but it doesn't create a firm, snappy lever.

    6.6
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    45 mm (1.8")
    Toe Apex Position
    57.9%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    20.6°

    Though the rocker starts early, the low toe spring and shallow rocker angle mean it provides less assistance through push-off than shoes like the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 and PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4.

    5.8
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    57 N

    The rocker is very compliant and flattens easily under load. This means the shoe loses its guided rollover when you push harder, especially compared to stiffer racers like the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 and PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4.

    8.4

    Cushioning

    The On Cloudboom Volt provides impressive cushioning, with excellent heel protection and great forefoot cushioning to comfortably handle race-day efforts. However, there's a noticeable decline after the first 10km, so it's not the best pick for longer races.

    Pros
    • Excellent heel protection.

    • Great forefoot cushioning.

    Cons
    • Cushioning fades as the miles build.

    8.5
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    4.01 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    10.33 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    17.01 J

    The heel offers excellent cushioning overall. It absorbs a great amount of energy at lower and moderate forces and remains very good under higher forces, providing reliable impact protection across a wide range of runners and paces.

    8.3
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    5.37 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    9.03 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    13.04 J

    The forefoot of this shoe absorbs an outstanding amount of energy at lower forces, but sees a significant drop off as more force is applied. This means lighter forefoot landings get the most protection, while harder forefoot strikes are less cushioned but still well protected.

    6.3

    Stability

    The On Cloudboom Volt has mediocre stability. Its arch and forefoot outsole widths are adequate, but the narrow heel, soft forefoot, and modest heel width-to-stack ratio keep the platform from feeling very secure. That said, it’s stable enough for a racing shoe overall.

    Pros
    • Adequate arch width helps support midfoot.

    • Forefoot outsole width provides a decent platform at toe-off.

    Cons
    • Narrow heel outsole makes rearfoot landings less secure.

    • Soft forefoot and modest heel width-to-stack ratio limit better stability.

    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    81 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Arch Width
    73 mm (2.9")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    108 mm (4.3")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.09
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.58
    6.8
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    38.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    49.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    70.3 N/mm

    The heel has okay firmness across all force levels. It stays consistent as more force is applied, but it never becomes especially firm under load, meaning it's soft rather than planted.

    6.1
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    49.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    65.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    92 N/mm

    The forefoot has mediocre firmness across all force levels. It stays on the softer side even as more force is applied, so the front of the shoe doesn't provide the firm, snappy platform you get from racers like the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 or PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4. This also makes the forefoot less planted when loaded.

    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    Carbon Fiber
    9.3

    True To Size

    The On Cloudboom Volt fits true to size in length, so most runners can stick with their usual size. The forefoot is very accommodating for a performance shoe, while the arch fits a bit more snugly. That said, this is common for performance-oriented shoes and shouldn't be an issue for most runners, though it could bother those with higher-volume feet or wider arches.

    Pros
    • True-to-size length.

    • Very accommodating forefoot for a race shoe.

    Cons
    • Snugger arch may trouble wider feet.

    10
    Length Fit
    9.8
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    -1.2 mm (-0.047")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    0.8 mm (0.032")
    7.1
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -4.6 mm (-0.180")

    The On Cloudboom Volt has decent arch fit. The arch runs slightly narrow, so it may feel a bit snug through the midfoot for runners with wider feet, but it won't be a major issue for most runners.

    8.7
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -1.8 mm (-0.071")
    Additional Tests
    7.9
    Design
    Weight
    Weight
    209.1 g (7.38 oz)

    The On Cloudboom Volt is light overall, but it's on the heavier side for a marathon racer, weighing more than shoes like the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 and PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4.

    Design
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    38.6 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    30.1 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.5 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    5.0 mm
    Design
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    276 mm (10.9")
    Internal Heel Width
    59 mm (2.3")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    89 mm (3.5")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    8.2
    Design
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    28 mm (1.1")
    Heel Apex Position
    24.6%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    21.8°

    The high heel spring and early rocker help the shoe roll efficiently from heel strike into midstance, whilst also making the rear of the shoe assistive in transitions.

    7.0
    Performance
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.69 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.50 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    7.38 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    7.31 J

    Though decent overall, the forefoot long-run protection lags behind more dedicated long-distance racers like the PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4, offering less protection late into long runs.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the On Cloudboom Volt in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label of our pair. The color featured on the shoe we tested is Black/Juniper, but you can also get the shoe in other colors, depending on the region. As of June 2026, no wide variants are available. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The On Cloudboom Volt is On's take on a short-distance super shoe, built around a PEBA-based midsole and a full-length carbon Speedboard plate. However, despite having all the ingredients of a modern super shoe, it falls short compared to others in its class. Among similar plated super shoes, the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 offers a snappier ride with a more aggressive forefoot rocker, while the PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4 delivers much better responsiveness in a significantly lighter package. The result is a shoe that remains distinctly On but one that struggles to stand out against the competition.

    Within On's performance lineup, the Cloudboom Volt sits as the brand's shorter-distance super shoe. The On Cloudboom Strike is the flagship marathon racer, while the On Cloudboom Max offers a more forgiving alternative for longer races, targeting four-hour-plus marathoners.

    If you're interested in other options from On, check out our recommendations for the best On running shoes. For more race-day options, have a look at our recommendations for the best running shoes and the best marathon running shoes.

    ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5

    Track

    The On Cloudboom Volt and ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 are both plated super shoes that target faster training and shorter races. The ASICS is lighter and uses a more aggressive rocker geometry, making it quicker through toe-off and easier to turn over at speed. The On offers more cushioning with a more restrained geometry to make it less efficient when racing.

    PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4

    Track

    The On Cloudboom Volt and PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 4 are both carbon-plated race shoes, but they target different runners. The PUMA is significantly lighter and pairs a more responsive midsole with a more aggressive rocker geometry, making it quicker and more efficient across race distances. The Cloudboom Volt delivers a firmer, more recognizably On ride, but lacks the responsiveness and race-day efficiency of the PUMA.

    On Cloudboom Strike

    Track

    The On Cloudboom Volt and On Cloudboom Strike are both plated super shoes that sit in On's Cloudboom lineup, but they target different race distances. The Strike combines slightly more cushioning with better responsiveness and long-run comfort, making it a more versatile option across distances. The Volt, meanwhile, is slightly more suited to shorter races as it bottoms out over longer distances.