ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 vs GLIDERIDE MAX 2

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2

Tested using Methodology v0.12

Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:36 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.12

Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:39 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Picture

Track

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Picture

Track

Our Verdict

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 and ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 are both max-cushioned trainers, but they deliver protection in different ways. The GLIDERIDE is the more performance-leaning option: it's lighter, uses a partial plastic plate, and has a more pronounced rocker, so transitions feel smoother and more rolling. The GEL-NIMBUS 27 is the more traditional max-cushion shoe. It doesn't rely on a plate or an aggressively guided rocker to move you forward, so the ride feels more relaxed. Cushioning also differs: the NIMBUS tends to feel less cushioned in the heel but more cushioned in the forefoot. Overall, the NIMBUS 27 is usually the better pick for pure recovery, where you just want comfort without thinking about the shoes you're wearing, while the GLIDERIDE MAX 2 makes more sense if you still want max protection but with more substance and a smoother geometry.

0 

Variants

  • GEL-NIMBUS 27 (Amber/Neutral Pink - (Men - US 9))
  • GEL-NIMBUS 27 (Birch/Cold Moss - (Women - US 7))
  • GLIDERIDE MAX 2 (Black/Lilac Hint - (Women - US 7))
  • GLIDERIDE MAX 2 (Black/White - (Men - US 9))

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

6.4
6.8

Weight  

4.3
6.0

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.0
6.8

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.3
6.0

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

301.7 g (10.64 oz)
259.7 g (9.16 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

45.0 mm
45.9 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

35.2 mm
35.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.8 mm
10.6 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
6.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
87 mm (3.4")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

84 mm (3.3")
78 mm (3.1")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

116 mm (4.6")
112 mm (4.4")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.09
1.90

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.30
3.17

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

278 mm (10.9")
280 mm (11.0")

Internal Heel Width 
 

66 mm (2.6")
63 mm (2.5")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

95 mm (3.7")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

Yes
Yes

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.6
9.8

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

1.5 mm (0.057")
1.4 mm (0.054")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

3.7 mm (0.146")
0.0 mm (0.001")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

7.3
6.2

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-3.2 mm (-0.126")
-4.6 mm (-0.180")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

8.8
6.5

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-2.2 mm (-0.087")
-5.2 mm (-0.204")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

6.2
6.8

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

17 mm (0.7")
18 mm (0.7")

Heel Apex Position 
 

21.7%
19.0%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

14.7°
17.8°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

6.9
8.1

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

48 mm (1.9")
59 mm (2.3")

Toe Apex Position 
 

66.7%
61.0%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

25.6°
27.2°

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Fully-gusseted
Fully-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
3/4-Length Plastic Plate
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

2.1
2.3

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

68.0%
68.4%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

2.8
3.4

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

69.2%
70.0%

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.8
8.5

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.38 J
3.49 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.45 J
10.57 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

16.82 J
19.67 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.6
7.7

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.22 J
4.58 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.40 J
8.28 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

14.18 J
12.52 J

Heel Firmness 
 

8.1
7.7

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Firmness Graph

Firmness At 550N 
 

45.6 N/mm
47.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

55.8 N/mm
53.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

76.6 N/mm
70.8 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.8
8.6

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Firmness Graph

Firmness At 800N 
 

57.4 N/mm
63.0 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

72.1 N/mm
79.6 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

98 N/mm
108 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.0
6.8

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.84 J
7.53 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.65 J
7.29 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.54 J
7.13 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.51 J
7.00 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

7.5
6.7

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

99 N
77 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

4.5
4.9

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

55.3%
56.6%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

7.8
7.8

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

16.0 N/mm
14.2 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

312 N
357 N

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2

Comments

  1. Comparison

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 vs ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones