Products
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:28 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:33 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
36.6 mm
Weight
264.7 g (9.34 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
39.5 mm
Weight
255.1 g (9.00 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
ASICS GT-2000 14
ASICS GT-2000 15
The ASICS GT-2000 15 and ASICS GT-2000 14 are two iterations of the same support trainer, but the newer model is the better running shoe overall. It's lighter, more cushioned, and considerably more energetic while remaining impressively stable. The GT-2000 14 is firmer and slightly more stable, so it's worth considering if you prefer a rigid and corrective support shoe or find it for substantially less.
Variants
- GT-2000 14 (Black/Citron - (Men - US 9))
- GT-2000 14 (Black/Graphite Grey - (Men - US 9))
- GT-2000 15 (Birch/Cream - (Men - US 9))
- GT-2000 15 (Birch/Cream - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
6.3
7.2
Heel Stack Height
36.6 mm
39.5 mm
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
5.0
7.5
Weight
5.8
6.2
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
5.7
6.6
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
5.8
6.2
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
264.7 g (9.34 oz)
255.1 g (9.00 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
36.6 mm
39.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
29.6 mm
30.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
8.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
93 mm (3.7")
92 mm (3.6")
Outsole Arch Width
80 mm (3.1")
81 mm (3.2")
Outsole Forefoot Width
115 mm (4.5")
118 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.54
2.33
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.88
3.83
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
284 mm (11.2")
283 mm (11.1")
Internal Heel Width
68 mm (2.7")
70 mm (2.8")
Internal Forefoot Width
95 mm (3.7")
97 mm (3.8")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.3
8.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.0 mm (0.001")
3.7 mm (0.145")
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.2 mm (-0.125")
-2.9 mm (-0.116")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.9
3.3
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.8 mm (-0.148")
-7.8 mm (-0.307")
Arch Fit: Width
7.0
9.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-4.7 mm (-0.183")
5.6 mm (0.222")
Length Fit
6.0
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
5.2
6.9
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
13 mm (0.5")
18 mm (0.7")
Heel Apex Position
13.6%
15.3%
Heel Rocker Angle
18.0°
21.8°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.6
7.0
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
46 mm (1.8")
48 mm (1.9")
Toe Apex Position
66.1%
67.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.7°
26.8°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
FF BLAST MAX
Primary Foam Name
FF BLAST MAX
Primary Foam Type
POE
POE
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
6.0 mm (0.2")
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.8 mm (0.1")
1.8 mm (0.1")
Stretch
10.0%
12.0%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
2.8
7.0
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
69.3%
76.2%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
5.0
7.5
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
71.9%
78.1%
Heel Cushioning
6.0
7.6
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.00 J
3.56 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
7.70 J
9.27 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
12.88 J
15.54 J
Forefoot Cushioning
6.0
7.4
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.82 J
4.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
6.45 J
7.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
9.39 J
11.30 J
Heel Firmness
9.0
7.9
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
52.4 N/mm
42.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
66.7 N/mm
54.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
94.7 N/mm
77.2 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.4
8.4
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
74.7 N/mm
58.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
97.8 N/mm
77.4 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
136 N/mm
109 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
5.7
6.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
6.26 J
7.29 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
6.12 J
7.04 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
6.03 J
6.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
5.98 J
6.76 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.5
6.5
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
99 N
72 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
4.4
5.7
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
54.7%
59.1%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.7
6.2
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
15.2 N/mm
7.0 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
320 N
263 N
Heel Compression Depth
4.8
6.0
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
10.5 mm
13.0 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
16.5 mm
20.3 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
20.1 mm
24.6 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
4.6
5.8
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
10.7 mm
13.6 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
13.3 mm
16.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
15.1 mm
18.9 mm
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
ASICS GT-2000 14
ASICS GT-2000 15
Comments
ASICS GT-2000 14 vs ASICS GT-2000 15: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.