ASICS GT-2000 15 vs GT-2000 14: Which Running Shoe Is Better?

FEEDBACK

Products

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Jul 16, 2026 02:47 PM

SEE PRICE

Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Aug 14, 2026 04:19 PM

This review is in Early access

SEE PRICE

Amazon

Heel Stack Height 36.6 mm

Weight 264.7 g (9.34 oz)

Heel-To-Toe Drop 7.0 mm

Plate None

Heel Stack Height 39.5 mm

Weight 255.1 g (9.00 oz)

Heel-To-Toe Drop 8.7 mm

Plate None

Recommended in 1 article:
Stability

Our Verdict

ASICS GT-2000 14

ASICS GT-2000 15

Full comparison details regarding individual product score sets can be found in the section below

Variants

GT-2000 14 (Black/Citron - (Men - US 9))
GT-2000 14 (Black/Graphite Grey - (Men - US 9))

GT-2000 15 (Birch/Cream - (Men - US 9))
GT-2000 15 (Birch/Cream - (Women - US 7))

Review

See ASICS GT-2000 14 Review

See ASICS GT-2000 15 Review

Check Price

DicksSportingGoods.com

SEE PRICE

RoadRunnerSports.com

Main Differences for

Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing

6.3

0.0

Heel Stack Height

36.6 mm

Lock mm

Full Comparison

Half/Full Marathon Racing

6.3

0.0

5K/10K Racing

6.8

0.0

Long Run

6.9

0.0

Daily Training

7.5

0.0

Energy Return

4.3

0.0

Stability

8.9

0.0

Cushioning

6.0

0.0

Bounciness

4.4

0.0

Snappiness

6.7

0.0

Roll

7.3

0.0

True To Size

7.2

0.0

Design

Weight

5.8

N/A

Right Shoe Weight Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Left Shoe Weight Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Weight

264.7 g (9.34 oz)

Lock g (Lock oz)

Stack Heights

Stack Height Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Heel Stack Height

36.6 mm

Lock mm

Forefoot Stack Height

29.6 mm

Lock mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop

7.0 mm

Lock mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop

8.0 mm

Lock mm

External Shape

3D Model Full Shoe

Preview 3D

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Outsole Heel Width

93 mm (3.7")

Lock mm (Lock")

Outsole Arch Width

80 mm (3.1")

Lock mm (Lock")

Outsole Forefoot Width

115 mm (4.5")

Lock mm (Lock")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio

2.54

Lock

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio

3.88

Lock

Internal Shape

3D Model Internal

Preview 3D

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Internal Length

284 mm (11.2")

Lock mm (Lock")

Internal Heel Width

68 mm (2.7")

Lock mm (Lock")

Internal Forefoot Width

95 mm (3.7")

Lock mm (Lock")

Wide Sizing Available

Yes

Locked

Forefoot Fit: Width

9.3

N/A

Forefoot Width Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation

0.0 mm (0.001")

Lock mm (Lock")

Toe TTS Deviation

-3.2 mm (-0.125")

Lock mm (Lock")

Forefoot Fit: Height

6.9

N/A

Forefoot Height Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Toe TTS Deviation

-3.8 mm (-0.148")

Lock mm (Lock")

Arch Fit: Width

7.0

N/A

Arch Fit Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Arch Width TTS Deviation

-4.7 mm (-0.183")

Lock mm (Lock")

Length Fit

6.0

N/A

Toe Clearance Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Heel Rocker Geometry

5.2

N/A

Heel Rocker Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Heel Spring

13 mm (0.5")

Lock mm (Lock")

Heel Apex Position

13.6%

Lock%

Heel Rocker Angle

18.0°

Lock°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry

6.6

N/A

Forefoot Rocker Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Toe Spring

46 mm (1.8")

Lock mm (Lock")

Toe Apex Position

66.1%

Lock%

Forefoot Rocker Angle

24.7°

Lock°

Foam

Primary Foam Picture

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Secondary Foam Picture

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Primary Foam Name

FF BLAST MAX

Locked

Primary Foam Type

POE

Locked

Secondary Foam Name

N/A

Secondary Foam Type

N/A

Laces

Laces Picture

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Lace Type

Flat

Locked

Width

6.0 mm (0.2")

Lock mm (Lock")

Thickness

1.8 mm (0.1")

Lock mm (Lock")

Stretch

10.0%

Lock%

Other Features

Other Features Photo

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Tongue Gusset Type

Fully-gusseted

Locked

Plate

None

Locked

Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return

2.8

N/A

Heel Compression Video

SAMPLE

Join Now

for videos & test results

Heel Energy Return

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Heel Energy Return

69.3%

Lock%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return

5.0

N/A

Forefoot Compression Video

SAMPLE

Join Now

for videos & test results

Forefoot Energy Return

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Forefoot Energy Return

71.9%

Lock%

Heel Cushioning

6.0

N/A

Heel Cushioning Picture

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Heel Cushioning

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Energy Absorbed At 550N

3.00 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N

7.70 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N

12.88 J

Lock J

Forefoot Cushioning

6.0

N/A

Forefoot Cushioning Picture

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Forefoot Cushioning

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Energy Absorbed At 800N

3.82 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N

6.45 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N

9.39 J

Lock J

Heel Firmness

9.0

N/A

Heel Firmness Graph

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Firmness At 550N

52.4 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Firmness At 1100N

66.7 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Firmness At 1900N

94.7 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Forefoot Firmness

9.4

N/A

Forefoot Firmness Graph

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Firmness At 800N

74.7 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Firmness At 1300N

97.8 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Firmness At 2050N

136 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

5.7

N/A

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Energy Absorbed At 10km

6.26 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 20km

6.12 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 30km

6.03 J

Lock J

Energy Absorbed At 40km

5.98 J

Lock J

Rocker Stiffness

7.5

N/A

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video

SAMPLE

Join Now

for videos & test results

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Force To Flatten The Rocker

99 N

Lock N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return

4.4

N/A

Forefoot Bending Video

SAMPLE

Join Now

for videos & test results

Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Forefoot Bending Energy Return

54.7%

Lock%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness

7.7

N/A

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Forefoot Bending Resistance

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Forefoot Bending Stiffness

15.2 N/mm

Lock N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force

320 N

Lock N

Heel Compression Depth

4.8

N/A

Heel Compression Graph

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Heel Compression At 550N

10.5 mm

Lock mm

Heel Compression At 1100N

16.5 mm

Lock mm

Heel Compression At 1900N

20.1 mm

Lock mm

Forefoot Compression Depth

4.6

N/A

Forefoot Compression Graph

Preview Graph

SAMPLE

Join Now

for pictures & test results

Forefoot Compression At 800N

10.7 mm

Lock mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N

13.3 mm

Lock mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N

15.1 mm

Lock mm

Check Price

DicksSportingGoods.com

SEE PRICE

RoadRunnerSports.com

ASICS GT-2000 14

ASICS GT-2000 15

Comments

Comparison

• Posted 2 hours ago

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs ASICS GT-2000 15: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.

Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide

No comments yet, refresh to see new ones

To access

Become a member

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs GT-2000 15

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Our Verdict

Variants

Review

Check Price

Main Differences for Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold

Half/Full Marathon Racing

Heel Stack Height See Details

Full Comparison

Half/Full Marathon Racing

5K/10K Racing

Long Run

Daily Training

Energy Return

Stability

Cushioning

Bounciness

Snappiness

Roll

True To Size

Weight

Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight

Stack Heights

Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height

Forefoot Stack Height

Heel-To-Toe Drop

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop

External Shape

3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width

Outsole Arch Width

Outsole Forefoot Width

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio

Internal Shape

3D Model Internal

Internal Length

Internal Heel Width

Internal Forefoot Width

Wide Sizing Available

Forefoot Fit: Width

Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation

Toe TTS Deviation

Forefoot Fit: Height

Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation

Arch Fit: Width

Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation

Length Fit

Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry

Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring

Heel Apex Position

Heel Rocker Angle

Forefoot Rocker Geometry

Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring

Toe Apex Position

Forefoot Rocker Angle

Foam

Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name

Primary Foam Type

Secondary Foam Name

Secondary Foam Type

Laces

Laces Picture

Lace Type

Width

Thickness

Main Differences for

Half/Full Marathon Racing

Heel Stack Height