Products
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Oct 01, 2026 03:45 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:33 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
41.4 mm
Weight
260.6 g (9.19 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.7 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
39.5 mm
Weight
255.1 g (9.00 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Saucony Hurricane 26
ASICS GT-2000 15
The Saucony Hurricane 26 is a better, more practical support shoe for daily training than the ASICS GT-2000 15. It offers stronger impact protection at both the heel and forefoot, maintains that protection better over distance, and feels considerably softer under the forefoot. It also returns more energy there, making it appealing for runners who want comfort without an overly firm ride. The ASICS is a better choice if you're a runner who has trouble keeping your foot centered and needs maximum stability.
Variants
- Hurricane 26 (Black/Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
- Hurricane 26 (Cadet/Black - (Men - US 9))
- GT-2000 15 (Birch/Cream - (Men - US 9))
- GT-2000 15 (Birch/Cream - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.6
7.2
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
8.4
5.7
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.0
6.6
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.0
6.2
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
260.6 g (9.19 oz)
255.1 g (9.00 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
41.4 mm
39.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
33.7 mm
30.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.7 mm
8.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
112 mm (4.4")
92 mm (3.6")
Outsole Arch Width
88 mm (3.5")
81 mm (3.2")
Outsole Forefoot Width
125 mm (4.9")
118 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.32
2.33
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.71
3.83
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
279 mm (11.0")
283 mm (11.1")
Internal Heel Width
67 mm (2.6")
70 mm (2.8")
Internal Forefoot Width
95 mm (3.7")
97 mm (3.8")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.1
8.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
2.2 mm (0.087")
3.7 mm (0.145")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.7 mm (-0.107")
-2.9 mm (-0.116")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.4
3.3
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.1 mm (-0.122")
-7.8 mm (-0.307")
Arch Fit: Width
9.1
9.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-1.7 mm (-0.065")
5.6 mm (0.222")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.3
6.9
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
29 mm (1.1")
18 mm (0.7")
Heel Apex Position
22.6%
15.3%
Heel Rocker Angle
23.4°
21.8°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.4
7.0
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
51 mm (2.0")
48 mm (1.9")
Toe Apex Position
63.0%
67.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.9°
26.8°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
incrediLUX
FF BLAST MAX
Primary Foam Type
A-TPU
POE
Secondary Foam Name
PWRRUN
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
EVA
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
6.0 mm (0.2")
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.8 mm (0.1")
1.8 mm (0.1")
Stretch
12.5%
12.0%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.1
7.0
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
76.4%
76.2%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.4
7.5
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
83.4%
78.1%
Heel Cushioning
8.3
7.6
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.63 J
3.56 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.98 J
9.27 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
18.03 J
15.54 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.6
7.4
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.70 J
4.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
9.55 J
7.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
13.75 J
11.30 J
Heel Firmness
6.8
7.9
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
39.4 N/mm
42.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
50.1 N/mm
54.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
69.0 N/mm
77.2 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
4.8
8.4
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
44.1 N/mm
58.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
59.4 N/mm
77.4 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
84 N/mm
109 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.0
6.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.00 J
7.29 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.71 J
7.04 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.50 J
6.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.33 J
6.76 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.4
6.5
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
69 N
72 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
8.4
5.7
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
74.6%
59.1%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.7
6.2
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
12.6 N/mm
7.0 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
235 N
263 N
Heel Compression Depth
6.5
6.0
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
14.0 mm
13.0 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
22.0 mm
20.3 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
27.5 mm
24.6 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
7.5
5.8
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
18.1 mm
13.6 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
21.9 mm
16.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
24.5 mm
18.9 mm
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Saucony Hurricane 26
ASICS GT-2000 15
Comments
Saucony Hurricane 26 vs ASICS GT-2000 15: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.