Dynafish Xiaonian vs 361 Flame 5

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Dynafish Xiaonian
361 Flame 5

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 25, 2026 03:21 PM

DicksSportingGoods.com

Tested using Methodology v0.16

Updated Sep 12, 2026 10:08 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
Dynafish Xiaonian Picture

Track

361 Flame 5 Picture

Track

Our Verdict

Dynafish Xiaonian

361 Flame 5

The Dynafish Xiaonian is a better shoe than the 361 Flame 5 for most runners. It's much lighter, more cushioned, more energetic, and more stable, making it far more versatile for everything from daily running to racing. The Flame 5 gives you a quicker, more forceful ride, so it's the better choice if you specifically want a carbon-plated racer, though runners with sensitive heels or Achilles tendons may want to avoid it due to its problematic heel counter.

0 

Variants

  • Xiaonian (Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Xiaonian (Burning Sun - (Women - US 7))
  • Flame 5 (Attitude - (Women - US 7))
  • Flame 5 (Feather White/Dawn Purple - (Men - US 9))
Read more

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

8.4
8.0

Weight  

8.4
6.9

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

5.9
8.8

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.4
6.9

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

192.5 g (6.79 oz)
236.8 g (8.35 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

40.6 mm
40.3 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

31.2 mm
33.8 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.4 mm
6.5 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

7.0 mm
6.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Dynafish Xiaonian 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
361 Flame 5 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

97 mm (3.8")
84 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

80 mm (3.1")
71 mm (2.8")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

118 mm (4.7")
112 mm (4.4")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.39
2.08

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.78
3.31

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Dynafish Xiaonian 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
361 Flame 5 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

275 mm (10.8")
279 mm (11.0")

Internal Heel Width 
 

58 mm (2.3")
64 mm (2.5")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
92 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

8.9
9.5

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

4.1 mm (0.160")
0.6 mm (0.022")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-1.4 mm (-0.056")
6.4 mm (0.253")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

8.2
5.8

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-2.3 mm (-0.092")
-5.0 mm (-0.196")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

9.8
9.7

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-0.6 mm (-0.023")
3.1 mm (0.121")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

6.6
7.5

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

21 mm (0.8")
23 mm (0.9")

Heel Apex Position 
 

29.8%
24.6%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

13.7°
18.2°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

8.3
7.9

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

62 mm (2.4")
55 mm (2.2")

Toe Apex Position 
 

58.5%
63.2%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

27.3°
27.6°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

Not Advertised
CQT FLAME

Primary Foam Type 
 

TPEE
Nylon

Secondary Foam Name 
 

No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam

Secondary Foam Type 
 

No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Flat
Sawtooth

Width 
 

4.0 mm (0.2")
4.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.5 mm (0.1")
1.5 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

12.5%
7.5%

Breathability 
 

7.5

Breathability Video  

Upper Breathability  

361 Flame 5 Upper Breathability

Upper Microscope Photo  

361 Flame 5 Upper Microscope Photo

Time-To-Dry 
 

9.6

Time-To-Dry Timelapse  

Time-To-Dry Graph  

 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Time-To-Dry Graph

Time To 30% Dry 
 

2.4 hrs

Time To 70% Dry 
 

7.7 hrs

Time To Dry 
 

12.1 hrs

Water Absorption 
 

9.7

Dry Weight Photo  

361 Flame 5 Dry Weight Photo

Wet Weight Photo  

361 Flame 5 Wet Weight Photo

Water Absorbed 
 

19.3%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
Carbon Fiber
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

8.0
7.5

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

80.8%
78.1%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

8.6
7.7

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

84.3%
79.2%

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.8
8.1

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

4.08 J
3.95 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

11.05 J
9.62 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

18.34 J
16.02 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

9.1
8.7

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.83 J
5.20 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

10.36 J
9.66 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

15.20 J
14.65 J

Heel Firmness 
 

5.9
7.2

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Heel Firmness Graph

Firmness At 550N 
 

36.7 N/mm
38.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

46.1 N/mm
51.0 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

65.6 N/mm
73.1 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

5.8
6.8

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Firmness Graph

Firmness At 800N 
 

49.6 N/mm
53.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

63.2 N/mm
67.3 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

87 N/mm
92 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.5
8.3

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

9.52 J
9.14 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

9.29 J
8.97 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

9.15 J
8.85 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

9.04 J
8.76 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

7.5
7.8

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

101 N
113 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

7.9
9.1

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

70.5%
82.6%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

5.9
8.8

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

6.9 N/mm
30.6 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

243 N
360 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

7.1
6.4

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

15.0 mm
14.3 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

23.9 mm
21.6 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

28.9 mm
26.0 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

7.0
6.5

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
361 Flame 5 Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

16.1 mm
14.9 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

20.6 mm
19.3 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

23.6 mm
22.4 mm

Dynafish Xiaonian

361 Flame 5

Comments

  1. Comparison

Dynafish Xiaonian vs 361 Flame 5: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones