Li-Ning Chaoying Pro vs Red Hare 9 Pro

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Li-Ning Chaoying Pro
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro

Tested using Methodology v0.13

Updated Aug 11, 2026 02:17 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Aug 11, 2026 02:11 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Picture

Track

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Picture

Track

  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Most Comfortable

Our Verdict

Li-Ning Chaoying Pro

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro

The Li-Ning Chaoying Pro and Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro offer two distinct rides. The Chaoying has more cushioning and is lighter but less energetic. The Red Hare 9 Pro is a lively daily trainer, but it lacks the range of the Chaoying. Get the Chaoying Pro if you want a shoe for longer runs; get the Red Hare 9 Pro for shorter, everyday runs.

0 

Variants

  • Chaoying Pro (Crystal Gray/Silver - (Women - US 7))
  • Chaoying Pro (Dim Twilight Blue/Standard White/Lilac Breeze - (Women - US 7))
  • Red Hare 9 Pro (Black/Lemon Yellow/Mint Green - (Men - US 9))
  • Red Hare 9 Pro (Black/White/Neon Lime - (Men - US 9))
Read more

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

7.7
7.0

Heel Stack Height 
 

40.9 mm
36.0 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

30.8 mm
28.4 mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

7.5
6.5

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

7.4
7.1

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

222.5 g (7.85 oz)
231.8 g (8.17 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

40.9 mm
36.0 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

30.8 mm
28.4 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

10.1 mm
7.6 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
91 mm (3.6")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
69 mm (2.7")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

118 mm (4.6")
117 mm (4.6")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.30
2.52

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.83
4.12

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

275 mm (10.8")
280 mm (11.0")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
62 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

92 mm (3.6")
95 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

8.3
9.4

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

5.4 mm (0.214")
2.8 mm (0.109")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

5.9 mm (0.231")
-1.1 mm (-0.045")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

6.9
3.2

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-3.8 mm (-0.148")
-7.9 mm (-0.311")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

0.0
5.0

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-11.5 mm (-0.451")
-6.9 mm (-0.271")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

8.2
7.7

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

28 mm (1.1")
28 mm (1.1")

Heel Apex Position 
 

22.6%
30.7%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

22.7°
17.8°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

6.2
8.1

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

43 mm (1.7")
58 mm (2.3")

Toe Apex Position 
 

66.2%
57.6%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

23.3°
25.8°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

Super Boom
Boom

Primary Foam Type 
 

PEBA
Unknown

Secondary Foam Name 
 

N/A
N/A

Secondary Foam Type 
 

EVA
N/A

Laces 
 

Laces Picture  

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Flat

Width 
 

6.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.7 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

7.5%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
Plastic Shank
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

4.9
7.5

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

71.8%
78.4%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

6.7
7.3

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

75.1%
77.5%

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.4
7.3

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.49 J
3.09 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

10.78 J
9.22 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

18.88 J
15.79 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.3
7.6

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.22 J
4.49 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.04 J
8.19 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

13.21 J
12.24 J

Heel Firmness 
 

7.7
8.7

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Heel Firmness Graph

Firmness At 550N 
 

46.9 N/mm
52.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

52.6 N/mm
60.4 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

71.6 N/mm
83.3 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.5
8.8

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Firmness Graph

Firmness At 800N 
 

54.3 N/mm
65.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

70.4 N/mm
82.3 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

97 N/mm
112 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

7.5
6.5

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.14 J
7.18 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

7.98 J
6.97 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

7.87 J
6.87 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

7.81 J
6.79 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

8.1
6.0

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

124 N
61 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

6.6
7.1

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

62.7%
65.6%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

7.6
6.3

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Chaoying Pro Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

17.6 N/mm
7.8 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

268 N
264 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

5.2

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

10.5 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

18.2 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

22.8 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

5.4

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

12.2 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

15.8 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

18.3 mm

Li-Ning Chaoying Pro

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro

Comments

  1. Comparison

Li-Ning Chaoying Pro vs Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones