Products
Tested using Methodology v0.16
Updated Sep 25, 2026 01:47 AM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.16
Updated Sep 28, 2026 04:13 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
36.9 mm
Weight
220.0 g (7.76 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.7 mm
Plate
Plastic Shank
Heel Stack Height
46.2 mm
Weight
237.2 g (8.37 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.1 mm
Plate
Plastic Shank
Our Verdict
adidas Adizero Evo SL
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra
The Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra is a better shoe overall than the adidas Adizero Evo SL, especially for cushioned long runs. It absorbs substantially more impact under both the heel and forefoot, and retains that advantage over distance. That means it's a better choice for daily runs, long runs, and even long-distance racing. Its softer cushioning also provides more comfort if you dislike a firm feel. The adidas shoe is better if you want a lighter shoe that sits closer to the ground and feels slightly steadier.
Variants
- Adizero Evo SL (Black/Iron Metallic/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Adizero Evo SL (Carbon/Lucid Red/Solar Slime - (Men - US 9))
- Red Hare 9 Ultra (Black - (Women - US 7))
- Red Hare 9 Ultra (Champagne White - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.6
8.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.6
9.3
Heel Stack Height
36.9 mm
46.2 mm
Weight
7.5
6.9
Outsole Arch Width
64 mm (2.5")
81 mm (3.2")
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
7.5
6.9
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
220.0 g (7.76 oz)
237.2 g (8.37 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
36.9 mm
46.2 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.2 mm
37.1 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.7 mm
9.1 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
N/A
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
84 mm (3.3")
93 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
64 mm (2.5")
81 mm (3.2")
Outsole Forefoot Width
114 mm (4.5")
117 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.27
2.01
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.77
3.15
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
276 mm (10.8")
273 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
61 mm (2.4")
56 mm (2.2")
Internal Forefoot Width
94 mm (3.7")
92 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
7.6
9.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-2.2 mm (-0.085")
3.4 mm (0.133")
Toe TTS Deviation
-6.4 mm (-0.253")
-0.9 mm (-0.037")
Forefoot Fit: Height
8.5
6.0
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.1 mm (-0.081")
-4.8 mm (-0.189")
Arch Fit: Width
8.5
0.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-2.6 mm (-0.103")
-16.7 mm (-0.656")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.4
6.6
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
21 mm (0.8")
22 mm (0.9")
Heel Apex Position
20.3%
30.5%
Heel Rocker Angle
19.3°
13.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.2
7.3
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
49 mm (1.9")
50 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
62.7%
59.3%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.0°
22.6°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
LIGHTSTRIKE PRO
Super BOOM Capsule
Primary Foam Type
TPEE
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
Super BOOM
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
PEBA
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.1 mm (0.0")
1.3 mm (0.1")
Stretch
6.0%
8.5%
Breathability
7.5
7.5
Breathability Video
Upper Breathability
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Upper Microscope Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Time-To-Dry
8.8
7.4
Time-To-Dry Timelapse
Time-To-Dry Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Time To 30% Dry
4.6 hrs
6.2 hrs
Time To 70% Dry
12.3 hrs
17.9 hrs
Time To Dry
17.9 hrs
26.6 hrs
Water Absorption
8.0
8.7
Dry Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Wet Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Water Absorbed
38.6%
33.8%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Plastic Shank
Plastic Shank
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.1
8.4
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
81.4%
83.0%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.4
8.5
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
83.3%
83.9%
Heel Cushioning
8.0
9.4
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.46 J
4.25 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.03 J
12.56 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
17.07 J
21.97 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.1
9.5
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.16 J
6.51 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.87 J
11.59 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
12.68 J
17.07 J
Heel Firmness
7.7
5.2
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
44.0 N/mm
36.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
52.8 N/mm
43.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
73.9 N/mm
59.2 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.5
4.1
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
53.9 N/mm
42.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
70.3 N/mm
54.6 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
98 N/mm
75 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.6
9.3
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
8.31 J
11.07 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.17 J
10.79 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.07 J
10.63 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.99 J
10.49 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.1
5.8
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
63 N
58 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.7
8.5
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
69.4%
76.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.4
7.0
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
9.4 N/mm
14.2 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
247 N
244 N
Heel Compression Depth
6.0
7.5
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
12.5 mm
15.1 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
20.8 mm
25.6 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
25.7 mm
32.1 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
6.3
8.0
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
14.8 mm
18.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
18.5 mm
23.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
20.8 mm
27.2 mm
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
adidas Adizero Evo SL
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra
Comments
adidas Adizero Evo SL vs Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.