Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 22, 2026 03:59 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.10
Updated Apr 30, 2026 07:33 PM
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Weight
239.9 g (8.46 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.7 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Weight
214.7 g (7.57 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.3 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4
New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4
The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 and New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 share similar names and designs—but don't let that fool you, as they're fundamentally different shoes. The Rebel v4 is a versatile low-stack daily trainer, offering stability ideal for everyday miles. The SuperComp Elite v4, however, is a specialized racing shoe featuring a carbon plate and higher energy return, providing a more aggressive ride for peak performance on race day.
Variants
- FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 (Cyber Jade/White/Black - (Men - US 9))
- FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 (Cyber Jade/White/Black - (Women - US 7))
- FuelCell Rebel v4 (Black/Graphite - (Men - US 9))
- FuelCell Rebel v4 (Black/Graphite/White - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.8
5.3
Heel Stack Height
39.5 mm
31.3 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
35.9 mm
24.0 mm
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.1
6.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.4
5.0
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.2
5.5
Weight
6.8
7.7
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.8
7.7
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
239.9 g (8.46 oz)
214.7 g (7.57 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
39.5 mm
31.3 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
35.9 mm
24.0 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.7 mm
7.3 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
86 mm (3.4")
95 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
74 mm (2.9")
77 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
111 mm (4.4")
116 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.17
3.04
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.09
4.83
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
270 mm (10.6")
274 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
95 mm (3.8")
95 mm (3.7")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.0
7.8
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
3.8 mm (0.149")
7.4 mm (0.293")
Toe TTS Deviation
3.9 mm (0.152")
2.5 mm (0.099")
Forefoot Fit: Height
10
7.1
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
1.8 mm (0.072")
-3.5 mm (-0.138")
Arch Fit: Width
9.6
6.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-1.0 mm (-0.040")
-5.8 mm (-0.226")
Length Fit
10
7.0
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.9
Heel Rocker Photo
Heel Spring
25 mm (1.0")
Heel Apex Position
23.2%
Heel Rocker Angle
20.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
8.6
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Toe Spring
65 mm (2.6")
Toe Apex Position
57.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
28.4°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Carbon Fiber
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.2
5.5
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
81.9%
72.6%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.1
6.0
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
81.4%
73.4%
Heel Cushioning
7.8
6.1
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.77 J
3.17 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.44 J
7.75 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
15.67 J
12.55 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.3
5.7
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.23 J
3.71 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
9.07 J
6.10 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
13.24 J
8.64 J
Heel Firmness
7.4
7.1
Heel Firmness
Preview Graph
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
39.3 N/mm
61.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
51.9 N/mm
149.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
74.5 N/mm
342.2 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.0
9.1
Forefoot Firmness
Preview Graph
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
52.2 N/mm
145.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
68.1 N/mm
317.3 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
95 N/mm
622.7 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.4
5.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
7.99 J
5.49 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
7.88 J
5.34 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
7.81 J
5.24 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.76 J
5.16 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.8
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
111 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
8.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
73.0%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.3
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
21.0 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
357 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4
New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4
Comments
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 vs New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.