New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Oct 21, 2025 at 03:41pm
Test bench update Oct 28, 2025 at 05:21pm
Tested using Methodology v0.9 
New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4
5.3
Marathon Racing 
7.2
5K/10K Racing 
5.9
Energy Return 
5.9
Cushioning 
8.7
Lateral Stability 
 0
Current Deal: The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 has dropped in price by $45.00 at Amazon.com.
SEE DEAL
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5
  1. Recommended in:
  2. Running Shoes
  3. For Men
  4. For Women

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 brings some serious updates to an already well-loved running shoe. A wide base underfoot and a relatively low stack provide amazing stability, while the lightweight design keeps things nimble—though not quite race-day fast. Now featuring a PEBA-EVA blend midsole, the shoe offers some responsiveness, but it's really ideal for daily training, from easy miles to moderately paced runs. The upper strikes a balance between breathability and structure, making the Rebel v4 a comfortable and reliable option for daily training.

Our Verdict

5.3
Marathon Racing 

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 isn't made for marathon racing. The shoe's lower energy return and insufficient underfoot protection significantly lower its efficiency and suitability for long-distance performances. It's far from a dedicated racing machine, but given its low weight and great stability, there are certainly even less capable options out there.

Pros
  • Excellent stability.

  • Lightweight.

Cons
None
7.2
5K/10K Racing 

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 performs decently for shorter distances thanks to its relatively lightweight build. While the shoe's firm forefoot helps, the responsiveness is still too low to help you push off efficiently during faster, shorter races.

Pros
  • Lightweight.

Cons
  • Energy return is too low for racing.

5.9
Energy Return 

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4's midsole offers middling energy return. While you'll still get some bounce, it lacks the dynamic propulsion offered by top-tier racing shoes.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Energy return is too low for racing.

5.9
Cushioning 

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 delivers sub-par cushioning. While there is some protection in the heel, the forefoot cushioning is disappointing, making it less suitable for runners who prefer plush landings during extended training sessions. Because it's lower stacked, it will bottom out faster than more protective alternatives.

Pros
  • Heel cushioning is okay.

Cons
  • Not enough underfoot protection, especially in the forefoot.

8.7
Lateral Stability 

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 offers amazing lateral stability, making it an excellent choice for runners needing confidence and security. Its very wide outsole platform and lower stack height provide great ground contact, helping the shoe maintain a steady balance for runners who prioritize stability.

Pros
  • Super wide base makes for a stable platform.

  • Lower stack makes for a grounded ride.

  • Midsole is firm.

Cons
None
  • 5.3
    Marathon Racing
  • 7.2
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 5.9
    Energy Return
  • 5.9
    Cushioning
  • 8.7
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Oct 28, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.9, which adds a Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test to our performance section. Read more in our changelog.
    2.  Updated Oct 21, 2025: 

      We've adjusted this review's writing to align with the new test bench, including updates to all usage scores and test boxes for Cushioning, Firmness, and Energy Return.

    3.  Updated Oct 20, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.
    4.  Updated Jul 30, 2025: 

      We revised the phrasing in the Marathon Racing, Lateral Stability and Cushioning boxes to better align with the latest test bench scores., We also updated the side-by-side comparisons with the Brooks Hyperion 2 and New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 to ensure they are as accurate as possible with regards to cushioning.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label. The color shown here is Cyber Jade with White and Black, but the shoe is available in other colorways, including White with Bleached Lime Glo and Hot Mango, White with Linen and Sea Salt, and Black with Graphite and White. Wide versions are offered separately for both men (2E) and women (D).

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 is a lightweight daily trainer designed for runners who appreciate a wide platform that's close to the ground. It caters well to those who need extra stability on their shorter daily mileage. However, runners seeking maximum cushioning and comfort for their daily training might find alternatives like the Mizuno Neo Zen more enjoyable for long-distance comfort. If your priority is shaving grams, the Brooks Hyperion 2 is a lighter daily trainer, but this comes at a cost: less cushioning and less stability than the Rebel v4. If you require structural lateral stability and are after more support to correct overpronation, the ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31 is where to look.

    Within New Balance's performance-oriented FuelCell lineup, the Rebel v4 is positioned above the New Balance FuelCell Pvlse v1, which serves as their minimalist trainer, but below the more cushioned and plated New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4, which is their racing super shoe. Also, note that New Balance has updated the Rebel line with the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5, which shifts the model toward a softer, higher-stacked, and more comfort-focused design. While it broadens the shoe's appeal for daily training, it also moves away from the lightweight feel that defined the Rebel v4.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, as well as the best running shoes for men and the best running shoes for women.

    HOKA Mach 6

    The HOKA Mach 6 and New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 are both lightweight daily trainers, ideal for runners who prefer a more nimble feel. The Rebel v4 is the lighter of the two, offering a more grounded and stable ride that feels secure underfoot. The Mach 6, while slightly heavier, delivers a more dynamic experience with more bounce, making it feel livelier during runs.

    ASICS NOVABLAST 5

    The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 and the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 are both daily trainers, but they cater to different running preferences. The New Balance offers a classic daily trainer feel with a firmer midsole and a more grounded, stable ride. On the other hand, the ASICS is significantly more cushioned, providing better underfoot protection, which is especially beneficial during longer runs or for those who prioritize softness and comfort. While both shoes are reliable choices for daily training, choose the Rebel v4 if you prefer a stable, firm feel and the NOVABLAST 5 if you want maximum cushioning and comfort over extended distances.

    New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5

    The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 and New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 share the same lineage, but the v5 marks a clear shift toward a more cushioned, mainstream daily trainer feel. The Rebel v4 is lower to the ground, firmer, and more responsive, making it a go-to option for runners who want a stripped-down, exciting ride when training. The Rebel v5, on the other hand, adds more stack, a softer midsole feel, and greater upper padding, making it plusher and more forgiving, especially on easy or recovery days. On the other side, it's about 20 grams heavier. For runners who love the v4's raw, fun feel, the update might feel like a step away from its original intent. For those looking for a more comfortable, cushioned version of a (relatively) lightweight trainer, the v5 broadens its appeal.

    ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31

    For most runners, the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 has some advantages over the ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31. It's a significantly lighter shoe that has some ground feel due to its much lower stack height than the GEL-KAYANO. Thanks to its more responsive foam, the New Balance is a bit more efficient and better at picking up the pace. The GEL-KAYANO is still a better fit for runners who prefer higher stacks or need a stability shoe.

    Show more 
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    7.7
    Weight
    Weight
    214.7 g (7.57 oz)

    The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 is lightweight, helping keep your stride feeling agile. Its less imposing stack height makes it quite light, especially for a daily trainer.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    31.3 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    24.0 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    7.3 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    95 mm (3.7")
    Outsole Arch Width
    77 mm (3.0")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    116 mm (4.6")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.04
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    4.83
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    274 mm (10.8")
    Internal Heel Width
    64 mm (2.5")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    95 mm (3.7")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Semi-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    5.5
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    72.6%

    The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4's heel energy return is middling, offering only a modest sense of bounce and responsiveness. Runners won't experience a particularly energetic ride at heel strike, meaning the shoe doesn't significantly aid propulsion from the heel. This makes it better suited for runners who rely less on pronounced heel-to-toe transitions.

    6.0
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    73.4%

    Similarly, the forefoot energy return in this shoe remains mediocre, providing only moderate responsiveness upon toe-off. While there's some bounce for a daily trainer, the model lacks the dynamic pop sought by competitive runners in faster, more aggressive workouts or races.

    6.1
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.17 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    7.75 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    12.55 J

    The shoe initially feels acceptably cushioned at the heel, dampening the road effects, especially during shorter to moderate runs. However, hands-on testing revealed issues over extended distances. Due to its softer midsole compound, the cushioning noticeably compresses after roughly nine miles (15 km), partially bottoming out and significantly reducing its effectiveness. Consequently, runners looking to tackle longer distances or sustained mileage may find it disappointingly insufficient over time.

    5.7
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    3.71 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    6.10 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    8.64 J

    The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4's forefoot cushioning is inadequate. Practical testing uncovered significant drawbacks over longer distances, where the midsole foam noticeably collapses in the forefoot region, bottoming out and compromising comfort and protection.

    7.1
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    61.5 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    149.9 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    342.2 N/mm

    The midsole is on the firmer side, but it's not overly stiff, either. This balance helps maintain steady and efficient landings, which is especially useful on longer or uneven routes where consistent stability matters.

    9.1
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    145.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    317.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    622.7 N/mm

    The forefoot foam of this shoe is very firm, delivering a highly stable and consistent feel across various intensities and paces. This contributes notably to excellent ground feedback and enhanced stability. However, this model might feel overly firm for runners who prefer a softer feel in the forefoot.

    5.0
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    5.49 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    5.34 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    5.24 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    5.16 J