The Bose Soundbar 700 is a decent 3.0 soundbar. It performs noticeably better than the similar Bose Soundbar 500 thanks to a better frequency response and a more neutral sound profile. Also, this bar has side-firing speakers which make the sounds bounce off your walls, giving you an impressive soundstage. It also gets loud enough for most uses and doesn’t compress at max volume, which is great and is something the Soundbar 500 has trouble with.
Decent for mixed usage. The Bose Soundbar 700 has a decent stereo frequency response that's fairly well-balanced and neutral, which is great for a wide variety of music genres and voice-oriented content like audiobooks and podcasts. This bar gets loud enough for most content and has a unique and very wide soundstage thanks to their side-firing speakers. However, some may feel it lacks bass, although this can be improved by getting a separate subwoofer. It also doesn’t give the most immersive listening experience with movies, but this setup can easily be upgraded to do so.
Good for dialog. The Bose 700 has good voice reproduction thanks to its well-balanced and neutral sound profile. It also gets loud enough for most voice-oriented content like audiobooks and podcasts, which you’re easily going to be able to stream wirelessly to the bar. It also has a dialog enhancement feature to make voices and dialog even clearer, especially at a lower volume, which is very useful.
Good for music. The Bose 700 has a decent stereo frequency response that's well-balanced and suitable for a wide variety of music genres. Some may feel like it lacks a bit of sub-bass, but you can also get the separate subwoofer, which should help with the bass performance. The bar also has a great soundstage thanks to the side-firing speakers. This soundbar also has a room correction feature to make it sound better in your room. You can get the bar to play at a pretty loud level, and it won’t compress too much, which is great.
Decent for movies. The Bose Soundbar 700 doesn’t support Atmos and doesn't offer a good overall surround experience with the bar itself. On the upside, its soundstage is very wide thanks to the side-firing speakers, which make sounds seem like they’re coming from the walls. You’ll be able to watch movies at a loud volume too, and the bar won’t compress too much. It'll be a good option for dialog in movies.
The Soundbar 700 is one of the most recent high-end models from Bose, but came out in 2018. It's slightly bigger and performs better than the Bose Soundbar 500 from the same year. When fully set up with a sub and back satellites, the Bose 700's main competitors are the Bose 500, the Samsung HW-N950, the Sony HT-Z9F with satellites, the 5.1 Sonos Beam setup with a sub and satellites, and the Sonos Playbar.
The Bose Soundbar 700 has a unique style with a glass top and a metal grille that covers the front and the sides. The bar gives off a premium feel.
This setup has no subwoofer. If you're looking for a soundbar with a dedicated sub, check out the Klipsch Cinema 600.
The bar is fairly large and unlikely to fit between the legs of a 55" TV stand. On the upside, it's not too tall, so if you place it in front of the TV, it won't block the bottom of your screen or mess with the IR reception usually found on the bottom edge of TVs.
The back of the bar has two ports, one on each side for the speakers, and two openings: one for the power and one for the inputs.
The build quality is excellent. The entire setup is very robust and gives off a premium feel, and the entire design is unique. The glass on the bar can collect dust and attract fingerprints.
The stereo frequency response of the Bose Soundbar 700 is decent and better than the similar Bose Soundbar 500. Unfortunately, the bar by itself doesn’t have a very low low-frequency extension, which can be improved if you get the separate sub. This means it'll have a bit of trouble reproducing the deep thump and rumble from movies and bass-heavy music genres. On the upside, the sound profile of the Soundbar 700 is well-balanced and neutral.
Note: This soundbar was tested with the bar only, but we plan to test it with a full setup (sub and satellites) in the future.
When listening to the Bose Soundbar 700, the soundstage is great. Due to the side-firing speakers, the bar projects the noise at the walls, which reflect it back at the listener. This results in a soundstage that feels wider than tower speakers from a home theater setup. Unfortunately, this feels a bit unnatural and overdone and sounds don’t seem to be coming from an accurate pinpoint location.
The dynamic performance of the Bose Soundbar 700 is way better than the Bose Soundbar 500. It can get pretty loud and doesn’t compress content too much, even at max volume. This is great for a large room or a crowded environment where you need to push the bar to its maximum capacities.
The THD performance of the Bose 700 is good. The amount of THD at a normal listening volume is within good limits and there’s no big jump in THD at max volume, resulting in an overall clean and pure sound coming from this bar.
The Bose Soundbar 700 by itself is a 3.0 setup that has great performance in the center channel. Due to its configuration, the Bose 700 has a dedicated center speaker, which results in a clearer and more accurate audio reproduction of the dialog in movies.
Just like the Bose 500, the Bose Soundbar 700 has sub-par surround performance. Due to its 3.0 system configuration, the bar alone downmixes surround content which won’t make an accurate and clear representation of surround objects. This means the result isn’t very immersive and the objects are perceived to come from the front instead of the sides or behind you. On the upside, the sound profile is still fairly accurate and well-balanced.
The Bose Soundbar 700 doesn’t support Atmos.
The Bose 700 has the same decent sound enhancement features as the Soundbar 500. It has a room correction feature that you set up using the Bose ADAPTiQ headset and it will apply sound correction depending on your room. It also has a Dialog Enhancement feature, which will help make dialog in movies a bit clearer, even at a lower volume. On the downside, unlike the Sony HW-S60T or Bang & Olufsen Beosound Stage, it doesn’t have a graphic EQ to help you customize the sound to your personal liking. However, there are presets available.
The Bose Soundbar 700 has limited wired connectivity. You can't use it as a hub as it lacks a Full HDMI In port and there is no Analog Audio In that can be helpful with older devices. There's an 'IR' input that you can use to connect an infrared transmitter so the bar can relay the infrared signal it receives. There's also a 'BASS' port for connecting to an external subwoofer, a 'DATA' port for firmware upgrades, and the 'ADAPTiQ' port for the headset that's included to help with room calibration.
Update 10/05/2020: We have changed the results of our 5.1 PCM (eARC only) test from 'Untested' to 'Undetermined'. While this bar has an HDMI ARC port and it supports eARC, it seems to reencode these formats into Dolby Digital. We can't determine if it supports PCM as it could be reencoded as Dolby Digital instead.
Just like the Bose Soundbar 500, this bar also supports eARC. Unfortunately, it can only downmix surround sound encoded in the Dolby Digital and DTS formats to 3.0 due to the bar's speaker configuration. Dolby Digital is widely available on streaming platforms, whereas DTS is usually the fallback of the higher quality DTS-HD MA format. This bar can't offer you a more immersive sound experience as it lacks support for object-based surround sound formats, like Dolby Atmos.
The lack of Full HDMI In ports doesn't allow this bar to serve as a hub between your external devices and your TV.
The Bose Soundbar 700 can decode surround sound encoded either in Dolby Digital or DTS formats through Optical. It will, however, downmix it to 3.0. Dolby Digital is common in streaming platforms and Blu-rays, while the DTS format isn't widely available on its own, but rather as a fallback of the DTS-HD MA found regularly on Blu-ray discs.
Excellent wireless playback support. You can seamlessly play music from your phone or tablet using the Bluetooth connection, which can't be done with the Sonos Arc. This bar will also connect to your Wi-Fi network so that you can cast to it, or you can use Apple AirPlay if you have a compatible device.
The Bose Soundbar 700 doesn't have a Full HDMI In and can't relay a video signal from an external source.
The interface is identical to the Bose Soundbar 500. It consists of a light that behaves differently according to your actions. Although it looks nice, it requires a lot of learning to get used to it.
The Bose Soundbar 700 has just two buttons: An 'action button' and a 'microphone off'. The action button manually activates voice assistants and can also be used to silence alarms or timers. The 'microphone off' completely disables voice assistants and you have to unmute the mic to re-activate them.
The remote that accompanies this bar can control all functions of the bar but is fairly large. This is probably because it can also act as a universal remote to control other devices in your household.
This bar pairs with the Bose Music App, just like the Bose 500. This app integrates the Tune In service, which has a multitude of internet radio stations and podcasts that you can listen to on the soundbar. Unfortunately, the app can't cast music or completely replace the remote as it can't switch inputs in certain cases.
Like the Bose Soundbar 500, the Bose Soundbar 700 can easily be upgraded with a wireless sub and satellites, but we tested it with the bar only. By itself, the bar has a decent performance and one of the widest soundstages thanks to the side-firing speakers. It has a great neutral sound profile. It's also one of the better-built soundbars and has a very unique and sleek style with a glass panel. See our recommendations for the best soundbars, the best Dolby Atmos soundbars, and the best soundbars with a subwoofer.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a slightly better option than the Sonos Arc. Overall, the Arc isn't as well-built, but it supports Atmos, which is great for a more immersive movie listening experience. On the other hand, the sound profile of the Bose 700 is slightly more neutral, and it allows for Bluetooth playback, which is convenient. Both setups can be upgraded easily but can get quite expensive.
When comparing the bars by themselves, the Bose Soundbar 700 is slightly better than the Sonos Beam. It performs slightly better at max volume without as much compression as the Beam. It has a better overall design with a nice glass panel and feels better-made. On the other hand, the Sonos is smaller and is easier to fit in your home theater setup. The Bose 700 has more inputs, supports DTS, and can play content wirelessly via Bluetooth as well as Wi-Fi.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is better than the Sonos Playbar. It has a slightly more accurate stereo frequency response and compresses less than the Playbar at max volume. The Soundbar 700 also has more inputs, although neither soundbar has an HDMI In port. The Bose 700 also has a sleeker design with a glass panel on the top. Both soundbars perform fairly similarly sound-wise, and both can be upgraded easily with a sub and satellites.
The Samsung HW-Q90R is a better soundbar system than the Bose Soundbar 700, although we didn't test it with the complete setup with a sub and satellites. With the bar by itself, the Bose 700 falls short to the Q90R. The Samsung soundbar system gets louder, has better overall performance, and supports Atmos, on top of having better connectivity options since the Bose 700 doesn't have any full HDMI In inputs. On the other hand, the Bose 700 can easily be upgraded, and the bar itself has a great stereo soundstage and feels premium and better-built.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is better than the Bose Soundbar 500. It has a better overall audio quality and can get louder, on top of having less compression at max volume. It also supports more audio formats and is slightly better-built and sleeker-looking thanks to the glass panel on top of it.
The Samsung HW-Q80R is better than the Bose Soundbar 700 by itself, but the Bose can easily be upgraded with a sub too. The Q80R comes with the sub and has a better overall bass performance, on top of being able to play louder. It also supports Atmos thanks to the two up-firing speakers. On the other hand, the Bose 700's soundstage is one of the widest, although a bit diffused. It also doesn't have any Full HDMI In ports, unlike the Samsung.
Although we didn't test the Bose Soundbar 700 with a sub and satellites, it performs noticeably better than the Klipsch Bar 48, which has a subwoofer. The Bose 700 has a great and wider soundstage and a better stereo frequency response. The Bar 48 lacks sub-bass even with a dedicated subwoofer, which is disappointing. The Bose 700 can also be upgraded easily, which will more than likely help its overall performance.
The Samsung HW-Q70R is better than the Bose Soundbar 700. The Samsung has much better bass performance due to its dedicated subwoofer, and it has up-firing speakers to simulate height in Dolby Atmos content. On the other hand, the Bose has a better center channel performance for dialogue-heavy content and a much better build quality, but it doesn't have as many input options as the Samsung.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a better 3.0 setup than the Bose Smart Soundbar 300. The 700 feels better built, it supports eARC, and it has room correction as well as EQ presets. It can get louder with fewer compression artifacts, and its surround performance is better.
The Sony HT-Z9F is a better soundbar than the Bose Soundbar 700. It has a slightly lower LFE, thanks to its dedicated wireless subwoofer, and has significantly better connectivity options. It also supports Atmos, but due to its lack of upwards firing or rear speakers, doesn't create the most immersive Atmos experience. On the other hand, the Bose feels even more premium and well-made and has better center-channel performance.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a better soundbar than the JBL Link Bar. It's easily upgradable, but even the bar itself performs better. It has a dedicated center channel, has a better sound quality and offers more sound enhancement features like a room correct. Its soundstage is also very wide due to the speakers' positioning and reflects the sounds off the walls to the listeners. On the other hand, the JBL Lik Bar has a bit more ports and connectivity options. It has three full HDMI In ports and an audio jack for an AUX cable, which the Bose lacks. However, it isn't as well-built as the Bose 700.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a better 3.0 setup than the Bang & Olufsen Beosound Stage. The Bose has a better build quality, its sound profile is more neutral, and it offers a room correction feature. However, the Bang & Olufsen supports Dolby Atmos, it has a graphic EQ, and it has a full array of physical inputs. It also has outstanding wireless playback options.
The Bose Soundbar 700, by itself, doesn't perform as well as the Sony HT-ST5000 soundbar setup. Since the Sony comes with a subwoofer, it has a lot more bass than the Bose. It doesn't sound as clear and detailed, though, and has troubles with compression and distortion at max volume. However, the Bose lacks input options compared to the Sony, and doesn't support as many audio format options.
The Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2Ch and the Bose Soundbar 700 are often compared. However, since we only tested the Bose with the bar alone, results between a 9.2.4 setup and a 3.0 soundbar aren't very comparable. On the other hand, with stereo content, the Bose does much better and has a wider soundstage due to the side-firing speakers. The Nakamichi can get louder and thanks to the additional speakers it has, it offers an amazing surround experience.
The Bose Soundbar 700 and the Klipsch Cinema 600 are similarly-performing soundbars, so depending on your listening habits, you may prefer one over the other. The Bose is better-built, has a better soundstage, and offers a room correction feature, unlike the Klipsch. However, the Klipsch comes with a dedicated subwoofer which helps produce a more extended low-bass.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is slightly better than the Sennheiser AMBEO Soundbar. The Sennheiser sounds pretty bad without its AMBEO mode, and the Bose 700 has a good neutral sound profile. The soundstage is also great and quite wide. On the other hand, the AMBEO mode of the Sennheiser bar is impressive and very immersive with surround content. However, you can easily add a sub and satellites to the Soundbar 700 to enhance your listening experience.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a better overall performing soundbar than the Samsung HW-S60T. The Bose is a 3.0 channel soundbar with a very balanced mid range and a slightly bright sound profile. It can get pretty loud with fewer compression artifacts, its discrete center channel is exceptionally well-balanced for clear and accurate vocal reproduction, and it even supports eARC. However, the Samsung has a better app that you can also use as a remote, and the bar itself is less wide, so it should fit better between the legs of a 55" TV.
The Samsung HW-Q60R and the Bose Soundbar 700 have similar performance in mixed usage. The Samsung comes with a dedicated subwoofer, while the Bose is a standalone soundbar. Build quality is much better on the Bose, but the Samsung has more input selection and better sound enhancement features, including a graphic EQ. Both support Bluetooth, but the Bose supports AirPlay, while the Samsung doesn't.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a noticeably better sounding bar than the Sony HT-CT800. It has a better stereo performance with a noticeably larger soundstage as well. The Bose 700 can get louder and doesn't compress at max volume, like CT800 does. It also has a dedicated center channel which makes dialog in movies easier to understand and can easily be upgraded with a sub and satellites. However, if you're looking to use your soundbar as a hub for your devices, the Bose 700 doesn't have any Full HDMI In ports, while the CT800 has plenty.
The 3.0 channel Bose Soundbar 700 is much better than the AmazonBasics 2.1 Channel Bluetooth soundbar. The Bose sounds much better-balanced with a wider soundstage, has more sound enhancement features, including room correction, and also supports DTS surround content. It's a pretty long soundbar though, so the AmazonBasics might be a better option if you're tight on space.
The 3.0 channel Bose Soundbar 700 is much better than the 2.0 TaoTronics TT-SK023. The Bose can play both Dolby Digital and DTS surround formats over HDMI ARC, has a center channel for clearer voices and dialogue, a much wider soundstage, and a better-balanced sound. The TaoTronics is much more compact, though, which you may prefer if you're tight on space.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is noticeably better than the Sony HT-S200F. The audio reproduction of the Bose is accurate and it also provides one of the widest soundstages we've tested. The bar is sleek and very well-made. It also gets louder than the Sony and performs quite better with surround content as well. Also, the Bose 700 can be upgraded with a sub and satellites, which will help its overall sound performance as well.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is much better than the Insignia NS-HSB318 2.0. The 3.0-channel Bose has a more balanced sound profile with stereo content, and it can downmix a few different surround formats. It has a dedicated center channel for clearer voices and dialogue in movies and TV shows, and its stereo soundstage is quite impressive as well. The Insignia sounds boxier, doesn't have very many sound enhancement features, and doesn't support any surround sound formats. It does have a more compact design, however, which some people may prefer.
The Bose Soundbar 700 is a better soundbar than the Klipsch Cinema 400. The Bose is better-built, and since it's a 3.0 setup, it has a discrete center channel that offers a better center performance. It has a better soundstage, and it gets louder, too. However, the Klipsch has a more balanced sound profile, and it comes with some EQ presets.