Preferred store
Updated , Marc Henney

Our Recording Quality Score and Tests

What it is: Microphone recording quality shows how natural, neutral, extended and intelligible speech would be with the device under test, in a quiet environment.
When it matters: A microphone with a good recording quality ensures that the person listening to you would hear a full, clear, and easily understandable speech. Therefore, it is important whenever a good quality of speech transmission and intelligibility is needed.
Score components:

Microphone recording quality is concerned with the performance of the microphones and the quality of speech, when used in an ideal (quiet) environment. It shows how natural, neutral, extended and intelligible speech would be as heard by the listener.

It is part of our series of tests of the microphone of headphones.

Recording quality score is comprised of five tests: low-frequency extension (LFE), frequency response standard deviation (FR. Std. Dev.), high-frequency extension (HFE), harmonic distortion (Weighted THD), and gain.

Test Results

When it matters

A microphone with a good recording quality ensures that the person listening to you hears a full, clear, and easily understandable speech. Therefore, it is important whenever a good quality of speech transmission is needed. It is worth noting again that recording quality doesn't take into account the noise handling capability of the microphones, and the results are only valid in a quiet environment. For noise, we test this separately here

Our tests

Testing Procedure

Our isolation tests are performed in a 6' x 3' x 3' isolation box. The box is partially treated with bass traps and absorbers, and an M-Audio BX8 Carbon speaker is placed at one end of the box with the HMS (Head Measurement System) being positioned at the other end. The speaker is positioned at an angle in order to create a balance of direct and diffuse sound.

Isolation Box - Front View

Isolation Box - Front View

Isolation Box - Rear View

Isolation Box - Rear View

The target for our recording quality test is the response of a measurement microphone placed 5cm away from our dummy head’s mouth calibrated to 94dB SPL, and based on that, we calculate low-frequency extension, frequency response, high frequency extension, harmonic distortion, and gain.

Microphone Target Response

Microphone Target Response

The signal for the LFE, FR, HFE, and gain tests is a pink noise (random noise with equal energy per octave) limited between 20Hz - 20KHz. The reason for using a pink noise instead of a swept sine is to circumvent the effects of the automatic gain control (AGC) algorithm that most the active/Bluetooth headphones use. For the Weighted THD test, a swept sine is used since it is better at catching the distortion artifacts produced by the AGC algorithm, compared to a pink noise.

Each device is tested 5 times and the results shown here are the average of 5 passes. For headphones with an in-line microphone, the microphone is fixed at 0/90/180 degree angles relative to the speaker. For the last 2 passes, the microphone is allowed to dangle freely in order to simulate the random positions the microphone could end up in real-life situations. For the headphones that have the microphone built in the ear cup, a re-seat is performed before each pass. The headsets that come with boom microphones are measured with the boom in the optimum position for the first pass, and for the subsequent 4 passes, the microphone is moved up/down/front/back relative to the optimum position.

Recorded Speech

What it is: Actual audio recording of the headphone's microphone, recorded while placed on the dummy head, with speech being played back through the dummy head's mouth simulator.
When it matters: When a clean, full, and intelligible speech transmission is required.

Recorded speech is the recording of a reference track captured using the headphone's microphone. It can be used in comparison with other microphone recordings on the website, or it can be compared against our reference recording captured using our reference microphone.

Reference Recorded Speech:

Low-frequency Extension

What it is: Low-frequency extension shows how deep the bass response of the microphone is, and therefore, how deep and full your voice would sound to the listener. It is the lowest frequency at which the frequency response reaches -3dB of the target response.
When it matters: LFE is not a big factor in speech intelligibility and even speech recorded with a mic that has an LFE of 500Hz could still be easily understood. Therefore, it is mostly important if you are concerned with how deep and full your voice would be heard.
Good value: <150Hz
Noticeable difference: 30Hz

LFE is the lowest frequency at which the microphone response reaches -3dB of our target response. It can be considered as a metric for how deep and full the voice recording will be with the microphone. The lower the LFE the better, however, values below 150Hz should be considered good. It should also be noted that LFE has very little effect on the intelligibility of speech and even a microphone with an LFE of 500Hz could still be very well understood (even though it will sound very thin).

A number of factors, such as the microphone's polar pattern and proximity to the source, affect the low-frequency extension of microphones. However, as a rule of thumb, the closer the microphone to the mouth (as is the case with boom mics) the better the LFE tends to be.


LFE: 77Hz

Apple Earpods

LFE: 285Hz

B&W P7

LFE: 515Hz

Frequency Response Standard Deviation

FR. Std. Dev: 1.23dB

FR. Std. Dev: 2.25dB

FR. Std. Dev: 4.4dB

FR. Std. Dev: 7.13dB
What it is: Frequency Response Standard Deviation shows how accurately and balanced sound is captured by the microphone at each frequency. FR Std. Dev. is calculated between LFE and HFE, and the rest of the spectrum is ignored.
When it matters: A good frequency response is desired when a natural and neutral speech quality is desired. As opposed to HFE which is more a metric for speech intelligibility, frequency response could be considered as a metric for a natural and neutral sound.
Good value: >3.5dB
Noticeable difference: 0.5dB

Frequency response is calculated between LFE and HFE, ignoring the rest of the spectrum. It is scored by calculating the amount of deviation between the microphone's response and our target response. FR Std. Dev. can be considered as a metric for the neutrality and spectral balanced of the recorded speech. The effects of FR on speech intelligibility is more than HFE, but less consequential than LFE.

High-Frequency Extension

What it is: High-frequency extension is the highest frequency at which the frequency response reaches -3dB of the target response. It shows how extended the treble response of the microphone is.
When it matters: HFE is one the most important factors in speech intelligibility. The higher the HFE, the brighter, more open, and more extended the speech quality will be which makes it a lot easier to understand by the listener.
Good value: >8KHz
Noticeable difference: 1KHz

HFE is the highest frequency at which the microphone response reaches -3dB of our target response. It can be considered as a metric for clarity, presence, and intelligibility of speech, since the frequency range of 1KHz-8KHz has the most effect on speech comprehensibility. The higher the HFE the better, however, values above 8KHz should be considered good. Compared to the other tests present in the recording quality section at the moment, HFE has the highest correlation with speech quality and intelligibility.

A number of factors, such as the microphone's polar pattern and proximity to the source, as well as the connection protocol, affect the HFE performance of microphone. Generally, wired headphones or wireless headset with their own proprietary protocol tend to do better at HFE, compared to Bluetooth devices. This is due to the fact that Bluetooth Hands-Free Profile (HFP) supports audio only up to 4KHz, as opposed to the other protocols that can go as high as 20KHz.

Weighted Total Harmonic Distortion

What it is: The unwanted frequencies (harmonics) produced alongside the intended frequencies, which cause deformation of an output signal compared to its input.
When it matters: When clean and pure sound reproduction is desired, though its effect is not as noticable as frequency response.
Good value: <1.5
Noticeable difference: 1.0

Harmonic distortion for microphones is captured using a swept sine, as opposed to a pink noise used for the other tests. A swept sine signal can expose the artifacts caused by the automatic gain control (AGC) of the headphones better. The final value is calculated using a weighted filter that gives more importance to high-frequency distortion since humans are more sensitive to harmonic distortion at higher frequencies. However, it should be noted that THD (total harmonic distortion), compared to LFE, FR, and HFE, doesn't have a high correlation with perceived recording quality, even after applying a weighting filter.


What it is: Shows how much louder the microphone can go above our reference loudness level. The gain value is reported relative to our reference level, which is 94dB at a distance of 5cm from the mouth.
When it matters: A microphone with a high gain is important when the input signal (speech) is very quiet. For example when whispering, or talking on the phone in a library.
Good value: >18dB
Noticeable difference: 3dB

Our target SPL (sound pressure level) for our microphone tests is 94dB SPL. However, the gain on all microphones can be adjusted either on the headphone or on the device they are connected to. The gain value is acquired by setting the input level of the microphone to the maximum and recording the level. It is reported relative to the 94dB reference, therefore a gain of 10dB means that at the highest setting, the recorded SPL was 104dB SPL. As a rule of thumb, Bluetooth headphones tend to get the highest gain value because of their dedicated internal microphone amplifier.

What is not included

A few elements that you could care about are not included in the score at the moment:

  • Evaluation of the codec quality (PEAQ)
  • Evaluation of speech quality (POLQA)

If you feel there is an item missing that should be included, please let us know in the Q&A section.

Questions Found an error?

Let us know what is wrong in this question or in the answer.


Questions & Answers

I've been looking for a decent mid-range set of earbuds with a mic. I love the fact that you include the audio from the evaluation, but I would love to be able to compare it to the actual recording itself. Please add a link to the Mic reviews so that we can hear the original recording. Yes the quality will vary depending on what we are using to listen to it, but I need a baseline. Thanks
Thanks for your suggestion. We have added our reference recording to the Recording Quality article page.
Questions Have a question?

Before asking a question, make sure you use the search function of our website. The majority of the answers are already here.

Current estimated response time, based on # of pending questions: 3.0 business days.

A valid email is required. We answer most questions directly by email to prevent cluttering the site.