Mattress
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Join now
Best
Mattresses Side Sleepers Brands Memory Foam Firm Heavy People Mattresses-In-A-Box Hybrid Cooling
Tools
Compare NEW Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Review Pipeline Vote Custom Ratings
Popular
Casper Snow Helix Midnight Luxe 2025 Saatva Latex Hybrid Tuft and Needle Mint Nolah Evolution Novaform Legacy Beautyrest Mattress Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Beautyrest Silver BRS900 Sleep On Latex Pure Green Organic Casper Cooling Select Novosbed Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Boring Hybrid Boring Mattress Tempur-Pedic TEMPUR-Adapt Saatva Classic Purple RestorePlus Hybrid Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid Silk & Snow Mattress
53 Mattresses bought and tested
Supported by you via membership, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Mattress
  3. Compare

Casper Snow vs Boring Hybrid

Which Mattress Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      Style
    Performance
      FirmnessBody ConformitySupportBouncinessComfort Layers EnvelopmentResponsivenessMotion IsolationEdge SupportCooling
    Components
      CoverEdge ConstructionFoam Layer MaterialFoam Layer Mass DensityFoam Layer ThicknessSpring Layer DimensionsFoam Layer FirmnessSpring Layer FirmnessFoam Layer ResilienceSpring Layer Bounciness
    Comments

Products

Casper Snow
Boring Hybrid

Tested using Methodology v1.2

Updated Mar 05, 2026 06:56 PM

SEE PRICE
Casper

Tested using Methodology v1.2

Updated Mar 04, 2026 01:12 PM

SEE PRICE
Boring
Casper Snow Picture

Track

Boring Hybrid Picture

Track

Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium (47 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarPolyfoam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
  1. Recommended in 6 articles:
  2. Mattresses
  3. Side Sleepers
  4. Memory Foam
  5. 3
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Brands
  3. Hybrid
  4. Cooling

Our Verdict

Casper Snow

Boring Hybrid

The Casper Snow is a better choice for most people than the Boring Hybrid. The Casper provides both better support and better body conformity, making it a more comfortable option for most sleepers regardless of weight or sleeping position. While both options work well for hot sleepers, the Casper offers more efficient cooling. On the other hand, the Boring is much more durable, so it will resist sagging and indentations for a lot longer. It's more responsive, too, making it easier to move around.

0 

Variants

  • Snow (Queen)
  • Hybrid (Queen)

Review

See Casper Snow Review
See Boring Hybrid Review
0 
2 

Check Price

Queen
Snow
SEE PRICE
Casper
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring

Main Differences for
Side Sleeping

Threshold 

0.10

Side Sleeping 
 

8.3
7.0
No major differences between these mattresses for side sleeping. See full list of tests below.

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Style Picture

Mattress Type 
 

Hybrid
Hybrid

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

Yes
Yes

Quilted Top Layer 
 

No
No

Grab Handles 
 

No
No

Thickness  

30.5 cm (12.0")
26.2 cm (10.3")
Show Text 
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Head/Feet Firmness
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Head/Feet Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Lumbar Firmness
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Lumbar Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

56 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

47 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Medium (47 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
Show Text 

Body Conformity 
 

8.4
7.2

Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

62 mm (2.5")
39 mm (1.5")

Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb) 
 

80 mm (3.2")
67 mm (2.6")

Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

96 mm (3.8")
90 mm (3.5")
Show Text 

Support 
 

8.6
6.7

Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

0 mm (0.0")
16 mm (0.6")

Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb) 
 

7 mm (0.3")
27 mm (1.1")

Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

13 mm (0.5")
30 mm (1.2")
Show Text 

Bounciness 
 

7.1
8.1

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

13.0 cm (5.1")
21.0 cm (8.3")
Show Text 

Comfort Layers Envelopment 
 

7.7
6.6

Sinking & Contouring Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Sinking & Contouring Picture

Sinking Depth 
 

5.6 cm (2.2")
4.8 cm (1.9")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

28.3 cm (11.1")
30.6 cm (12.0")
Show Text 

Responsiveness 
 

4.5
9.3

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

3.1 s
0.5 s
Show Text 

Motion Isolation 
 

8.5
8.6

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

0.56 g
0.56 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.33 s
0.32 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

2.91 g
2.88 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.32 s
0.31 s
Show Text 

Edge Support 
 

6.0
8.9

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Compare in Graph Tool

Small Platen  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Small Platen
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Small Platen
 Compare in Graph Tool

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

149 mm
132 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

194 mm
156 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

148 mm
147 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

46 mm
9 mm
Show Text 

Cooling 
 

8.9
8.3

Cooling Graph  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Cooling Graph
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Cooling Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

71 kJ
63 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

198 kJ
179 kJ
Show Text 
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Cover Picture

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Polyester, Polyethylene, Spandex
Polyester, Spandex

Removable 
 

No
No

Machine Washable 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Edge Support Picture

Edge Component 
 

Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Show Text 

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Foam Layer Material Picture

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
Polyfoam

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

5.3
8.3

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

40 kg/m³ (2.5 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.3 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.6
2.4

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

40 kg/m³ (2.5 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.6
2.4

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

38 kg/m³ (2.4 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.6
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

41 kg/m³ (2.6 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.6
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
38 kg/m³ (2.3 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
1.5

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Foam Layer Thickness Picture

Quilted Top 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

2.7 cm (1.1")
3.8 cm (1.5")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

2.7 cm (1.1")
3.8 cm (1.5")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
3.8 cm (1.5")

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Spring Layer Height Picture

Spring Layer Density Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Casper Snow Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Spring Layer Density Picture

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Height 
 

16.8 cm (6.6")
16.5 cm (6.5")

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

277 coils/m² (26 coils/ft²)
244 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

14 gauge
14 gauge

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

14 gauge
14 gauge
Show Text 

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Comfort Layer IPD
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Comfort Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

Casper Snow Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.0 kPa
1.9 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.0 kPa
1.9 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.0 kPa
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.9 kPa
N/A

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

N/A
2.9 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

Casper Snow Comfort Layer Firmness
Boring Hybrid Comfort Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Support Layer Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Casper Snow Support Layer Firmness
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Support Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

97 Pa/mm
72 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

93 Pa/mm
69 Pa/mm
Show Text 

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

2%
12%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

2%
12%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

1%
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

5%
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
23%

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

37.5 cm (14.8")
28.0 cm (11.0")
Show Text 

Check Price

Queen
Snow
SEE PRICE
Casper
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring
Back to Top

Casper Snow

Boring Hybrid

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 2 months ago

Casper Snow vs Boring Hybrid: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

See All Home Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Membership (which gives you access to extra features) and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.