Products
Casper Snow
Boring Hybrid
Tested using Methodology v1.1
Updated Feb 10, 2026 07:33 PM
SEE PRICE
Casper
Tested using Methodology v1.1
Updated Jan 22, 2026 08:11 PM
SEE PRICE
Boring
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium (47 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarPolyfoam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
Casper Snow
Boring Hybrid
The Casper Snow is a better choice for most people than the Boring Hybrid. The Casper provides both better support and better body conformity, making it a more comfortable option for most sleepers regardless of weight or sleeping position. While both options work well for hot sleepers, the Casper offers more efficient cooling. On the other hand, the Boring is much more durable, so it will resist sagging and indentations for a lot longer. It's more responsive, too, making it easier to move around.
Variants
- Snow (Queen)
- Hybrid (Queen)
Check Price
Queen
Snow
SEE PRICE
Casper
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
8.3
7.0
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
62 mm (2.5")
39 mm (1.5")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
7.7
6.6
Indent @ 80 kg (172 lb)
80 mm (3.2")
67 mm (2.6")
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
No
No
Grab Handles
No
No
Thickness
30.5 cm (12.0")
26.2 cm (10.3")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
56 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
47 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Medium (47 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
8.4
7.2
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
62 mm (2.5")
39 mm (1.5")
Indent @ 80 kg (172 lb)
80 mm (3.2")
67 mm (2.6")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
96 mm (3.8")
90 mm (3.5")
Support
8.6
6.7
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
0 mm (0.0")
16 mm (0.6")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (172 lb)
7 mm (0.3")
27 mm (1.1")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
13 mm (0.5")
30 mm (1.2")
Bounciness
7.1
8.1
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
13.0 cm (5.1")
21.0 cm (8.3")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
7.7
6.6
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
5.6 cm (2.2")
4.8 cm (1.9")
Diameter Of Distortion
28.3 cm (11.1")
30.6 cm (12.0")
Responsiveness
4.5
9.3
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
3.1 s
0.5 s
Motion Isolation
8.5
8.6
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
0.56 g
0.56 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.33 s
0.32 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
2.91 g
2.88 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.32 s
0.31 s
Edge Support
6.0
8.9
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
149 mm
132 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
194 mm
156 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
148 mm
147 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
46 mm
9 mm
Cooling
8.9
8.3
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
71 kJ
63 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
198 kJ
179 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Polyester, Polyethylene, Spandex
Polyester, Spandex
Removable
No
No
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
Polyfoam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
Polyfoam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
Polyfoam
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Mass Density
5.3
8.3
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
40 kg/m³ (2.5 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.3 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.6
2.4
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
40 kg/m³ (2.5 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.6
2.4
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
38 kg/m³ (2.4 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.6
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
41 kg/m³ (2.6 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.6
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
38 kg/m³ (2.3 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
1.5
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Support Foam Density vs Reference
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
2.7 cm (1.1")
3.8 cm (1.5")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
2.7 cm (1.1")
3.8 cm (1.5")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
3.8 cm (1.5")
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
16.8 cm (6.6")
16.5 cm (6.5")
Support Layer Coil Density
277 coils/m² (26 coils/ft²)
244 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
14 gauge
14 gauge
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
14 gauge
14 gauge
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.0 kPa
1.9 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.0 kPa
1.9 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.0 kPa
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.9 kPa
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
N/A
2.9 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
97 Pa/mm
72 Pa/mm
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
93 Pa/mm
69 Pa/mm
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
2%
12%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
2%
12%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
1%
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
5%
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
23%
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
37.5 cm (14.8")
28.0 cm (11.0")
Check Price
Queen
Snow
SEE PRICE
Casper
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Casper Snow
Boring Hybrid
Comments
Casper Snow vs Boring Hybrid: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.