Running Shoe
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Join now
Best
Running Shoes For Men Women Nike Brooks Marathon Long Distance For Beginners New Balance ASICS Stability HOKA adidas Cheap Cushioned Heavy Runners On Most Comfortable Saucony PUMA
Tools
Compare 3D Compare Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Review Pipeline Vote Custom Ratings
Popular
Dynafish Xiaonian Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra ASICS MEGABLAST Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite adidas Adizero Evo SL HOKA Bondi 9 ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 ASICS NOVABLAST 6 adidas Adizero Pacer Nike Vomero Plus PUMA Velocity NITRO 5 ASICS NOVABLAST 5 Saucony Endorphin Azura Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Saucony Hurricane 26 Nike Vomero Premium Kiprun Kipstorm Challenger ASICS GEL-KAYANO 33 PUMA Deviate Pure NITRO Saucony Triumph 24
303 Running Shoes bought and tested
Supported by you via membership, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Running Shoe
  3. Compare

HOKA Clifton 10 vs ANTA PG7 3

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      WeightStack HeightsExternal ShapeInternal ShapeForefoot Fit: WidthForefoot Fit: HeightArch Fit: WidthLength FitHeel Rocker GeometryForefoot Rocker GeometryFoamLacesOther Features
    Performance
      Heel Compression Energy ReturnForefoot Compression Energy ReturnHeel CushioningForefoot CushioningHeel FirmnessForefoot FirmnessForefoot Long Run CushioningRocker StiffnessForefoot Bending Energy ReturnForefoot Bending StiffnessHeel Compression DepthForefoot Compression Depth
    Comments

Products

HOKA Clifton 10
ANTA PG7 3

Tested using Methodology v0.14

Updated Sep 17, 2026 05:11 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:27 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
HOKA Clifton 10 Picture

Track

ANTA PG7 3 Picture

Track

Heel Stack Height
41.6 mm
Weight
273.3 g (9.64 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.9 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
41.9 mm
Weight
279.4 g (9.86 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.3 mm
Plate
None
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. HOKA

Our Verdict

HOKA Clifton 10

ANTA PG7 3

The HOKA Clifton 10 and ANTA PG7 3 are both highly cushioned daily trainers, mostly separated by price. The HOKA shoe is more stable thanks to a wider arch platform and a semi-gusseted tongue, so if that's important to you, the higher price tag might be worth it. Otherwise, the ANTA shoe offers similar performance at a more competitive price.

GIFT THIS COMPARISON

0 

Variants

  • Clifton 10 (Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Clifton 10 (Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • PG7 3 (Black - (Men - US 9))
  • PG7 3 (Black - (Women - US 7))

Review

See HOKA Clifton 10 Review
See ANTA PG7 3 Review
0 
0 

Check Price

SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Hoka.com
SEE PRICE
ANTA
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
Read more

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

6.6
6.6
No major differences between these running shoes for half/full marathon racing. See full list of tests below.

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

5.5
5.2

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

273.3 g (9.64 oz)
279.4 g (9.86 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

41.6 mm
41.9 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

31.7 mm
31.6 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.9 mm
10.3 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
HOKA Clifton 10 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ANTA PG7 3 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
95 mm (3.7")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

85 mm (3.3")
76 mm (3.0")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

113 mm (4.4")
114 mm (4.5")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.26
2.27

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.56
3.61

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
HOKA Clifton 10 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ANTA PG7 3 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

280 mm (11.0")
277 mm (10.9")

Internal Heel Width 
 

62 mm (2.4")
68 mm (2.7")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

98 mm (3.9")
93 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

Yes
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.4
9.2

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

2.8 mm (0.108")
3.9 mm (0.152")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-1.2 mm (-0.048")
0.1 mm (0.006")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

7.0
5.3

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-3.6 mm (-0.143")
-5.6 mm (-0.220")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

10
9.4

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

0.5 mm (0.020")
-1.3 mm (-0.050")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

8.4
8.5

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

30 mm (1.2")
32 mm (1.3")

Heel Apex Position 
 

19.9%
20.0%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

27.3°
28.1°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

7.3
7.7

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

50 mm (2.0")
55 mm (2.2")

Toe Apex Position 
 

65.8%
63.3%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

26.6°
26.6°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

N/A
N/A

Primary Foam Type 
 

EVA
Unknown

Secondary Foam Name 
 

N/A
N/A

Secondary Foam Type 
 

No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Flat
Flat

Width 
 

5.0 mm (0.2")
6.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.7 mm (0.1")
1.7 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

11.0%
12.5%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
None
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

4.4
2.6

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Heel Energy Return 
 

71.1%
68.9%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

4.4
5.0

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

71.1%
71.8%

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.4
8.5

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.84 J
3.66 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

10.26 J
10.49 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

17.10 J
18.48 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

7.8
7.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.82 J
4.72 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

8.42 J
8.41 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

12.38 J
12.47 J

Heel Firmness 
 

7.1
7.1

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Firmness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness At 550N 
 

39.9 N/mm
41.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

50.1 N/mm
50.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

71.1 N/mm
69.7 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.1
8.3

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness At 800N 
 

57.3 N/mm
59.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

74.4 N/mm
76.2 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

103 N/mm
105 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

5.9
6.6

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

6.70 J
7.02 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

6.41 J
6.98 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

6.20 J
6.94 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

6.04 J
6.91 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

5.9
5.3

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

60 N
48 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

5.1
6.1

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

57.3%
60.7%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

6.9
7.1

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

11.5 N/mm
11.6 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

268 N
288 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

6.4

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

13.2 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

21.7 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

27.3 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

5.9

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

13.4 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

17.1 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

19.6 mm

Check Price

SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Hoka.com
SEE PRICE
ANTA
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
Back to Top

HOKA Clifton 10

ANTA PG7 3

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 1 month ago

HOKA Clifton 10 vs ANTA PG7 3: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

See All Shoe Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Membership (which gives you access to extra features), when you buy RTINGS.com Merch, and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.