ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 vs Brooks Glycerin Max 2

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2
Brooks Glycerin Max 2

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 27, 2026 05:25 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 14, 2026 05:38 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Our Verdict

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2

Brooks Glycerin Max 2

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 and the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 may share a similar name, but they represent two very different interpretations of what a high-stack daily trainer should be. The Glycerin Max 2 is much heavier and sits higher off the ground, leaning fully into cushioning volume and impact absorption. It delivers a softer, more forgiving ride overall, with noticeably more forefoot cushioning that prioritizes shock reduction. The GLIDERIDE MAX 2, by contrast, with its lower weight, pronounced rocker, and partial plastic plate, creates a smoother, more rolling transition. While it's still highly protective, it doesn't feel as plush or sink-in soft as the Glycerin Max 2, especially up front.

0 

Variants

  • GLIDERIDE MAX 2 (Black/Lilac Hint - (Women - US 7))
  • GLIDERIDE MAX 2 (Black/White - (Men - US 9))
  • Glycerin Max 2 (Grey/Coconut/Metallic - (Women - US 7))
  • Glycerin Max 2 (Orange/Beacon Blue/Nightlife - (Men - US 9))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

6.4
5.5

Weight  

6.0
3.7

Plate 
 

3/4-Length Plastic Plate
None

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

6.0
3.7

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

259.7 g (9.16 oz)
314.3 g (11.09 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

45.9 mm
47.9 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

35.3 mm
41.0 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

10.6 mm
6.9 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.0 mm
6.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

87 mm (3.4")
88 mm (3.5")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

78 mm (3.1")
85 mm (3.4")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

112 mm (4.4")
114 mm (4.5")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.90
1.84

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.17
2.78

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

280 mm (11.0")
280 mm (11.0")

Internal Heel Width 
 

63 mm (2.5")
66 mm (2.6")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
92 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

Yes
No

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Fully-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

3/4-Length Plastic Plate
None
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

2.3
2.0

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

68.4%
67.8%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

3.4
3.1

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

70.0%
69.6%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.5
8.5

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.49 J
3.47 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

10.57 J
10.81 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

19.67 J
19.55 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

7.7
9.0

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.58 J
5.33 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

8.28 J
10.19 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

12.52 J
15.84 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

4.1
4.1

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

47.5 N/mm
46.4 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

86.5 N/mm
85.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

162.5 N/mm
170.7 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.5
6.1

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

98.8 N/mm
78.4 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

198.0 N/mm
147.1 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

350.9 N/mm
273.9 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

6.8
8.4

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

7.53 J
9.41 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

7.29 J
9.15 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

7.13 J
9.02 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

7.00 J
8.93 J
Show Text 

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2

Brooks Glycerin Max 2

Comments

  1. Comparison

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 2 vs Brooks Glycerin Max 2: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones