Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jul 24, 2026 05:31 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Jul 21, 2026 12:48 PM
SEE PRICE
Hoka.com
Heel Stack Height
40.9 mm
Weight
289.1 g (10.20 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
13.6 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
38.1 mm
Weight
270.8 g (9.55 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.9 mm
Plate
N/A
Our Verdict
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
HOKA Arahi 9
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and HOKA Arahi 9 are both supportive daily trainers, but they take different approaches to stability. The Brooks is heavier, though neither shoe is especially light, and its firm GuideRails provide more traditional, pronounced correction that can feel restrictive and harsher underfoot. The HOKA offers a bit more cushioning, especially at the heel, along with a wider arch and more rocker, giving it a smoother, more rolling ride that feels easier to use across daily mileage.
Variants
- Adrenaline GTS 25 (Black/Biscuit - (Men - US 9))
- Adrenaline GTS 25 (Black/Black/Ebony - (Men - US 9))
- Arahi 9 (Alabaster/Oat Milk - (Women - US 7))
- Arahi 9 (Virtual Blue/Soft Cobalt - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
5.4
6.5
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.6
5.6
Forefoot Stack Height
27.3 mm
29.2 mm
Weight
4.8
5.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.7
6.0
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
4.8
7.3
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.8
5.6
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
289.1 g (10.20 oz)
270.8 g (9.55 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.9 mm
38.1 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
27.3 mm
29.2 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
13.6 mm
8.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
12.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
93 mm (3.7")
95 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
77 mm (3.0")
86 mm (3.4")
Outsole Forefoot Width
110 mm (4.3")
115 mm (4.5")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.27
2.49
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
4.03
3.94
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
280 mm (11.0")
281 mm (11.1")
Internal Heel Width
65 mm (2.6")
61 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
90 mm (3.5")
95 mm (3.7")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.4
9.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
2.8 mm (0.109")
3.8 mm (0.150")
Toe TTS Deviation
2.2 mm (0.085")
0.3 mm (0.011")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.8
7.3
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.8 mm (-0.149")
-3.2 mm (-0.128")
Arch Fit: Width
9.9
8.3
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
1.1 mm (0.045")
-2.9 mm (-0.115")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
4.9
8.1
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
16 mm (0.6")
25 mm (1.0")
Heel Apex Position
9.3%
20.0%
Heel Rocker Angle
21.8°
24.9°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
4.8
7.3
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
36 mm (1.4")
51 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
69.1%
63.3%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
21.8°
24.9°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
N/A
Primary Foam Type
EVA
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
Secondary Foam Type
N/A
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Flat
Width
6.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.8 mm (0.1")
Stretch
19.0%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.8
1.7
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
67.4%
67.2%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.6
5.6
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
69.0%
72.7%
Heel Cushioning
7.2
7.7
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.05 J
3.51 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.96 J
9.55 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.00 J
16.17 J
Forefoot Cushioning
5.2
6.6
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.21 J
4.25 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
5.60 J
7.03 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
8.34 J
10.09 J
Heel Firmness
8.8
7.9
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
52.5 N/mm
43.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
61.2 N/mm
54.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
83.2 N/mm
76.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.8
8.9
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
86.9 N/mm
63.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
112.7 N/mm
84.6 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
155 N/mm
119 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.7
6.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
5.24 J
6.58 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
5.11 J
6.44 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
5.05 J
6.37 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
4.99 J
6.32 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.0
5.9
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
61 N
58 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
4.3
4.0
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
54.5%
53.5%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.0
7.8
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
9.7 N/mm
16.4 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
315 N
323 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
HOKA Arahi 9
Comments
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 vs HOKA Arahi 9: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.