Brooks Hyperion 2 vs adidas Adizero Evo SL

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Brooks Hyperion 2
adidas Adizero Evo SL

Tested using Methodology v0.8.2

Updated Feb 11, 2026 06:33 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 12, 2026 06:19 PM

SEE PRICE
Adidas.com
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Running Shoes
  3. Women
  4. For Men

Our Verdict

Brooks Hyperion 2

adidas Adizero Evo SL

The adidas Adizero Evo SL is better overall than the Brooks Hyperion 2, offering more versatility for different kinds of runs. It delivers significantly better energy return, making for a more responsive ride when picking up the pace, and its more cushioned midsole makes it a better fit for longer efforts as well.

0 

Variants

  • Hyperion 2 (Alloy/Bright White/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Hyperion 2 (Alloy/Bright White/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • Adizero Evo SL (Carbon/Lucid Red/Solar Slime - (Men - US 9))
  • Adizero Evo SL (Cloud White/Core Black/Cloud White - (Men - US 9))
Read more

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

5.4
7.7

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

24.8 mm
30.2 mm

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

6.2
8.4

Heel Energy Return 
 

3.1
8.1

Heel Stack Height 
 

33.5 mm
36.9 mm

Plate 
 

None
Plastic Shank

Weight  

8.1
7.5

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.1
7.5

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
adidas Adizero Evo SL Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
adidas Adizero Evo SL Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

200.4 g (7.07 oz)
220.0 g (7.76 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion 2 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
adidas Adizero Evo SL Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

33.5 mm
36.9 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

24.8 mm
30.2 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.7 mm
6.7 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
6.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Brooks Hyperion 2 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
adidas Adizero Evo SL 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

78 mm (3.1")
84 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

70 mm (2.8")
64 mm (2.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

109 mm (4.3")
114 mm (4.5")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.33
2.27

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

4.40
3.77
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Brooks Hyperion 2 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
adidas Adizero Evo SL 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

272 mm (10.7")
276 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

61 mm (2.4")
61 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

92 mm (3.6")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion 2 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
adidas Adizero Evo SL Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted (medial)
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
Plastic Shank
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

3.1
8.1

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion 2 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

69.5%
81.4%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

6.2
8.4

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion 2 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

73.7%
83.3%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

6.7
8.0

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion 2 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
adidas Adizero Evo SL Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion 2 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

2.89 J
3.46 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

8.65 J
10.03 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

14.52 J
17.07 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

6.0
8.1

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
adidas Adizero Evo SL Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion 2 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

3.70 J
5.16 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

6.57 J
8.87 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

9.54 J
12.68 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.7
5.0

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion 2 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

50.1 N/mm
47.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

122.1 N/mm
98.2 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

264.1 N/mm
234.4 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.8
8.0

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion 2 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

125.2 N/mm
96.4 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

265.6 N/mm
209.8 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

547.7 N/mm
459.6 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

7.6

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
adidas Adizero Evo SL Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.31 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.17 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.07 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

7.99 J
Show Text 

Brooks Hyperion 2

adidas Adizero Evo SL

Comments

  1. Comparison

Brooks Hyperion 2 vs adidas Adizero Evo SL: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones