Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 19, 2026 06:14 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.11
Updated Jun 22, 2026 11:22 AM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Weight
250.3 g (8.83 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.8 mm
Plate
None
Weight
265.9 g (9.38 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.6 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
New Balance 1080v15
adidas Supernova Rise 3
The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 and adidas Supernova Rise 3 are two daily trainers, but they emphasize different aspects of comfort and performance. The New Balance uses a higher stack and a more modern Infinion midsole, delivering more cushioning and a bit more bounce, which makes it better suited for longer runs and more relaxed mileage. The adidas feels more grounded, with more road feel and a more stable platform, but it is heavier and less well suited to longer distances where cushioning matters more.
Variants
- 1080v15 (Afterglow/Blue Bird - (Men - US 9))
- 1080v15 (Afterglow/Blue Bird - (Women - US 7))
- Supernova Rise 3 (Aurora Onix/Silver Metallic/Lucid Orange - (Men - US 9))
- Supernova Rise 3 (Black/White/Black - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.3
5.5
Forefoot Stack Height
30.6 mm
25.3 mm
Heel Stack Height
38.4 mm
34.9 mm
Plate
None
None
Weight
6.4
5.8
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.1
5.2
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.5
6.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.8
5.6
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
5.6
7.5
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.4
5.8
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
250.3 g (8.83 oz)
265.9 g (9.38 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
38.4 mm
34.9 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.6 mm
25.3 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.8 mm
9.6 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
94 mm (3.7")
95 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
79 mm (3.1")
77 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
109 mm (4.3")
117 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.45
2.72
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.56
4.62
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
278 mm (10.9")
276 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
72 mm (2.8")
66 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
96 mm (3.8")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
8.8
9.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-2.2 mm (-0.088")
2.2 mm (0.087")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.3 mm (-0.089")
0.3 mm (0.010")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.1
8.5
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-4.7 mm (-0.185")
-2.0 mm (-0.080")
Arch Fit: Width
5.7
5.6
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-6.2 mm (-0.244")
-6.2 mm (-0.244")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.3
7.8
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
29 mm (1.1")
27 mm (1.1")
Heel Apex Position
20.5%
16.6%
Heel Rocker Angle
25.8°
24.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.0
6.6
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
42 mm (1.7")
46 mm (1.8")
Toe Apex Position
66.0%
66.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
22.8°
24.7°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
6.4
5.3
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
74.3%
72.3%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.5
6.6
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
78.1%
74.7%
Heel Cushioning
8.2
7.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.91 J
3.26 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.06 J
8.93 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.21 J
15.16 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.7
6.4
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.16 J
4.16 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.32 J
6.82 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
11.56 J
9.77 J
Heel Firmness
6.7
5.9
Heel Firmness
Preview Graph
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
37.1 N/mm
53.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
48.5 N/mm
116.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
70.4 N/mm
265.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.3
8.9
Forefoot Firmness
Preview Graph
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
51.3 N/mm
133.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
69.6 N/mm
279.3 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
99 N/mm
547.1 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.8
5.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
7.51 J
6.33 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
7.25 J
6.09 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
7.10 J
5.94 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.00 J
5.83 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.3
6.3
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
67 N
68 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.1
5.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
65.3%
57.4%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
5.6
7.5
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
9.9 N/mm
15.6 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
196 N
280 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
New Balance 1080v15
adidas Supernova Rise 3
Comments
New Balance 1080v15 vs adidas Supernova Rise 3: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.