Nike Alphafly 3 vs Vomero Plus

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Nike Alphafly 3
Nike Vomero Plus

Tested using Methodology v0.16

Updated Sep 23, 2026 02:08 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.16

Updated Sep 30, 2026 06:32 PM

SEE PRICE
Nike.com
Nike Alphafly 3 Picture

Track

Nike Vomero Plus Picture

Track

  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Nike
  1. Recommended in 2 articles:
  2. Women
  3. Nike

Our Verdict

Nike Alphafly 3

Nike Vomero Plus

The Nike Alphafly 3 is a significantly better racing shoe than the Nike Vomero Plus. It's significantly lighter with better energy return and moves you through stride much quicker. However, if you're just looking for a more cushioned shoe to handle weekly miles, the Vomero Plus is the better option.

0 

Variants

  • Alphafly 3 (Black/Olive Aura/Metallic Silver - (Men - US 9))
  • Alphafly 3 (Bright Crimson/Lime Blast/Mint Foam/Cave Purple - (Men - US 9))
  • Vomero Plus (Black/Cool Grey/Metallic Dark Grey/White - (Men - US 9))
  • Vomero Plus (Black/Cool Grey/Metallic Dark Grey/White - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

8.2
7.1

Weight  

8.1
5.2

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.1
5.2

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

200.7 g (7.08 oz)
280.7 g (9.90 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.8 mm
43.8 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

33.4 mm
34.4 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.4 mm
9.4 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
10.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Nike Alphafly 3 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Nike Vomero Plus 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
99 mm (3.9")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

68 mm (2.7")
75 mm (3.0")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

116 mm (4.6")
115 mm (4.5")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.29
2.26

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.47
3.34

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Nike Alphafly 3 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Nike Vomero Plus 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

273 mm (10.7")
278 mm (10.9")

Internal Heel Width 
 

59 mm (2.3")
64 mm (2.5")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

90 mm (3.5")
91 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
Yes

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.4
9.6

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

-0.8 mm (-0.032")
2.3 mm (0.091")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-2.2 mm (-0.087")
2.3 mm (0.091")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

9.7
10

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-0.8 mm (-0.030")
0.2 mm (0.007")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

6.2
5.8

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-5.6 mm (-0.219")
-6.0 mm (-0.236")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

6.6
8.4

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

16 mm (0.6")
33 mm (1.3")

Heel Apex Position 
 

15.3%
28.1%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

21.3°
21.2°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

6.7
6.5

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

45 mm (1.8")
45 mm (1.8")

Toe Apex Position 
 

66.4%
61.3%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

26.6°
21.0°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

ZoomX
ZoomX

Primary Foam Type 
 

PEBA
Unknown

Secondary Foam Name 
 

No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam

Secondary Foam Type 
 

No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Sawtooth
Flat

Width 
 

6.0 mm (0.2")
5.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.2 mm (0.0")
1.9 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

10.5%
10.5%

Breathability 
 

7.5
6.0

Breathability Video  

Upper Breathability 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Upper Breathability
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Upper Breathability

Upper Microscope Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Upper Microscope Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Upper Microscope Photo

Time-To-Dry 
 

8.1
2.5

Time-To-Dry Timelapse  

Time-To-Dry Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Time-To-Dry Graph
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Time-To-Dry Graph

Time To 30% Dry 
 

5.1 hrs
12.7 hrs

Time To 70% Dry 
 

14.9 hrs
32.2 hrs

Time To Dry 
 

24.3 hrs
46.0 hrs

Water Absorption 
 

8.4
4.9

Dry Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Dry Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Dry Weight Photo

Wet Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Wet Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Wet Weight Photo

Water Absorbed 
 

35.6%
57.7%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
None
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

8.2
7.7

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

82.0%
79.4%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

8.2
7.8

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

82.2%
79.5%

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.6
8.4

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.82 J
3.64 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.18 J
10.40 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

14.96 J
18.04 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.0
8.6

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.68 J
5.41 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

8.55 J
9.50 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

13.10 J
13.92 J

Heel Firmness 
 

7.4
7.3

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Heel Firmness Graph

Firmness At 550N 
 

38.8 N/mm
42.4 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

52.3 N/mm
51.2 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

75.9 N/mm
70.9 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.9
7.0

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Firmness Graph

Firmness At 800N 
 

57.0 N/mm
53.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

73.1 N/mm
68.1 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

99 N/mm
94 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

7.8
7.1

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.41 J
7.70 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.33 J
7.54 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.27 J
7.43 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.24 J
7.37 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

7.9
6.3

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

117 N
67 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

8.0
7.1

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

71.3%
65.7%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

9.5
7.4

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

41.6 N/mm
12.8 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

484 N
314 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

6.3
6.3

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

14.2 mm
13.0 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

21.0 mm
21.5 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

25.0 mm
26.8 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

6.1
6.5

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
Nike Vomero Plus Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

14.0 mm
15.1 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

17.8 mm
19.1 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

20.6 mm
21.8 mm

Nike Alphafly 3

Nike Vomero Plus

Comments

  1. Comparison

Nike Alphafly 3 vs Nike Vomero Plus: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones