Products
Tested using Methodology v1.0
Updated Oct 27, 2026 06:22 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v1.0
Updated Oct 23, 2026 02:51 PM
SEE PRICE
Nike.com
Heel Stack Height
38.4 mm
Weight
250.3 g (8.83 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.8 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
43.8 mm
Weight
280.7 g (9.90 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.4 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
New Balance 1080v15
Nike Vomero Plus
The Nike Vomero Plus is a better choice than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v15 if you want a fun, energetic ride. It's more cushioned and livelier. The New Balance is lighter, lower, and more stable, giving it a reliable, no-fuss ride that stays predictable from start to finish.
Variants
- 1080v15 (Afterglow/Blue Bird - (Men - US 9))
- 1080v15 (Afterglow/Blue Bird - (Women - US 7))
- Vomero Plus (Black/Cool Grey/Metallic Dark Grey/White - (Men - US 9))
- Vomero Plus (Black/Cool Grey/Metallic Dark Grey/White - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.3
7.1
Weight
6.4
5.2
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.4
5.2
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
250.3 g (8.83 oz)
280.7 g (9.90 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
38.4 mm
43.8 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.6 mm
34.4 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.8 mm
9.4 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
10.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
94 mm (3.7")
99 mm (3.9")
Outsole Arch Width
79 mm (3.1")
75 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
109 mm (4.3")
115 mm (4.5")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.45
2.26
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.56
3.34
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
278 mm (10.9")
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
72 mm (2.8")
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
91 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
8.8
9.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-2.2 mm (-0.088")
2.3 mm (0.091")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.3 mm (-0.089")
2.3 mm (0.091")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.1
10
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-4.7 mm (-0.185")
0.2 mm (0.007")
Arch Fit: Width
5.7
5.8
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-6.2 mm (-0.244")
-6.0 mm (-0.236")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.3
8.4
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
29 mm (1.1")
33 mm (1.3")
Heel Apex Position
20.5%
28.1%
Heel Rocker Angle
25.8°
21.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.0
6.5
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
42 mm (1.7")
45 mm (1.8")
Toe Apex Position
66.0%
61.3%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
22.8°
21.0°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
Infinion Foam
ZoomX
Primary Foam Type
TPEE
Unknown
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
6.0 mm (0.2")
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.7 mm (0.1")
1.9 mm (0.1")
Stretch
10.0%
10.5%
Breathability
6.0
6.0
Breathability Video
Upper Breathability
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Upper Microscope Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Time-To-Dry
4.6
2.5
Time-To-Dry Timelapse
Time-To-Dry Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Time To 30% Dry
10.3 hrs
12.7 hrs
Time To 70% Dry
26.6 hrs
32.2 hrs
Time To Dry
36.1 hrs
46.0 hrs
Water Absorption
4.9
4.9
Dry Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Wet Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Water Absorbed
57.7%
57.7%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
6.4
7.7
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
74.3%
79.4%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.5
7.8
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
78.1%
79.5%
Heel Cushioning
8.2
8.4
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.91 J
3.64 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.06 J
10.40 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.21 J
18.04 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.7
8.6
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.16 J
5.41 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.32 J
9.50 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
11.56 J
13.92 J
Heel Firmness
6.7
7.3
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
37.1 N/mm
42.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
48.5 N/mm
51.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
70.4 N/mm
70.9 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.3
7.0
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
51.3 N/mm
53.1 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
69.6 N/mm
68.1 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
99 N/mm
94 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.8
7.1
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
7.51 J
7.70 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
7.25 J
7.54 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
7.10 J
7.43 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.00 J
7.37 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.3
6.3
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
67 N
67 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.1
7.1
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
65.3%
65.7%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
5.6
7.4
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
9.9 N/mm
12.8 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
196 N
314 N
Forefoot Compression Depth
6.4
6.5
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
15.6 mm
15.1 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
18.7 mm
19.1 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
20.7 mm
21.8 mm
Heel Compression Depth
6.7
6.3
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
14.8 mm
13.0 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
22.7 mm
21.5 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
27.0 mm
26.8 mm
Dry Concrete Grip
9.3
7.3
Dry Concrete Forefoot Video
Dry Concrete Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
285.3 N (64.1 lbf)
202.3 N (45.5 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
1.11
0.79
Wet Concrete Grip
8.7
7.7
Wet Concrete Forefoot Video
Wet Concrete Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
249.1 N (56.0 lbf)
215.6 N (48.5 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.97
0.84
Wet Aluminum Grip
6.5
5.8
Wet Aluminum Forefoot Video
Wet Aluminum Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
113.3 N (25.5 lbf)
101.0 N (22.7 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.68
0.61
Gravel Grip
3.7
2.9
Gravel Forefoot Video
Gravel Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
63.0 N (14.2 lbf)
46.5 N (10.5 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.38
0.28
Mud Grip
4.1
6.8
Mud Forefoot Video
Mud Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
68.5 N (15.4 lbf)
120.7 N (27.1 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.41
0.73
Exposed Foam
7.0
9.0
Outsole Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Exposed Foam
6.0
9.0
Forefoot Exposed Foam
8.0
9.0
Outsole Abrasion Wear
8.0
9.0
Outsole Durability Video
Outsole Durability Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Abrasion Wear
8.0
9.0
Forefoot Abrasion Wear
8.0
9.0
New Balance 1080v15
Nike Vomero Plus
Comments
New Balance 1080v15 vs Nike Vomero Plus: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.