Products
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Oct 13, 2026 06:19 PM
SEE PRICE
IKEA
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Oct 09, 2026 10:25 PM
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarPolyfoam
Firmness Level
Medium (43 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (54 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
IKEA VALEVÅG
Allswell Hybrid
The Allswell Hybrid and IKEA VALEVÅG have different strengths. The Allswell is firmer and more supportive, making it a better option for most back/stomach sleepers. It also offers significantly better motion isolation, so you'll feel fewer of your partner's movements. The IKEA VALEVÅG offers better pressure relief, so it's much more comfortable for side sleepers, especially in the average-weight and heavier categories. If you're a hot sleeper, you might prefer it for its significantly better cooling.
Variants
- VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm) (Full)
- VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm) (King)
- Hybrid (California King)
- Hybrid (Full)
Check Price
California King
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Full
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEARCH
Amazon
Full
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
King
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEARCH
Amazon
King
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Queen
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEE PRICE
IKEA
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Twin
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEARCH
Amazon
Twin
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Twin XL
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
7.4
6.7
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
Yes
Yes
Grab Handles
Yes
No
Thickness
24.6 cm (9.7")
26.7 cm (10.5")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
42 Pa/mm
50 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
43 Pa/mm
54 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Medium (43 Pa/mm)
Medium-Firm (54 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
7.5
6.6
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Body Conformity Picture 1
Body Conformity Picture 2
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
44 mm (1.7")
36 mm (1.4")
Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb)
72 mm (2.8")
59 mm (2.3")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
94 mm (3.7")
79 mm (3.1")
Support
7.1
7.5
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
15 mm (0.6")
12 mm (0.5")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb)
23 mm (0.9")
19 mm (0.7")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
26 mm (1.0")
20 mm (0.8")
Bounciness
8.1
7.5
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
21.0 cm (8.3")
16.0 cm (6.3")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
6.9
6.6
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
3.6 cm (1.4")
3.8 cm (1.5")
Diameter Of Distortion
23.0 cm (9.0")
25.8 cm (10.1")
Responsiveness
9.4
8.2
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
0.4 s
0.8 s
Motion Isolation
7.5
8.8
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
4.17 g
0.75 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.37 s
0.40 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
3.07 g
2.25 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.41 s
0.33 s
Edge Support
6.6
8.6
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
148 mm
116 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
157 mm
137 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
121 mm
114 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
36 mm
23 mm
Cooling
9.0
8.3
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
63 kJ
59 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
215 kJ
183 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Polyester
Not Provided by Manufacturer
Removable
No
No
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
Pocket Coils
Pocket Coils
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
Polyfoam + Fiber Fill
Polyfoam + Fiber Fill
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Polyfoam
Memory Foam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Polyfoam
Memory Foam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
Polyfoam
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Mass Density
5.8
6.0
Quilted Top Fill
25 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)
22 kg/m³ (1.4 lb/cu.ft.)
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
0.7
0.5
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
25 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)
36 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.7
0.6
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
25 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)
36 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.7
0.6
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
29 kg/m³ (1.8 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
0.9
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Support Foam Density vs Reference
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
1.4 cm (0.6")
3.0 cm (1.2")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
2.9 cm (1.1")
4.0 cm (1.6")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
2.9 cm (1.1")
4.0 cm (1.6")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
1.8 cm (0.7")
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
18.5 cm (7.3")
18.5 cm (7.3")
Support Layer Coil Density
233 coils/m² (22 coils/ft²)
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
16 gauge
14 gauge
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
16 gauge
14 gauge
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
2.9 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
2.2 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
2.2 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
3.7 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
N/A
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Preview Graph
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
75 Pa/mm
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
76 Pa/mm
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
33%
39%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
42%
12%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
42%
12%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
45%
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
34.0 cm (13.4")
Check Price
California King
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Full
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEARCH
Amazon
Full
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
King
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEARCH
Amazon
King
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Queen
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEE PRICE
IKEA
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Twin
VALEVÅG (Medium/Firm)
SEARCH
Amazon
Twin
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Twin XL
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
IKEA VALEVÅG
Allswell Hybrid
Comments
IKEA VALEVÅG vs Allswell Hybrid: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.