Mattress
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Insider Access
Best
Mattresses Side Sleepers Memory Foam Brands Firm Heavy People Mattresses-In-A-Box Hybrid Cooling
Tools
Compare NEW Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Custom Ratings
Popular
Saatva Latex Hybrid Helix Midnight Luxe 2025 Casper Snow Novaform Legacy Tuft and Needle Mint Boring Hybrid Purple RestorePlus Hybrid Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Sealy Posturepedic Hybrid Purple Mattress Boring Mattress Beautyrest Silver BRS900 Saatva Classic Allswell Hybrid Beautyrest Mattress Stearns & Foster Lux Estate Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid Sleep On Latex Pure Green Organic Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Nectar Premier
49 Mattresses bought and tested
Supported by you via membership, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Mattress
  3. Compare

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus vs Boring Hybrid

Which Mattress Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      Style
    Performance
      FirmnessBody ConformitySupportBouncinessComfort Layers EnvelopmentResponsivenessMotion IsolationEdge SupportCooling
    Components
      CoverEdge ConstructionFoam Layer MaterialFoam Layer Mass DensityFoam Layer ThicknessSpring Layer DimensionsFoam Layer FirmnessSpring Layer FirmnessFoam Layer ResilienceSpring Layer Bounciness
    Comments

Products

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus
Boring Hybrid

Tested using Methodology v1.1

Updated Feb 19, 2026 01:51 PM

SEARCH
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.1

Updated Jan 22, 2026 08:11 PM

SEE PRICE
Boring
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Picture
Boring Hybrid Picture
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (52 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarPolyfoam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Brands
  3. Hybrid
  4. Cooling

Our Verdict

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus

Boring Hybrid

The Boring Hybrid is a better choice for most people than the Novaform ComfortGrande Plus for most people. The medium-plush Boring offers better body conformity, though neither is a great choice for lighter sleepers in this regard. It's also more cooling, responsive, and durable. On the other hand, the Novaform offers more support for average and heavier individuals, so back and stomach sleepers in these categories may prefer it. It also offers better motion isolation, so movement is less likely to wake you.

0 

Variants

  • ComfortGrande Plus (Queen)
  • Hybrid (Queen)

Review

See Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Review
See Boring Hybrid Review
0 
2 

Check Price

Queen
ComfortGrande Plus
SEARCH
Amazon.com
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring

Main Differences for
Side Sleeping

Threshold 

0.10

Side Sleeping 
 

6.9
7.0

Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

75 mm (3.0")
90 mm (3.5")

Indent @ 80 kg (172 lb) 
 

60 mm (2.4")
67 mm (2.6")

Comfort Layers Envelopment 
 

7.3
6.6

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Style Picture

Mattress Type 
 

Foam
Hybrid

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

Yes
Yes

Quilted Top Layer 
 

No
No

Grab Handles 
 

Yes
No

Thickness  

34.9 cm (13.7")
26.2 cm (10.3")
Show Text 
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Head/Feet Firmness
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Head/Feet Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Lumbar Firmness
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Lumbar Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

52 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

52 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Medium-Firm (52 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
Show Text 

Body Conformity 
 

6.8
7.2

Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

40 mm (1.6")
39 mm (1.5")

Indent @ 80 kg (172 lb) 
 

60 mm (2.4")
67 mm (2.6")

Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

75 mm (3.0")
90 mm (3.5")
Show Text 

Support 
 

7.3
6.7

Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

16 mm (0.6")
16 mm (0.6")

Indent Difference @ 80 kg (172 lb) 
 

21 mm (0.8")
27 mm (1.1")

Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

21 mm (0.8")
30 mm (1.2")
Show Text 

Bounciness 
 

4.2
8.1

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

4.0 cm (1.6")
21.0 cm (8.3")
Show Text 

Comfort Layers Envelopment 
 

7.3
6.6

Sinking & Contouring Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Sinking & Contouring Picture

Sinking Depth 
 

4.8 cm (1.9")
4.8 cm (1.9")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

28.3 cm (11.1")
30.6 cm (12.0")
Show Text 

Responsiveness 
 

6.9
9.3

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

1.4 s
0.5 s
Show Text 

Motion Isolation 
 

9.2
8.6

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

0.58 g
0.56 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.25 s
0.32 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

1.97 g
2.88 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.23 s
0.31 s
Show Text 

Edge Support 
 

7.4
8.9

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Compare in Graph Tool

Small Platen  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Small Platen
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Small Platen
 Compare in Graph Tool

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

139 mm
132 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

157 mm
156 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

129 mm
147 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

29 mm
9 mm
Show Text 

Cooling 
 

7.7
8.3

Cooling Graph  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Cooling Graph
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Cooling Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

64 kJ
63 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

157 kJ
179 kJ
Show Text 
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Cover Picture

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Polyester, Nylon, Polyethylene, Spandex
Polyester, Spandex

Removable 
 

No
No

Machine Washable 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Edge Support Picture

Edge Component 
 

None
Polyfoam
Show Text 

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Foam Layer Material Picture

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

Polyfoam
Polyfoam

Support Foam  

Polyfoam
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

6.9
8.3

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

50 kg/m³ (3.1 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.3 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.8
2.4

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

50 kg/m³ (3.1 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.8
2.4

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

36 kg/m³ (2.3 lb/cu.ft.)
38 kg/m³ (2.3 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

1.4
1.5

Support Foam  

28 kg/m³ (1.8 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

0.9
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Foam Layer Thickness Picture

Quilted Top 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

7.5 cm (3.0")
3.8 cm (1.5")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

7.5 cm (3.0")
3.8 cm (1.5")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

7.0 cm (2.8")
3.8 cm (1.5")

Support Foam  

21.0 cm (8.3")
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Spring Layer Height Picture

Spring Layer Density Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Boring Hybrid Spring Layer Density Picture

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Height 
 

N/A
16.5 cm (6.5")

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
244 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
14 gauge

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
14 gauge
Show Text 

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Comfort Layer IPD
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Comfort Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

2.0 kPa
1.9 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

2.0 kPa
1.9 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

3.0 kPa
2.9 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

4.1 kPa
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Comfort Layer Firmness
Boring Hybrid Comfort Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Support Layer Firmness  

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Support Layer Firmness
 Preview Graph
Boring Hybrid Support Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
72 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
69 Pa/mm
Show Text 

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

4%
12%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

4%
12%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

40%
23%

Support Foam  

43%
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
28.0 cm (11.0")
Show Text 

Check Price

Queen
ComfortGrande Plus
SEARCH
Amazon.com
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring
Back to Top

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus

Boring Hybrid

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 1 month ago

Novaform ComfortGrande Plus vs Boring Hybrid: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

See All Home Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Insider access (which gives you access to extra features) and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.