Products
Saatva Latex Hybrid
Boring Hybrid
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Mar 05, 2026 06:56 PM
SEE PRICE
Saatva
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Mar 04, 2026 01:12 PM
SEE PRICE
Boring
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
No
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarLatex
Firmness Level
Firm (60 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarPolyfoam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
Saatva Latex Hybrid
Boring Hybrid
The Saatva Latex Hybrid is a better choice than the Boring Hybrid for most people. Although it has a firm feel, its highly contouring comfort layer helps it offer similar pressure relief to the Boring. At the same time, it offers better support for people in all weight categories. This makes it a better choice for back and stomach sleepers, especially. The Saatva is also more cooling and responsive, though the Boring offers better motion isolation, so it's worth considering if you sleep with a partner who tosses and turns.
Variants
- Latex Hybrid (Queen)
- Hybrid (Queen)
Check Price
Queen
Latex Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Saatva
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
7.4
7.0
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
No
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
Yes
No
Grab Handles
Yes
No
Thickness
31.0 cm (12.2")
26.2 cm (10.3")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
58 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
60 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Firm (60 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (41 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
7.3
7.2
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
45 mm (1.8")
39 mm (1.5")
Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb)
65 mm (2.5")
67 mm (2.6")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
83 mm (3.3")
90 mm (3.5")
Support
7.7
6.7
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
9 mm (0.4")
16 mm (0.6")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb)
15 mm (0.6")
27 mm (1.1")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
19 mm (0.8")
30 mm (1.2")
Bounciness
8.6
8.1
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
25.0 cm (9.8")
21.0 cm (8.3")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
7.5
6.6
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
4.3 cm (1.7")
4.8 cm (1.9")
Diameter Of Distortion
24.4 cm (9.6")
30.6 cm (12.0")
Responsiveness
9.8
9.3
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
0.1 s
0.5 s
Motion Isolation
7.8
8.6
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
0.86 g
0.56 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.67 s
0.32 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
2.26 g
2.88 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.72 s
0.31 s
Edge Support
9.1
8.9
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
116 mm
132 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
132 mm
156 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
115 mm
147 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
17 mm
9 mm
Cooling
8.6
8.3
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
67 kJ
63 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
187 kJ
179 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Organic Cotton
Polyester, Spandex
Removable
No
No
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
Pocket Coils
Polyfoam
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
Wool
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Latex
Polyfoam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Latex
Polyfoam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
Polyfoam
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Mass Density
8.3
8.3
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
76 kg/m³ (4.8 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.3 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
1.6
2.4
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
76 kg/m³ (4.8 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
1.6
2.4
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
38 kg/m³ (2.3 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
1.5
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Support Foam Density vs Reference
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
3.3 cm (1.3")
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
7.5 cm (3.0")
3.8 cm (1.5")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
7.5 cm (3.0")
3.8 cm (1.5")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
3.8 cm (1.5")
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
21.5 cm (8.5")
16.5 cm (6.5")
Support Layer Coil Density
278 coils/m² (26 coils/ft²)
244 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
14 gauge
14 gauge
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
14 gauge
14 gauge
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.5 kPa
1.9 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.9 kPa
1.9 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
N/A
2.9 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
61 Pa/mm
72 Pa/mm
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
64 Pa/mm
69 Pa/mm
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
33%
12%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
40%
12%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
N/A
23%
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
35.0 cm (13.8")
28.0 cm (11.0")
Check Price
Queen
Latex Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Saatva
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Boring
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Saatva Latex Hybrid
Boring Hybrid
Comments
Saatva Latex Hybrid vs Boring Hybrid: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.