adidas Adizero Takumi Sen 11  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Nov 27, 2025 at 09:02am
Tested using Methodology v0.8.2 
adidas Adizero Takumi Sen 11
6.7
Marathon Racing 
9.0
5K/10K Racing 
8.5
Energy Return 
5.9
Cushioning 
7.7
Lateral Stability 
 0

We've tested these running shoes to expand our database and allow users to compare results to help with their buying decisions. We don't expect to write a full review, but if you have any questions about this product, please let us know.

Our Verdict

6.7
Marathon Racing 
9.0
5K/10K Racing 
8.5
Energy Return 
5.9
Cushioning 
7.7
Lateral Stability 
  • 6.7
    Marathon Racing
  • 9.0
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 8.5
    Energy Return
  • 5.9
    Cushioning
  • 7.7
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Nov 27, 2025: Review published.
    2.  Updated Nov 24, 2025: Early access published.
    3.  Updated Aug 15, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Aug 06, 2025: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    Nike Streakfly 2

    The adidas Adizero Takumi Sen 11 and 

    the Nike Streakfly 2 are both built for shorter races and fast sessions, but they take different paths. The Takumi Sen 11 carries a bit more weight and sits on a higher stack, offering a touch more cushioning. Its EnergyRods add some stiffness, and in terms of raw midsole energy return, it actually has an edge. The Streakfly 2, however, is in a class of its own when it comes to efficiency at short distances. Its ultra-light build, firm forefoot, and full-length carbon plate make it incredibly snappy and efficient at higher paces, feeling closer to a track spike for the road. If you want a little more substance and protection, the adidas may suit you better, but for pure speed and efficiency over 5K to 10K, the Nike is unmatched.

    adidas Adizero Adios 9

    The adidas Adizero Adios 9 and the adidas Adizero Takumi Sen 11 are both lightweight speed options, but they serve slightly different purposes. The Adios 9 is the lighter of the two, with a very low stack that emphasizes ground feel and quick turnover. It uses a partial plastic shank to add a touch of stiffness, while keeping the ride stripped-down and minimal. The Takumi Sen 11, on the other hand, has a bit more stack and cushioning underfoot, making it more protective for slightly longer efforts. It replaces the shank with carbon fiber rods, which provide a stiffer feel but also make the shoe a bit less connected to the ground.

     

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    8.7
    Weight
    Weight
    181.6 g (6.40 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    32.1 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    25.3 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.8 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    7.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    73 mm (2.9")
    Outsole Arch Width
    61 mm (2.4")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    112 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.27
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    4.43
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    275 mm (10.8")
    Internal Heel Width
    60 mm (2.4")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    90 mm (3.5")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    Carbon Fiber Rods
    Performance
    8.5
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    84.2%
    8.5
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    83.9%
    6.0
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.63 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    7.56 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    11.38 J
    5.7
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    3.86 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    6.15 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    8.30 J
    7.8
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    65.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    183.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    448.8 N/mm
    9.3
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    146.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    348.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    808.0 N/mm