adidas Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG vs HOKA Mach X 2

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

adidas Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG
HOKA Mach X 2

Tested using Methodology v0.8.2

Updated Oct 24, 2025 08:37 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Nov 14, 2025 09:44 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Long Distance

Our Verdict

adidas Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG

HOKA Mach X 2

The HOKA Mach X 2 and the adidas Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG are both high-stack trainers built to handle long runs and pace variations, but they deliver distinct experiences. The HOKA is more cushioned overall, offering a softer, more forgiving ride that feels plush and comfortable over long efforts. In contrast, the adidas' midsole is noticeably bouncier and more energetic. The HOKA uses a nylon plate, which is less aggressive than the adidas' double carbon plate setup. The Mach X 2 is a bit lower stacked (but still very much a maximalist) and lighter overall. However, the upper of the HOKA feels a bit flimsier. 

0 

Variants

  • Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG (Cloud White/Core Black/Lucid Red - (Men - US 9))
  • Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG (Core Black/Zero Metalic/Spark - (Men - US 9))
  • Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG (Lucid Lemon/Core Black/Halo Silver - (Women - US 7))
  • Mach X 2 (Black/Electric Aqua - (Men - US 9))
  • Mach X 2 (Black/Electric Aqua - (Women - US 7))
  • Mach X 2 (Electric Coral - (Men - US 9))
  • Mach X 2 (Frost/Citrus - (Men - US 9))
Read more

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

7.7
7.8

Weight  

4.6
6.6

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.8
7.9

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.2
6.3

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Plastic

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.6
6.6

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

Weight 
 

295.8 g (10.43 oz)
244.6 g (8.63 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

Heel Stack Height 
 

46.4 mm
44.5 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

37.2 mm
37.5 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.2 mm
7.0 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.0 mm
5.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Outsole Heel Width 
 

83 mm (3.3")
89 mm (3.5")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

72 mm (2.8")
73 mm (2.9")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

115 mm (4.5")
109 mm (4.3")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.79
2.00

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.09
2.91

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Internal Length 
 

275 mm (10.8")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

61 mm (2.4")
58 mm (2.3")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

93 mm (3.7")
92 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
Yes

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Plastic
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.2
6.3

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

82.2%
74.0%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.8
7.9

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

86.3%
80.1%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.8
8.9

Heel Cushioning Picture  

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.92 J
4.36 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

11.03 J
11.15 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

19.24 J
18.24 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.9
9.3

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.53 J
6.05 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.86 J
10.61 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

15.39 J
15.82 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

4.3
4.7

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

44.9 N/mm
42.9 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

91.4 N/mm
100.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

201.1 N/mm
237.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

6.5
6.5

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

87.4 N/mm
79.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

162.4 N/mm
159.1 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

272.8 N/mm
313.2 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.4

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

9.37 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

9.14 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

9.00 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.89 J

adidas Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG

HOKA Mach X 2

Comments

  1. Comparison

adidas Adizero Prime X 2.0 STRUNG vs HOKA Mach X 2: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones